A posting from msp in 'SketchUp Pro>Groups and Layers' describes the
problem of reassigning
a nested group to a new layer. This requirement could also be
the suggested 'Nested Layers Feature'
On Aug 25, 2:28 am, bob <sbva...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> This seems a fair suggestion. Storing sub layers in a folder would
> make the layer window more readable. Mysearch has a point too, by also
> mentioning Components, Outliner, and (last but not least) materials.
> It all seems to evolve around keeping all those things together and
> under control. All the options in Sketchup asure lots is possible, but
> that you also need to be very carefull.
> Materials - when you have very carefully brought the number of
> materials under control, it can be distressing to import a single
> Warehouse component.
> Outliner - you can not see your component hyrarchy separate of your
> layer organisation, when you want to USE BOTH.
> Component Window - should have a search function
> Layer Window - lacks any functionality
> It has been suggested, there should be a Window that more or less
> combines both Outliner and the Layer Window. I think there is much to
> say for that.
> On Aug 24, 3:23 pm, tacarr <tac...@iname.com> wrote:
> > Regarding jgb suggestions to transfer everything to layer 0 when
> > importing does not really satisfy the requirement.
> > Sometimes it may be preferable to keep the layer structure of the
> > imported model/component so by it being brought in
> > on, say, a preselected 'master' layer and retaining its own unique sub
> > layering could be advantageous.
> > Using this systen within the master model would also fall inline with
> > jgb's layering convention e.g. 4.00 Wing
> > would be seen in the listing whereas all sub layers would be
> > unexpanded. This could be carried down to lower levels
> > to further enhance the hierarchical discipline of the model.
> > On Aug 24, 7:49 pm, Scc <gai...@gaieus.hu> wrote:
> > > I second this one!
> > > :-)
> > > Gai...
> > > On Aug 24, 1:03 pm, jgb <jgber...@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > I too have had this problem, not only with components, but with
> > > > objects imported from my other drawings. Layer0 is not so much a
> > > > problem as simply unnamed layer1 and layer2 objects.
> > > > To prevent that, I no longer use unnamed layers. I use a fairly
> > > > developed hierarchy of layers using numeric prefixes, to keep track of
> > > > the structure. In that way I can create a master model (i.e. an
> > > > airplane) and then develop detailed separate sub models of complex
> > > > parts, such as the wings, passenger cabins, etc. Each section of the
> > > > master drawing is given its master number, (i.e. 4.00 Wing) and in the
> > > > wing sub drawing, that is expanded to the various wing components,
> > > > such as 4.30 Engines. That way when I move a detail back to the
> > > > master drawing, or pull in other major parts from any other drawings,
> > > > the layers all fall neatly into place. No doubt, many using SU do a
> > > > similar construct.
> > > > However, incorporating other components or parts of other peoples
> > > > models will not fit my hierarchy. In severe cases, I've had to do an
> > > > intermediate import to a blank sheet, redefine the layers and then
> > > > import to my drawing.
> > > > What should happen, though, is when any object is imported into any
> > > > multi layered drawing, SU should present 3 choices.
> > > > 1- Import layers as is (the current default),
> > > > 2- Change all incoming layers to layer0, which includes all nested
> > > > layered elements, and
> > > > 3- Rename all/some incoming layers.
> > > > This is akin to deleting a layer in SU. That would solve the problem.
> > > > jgb
> > > > On Aug 24, 2:47 am, tacarr <tac...@iname.com> wrote:
> > > > > I have read with interest the discussion regarding 'Layer
> > > > > Containment'. Having built a rather large model using Layer '0' as the
> > > > > 'working' layer and then grouping and transferring to a new, named,
> > > > > layer I have come across a problem when importing a component from,
> > > > > say, 3D Wharehouse. The newly added component can have its own
> > > > > layering convention and when it is incorporated into the master model
> > > > > the layers are just inserted into the layer listing causing,
> > > > > sometimes, confusion within a carefully constructed layer list.
> > > > > My suggestion is to enable the layer list to be 'nested' in a similar
> > > > > way to the Outliner window, thus when a component is added the
> > > > > associated layers are contained within the 'Master' layer. These sub
> > > > > layers can then be viewed as required and not clutter up the original
> > > > > model listing.
> > > > > This, I feel, would greatly increase the power of the layer window by
> > > > > simplifying the access to the elements of an imported component and
> > > > > removing the confusion of an 'unruly' layer listing.