OK, then this is something that I think we need to get in before beta2, then. I guess I know what I'm going to be doing easter weekend!
On 27/03/2012, at 11:43 AM, Ingo Schommer wrote:
> Hasn't been merged, in my opinion it needs another round of thorough peer review > before it can go in. It's on production sites, but that only means > it satisfies their use cases and ways of accessing the ORM. > There's unit tests, but they're by no means exhaustive. > > We should also add a way to opt-out of the behaviour on a query level, > as usage is very context dependent. Sam, you started a ticket here: > http://open.silverstripe.org/ticket/6535 > > I've partially merged back the OP performance fixes, > but don't think the remainder ever went into a topic branch. > I've dug up the patches and created a ticket: > http://open.silverstripe.org/ticket/7077 > > Ingo > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SilverStripe Core Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to silverst...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to silverstripe-d...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/silverstripe-dev?hl=en. >