i tried it now on a project -- it does seem to work without problems... On 19 Apr 2012, at 21:41, Nathan Bronson wrote: > I think binary compatibility should work, but I haven't tested it. > > - Nathan > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Sciss <con...@sciss.de> wrote: >> ok, thanks. so you think going for "org.scala-tools" % "scala-stm_2.9.1" % "0.5" might produce problems? >> >> On 19 Apr 2012, at 21:03, Nathan Bronson wrote: >> >>> I will push a new build as soon as I get the necessary credentials. As >>> a temporary workaround you can check out the release-0.5-branch, add >>> the 2.9.2 version to built.sbt, and then sbt publish-local. >>> >>> - Nathan >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Sciss <con...@sciss.de> wrote: >>>> hi, >>>> >>>> did anyone understand whether Scala 2.9.2 is binary compatible with 2.9.1? >>>> >>>> in any case, would it be possible to push a version of Scala-STM 0.5 build against Scala 2.9.2 to maven central? >>>> >>>> thanks, -sciss- >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nathan Grasso Bronson >>> ngbr...@gmail.com >> > > > > -- > Nathan Grasso Bronson > ngbr...@gmail.com |