Pete and Richard (and me sometimes) are slowly chipping away at things, but I can't give a reliable estimate right now.
Tight now elm-reactor is a cool proof of concept that can be used up to a point, but eventually can't handle everything. None of the companies I know that use elm also use the reactor, and the ongoing changes are targeted at making it more viable for companies to use. So even with the fix you want, I don't think this should be a crucial part of your argument right now.
Every company I know that is using elm did this: start with a small project, maybe embedding elm in a larger page, maybe an internal page. Do all compilation with elm-make directly. If things go well, do this more and add things into you build system in a more legit way.
On Wednesday, December 2, 2015, Maxwell Gurewitz < maxth...@gmail.com> wrote: Ok great! Are there any estimates as to when the debugger will be fixed? I'm a dev at Opentable and I'd like to introduce Elm at my job, and if reactor is working it'd be a much easier sell! On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 9:04:35 PM UTC-8, Maxwell Gurewitz wrote: Hey everyone. Are there any plans to fix elm-reactor? Hot swapping has been broken for over a week, and I don't see any commits on elm-reactor recently.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elm-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elm-dev/8bf1777c-e54d-4d48-b2c3-9e60f6217beb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- Sent from Gmail Mobile
|