ckennel
unread,Jul 17, 2012, 1:29:27 PM7/17/12Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to xjview-dis...@googlegroups.com
I'm comparing xjView's volume report with SPM8's whole brain statistics report and noticed a discrepancy that I haven't found an explanation for.
I'm analyzing the exact same spmT file with the same p thresholds (p=0.001), cluster size (5 voxels) and search volume (whole brain), and in the legend at the bottom of the statistics table all values are the same except the FWEp, FDRp, FWEc, and FDRc. Here is what each program gives:
xjView: FWEp: 4.707, FDRp: 4.294, FWEc: 338, FDRc: 338
SPM8: FWEp: 8.792, FDRp: 8.512, FWEc: 300, FDRc: 20
Since the rest of the content in the legend and table above is the same between both programs, I'd like to know why the corrected T thresholds vary as it affects how I interpret the results.
Thanks in advance,
Chris Kennel