Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

JMS Multiple connections to != servers

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Gonçalo Moreira

unread,
Jul 9, 2004, 2:34:34 PM7/9/04
to

HI,

I'm trying to use a JMS client to connect to multiple WL Servers,
but i'm having the following error while connecting to the third server, always
the third server.
I swap the order of the connections and the error always happens on the third
server.
If i had one more server equals to the first or the second (the same IP) the connection
to the fourth server is fine but the connection to the third server is always
returning the same error.
Is there any limitation to the number of != servers that a JMS client can connect
?


weblogic.jms.common.JMSException: Connection not found
at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.InvocableManager.invocableFind(InvocableManager.java:136)
at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.Request.wrappedFiniteStateMachine(Request.java:596)
at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherImpl.dispatchAsyncInternal(DispatcherImpl.java:128)
at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherImpl.dispatchSyncFuture(DispatcherImpl.java:180)
at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:466)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:409)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:353)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:144)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:404)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicExecuteRequest.execute(BasicExecuteRequest.java:30)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)

Can somebody help me.

Thankx.
Gonçalo

Tom Barnes

unread,
Jul 12, 2004, 11:33:50 AM7/12/04
to Gonçalo Moreira
Typically this problem occurs when there is a naming conflict
between servers. Make sure:

each WL domain is uniquely named
each WL server is uniquely named
each JMS server is uniquely named
each JMS store is uniquely named

The latter three apply even if the resources in
question are in different domains.

Tom

Gonçalo Moreira

unread,
Jul 13, 2004, 10:19:11 AM7/13/04
to

Thanks Tom, it worked :-).

Tom Barnes <pleasereplyinnewsgroup.webl...@newsgroups.bea.com>
wrote:

0 new messages