Seattle taxes ranked most unfair in Washington - a state among the harshest on the poor nationwide

[Leroy N. Soetoro]

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/data/seattle-taxes-ranked-most-
unfair-in-washington-a-state-among-the-harshest-on-the-poor-
nationwide/?utm_source=news.google.com&utm_medium=Referral&utm_campaign=rs
s_editors_picks_feed_homepage&google_editors_picks=true

A household earning $25,000 in Seattle pays about $4,200, or 17 percent of
its income, in state and local taxes, according to a report from the
liberal-leaning Economic Opportunity Institute. But a $250,000-income
household pays $11,000, which pencils out to just 4.4 percent of income.
Here's why.

As if it isn’t hard to enough to make ends meet on a modest income in
Seattle.

A new report finds that even in Washington — a state whose tax system has
been called the nation’s most unfair to the poor — Seattle manages to
stand out from the pack.

The report, published this week by the Seattle-based Economic Opportunity
Institute (EOI), a liberal think tank, evaluated the tax burdens for
households at various income levels in 15 Washington cities. Among those
cities, the report found Seattle’s taxes to be the most regressive — in
other words, hard on the poor and easy on the rich.

Here’s why:

A household earning $25,000 in Seattle winds up paying about $4,200 in all
the various state and local taxes, according to the report — that’s a
staggering 17 percent of its income. But a $250,000-income household pays
$11,000, which pencils out to just 4.4 percent of income. That’s a gap of
12.6 percentage points between the tax rates on high- and low-income
households, the largest of any of the 15 cities studied.

Bellevue, in the No. 2 spot, is only slightly less regressive than
Seattle. Renton ranks third, giving King County a clean sweep for the top-
three regressive cities.

Even more embarrassing for us on the “blue” side of the state: The three
least-regressive cities are all in Eastern Washington. Spokane tops the
list, followed by Yakima and Wenatchee, in that order. While Spokane still
taxes the poor at a higher rate than the rich, the gap between those two
rates is 7 percentage points, smallest among the 15 cities.

“People don’t realize that tax systems can vary so much within the state,”
said Matthew Caruchet, communications director for the EOI and author of
the report. “The pressure on a low-income household in Seattle is much
different from the pressure on a low-income household in Yakima.”

Washington is considered a regressive tax state because we rely heavily on
sales and excise taxes, which are the same for everyone, rich or poor. And
of course, we have no state tax on income.

But why are taxes in Seattle harder on the poor than taxes in other areas
of the state?

A big part of that is property tax, says Caruchet. Even though Seattle has
one of the lowest property tax rates among the 15 cities, the home values
are so high here that the tax bills are much bigger.

That doesn’t just affect homeowners. Renters indirectly pay property tax,
too — it’s just folded into the rent. And with rents in Seattle so high,
that turns out to be a lot of money.

In the report’s methodology, it is assumed that the Seattle household
making $25,000 rents a one-bedroom apartment for about $1,390 a month. Of
that, nearly $210 — 15 percent of the total rent — goes toward property
tax, which adds up to $2,500 over the course of the year.

For each city in the report, rents for the $25,000-income households are
set at 25 percent below the Zillow market-rate estimates. Even so, some
may feel that the $1,390 rent figure for Seattle still seems high for a
low-income household. A family or individual living in subsidized housing
or a roommate situation could pay less in rent, and therefore less
property tax.

The $250,000 household is assumed to own its home, which in Seattle is
valued at $685,000, with an annual property tax of $6,300.

Nearby Bellevue is a bit less regressive than Seattle, due to its lower
sales-tax rates, lower car-registration fees and slightly lower rents.
Bellevue taxes the high-income household at the highest rate of any of the
15 cities, mainly due to very high property values.

Sales taxes take out another big chunk of income for low earners. But
Caruchet says that a lot of people falsely believe that sales taxes are
fair because rich people spend so much more than poor people.

“If someone makes 10 times as much money as you, they’re not buying 10
times as much stuff,” he said. “What actually happens is their money goes
into savings and investments.”

The report assumes that the $25,000-income households spends $824 on sales
taxes in a year, while the $250,000-income household spends $2,670. These
amounts were calculated using IRS spending assumptions at those income
levels.

Seattle’s sales taxes are higher than most other cities in the state,
another reason the city ranked as the most regressive. In the report,
which is based on data and tax rates from 2016, Seattle’s sales tax rate
was 9.6 percent. By comparison, Spokane’s sales tax was 8.7 percent.

Since then, the sales-tax situation has only gotten worse in Seattle for
low earners. The Sound Transit 3 transportation package increased the
sales tax to 10.1 percent, and we also have a new tax on soda.

But when it comes to raising money, Seattle’s hands are tied because we
can’t tax income, Caruchet says.

“Seattle has a lot of exigent needs. It’s a fast-growing city that needs
better transportation, more affordable housing,” he said. “So we need to
raise more revenue. But the only way we can do that is by increasing these
regressive taxes, like the soda tax. It’s creating more income
inequality.”

The EOI was a prominent advocate for the Seattle income tax on high
earners which former Mayor Ed Murray signed into law last July. The tax
was ruled illegal in King County Superior Court in November, and the city
has appealed it directly to the State Supreme Court.

Income tax in Washington was ruled unconstitutional by the state’s Supreme
Court in 1933.

“We are pretty optimistic that the Supreme Court will overturn the 1930s
decision,” Caruchet said, “especially because the 1930s decision relied on
court cases that have all been overturned.”

Last year, I wrote about a study by the municipal government of
Washington, D.C., which compared the tax burdens at different income
levels for the largest city in every state. That study found Seattle’s tax
system to be among the kindest to the rich, and harshest to the poor,
among large U.S. cities.


--
Donald J. Trump, 304 electoral votes to 227, defeated compulsive liar in
denial Hillary Rodham Clinton on December 19th, 2016. The clown car
parade of the democrat party ran out of gas and got run over by a Trump
truck.

Congratulations President Trump. Thank you for cleaning up the disaster
of the Obama presidency.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp.

ObamaCare is a total 100% failure and no lie that can be put forth by its
supporters can dispute that.

Obama jobs, the result of ObamaCare. 12-15 working hours a week at minimum
wage, no benefits and the primary revenue stream for ObamaCare. It can't
be funded with money people don't have, yet liberals lie about how great
it is.

Obama increased total debt from $10 trillion to $20 trillion in the eight
years he was in office, and sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood queer
liberal democrat donors.