On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 10:02:07 -0000, "Brian Gaff"
<
Bri...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>I think, answering in true politician format, that you are in fact asking
>the wrong question here. Most microwaves have a turntable due to the uneven
>nature of the power of heating in different areas due to standing waves
>etc, So unless you can actually be sure that your arbitrary placement of the
>heatable jug etc, is always going to get the best efficiency, you really
>cannot tell what is going on in any realistic way. Food does vary in
>conductivity of heat of course so always, the way anything behaves in a
>given machine will be mostly trial and error.
That issue of uneven heating due to standing waves only really
applies to solid foodstuff. With a jug of water, it's not really an
issue unless you're planning on bringing it close to boiling point
temperature.
The Toshiba also includes a 'stirrer' driven, rather neatly by the
exhaust flow of the magnetron cooling air, as well as a turntable.
>Also are you sure the actual power quoted is generated power? It might be
>input power and efficiency does vary of course.
The input power isn't quoted as such, the rating plate simply states
"240v (_that_ must date it!) at 5.6A which is 1344VA. The actual input
power measured 1250W on the test.
I've currently got a watt meter in line with the power feed to the
new oven and noticed a reading of 1370W whilst heating a bowl of milk
to dump a portion of 'shreddies' into for my 'breakfast' early this
PM.
I suppose I aught to check this using a half litre of water in the
same plastic measuring jug used for the original tests to get a more
useful comparison. BTW, it was this practice of heating a bowl of milk
for my breakfast cereal that led me to suspect that the new oven
wasn't any better than the old one since I found myself having to use
the same 100 seconds heating time to heat said milk to a similar
temperature.
> As for the original question, well, unless there is some catastrophic
>failure caused by a fault in the high voltage feed or a flash over
>Magnetrons last for ages. Early machines did have dire warnings about not
>having stuff in the machine and definitely no metal etc, to stop the
>standing waves damaging the machine, but I notice from the way mine behaves
>if you do daft things, it just switches off the power and bleeps or pulses
>the power to save the magnetron.
Yes, the power has to go somewhere, it can't build up indefinitely in
the system. The standing wave voltages will rise dramatically and the
surface currents in the cavity/waveguide/magnetron anode walls will
likewise build up increasing I squared R losses which can be tolerated
in the cavity and waveguide but far less so in the magnetron.
Undoubtedly, the output power of the magnetron will be reduced (which
aught to show as a reduced mains input power consumption - another
test to do) but not so much as to save the magnetron eventually
succumbing to the ill effects of the extra dissipation involved when
run under 'no load' conditions.
> If you like watching microwave abuse, plenty of that on the web. Myth
>busters and Brainiac to name but two.
Oh yes, I've watched many such 'interesting microwave experiments' on
youtube over the years. :-)
>
>I think I'd use any microwave I was used to, but it does pay to use the
>other one from time to time to stop things like capacitors fading with age.
> Brian
Personally, I'd rather keep the new one in reserve rather than put up
with the unnecessary pain of switching between a well implemented
control algorithm and an ill-thought out one.