On 21/07/2019 13:50, Mike wrote:
> Agreed, NASA kept copies of all the source material.
>
> What the BBC lost was their own personnel commenting and presenting
> *around* that source material, as I'm sure the BBC didn't send copies
> of it to NASA and say "add that to your archives for posterity!"
As I wrote, audio recordings of all the BBC coverage would have been
good to have kept and would not have had the complexities of standards
conversions. Perhaps they should have sent some boxes of the tapes to
NASA and they could have archived.
Video recordings were not kept because of the high cost but also they
did not know how long they would last so that would be one more cost to
add to the cost of the tape, storage and maintenance. They probably
realised that the recording standards would be changing over time.
They could have gone to all that expense then found that they could not
get permission from NASA to use the material!
Presumably everyone appearing on the programmes would have to sign
agreements to allow future use and be paid more. If one refused then
again they might not be able use the recordings