info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Cyclingers whinge they can't take umpteen bikes on a train.
24 views
Skip to first unread message
MrCheerful
Jun 11, 2017, 2:16:56 PM6/11/17
to
I thought bicycles were viable transport?
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/families-forced-drive-children-birmingham-13170075
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/families-forced-drive-children-birmingham-13170075
Mr Pounder Esquire
Jun 11, 2017, 3:17:01 PM6/11/17
to
MrCheerful wrote:
> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids worth of
> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's toy.
Did you spot the white face in the clip?
Birmingham is lost.
>
> http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/families-forced-drive-children-birmingham-13170075
fredal...@gmail.com
Jun 11, 2017, 3:37:24 PM6/11/17
to
On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
> MrCheerful wrote:
> > I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>
> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids worth of
> shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's toy.
I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
> MrCheerful wrote:
> > I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>
> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids worth of
> shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's toy.
>
> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
> Birmingham is lost.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
Mr Pounder Esquire
Jun 11, 2017, 5:00:19 PM6/11/17
to
fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
> wrote:
>> MrCheerful wrote:
>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>>
>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
>> toy.
>
> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
Dunno, don't care.
> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
> wrote:
>> MrCheerful wrote:
>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>>
>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
>> toy.
>
> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
You are nuts.
>
>>
>> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
>> Birmingham is lost.
>
>
> Are you so sure of your ancestry?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
Yes.
>>
>> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
>> Birmingham is lost.
>
>
> Are you so sure of your ancestry?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
Blond hair and blue eyes. Niggers do not have those.
Is there something you would like to tell us about yourself?
Don't be shy.
fredal...@gmail.com
Jun 11, 2017, 5:32:33 PM6/11/17
to
On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 10:00:19 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
> > wrote:
> >> MrCheerful wrote:
> >>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
> >>
> >> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
> >> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
> >> toy.
> >
> > I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
>
> Dunno, don't care.
You said you had bought '80 quids'.
> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
> > wrote:
> >> MrCheerful wrote:
> >>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
> >>
> >> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
> >> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
> >> toy.
> >
> > I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
>
> Dunno, don't care.
Do you know what a quid is?
> You are nuts.
I'll take that as a compliment.
> >
> >>
> >> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
> >> Birmingham is lost.
> >
> >
> > Are you so sure of your ancestry?
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
>
> Yes.
> Blond hair and blue eyes.
> Niggers do not have those.
> Is there something you would like to tell us about yourself?
> Don't be shy.
JNugent
Jun 11, 2017, 8:19:30 PM6/11/17
to
On 11/06/2017 22:32, fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 10:00:19 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
>> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
>>> wrote:
>>>> MrCheerful wrote:
>>>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>>>>
>>>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
>>>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
>>>> toy.
>>>
>>> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
>>
>> Dunno, don't care.
>
> You said you had bought '80 quids'.
> Do you know what a quid is?
"Quid" is the Latin for "what" (as a noun, eg, in the sense "that
> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 10:00:19 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
>> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
>>> wrote:
>>>> MrCheerful wrote:
>>>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>>>>
>>>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
>>>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
>>>> toy.
>>>
>>> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
>>
>> Dunno, don't care.
>
> You said you had bought '80 quids'.
> Do you know what a quid is?
which", as in "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger").
>> You are nuts.
>
> I'll take that as a compliment.
>>>>
>>>> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
>>>> Birmingham is lost.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you so sure of your ancestry?
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
>>
>> Yes.
>> Blond hair and blue eyes.
>
> The Human Genome Project did not take into account either hair or eye colour because it was not reflected in DNA, maybe you should tell them they are wrong.
>
>> Niggers do not have those.
>
> What is a Nigger?
> Maybe you meant Niggard.
It doesn't sound likely from the context.
Only a simpleton could confuse those terms, but you seem to have done it.
fredal...@gmail.com
Jun 11, 2017, 8:34:35 PM6/11/17
to
On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 1:19:30 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
> On 11/06/2017 22:32, fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 10:00:19 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
> >> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> MrCheerful wrote:
> >>>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
> >>>>
> >>>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
> >>>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
> >>>> toy.
> >>>
> >>> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
> >>
> >> Dunno, don't care.
> >
> > You said you had bought '80 quids'.
> > Do you know what a quid is?
>
> "Quid" is the Latin for "what" (as a noun, eg, in the sense "that
> which", as in "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger").
Is that the only definition of quid?
> On 11/06/2017 22:32, fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 10:00:19 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
> >> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 8:17:01 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> MrCheerful wrote:
> >>>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
> >>>>
> >>>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
> >>>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
> >>>> toy.
> >>>
> >>> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
> >>
> >> Dunno, don't care.
> >
> > You said you had bought '80 quids'.
> > Do you know what a quid is?
>
> "Quid" is the Latin for "what" (as a noun, eg, in the sense "that
> which", as in "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger").
>
> >> You are nuts.
> >
> > I'll take that as a compliment.
>
> Something tells me you shouldn't.
>
> >>>>
> >>>> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
> >>>> Birmingham is lost.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Are you so sure of your ancestry?
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >> Blond hair and blue eyes.
> >
> > The Human Genome Project did not take into account either hair or eye colour because it was not reflected in DNA, maybe you should tell them they are wrong.
> >
> >> Niggers do not have those.
> >
> > What is a Nigger?
>
> Or, as you no doubt already know, in Latin: "Quid est negro?".
>
> > Maybe you meant Niggard.
>
> It doesn't sound likely from the context.
>
> Only a simpleton
James Wilkinson Sword
Jun 24, 2017, 11:20:27 AM6/24/17
to
On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:16:53 +0100, MrCheerful <g.odon...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>
> http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/families-forced-drive-children-birmingham-13170075
Makes me laugh, just like when a rally car is taken to the race track on the back of a trailer.
> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>
> http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/whats-on/families-forced-drive-children-birmingham-13170075
--
*Squawk!* Pieces of Nine! Pieces of Nine! [Parroty error]
JNugent
Jun 24, 2017, 1:05:14 PM6/24/17
to
On 12/06/2017 01:34, fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
> JNugent wrote:
>>>> You are nuts.
>>> I'll take that as a compliment.
>> Something tells me you shouldn't.
> Why?
Why do you think?
>>>>>> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
>>>>>> Birmingham is lost.
>>>>> Are you so sure of your ancestry?
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
>>>> Yes.
>>>> Blond hair and blue eyes.
>>> The Human Genome Project did not take into account either hair or eye colour because it was not reflected in DNA, maybe you should tell them they are wrong.
>>>> Niggers do not have those.
>>> What is a Nigger?
>> Or, as you no doubt already know, in Latin: "Quid est negro?".
>
> No idea what that means.
I had just told you what it means.
>>> Maybe you meant Niggard.
>> It doesn't sound likely from the context.
>>
>> Only a simpleton
>
> And immediately lost the argument.
You'd lost it before that.
> JNugent wrote:
>> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
>>>> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
>>>>>> MrCheerful wrote:
>>>>>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>>>>>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
>>>>>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
>>>>>> toy.
>>>>> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
>>>> Dunno, don't care.
>>> You said you had bought '80 quids'.
>>> Do you know what a quid is?
>> "Quid" is the Latin for "what" (as a noun, eg, in the sense "that
>> which", as in "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger").
> Is that the only definition of quid?
You tell me.
>>> Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
>>>> fredal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
>>>>>> MrCheerful wrote:
>>>>>>> I thought bicycles were viable transport?
>>>>>> Viable only to the plebs that ride a bicycle. I shoved 80 quids
>>>>>> worth of shopping into the boot of my car today. Try that on a kid's
>>>>>> toy.
>>>>> I thought Skoall Bandits had been banned in the UK.
>>>> Dunno, don't care.
>>> You said you had bought '80 quids'.
>>> Do you know what a quid is?
>> "Quid" is the Latin for "what" (as a noun, eg, in the sense "that
>> which", as in "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger").
> Is that the only definition of quid?
>>>> You are nuts.
>>> I'll take that as a compliment.
>> Something tells me you shouldn't.
> Why?
>>>>>> Did you spot the white face in the clip?
>>>>>> Birmingham is lost.
>>>>> Are you so sure of your ancestry?
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLoel5EKT34
>>>> Yes.
>>>> Blond hair and blue eyes.
>>> The Human Genome Project did not take into account either hair or eye colour because it was not reflected in DNA, maybe you should tell them they are wrong.
>>>> Niggers do not have those.
>>> What is a Nigger?
>> Or, as you no doubt already know, in Latin: "Quid est negro?".
>
> No idea what that means.
>>> Maybe you meant Niggard.
>> It doesn't sound likely from the context.
>>
>> Only a simpleton
>
> And immediately lost the argument.
0 new messages