JNugent <
Jenni...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On 03/07/2018 13:36,
swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 09:03:10 UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>>> On 03/07/18 00:01, Simon Jester wrote:
>>>> On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 6:40:55 PM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>> On 30/06/18 18:53, Simon Jester wrote:
>>>>>> Cars typically put out 60 kw of heat. Even on the rare occasions
>>>>>> motorists stop at red lights they are still emitting 5 kw on idle.
>>>>>> Do we really need all this unnecessary heat?
>>>>> 60kW is on the high side. But that's just mechanical energy (which
>>>>> eventually turns to heat). The total heat output from burning the
>>>>> fuel is three times that.
>>>> All a cars energy comes from burning fuel and all energy becomes heat.
>>> Indeed. So values are 120kW (3x30, not 3x60) running and 15kW (3x5)
>>> idling.
>> Police are now offering a free car ventilation service! I am sure M'lud
>> Nuglet would say that this is "criminal damage" in Nugentworld.
>>
>>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5912649/Camden-police-officer-offers-free-ventilation-service-owners-leave-dogs-hot-cars.html
> Damaging a vehicle, where the damage is not accidental or consented to,
> is a criminal offence in almost all circumstances. But there is a
> defence against a statutory criminal damage charge, to the effect that
> causing the damage is not a crime if it is necessary, or at least, in
> the circumstances, reasonably believed to be necessary, in order to
> prevent other loss or damage to something in immediate need of protection.
Still using Wiki to pass yourself off as educated in the law, I see.