So, what's the answer about financial irregularities?
gareth
and continue to press for us all to join them.
Therefore, we all have an interest to know that any monies that we might
put their way are dealt with in an appropriate way.
Firstly, what is the outcome of the Peter Kirby affair? Have criminal
charges
been pressed? Has there been an attempt to dissemble matters? Has the
money been repaid? More than enough time has now elapsed on this
matter for answers to be forthcoming.
Secondly, what is the progress on the garden shed in Bletchley Park? The
RSCB press releases have intimated that the project might have had to be
abandoned, and the money written off. So, what is happening there?
gareth
Do they wish to attract members, or no?
"gareth" <no....@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message
news:j3sv8k$dpv$1...@dont-email.me...
Chris
Sorry - are you a member? I've been going round happily telling all the
members - those whom it concerns that is....
gareth
news:9zsvytt8ppti.i...@40tude.net...
No, I'm not a member of the RSCB. I used to be, but I resigned in disgust
in 1988.
However, you seem to have missed the point (or are deliberately ignoring the
point
and trying to change the subject as is the wont of all representatives of
the RSCB
who post here?), which I expressed as ...
Chris
No, it's a members club. Those who are members are told by the DRM's and
the RM's if they ask.
Len GM0ONX
Len GM0ONX
> "Chris"<ng...@chris-street.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:9zsvytt8ppti.i...@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09:36:03 +0100, gareth wrote:
>>> WELL ?????
>>> Do they wish to attract members, or no?
>>> "gareth"<no....@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:j3sv8k$dpv$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>> The RSCB continue to claim that they represent the interests of us all
>>>> and continue to press for us all to join them.
>>>> Therefore, we all have an interest to know that any monies that we might
>>>> put their way are dealt with in an appropriate way.
>>>> Firstly, what is the outcome of the Peter Kirby affair? Have criminal
>>>> charges
>>>> been pressed? Has there been an attempt to dissemble matters? Has the
>>>> money been repaid? More than enough time has now elapsed on this
>>>> matter for answers to be forthcoming.
>>>> Secondly, what is the progress on the garden shed in Bletchley Park? The
>>>> RSCB press releases have intimated that the project might have had to be
>>>> abandoned, and the money written off. So, what is happening there?
>>
>> Sorry - are you a member? I've been going round happily telling all the
>> members - those whom it concerns that is....
>
> No, I'm not a member of the RSCB. I used to be, but I resigned in disgust
> in 1988.
We're not interested who you bank with.
>
>
gareth
news:r4u667t4er780dl50...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:50:36 +0100, "gareth"
>>No, I'm not a member of the RSCB. I used to be, but I resigned in disgust
>>in 1988.
> I've never been tempted to re-join.
> Don't you think it's quite disgusting the way they've demanded that
> all new members since the year 2000, undergo a frontal lobotomy.
From the recent discussions between you and others in this NG, perhaps
it was more a matter of a bottle-in-front-of-me rather than a frontal
lobotomy?
Len GM0ONX
Are you really that poorly informed and out of touch? Have you alienated
yourself that much from your local radio amateurs by your actions that
no one will speak to you? Do you really not know anyone who is a member
of the RSGB and is prepared to tell you? They have access to all the
answers by phone to either a Board member or RM/DRM!
If you were really that interested in what the RSGB does you could even
have stood for the Regional Managers post in your area yourself this
month had you been a member. No, quite right, much easier to howl at the
moon! Those that can do, those that can't criticise!
gareth
news:j3vuko$lv8$1...@dont-email.me...
> On 03/09/2011 11:24, gareth wrote:
>> The RSCB continue to claim that they represent the interests of us all
>> and continue to press for us all to join them.
>> Therefore, we all have an interest to know that any monies that we might
>> put their way are dealt with in an appropriate way.
>> Firstly, what is the outcome of the Peter Kirby affair? Have criminal
>> charges
>> been pressed? Has there been an attempt to dissemble matters? Has the
>> money been repaid? More than enough time has now elapsed on this
>> matter for answers to be forthcoming.
>> Secondly, what is the progress on the garden shed in Bletchley Park? The
>> RSCB press releases have intimated that the project might have had to be
>> abandoned, and the money written off. So, what is happening there?
>
> Are you really that poorly informed and out of touch?
Why not answer the questions instead of side-stepping them by resorting to
silly infantile remarks?
> Have you alienated yourself that much from your local radio amateurs by
> your actions that no one will speak to you?
Why not answer the questions instead of side-stepping them by resorting to
silly infantile remarks?
> Do you really not know anyone who is a member of the RSGB and is prepared
> to tell you? They have access to all the answers by phone to either a
> Board member or RM/DRM!
A nonsense reply. If you suggest that I ask a member, then I put the
questions
to you
>
> If you were really that interested in what the RSGB does you could even
> have stood for the Regional Managers post in your area yourself this month
> had you been a member. No, quite right, much easier to howl at the moon!
> Those that can do, those that can't criticise!
Why not answer the questions instead of side-stepping them by resorting to
silly infantile remarks?
Chris
You can put it. I suspect that since Len is only bound by teh requirements
of common decency he would do what I would and tell an abusive person to go
away.
You could of course just phone Brian which is what I did to find out
originally, but I rather suspect that doing that would get you into even
more bother.
>>
>> If you were really that interested in what the RSGB does you could even
>> have stood for the Regional Managers post in your area yourself this month
>> had you been a member. No, quite right, much easier to howl at the moon!
>> Those that can do, those that can't criticise!
>
> Why not answer the questions instead of side-stepping them by resorting to
> silly infantile remarks?
The only infantile remarks seem to be coming from you I'm afraid.
Len GM0ONX
> silly infantile remarks?
Yet again you are in capable of telling the difference between in
inconvenient truth and an infantile remark.
>
>> Have you alienated yourself that much from your local radio amateurs by
>> your actions that no one will speak to you?
>
> Why not answer the questions instead of side-stepping them by resorting to
> silly infantile remarks?
Because I chose not to, its not your money. Its no secret, there must be
literally thousands of members who now know the up to date situation
regarding this affair and they seem to agree its a issue that is the
member's concern and have no wish to discuss it with non members on this
NG. That must really tick you off!
>
>> Do you really not know anyone who is a member of the RSGB and is prepared
>> to tell you? They have access to all the answers by phone to either a
>> Board member or RM/DRM!
>
> A nonsense reply. If you suggest that I ask a member, then I put the
> questions
> to you
>
It's not your money and I choose not to tell you. If another member
wishes to pass on the information that's up to them. The fact none has
given you the information suggests the low esteem they hold you in.
Another inconvenient truth not an infantile remark!
>>
>> If you were really that interested in what the RSGB does you could even
>> have stood for the Regional Managers post in your area yourself this month
>> had you been a member. No, quite right, much easier to howl at the moon!
>> Those that can do, those that can't criticise!
>
> Why not answer the questions instead of side-stepping them by resorting to
> silly infantile remarks?
>
Because I choose not too, it's not your money. Members can ask any
questions they wish by phone to a Board member or their DM/DRM. A
number on here have confirmed they have and been given asnwers to all
they questions they have raised.
>
gareth
> Yet again you are in capable of telling the difference between in
> inconvenient truth and an infantile remark.
Why resort to side-stepping with infantile remarks?
> Because I chose not to, its not your money.
Well, it certainly won't be my money and neither will it be the money
of those whom you might hope to recruit.
> That must really tick you off!
You give yourself away there. It is no skin off my nose but your attitude
and the attitude of your fellow representatives can only hasten the decline
of the RSCB which will be a good thing.
>The fact none has given you the information suggests the low esteem they
>hold you in.
Why resort to side-stepping with infantile remarks?
Len GM0ONX
> "Len GM0ONX"<gm0...@goooooglemail.com> wrote in message
> news:j4077u$fca$1...@dont-email.me...
>> Yet again you are in capable of telling the difference between in
>> inconvenient truth and an infantile remark.
>
> Why resort to side-stepping with infantile remarks?
They are not infantile remarks and if you were adult enough you would
know that.
>
>> Because I chose not to, its not your money.
>
> Well, it certainly won't be my money and neither will it be the money
> of those whom you might hope to recruit.
>
Your loss.
>> That must really tick you off!
>
> You give yourself away there. It is no skin off my nose but your attitude
> and the attitude of your fellow representatives can only hasten the decline
> of the RSCB which will be a good thing.
>
>> The fact none has given you the information suggests the low esteem they
>> hold you in.
>
> Why resort to side-stepping with infantile remarks?
>
>
They are not infantile remarks and if you were adult enough you would
know that. Do you dispute that you are held in low esteem by many radio
amateurs not just some on here?