info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
ok guys,you win
19 views
Skip to first unread message
Btms
Jan 20, 2017, 2:36:16āÆPM1/20/17
to
The spoiler alerts are just too provoking. I will listen at bedtime
tonighT, Friday. i hope it isn't the stuff nightmares are made of?
tonighT, Friday. i hope it isn't the stuff nightmares are made of?
Sally Thompson
Jan 20, 2017, 2:54:42āÆPM1/20/17
to
Btms <po...@thetames.me.uk> wrote:
> The spoiler alerts are just too provoking. I will listen at bedtime
> tonighT, Friday. i hope it isn't the stuff nightmares are made of?
>
>
>
Tonight was A Very Good Episode (TM).
> The spoiler alerts are just too provoking. I will listen at bedtime
> tonighT, Friday. i hope it isn't the stuff nightmares are made of?
>
>
>
--
Sally in Shropshire, UK
William McNicol
Jan 20, 2017, 3:01:50āÆPM1/20/17
to
On Friday, 20 January 2017 19:36:16 UTC, Btms wrote:
> The spoiler alerts are just too provoking. I will listen at bedtime
> tonighT, Friday. i hope it isn't the stuff nightmares are made of?
Nightmares?
> The spoiler alerts are just too provoking. I will listen at bedtime
> tonighT, Friday. i hope it isn't the stuff nightmares are made of?
Not at all, this is the stuff of which dreams are made.
Btms
Jan 20, 2017, 3:11:13āÆPM1/20/17
to
Connect. Chuffed and happy.
--
BTMS - Usurped as Editor in waiting
Fenny
Jan 20, 2017, 4:19:18āÆPM1/20/17
to
--
Fenny
Steve Hague
Jan 21, 2017, 4:39:36āÆAM1/21/17
to
while. Perhaps the good old days have returned.
Steve
Btms
Jan 21, 2017, 5:08:12āÆAM1/21/17
to
survival plan because he is obsessed with gaining control of Jack.
LFS
Jan 21, 2017, 11:47:13āÆAM1/21/17
to
--
Laura (emulate St George for email)
Mike McMillan
Jan 21, 2017, 11:57:51āÆAM1/21/17
to
LFS <la...@DRAGONspira.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
> I agree. There is still much to play out here before we see the back of him.
>
However, I think the gloatability factor has increased considerably this
> I agree. There is still much to play out here before we see the back of him.
>
week. š
--
Toodle Pip
J. P. Gilliver (John)
Jan 21, 2017, 12:06:18āÆPM1/21/17
to
In message <eehhkf...@mid.individual.net>, LFS
And they're storing up trouble for the future - real long-term future,
in old TA fashion: when he's a teenager, or even an adult, Henry will
(or at least might) really resent how they've kept him from his "Daddy",
whom he loves (and they haven't tried to change that; probably they
shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that sort of thing IRL).
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
ā¦ too popular actually to be any good. - Alison Graham in Radio Times 2-8
February 2013
in old TA fashion: when he's a teenager, or even an adult, Henry will
(or at least might) really resent how they've kept him from his "Daddy",
whom he loves (and they haven't tried to change that; probably they
shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that sort of thing IRL).
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
ā¦ too popular actually to be any good. - Alison Graham in Radio Times 2-8
February 2013
Btms
Jan 21, 2017, 12:08:41āÆPM1/21/17
to
name.
krw
Jan 21, 2017, 2:10:26āÆPM1/21/17
to
On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
worth making.
--
Kosmo Richard W
www.travelswmw.whitnet.uk
tiny.cc/KRWpics
> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
> sort of thing IRL).
Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
> sort of thing IRL).
appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
worth making.
--
Kosmo Richard W
www.travelswmw.whitnet.uk
tiny.cc/KRWpics
Btms
Jan 21, 2017, 2:47:30āÆPM1/21/17
to
krw <k...@whitnet.uk> wrote:
> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
>> sort of thing IRL).
>
> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
> worth making.
>
Or give him a copy of the report in the local paper.
> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
>> sort of thing IRL).
>
> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
> worth making.
>
J. P. Gilliver (John)
Jan 21, 2017, 4:20:17āÆPM1/21/17
to
In message
<1943604733.506720495.153...@news.eternal-september.
He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong; it's all a
matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. - Ayn Rand, quoted by Deb
Shinder 2012-3-30
<1943604733.506720495.153...@news.eternal-september.
matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. - Ayn Rand, quoted by Deb
Shinder 2012-3-30
Vicky
Jan 21, 2017, 5:02:57āÆPM1/21/17
to
On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:18:11 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
<G6...@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In message
><1943604733.506720495.153...@news.eternal-september.
>org>, Btms <po...@thetames.me.uk> writes:
>>krw <k...@whitnet.uk> wrote:
>>> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
>>>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>>>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>>>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
>>>> sort of thing IRL).
>>>
>>> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
>>> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
>>> worth making.
>>>
>>
>>Or give him a copy of the report in the local paper.
>>
>He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong; it's all a
>matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
>to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
>assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
>suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
Might Helen then remind him of the various times, like when Rob took
<G6...@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In message
><1943604733.506720495.153...@news.eternal-september.
>org>, Btms <po...@thetames.me.uk> writes:
>>krw <k...@whitnet.uk> wrote:
>>> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
>>>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>>>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>>>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
>>>> sort of thing IRL).
>>>
>>> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
>>> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
>>> worth making.
>>>
>>
>>Or give him a copy of the report in the local paper.
>>
>He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong; it's all a
>matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
>to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
>assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
>suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
his chocolate and rabbit, when Rob was unkind and over-bearing?
--
Vicky
J. P. Gilliver (John)
Jan 21, 2017, 5:13:05āÆPM1/21/17
to
In message <vim78c9rv05st0a7h...@4ax.com>, Vicky
though, or he may forget about them (or dismiss them as Childish Things
later, especially if later is when he's a teenager).
2010-10-18, 9:xx.]
<vicky...@gmail.com> writes:
>On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:18:11 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
><G6...@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:
[]
>On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:18:11 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
><G6...@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
>>>>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>>>>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
[]
>>>>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>>>>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>>He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong; it's all a
>>matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
>>to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
>>assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
>>suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
>
>Might Helen then remind him of the various times, like when Rob took
>his chocolate and rabbit, when Rob was unkind and over-bearing?
>
Good point. He should be reminded of those in the short time-scale,
>>matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
>>to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
>>assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
>>suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
>
>Might Helen then remind him of the various times, like when Rob took
>his chocolate and rabbit, when Rob was unkind and over-bearing?
>
though, or he may forget about them (or dismiss them as Childish Things
later, especially if later is when he's a teenager).
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
Religion is a name for opinion that cannot be argued about. [Heard on Radio 4,
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
2010-10-18, 9:xx.]
John Ashby
Jan 21, 2017, 5:15:09āÆPM1/21/17
to
On 21/01/17 21:18, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
> In message
> <1943604733.506720495.153...@news.eternal-september.
> org>, Btms <po...@thetames.me.uk> writes:
>> krw <k...@whitnet.uk> wrote:
>>> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower
>>> down:
>>>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>>>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>>>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to
>>>> that
>>>> sort of thing IRL).
>>>
>>> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
>>> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
>>> worth making.
>>>
>>
>> Or give him a copy of the report in the local paper.
>>
> He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong; it's all a
> matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
> to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
> assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
> suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
Suicide is probably the most aggressive act he could perpetrate on
> In message
> <1943604733.506720495.153...@news.eternal-september.
> org>, Btms <po...@thetames.me.uk> writes:
>> krw <k...@whitnet.uk> wrote:
>>> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower
>>> down:
>>>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>>>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>>>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to
>>>> that
>>>> sort of thing IRL).
>>>
>>> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
>>> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
>>> worth making.
>>>
>>
>> Or give him a copy of the report in the local paper.
>>
> He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong; it's all a
> matter of one person's word against another, or at least very difficult
> to prove. Add to that Rob's skill with situational manipulation,
> assuming he's still around then rather than having been driven to
> suicide/madness by the SWs/editor, and There Will Be Sad Times Ahead.
Helen, knowing her history with Greg. To lose one partner to a shotgun
might be considered a misfortune,...
john
Mike McMillan
Jan 21, 2017, 5:54:17āÆPM1/21/17
to
John Ashby <johna...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Suicide is probably the most aggressive act he could perpetrate on
> Helen, knowing her history with Greg. To lose one partner to a shotgun
> might be considered a misfortune,...
>
> john
>
To lose a second would be an excellent idea!
> Suicide is probably the most aggressive act he could perpetrate on
> Helen, knowing her history with Greg. To lose one partner to a shotgun
> might be considered a misfortune,...
>
> john
>
--
Toodle Pip
Nick Odell
Jan 21, 2017, 8:06:44āÆPM1/21/17
to
On 21/01/2017 17:07, Btms wrote:
> Mike McMillan <mike.m...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> LFS <la...@DRAGONspira.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree. There is still much to play out here before we see the back of him.
>>>
>>
>> However, I think the gloatability factor has increased considerably this
>> week. š
>>
>
> And that schaden....thingy. Not us of course but a few Ambridgeans I could
> name.
>
Sigmund's smarter, younger brother?
> Mike McMillan <mike.m...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> LFS <la...@DRAGONspira.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree. There is still much to play out here before we see the back of him.
>>>
>>
>> However, I think the gloatability factor has increased considerably this
>> week. š
>>
>
> And that schaden....thingy. Not us of course but a few Ambridgeans I could
> name.
>
Nick
Nick Odell
Jan 21, 2017, 8:09:37āÆPM1/21/17
to
On 21/01/2017 19:10, krw wrote:
> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
>> sort of thing IRL).
>
> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
> worth making.
>
T
> On 21/1/17 5:04 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote; my response is lower down:
>> even an adult, Henry will (or at least might) really resent how they've
>> kept him from his "Daddy", whom he loves (and they haven't tried to
>> change that; probably they shouldn't, but there's no easy answer to that
>> sort of thing IRL).
>
> Once he is an adult explaining that the courts did not consider it
> appropriate for Mr T to have influence on his non-son might be a point
> worth making.
>
Yes. Sitting Henry down in front of endless re-runs of the complete
"A-Team" box-set was a bad mistake on Rob's part.
Nick
Sid Nuncius
Jan 22, 2017, 2:40:11āÆAM1/22/17
to
On 21/01/2017 21:18, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
media all misreport the crowd size at a Presidential Inauguration,
exaggerate the extent of protests and manufacture some false story about
a President Elect tweeting extremely critical remarks about the US
security services?
--
Sid (Make sure Matron is away when you reply)
> Btms <po...@thetames.me.uk> writes:
>> Or give him a copy of the report in the local paper.
>>
> He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong;
Well quite. Why would anyone trust a report in a paper if the world's
>> Or give him a copy of the report in the local paper.
>>
> He could still decide that the courts (and paper) were wrong;
media all misreport the crowd size at a Presidential Inauguration,
exaggerate the extent of protests and manufacture some false story about
a President Elect tweeting extremely critical remarks about the US
security services?
--
Sid (Make sure Matron is away when you reply)
BrritSki
Jan 22, 2017, 3:33:58āÆAM1/22/17
to
Serena Blanchflower
Jan 22, 2017, 5:24:23āÆAM1/22/17
to
degree, Jack) to get through this without serious, long term, problems.
First he had all the stresses between Helen and Rob, at Blossom Hill
Cottage, followed by watching his mum plunge a knife into his daddy.
After that, his mummy vanished from his life and then, a few months
later, mummy reappeared and daddy vanished.
It probably doesn't help that the family are highly unlikely to discuss
any of this with Henry, even when he's old enough to understand - and
it's hard to know what he should be told when.
--
Best wishes, Serena
I woke up today with a strong desire to accomplish something. Luckily, I
remembered that a nap is something. (Henri, Le Chat Noir )
Serena Blanchflower
Jan 22, 2017, 5:26:42āÆAM1/22/17
to
If this wasn't TA, I'd be seriously worried that we were being set up
for Rob murdering the boys before, probably, killing himself - on the
basis that, if he couldn't have them, no one else should either.
Thankfully, I don't think TA would do that to us.
--
Best wishes, Serena
The greatest glory of living lies not in never falling but in rising
every time you fall. (Nelson Mandela)
Mike McMillan
Jan 22, 2017, 6:10:53āÆAM1/22/17
to
Serena Blanchflower <nos...@blanchflower.me.uk> wrote:
> If this wasn't TA, I'd be seriously worried that we were being set up
> for Rob murdering the boys before, probably, killing himself - on the
> basis that, if he couldn't have them, no one else should either.
> Thankfully, I don't think TA would do that to us.
>
>
Titchy could just do away with himself in his new flat and rot there for a
> If this wasn't TA, I'd be seriously worried that we were being set up
> for Rob murdering the boys before, probably, killing himself - on the
> basis that, if he couldn't have them, no one else should either.
> Thankfully, I don't think TA would do that to us.
>
>
few weeks until discovered....
--
Toodle Pip
Vicky
Jan 22, 2017, 6:38:42āÆAM1/22/17
to
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:26:45 +0000, Serena Blanchflower
<nos...@blanchflower.me.uk> wrote:
>
>If this wasn't TA, I'd be seriously worried that we were being set up
>for Rob murdering the boys before, probably, killing himself - on the
>basis that, if he couldn't have them, no one else should either.
>Thankfully, I don't think TA would do that to us.
Sadly I am not confident they wouldn't. B thinks that he will at least
<nos...@blanchflower.me.uk> wrote:
>
>If this wasn't TA, I'd be seriously worried that we were being set up
>for Rob murdering the boys before, probably, killing himself - on the
>basis that, if he couldn't have them, no one else should either.
>Thankfully, I don't think TA would do that to us.
try.
--
Vicky
Serena Blanchflower
Jan 22, 2017, 6:52:12āÆAM1/22/17
to
get away with it. I really hope I'm right about that anyway!
--
Best wishes, Serena
Do you try to set aside times of quiet for openness to the Holy Spirit?
(Quaker Advices and Queries #3)
Sam Plusnet
Jan 22, 2017, 9:25:13āÆPM1/22/17
to
Correction: Tom Forrest bagged a poacher so (I think) that makes them
even. (We don't count badgers do we?)
>
> If this wasn't TA, I'd be seriously worried that we were being set up
> for Rob murdering the boys before, probably, killing himself - on the
> basis that, if he couldn't have them, no one else should either.
> Thankfully, I don't think TA would do that to us.
>
>
--
Sam Plusnet
> If this wasn't TA, I'd be seriously worried that we were being set up
> for Rob murdering the boys before, probably, killing himself - on the
> basis that, if he couldn't have them, no one else should either.
> Thankfully, I don't think TA would do that to us.
>
>
--
0 new messages