The complainer was concerned that
> >his own past and actions would be questioned in court; therefore he
> >withdrew his complaint.
> >Surely this is wasting the police time. I have no idea what reason he
> >gave to the police for withdrawing the complaint; but will the police
> >just stop any investigation at the whim of the original complainer.
> >Will they have had to give a reason - other than I don't fancy my day in
> >court.
> >Doesn't seem quite right to me.
>
> It's only wasting police time if it was done deliberately with the aim of
> wasting police time, or if there really was absolutely no substance to the
> complaint at all but the complainer just felt like doing it for a lark.
>
The offence is wasting police time *by making a false report*.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/58/section/5
I was interested to see section 5(1), which i hadn't come across before,
which is relevant to attempts to settle disputes by threatening to involve
the police.
Of course the police or prosecutors don't need a complaint to continue a
prosecution, but in practice they will not generally proceed with a minor
charge for an offence against a particular person if that person does not
complain, if only because it is difficult to make charges stick if you do
not have a co-operating witness. If the offence is serious or the complaint
is withdrawn late they may still decide to proceed.
--
Chris R
========legalstuff========
I post to be helpful but not claiming any expertise nor intending
anyone to rely on what I say. Nothing I post here will create a
professional relationship or duty of care. I do not provide legal
services to the public. My posts here refer only to English law except
where specified and are subject to the terms (including limitations of
liability) at
http://www.clarityincorporatelaw.co.uk/legalstuff.html
======end legalstuff======