In article <
c71d84e4-188e-44d6...@10g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>,
richard <
edaler...@gmail.com> writes:
> Family friend has had an old storage heater in bathroom.It packed up
> so a firm has fitted them a new one. It is rated for use in bathrooms
> but is exactly half the size needed to heat the room and they way
Aren't they always exactly half the size needed to heat the room,
regardless how big they are? ;-) In this country at least.
Dad had a flat in Paris, and that had one giant storage heater in
the central hallway, which was big enough to heat the whole flat
for over a day on a full charge, and so worked well. The ones fitted
in this country never seem to though - always much too small.
> overcharged for the privedge.
> It does have no control switches unlike the correct sized heater.the
> heater is about 85cms from fixed bath...and is on economy 7,but only
> prtected by a wired wylex fuse.Also in the bathroom is one of those
> olde worlde ring radiant heaters and that IS within 60cms of the
> bath,with a low ceiling height to boot.would the corrected sized
> heater protected by a rcd spur ,and remove the light,for a splashproof
> bulkhead be an OK answer?
It sounds like a room which was probably wired to the
14th Ed regs (without actually digging out my 14th Ed regs).
Replacing the storage heater like-for-like providing things
like the equipotential bonding are all in place is still OK today.
If you want to bring it up to 17th Edition regs, you really need
to do the whole room, and that's going to be more than one circuit.
The regs are not designed with a view of mixing different editions
in the same circuits, or same bathroom. Even in the overlap
periods between editions, you must use entirely one or the other.
> I am going to sound out my pet electrian tomorow,part P and wll
> that.thanks in advance
--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]