What Terrifies America's Enemies
Will Williams
What Terrifies America's Enemies
More and More People are Thinking Politically Incorrect Thoughts
by Dr. William Pierce,
National Alliance Chairman
I talked with you recently about the mentality of journalists, but I
want to say a few more things on that subject today. I've been getting
many calls from journalists recently because of the Oklahoma City
bombing trial and the fact that the defendant is alleged to have read
one of my books, The Turner Diaries. The journalists always ask me
whether I think the bombing was inspired by my book, and I always reply
that I have no way of knowing what was going on in the mind of the
bomber, but that I am reasonably sure of one thing: if Janet Reno and
Bill Clinton had not burned all of those women and children to death
in Waco in 1993, there would have been no bombing of the Federal
Building in Oklahoma City exactly two years later. Even if the
perpetrators of the Waco massacre had been put on trial for murder and
punished with appropriate severity, there would have been no bombing.
And I always find that the journalists have a hard time understanding
that. To them the Waco massacre is not at all troubling, and it is
hardly a reason to be angry at the government. They see all of those
people who were killed in the Branch Davidian church at Waco as a bunch
of weirdoes, a bunch of crazy religious fanatics, who really deserve
no sympathy. I mean they weren't at all trendy and jaded and New
Yorkish like the journalists themselves or like the sort of people the
journalists meet at cocktail parties in New York or Washington; so
they don't count. Besides, they were against the government and they
liked guns, so they deserved what they got. The journalists don't come
right out and say that, but it's pretty clear that's what they're
thinking. They show it in a hundred ways. Typical is a front-page
story about anti-government groups in the March 25, 1997, issue of The
Village Voice which refers to the government's massacre of the Branch
Davidians only as "the government's siege at Waco." Bill Clinton and
Janet Reno didn't massacre all of those women and children at Waco;
they didn't murder them; they didn't even kill them; they just besieged
them.
The journalists always minimize Waco; they always use euphemisms and
avoid words like "murder" and "massacre." And it's clear that they
regard the Oklahoma City bombing as a far more heinous crime: not
because there were more casualties at Oklahoma City than at Waco, but
because the Oklahoma City bombing was a blow at their government, a
blow at their beloved Clinton administration. In a sense the bombing
at Oklahoma City was directed against the journalists too, whereas the
Waco massacre wasn't. Which is to say, that any threat to the
government these days is taken personally by most journalists.
I tell them that regardless of the beliefs or occupations of the people
killed at Waco and the people killed in Oklahoma City, I regard the
Waco massacre as a far more serious and worrisome crime than the
Oklahoma City bombing, simply because the Federal government committed
the Waco massacre, while presumably it was an individual terrorist, or
at least a very small group of terrorists having no connection to the
government who bombed the Federal building in Oklahoma City. I tell
them that having a small number of terrorists running around bombing
buildings is one thing, but having the Federal government committing
massacres is quite another thing. A criminal government is much more
a threat to its citizens than are a few individual criminals not
connected to the government. We know how to deal with individual
terrorists, but how do you deal with a terrorist government?
But the journalists don't see it that way. They subconsciously
identify with the government, especially with the Clinton government.
The government's enemies are their enemies.
I remember the time I was writing The Turner Diaries, in 1975. That was
a time when the journalists had much less sympathy for the government
than now. That was a time when all of those big anti-American
demonstrations were going on in Washington. The journalists all were
on the side of the demonstrators. They were all on the side of the
mobs marching in the streets carrying Viet Cong flags and shouting,
"Ho-ho-ho Chi Minh, the Viet Cong's gonna win."
In 1975 I saw trends in American society, and I tried to understand
where those trends would take us in the next 20 years. I saw, on the
one hand, what the journalists' support of the anti-American
demonstrators and, on the other hand, the government's vacillating and
ambivalent attitude toward the Vietnam war were doing to American
society. I saw everyone losing respect for the government, becoming
angry at the government. I saw the kids on the university campuses
being led into anti-Americanism by the Jewish-leftist groups. I saw
the returning Vietnam vets being treated like dirt by the media and by
the government. And I saw how disillusioned all of the traditionalists
and patriots who witnessed all of this were becoming. And I predicted
that this general and widespread loss of respect for the government
would lead to dangerous social instability and pave the way for civil
disorder and civil war. But because it was Politically Correct at that
time to be against the government, the journalists just sneered at me
and called me a "bigot."
I looked at what the feminists were doing, with all of their claims
that men and women are basically the same and should be treated exactly
alike. I saw the breakdown in the traditional relationship between men
and women that feminism was causing, already in 1975. I saw the growing
hostility between men and women, and I predicted that this would lead
to an increased incidence of violence against women, an increased
incidence of rape. I predicted this in The Turner Diaries. The
journalists could see the same things I saw in 1975, but the
Politically Correct attitude was to regard feminism as a good thing,
which could only lead to good consequences. So the journalists sneered
at what I predicted and called it "hate."
And I saw the effects that the government's forced mixing of the races
in the schools and in residential areas and in the workplace were
having. I saw people becoming alienated. I saw the breakdown of
traditional community feeling. I saw young people growing up without
any sense of rootedness, any sense of identity, any sense of belonging.
And I predicted that this alienation would lead to social instability
and to a thousand other social ills. And the journalists also could see
this growing alienation back in the 1970s, but to all of them forced
racial mixing was a wonderful thing. It was Politically Correct. It
was one thing on which they agreed with the government. So they called
me a "racist" and condemned my predictions.
And now, 22 years later, what the journalists find truly horrifying
about The Turner Diaries is not just that the book predicts many
unpleasant developments, and those developments are beginning to
happen, they're beginning to become apparent to everyone, they no
longer can be denied and ignored -- what's really horrifying to the
journalists is that I based my predictions of those developments on
the trends of the 1960s and 1970s; I based them on things the
journalists hold sacred. I predicted that the breakdown of respect for
the government that they themselves were causing back in the 1960s and
1970s would lead to terrorism, whereas they would have us believe that
terrorism is simply what happens when some people are permitted to have
Politically Incorrect opinions. I predicted that feminism would lead
to increased rape and other violence against women, whereas they would
have us believe that feminism has nothing to do with it, that it's all
the result of what they call "sexism." I predicted that forced racial
mixing would lead to more hatred between the races, more violence
between the races, and to growing alienation and social instability,
whereas they would simply blame it all on "White racism."
The journalists are horrified because I spelled out all of these
predictions in black and white more than 20 years ago, and now they're
coming to pass, and as they come to pass they verify the assignment of
causes I made back in 1975. They verify the assignment of blame I made
more than 20 years ago, and that blame is against everything which is
Politically Correct, everything which is Holy Writ to the journalists. I
told the world where feminism and government enforced multiracialism and
the government's no-win policy during the Vietnam war and the media's
encouragement of anti-American demonstrations would lead. I condemned all
of these things and predicted that they would have disastrous consequences
for America, while the journalists praised and supported these same things
and predicted that only good could come from them.
And now I am being proved right, and they are being proved wrong, and
the proof is there for all the world to see, as The Turner Diaries
becomes more and more widely read. That horrifies the journalists and
fills them with hatred and anger.
Their reaction is not to examine their beliefs and admit that they
were wrong. It is not to question their support for feminism and
multiracialism and think about changing their ideas. No, their
reaction instead is to condemn my book and look for ways to keep people
from reading it. It is to blame the predictions I made 22 years ago
for causing the developments I predicted. It is to blame the book
rather than the destructive social policies I warned against in the
book. And it is to try to make people frightened of the book, so they
won't read it.
Last year, when a new printing of The Turner Diaries began appearing
on the shelves of major bookstores, a left-wing mailing list huckster
named Morris Dees, the head of the so-called Southern Poverty Law
Center, who is a darling of the journalists and always is described by
them as a "human-rights advocate," launched a letter-writing campaign
to pressure bookstores into refusing to carry my book. Other Jewish
organizations also tried to keep the book out of the mainstream. They
don't want the book read, because it explains what is happening now
and why it is happening. They are terrified of having people understand
what's going on. They realize that if enough people understand why our
society is coming apart, why our young women in the Army are being
raped by Black drill instructors and officers, why the Federal building
in Oklahoma City was bombed, why terrorism is on the rise everywhere,
why drug usage is way up among our young people, why the suicide rate
and the divorce rate are so high, why there is so much more corruption
in the government -- if people understand these things, there will be
a terrible and bloody reaction against the journalists and the Jews and
everyone else responsible for the policies which have been destroying
our society. They are terrified that the people they have deceived and
betrayed for so long will take a bloody vengeance on them.
This fear of the people finding out what's going on and then doing
something about it is not just an American phenomenon. Jews, leftists,
journalists, and politicians in Europe are terrified as well. I have
an article from Forbes magazine in front of me, the April 7 issue. It
is an article about the Jewish multibillionaire George Soros and his
activities around the world. You may have heard of Soros before. He's
a darling of the controlled media and is always being praised as a
"philanthropist" and a "human-rights activist." He made his billions
speculating in currency and commodities, but he spends his money
propping up crypto-Communist regimes in Europe and sponsoring leftist
causes. He buys newspapers and uses them to push leftist ideas and
boost leftist candidates. He literally buys elections in places like
Hungary and other eastern European countries. And the candidates he
supports in those countries are the same Communist gangsters who
plundered and ruined those countries and tyrannized them before the
breakup of the Soviet Union. Now the Communists have changed hats and
changed the names of their parties -- now they call themselves
"socialists" or more often "democrats" -- but they're still the same
gangsters, and they all should be put up against a wall and shot. And
they're the people George Soros is spending hundreds of millions of
dollars every year to keep in power.
And why is Soros doing that? Forbes tells us why. They quote a Jewish
banker who is one of Soros' friends. He says, "Soros is terrified of
right-wing nationalism." And Soros himself says essentially the same
thing. He is willing to go to any expense to keep patriotic feeling
from reasserting itself in eastern Europe. He knows that if patriots
ever regain control of their destiny, not only will all of his kinsmen
who fattened themselves on the blood of the people of these countries
under Communist rule be out in the cold, but they may be called to
account for their crimes. That thought terrifies Soros, just as it
terrifies journalists over here.
And a similar process is at work in central and western Europe as well.
The same fear is present among the ruling establishments that were
installed by the victorious democratic-Communist Allies at the end of
the Second World War. In most of these countries it has become illegal
to question the mythology of anti-fascism which these regimes have used
to justify their existence and to shield themselves from criticism. In
particular, it has become absolutely taboo to question the Jews' claim
to a unique and privileged status in Europe because of their
"persecution" in the past.
In late March a magazine editor in Strasbourg, France, was fined more
than $5000 and given a six-month suspended jail sentence merely for
publishing an article in his magazine which mentioned that there were
no gas chambers for killing Jews at a concentration camp in Struthof,
near Strasbourg. Now there was a concentration camp, a prison camp, at
Struthof in France during the war. And it is a fact, generally
recognized by persons knowledgeable about the matter, that there were
no gas chambers at Struthof for killing Jews. But in France it is
illegal to mention this fact, because to mention it may raise doubts
about other "Holocaust" claims. To mention this fact may weaken the
fabric of the whole "Holocaust" mythology, a mythology upon which the
present establishment in France depends for its moral justification.
In Europe the "Holocaust" mythology has become a government-backed
religion, and one may not question any part of it, any "Holocaust"
claim, no matter how extravagant or absurd. To say, for example,
"Well, everybody knows that Jews were persecuted during the war, but
let's face it, we all know that there were no Jews gassed at Struthof,"
is like someone in the 15th century announcing in public, "Well, I
go along with most of the Bible, but I just can't swallow those parts
about walking on water and the virgin birth." The reaction from the
authorities would be pretty much the same in the two cases.
And what happened to that magazine editor in Strasbourg -- whose name,
by the way, is Gabriel Andres -- has happened to many people recently
in Germany and other European countries. The liberal-democrat regimes
are feeling more and more insecure, more and more threatened by the
specter of a resurgent patriotism which will hold them accountable for
their treason. And they are responding with a more desperate effort to
protect the official mythology, to prohibit dissent, to keep the people
from understanding what is going on, and has been going on for more
than 50 years.
Will they be successful? Will the media bosses and the Southern Poverty
Law Center and the other powerful Jewish organizations be able to keep
dissent suppressed in America by screaming, "Hate, hate, hate!" and
waving The Turner Diaries around every time someone questions their
policies? Will George Soros be able to keep his crypto-Communist pals
in office in Hungary and the other plundered nations of eastern Europe
and stifle all patriotic feeling? Will the frightened, crooked, little
men who run France and Germany and Britain and the other European
countries be able to keep the people of their countries intimidated
with threats of imprisonment if they question the official religion of
the "Holocaust" or ask other embarrassing questions?
Well, if it depended on the average voter in America or in Europe, they
would be successful. The average voter doesn't care what's true and
what isn't. He doesn't care about freedom. He's not interested in
questioning the official religion. As long as he's well fed, he just
doesn't care about anything except the sports page and the comic strips.
So why is George Soros terrified? Why are the bought politicians in
France and Germany and Britain feeling so insecure? Why are the
journalists and media bosses in America so shrill and so hateful?
It is because of you, my friends. It is because of the growing minority
of Americans and Frenchmen and Germans an Hungarians who do care. They
are afraid of you. They know that you are fed up. They know that your
numbers are growing. They are afraid of what you will do.
~
For more information or to find out how you can join the leading
patriotic organization in the world today, visit the National Alliance
web site and read "What is the National Alliance" at
http://www.natvan.com/WHAT/WHATDIR.HTML.
Kenneth Crownover
What terrifies me is that people may actually believe this NAZI SPAM! You
know in about 55 years the Oklahoma City bombing probably want have happened
ether. It bothers me, that what seems to bother people like you the most
about Drill Instructors raping recruits; is not the rape but that the women
are white and the men are black. Would it some how be less an offence if the
Instructor had been white? I have not read your book. And I would like to
thank you for your post, Because now I know I will never read your book.
For your information I am white southern male. I own several shotguns,
rifles and a handgun or two. I am also a veteran of the Gulf War (USMC). I
am a Christian. I think you are full of s@#%. I also believe the majority of
people in the south believe as I do.
DR MEOFF
>>> BOOK haha, What a joke. This boob write a book, he can't compose a post.
Kenneth Crownover wrote in message <6aee9v$j6f$1...@dbtsvr2.dbtech.net>...
Will Williams
"Kenneth Crownover" <ns_k...@dbtech.net> wrote:
>What terrifies me is that people may actually believe this NAZI SPAM! You
>know in about 55 years the Oklahoma City bombing probably want have happened
>ether. It bothers me, that what seems to bother people like you the most
>about Drill Instructors raping recruits; is not the rape but that the women
>are white and the men are black.
Yeah! You'd better look out for people like me. We don't cotten to the
Affirmative Action nigger officers and non-coms raping our White girls, nor
to those who created such a revolting situation, nor to those Whites like
you who seem to approve of it.
>...Would it some how be less an offence if the Instructor had been white?
You're goddamned right it would. We would deal with that sorry SOB too, but
you are confusing the issue with your meaningless hypothethis. We are
talking about Black male predators abusing their trust, preying on
vulnerable White girls who are trainees -- in almost every case -- in
*your* military. You like that?
>I have not read your book. And I would like to thank you for your post,...
You're welcome.
>...Because now I know I will never read your book. For your information I am
>white southern male.
No you are not. You are a depigmented American, featherless biped who
happens to be presently located south of the Mason-Dixon line; north of the
Gulf of Mexico; and east of Dallas. The jury is still out as to your
maleness.
>...I own several shotguns, rifles and a handgun or two. I am also a veteran of the
>Gulf War (USMC)...
Your point, please.
>...I am a Christian...
That is your problem. I'm not into spookcraft myself.
>...I think you are full of s@#%...
That seems a rather intolerant jab for a Bible-believing hymn singer. Of
course you've left yourself a little wiggle room in that "s@#%" could be
code for "song."
>...I also believe the majority of people in the south believe as I do.
Well, that's just something we'll have to overcome, if true. May the best
side win!
W.C.McPherson
Will Williams wrote in message
<6ahak7$8...@camel18.mindspring.com>...
>"Kenneth Crownover" <ns_k...@dbtech.net> wrote:
>>...I also believe the majority of people in the south believe as
I do.
>Well, that's just something we'll have to overcome, if true. May
the best
>side win!
as you do and that the best side has already won. BTW, I am a
white man born and bred in lower Al and lived here all my life
except for time in the military (volunteer Vietnam vet).