TopBraid and SRWL Rules

[Bernard Chabot]

Hello, 

How TopBraid is dealing with SRWL Rules ?

Best Regards

Bernard

[Holger Knublauch]

See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/topbraid-users/FUizVfM5uk4

Short answer: not.

HTH
Holger

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), Reference Data Manager (RDM), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Can we now have same statement but than SPIN>SHACL …..?

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

[David Price]

WRT SHACL:

http://www.topquadrant.com/2015/07/29/shacl-the-next-generation-data-modeling-language/

is a good place to start. In that article it says:

The latest release of TopBraid Composer 5.0 includes experimental SHACL support to help early adopters, and to collect feedback for the specification itself. TopQuadrant's serious commitment to SHACL is also highlighted by the TopBraid SHACL API, which is hosted as an open source Java project on GitHub. SHACL can be regarded as the more ambitious next generation of TopQuadrant's SPIN technology, which has been in successful use for many years.

Cheers,

David

UK +44 7788 561308

US +1 336 283 0606

[Irene Polikoff]

And, btw, the first public working draft for SHACL is now published http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ and open for comments.

Irene Polikoff

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Ths, I have a futher look into it.

 

So far I have just many questions like

- why not have (just) a closed world interpretation of owl”. (and cleanly add more restriction power)

- Why compete with owl? (yes you can mix but that sounds not elegant)….

- Suppose shacl will defeat owl….arent we gonne miss the open world advantages of owl? (which certainly are there I guess.)?

- Is there some analysis out there comparing pros/cons owl/shacle or some common future into yetanotheracronym?

- what about RIF or OWL+RIF?

- doesn’t shacl compromise the basic principle of anybody can say anything about anything

- can we split the world neatly into CWA and OWA needs?

Well, all rethorical, for now…

 

Thx again michel

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Thx, I guess it’ll answers some of my eralier questions…..michel

[Irene Polikoff]

This type of questions are more likely to be answered by 

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter

And the requirements document

http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-ucr/

Sent from my iPhone

Sent from my iPhone