(Temporal) formulas are inductively defined as
- state predicates,
- [][A]_v and <> <<A>>_v for an action A and a state formula v,
- Boolean combinations of temporal formulas,
- []F and <>F for temporal formulas (and the derived forms F ~> G, WF_v(A), SF_v(A)),
- \E x : F, \A x : F, \EE v : F, \AA v : F,
- F -+-> G
It follows from the above that
[]<>( <<A>>_v \/ <<B>>_v )
is simply not a syntactically well-formed formula of TLA whereas
[]<> << A \/ B >>_v
is. If the first one were a formula, the two were semantically equivalent.
Hope this helps,
Stephan
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
tlaplus+u...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to
tla...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/group/tlaplus.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.