DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
The Lone Weasel
Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
--
Yours truly,
The Lone Weasel
Klaus Schadenfreude
>If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for Nader, but
>Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
>voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
>have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
I regret Obama winning, because he's a lying sleaze ball, just like
you.
The Lone Weasel
wrote:
> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for Nader, but
> >Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
> >voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
> >have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
>
> I regret Obama winning
Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA? There wasn't an option to say
"I'm sorry I didn't vote for Obama", so it's your typical rightwing
trap poll.
I think your regret is hilarious, Clownsnout...
Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh.
Klaus Schadenfreude
>On Mar 15, 9:56 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>> >If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for Nader, but
>> >Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
>> >voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
>> >have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
>>
>> I regret Obama winning
>
>Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
>saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
I'd imagine those numbers are steadily growing. Check back in a year.
>There wasn't an option to say
>"I'm sorry I didn't vote for Obama", so it's your typical rightwing
>trap poll.
Awwwwww, an unfair poll? A poll designed to be biased? Kinda like
those polls Clinton used to steer the ship of state by, instead of
doing what was right?
A poll like that, flabtard?
>I think your regret is hilarious, Clownsnout...
The list of people who care what you think is steadily shrinking. Soon
it will just be you, and your talking dog.
_________________________
>Second, Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second
>Amendment will have almost no effect on federal law. No
>firearms statute will be overturned.
-Constitutional Scholar Lee Harrison
4916 Dead, 49 since 1/20/09
> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 15, 9:56 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> >If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for
>>> >Nader, but Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I
>>> >don't regret not voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better
>>> >president than Nader would have been so it's kind of "blessed if you
>>> >did, blessed if you didn't."
>>>
>>> I regret Obama winning
>>
>>Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
>>saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
>
> I'd imagine those numbers are steadily growing. Check back in a year.
The alternative being four more years of you incompetent, corrupt
assholes.
No, not many people are going to regret voting for Obama.
>
>>There wasn't an option to say
>>"I'm sorry I didn't vote for Obama", so it's your typical rightwing trap
>>poll.
>
> Awwwwww, an unfair poll? A poll designed to be biased? Kinda like those
> polls Clinton used to steer the ship of state by, instead of doing what
> was right?
>
> A poll like that, flabtard?
>
>>I think your regret is hilarious, Clownsnout...
>
> The list of people who care what you think is steadily shrinking. Soon
> it will just be you, and your talking dog.
>
> _________________________
>>Second, Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second Amendment
>>will have almost no effect on federal law. No firearms statute will be
>>overturned.
> -Constitutional Scholar Lee Harrison
--
“Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the
entrails of the last priest.” -Dennis Diderot Pay your taxes so the
rich don't have to. Atheist #2211
--
“Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the
entrails of the last priest.” -Dennis Diderot Pay your taxes so the
rich don't have to. Atheist #2211
Klaus Schadenfreude
<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:10:52 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>
>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mar 15, 9:56 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> >If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for
>>>> >Nader, but Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I
>>>> >don't regret not voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better
>>>> >president than Nader would have been so it's kind of "blessed if you
>>>> >did, blessed if you didn't."
>>>>
>>>> I regret Obama winning
>>>
>>>Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
>>>saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
>>
>> I'd imagine those numbers are steadily growing. Check back in a year.
>
>The alternative being four more years of you incompetent, corrupt
>assholes.
Did you ever get your citizenship, Zepp?
Baron_Mind
>
> The Lone Weasel pointed out the following..
>
>> If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for Nader, but
>> Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
>> voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
>> have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
>
> I regret Obama winning
That's because lying sleazeballs like you have had your day,
and the American public didn't like what they saw..
--We won, you're done, now quit whining about it, <l>user..
Baron_Mind
>
> 4916 Dead, 49 since 1/20/09 replied:
>>
>> "flawed_shrieking_fraud" sniveled one more time, because:
>>>
>>> The Lone Weasel <thelon...@yahoo.com> replied:
>>>
>>>> "flawed_shrieking_fraud" wined impotently, like a right-tard:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Lone Weasel originally commented:
>>>>
>>>>>> If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for
>>>>>> Nader, but Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I
>>>>>> don't regret not voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better
>>>>>> president than Nader would have been so it's kind of "blessed if you
>>>>>> did, blessed if you didn't."
>>>>>
>>>>> I regret Obama winning
>>>>
>>>> Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
>>>> saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
>>>
>>> I'd imagine those numbers are steadily growing. Check back in a year.
>>
>> The alternative being four more years of you incompetent, corrupt
>> assholes.
>
> Did you ever get your citizenship
Evasion noted..
--Now, go bravely run away again, Bobby..
4916 Dead, 49 since 1/20/09
I was born a citizen, Shady. Never changed.
Klaus Schadenfreude
<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:16:05 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>
>> In talk.politics.guns "4916 Dead, 49 since 1/20/09"
>> <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:10:52 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mar 15, 9:56 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> >If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for
>>>>>> >Nader, but Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I
>>>>>> >don't regret not voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better
>>>>>> >president than Nader would have been so it's kind of "blessed if
>>>>>> >you did, blessed if you didn't."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I regret Obama winning
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
>>>>>saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
>>>>
>>>> I'd imagine those numbers are steadily growing. Check back in a year.
>>>
>>>The alternative being four more years of you incompetent, corrupt
>>>assholes.
>>
>> Did you ever get your citizenship, Zepp?
>
>I was born a citizen, Shady. Never changed.
Of what country?
4929 Dead, 62 since 1/20/09
Couple of them, actually. Canada, for starters.
I look at you, strutting about, waving your little flag, and I ask why
anyone would want to be your countryman.
torresD
Bill Smith
<thelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for Nader, but
>Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
>voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
>have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
It would be great if he says he will do what he says with one
particular item; He said he would take a scientific approach to
everything. If he does, he'll make me happy, but he won't, because
there are things, like gun control, which he won't, which is
unfortunate.
Bill Smith
Klaus Schadenfreude
<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
What's the other one? One without much of an entrance standard, I
gather.
>I look at you, strutting about, waving your little flag, and I ask why
>anyone would want to be your countryman.
Indeed. Then I look forward to you moving back to Canada with your
maple leaf flag held high.
4929 Dead, 62 since 1/20/09
This, from a "dirt born"? What did you ever do to earn citizenship,
chuckles?
>
>>I look at you, strutting about, waving your little flag, and I ask why
>>anyone would want to be your countryman.
>
> Indeed. Then I look forward to you moving back to Canada with your maple
> leaf flag held high.
Why would anyone want to be your countryman.
What do you represent of America that would make anyone proud of it?
nraclaptrap
news:34arr4l3avs9q2kav...@4ax.com:
Prejudicial as always, eh ShillBill?
--
NRACLAPTRAP
Klaus Schadenfreude
I'm still waiting to hear how you were born a citizen of two
countries, slick.
>>>I look at you, strutting about, waving your little flag, and I ask why
>>>anyone would want to be your countryman.
>>
>> Indeed. Then I look forward to you moving back to Canada with your maple
>> leaf flag held high.
>
>Why would anyone want to be your countryman.
You wouldn't. I suggest you move back to Canaduh.
4929 Dead, 62 since 1/20/09
My turn, cupcakes. Why would anyone want to be your countryman?
>
>
>>>>I look at you, strutting about, waving your little flag, and I ask why
>>>>anyone would want to be your countryman.
>>>
>>> Indeed. Then I look forward to you moving back to Canada with your
>>> maple leaf flag held high.
>>
>>Why would anyone want to be your countryman.
>
> You wouldn't. I suggest you move back to Canaduh.
More fun to stay here and watch hapless bigots like yourself sputter and
fume ineffectually.
Klaus Schadenfreude
You had your turn, and you blew it.
>>>>>I look at you, strutting about, waving your little flag, and I ask why
>>>>>anyone would want to be your countryman.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. Then I look forward to you moving back to Canada with your
>>>> maple leaf flag held high.
>>>
>>>Why would anyone want to be your countryman.
>>
>> You wouldn't. I suggest you move back to Canaduh.
>
>More fun to stay here
Got run out, did you?
4929 Dead, 62 since 1/20/09
Why would anyone want to be your countryman?
>>>>>I look at you, strutting about, waving your little flag, and I ask
why
>>>>>anyone would want to be your countryman.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. Then I look forward to you moving back to Canada with your
>>>> maple leaf flag held high.
>>>
>>>Why would anyone want to be your countryman.
>>
>> You wouldn't. I suggest you move back to Canaduh.
>
>More fun to stay here
Got run out, did you?
More fun to stay here and watch you sputter and fume ineffectually.
Oh, by the way, Canyon--get some new material. Your act is so fucking
stale the dog wouldn't eat it.
Klaus Schadenfreude
<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>My turn, cupcakes.
You had your turn, and you blew it.
>Why would anyone want to be your countryman?
Asked and answered.
>>> You wouldn't. I suggest you move back to Canaduh.
>>
>>More fun to stay here
>
>Got run out, did you?
>
>More fun to stay here and watch you sputter and fume ineffectually.
>
>Oh, by the way, Canyon
I'm not Canyon, dipshit. So what is the other country you're a citizen
of? Let me guess.... Cuba? Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
Bill Smith
Do suppose he will insist on an unbiased study of firearms use, in
all it's forms, in the country before proposing legislation? I would
very much like to see it, but I think hell might freeze over first.
Bill Smith
Reverend Billy Bobby
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hm5qr4dkt0usr4cfq...@4ax.com...
> I regret Obama winning, because he's a lying sleaze ball, just like
> you.
Translation: I vish da nazis von da var so I cood goose step my boot up yer
azz.
Reverend Billy Bobby
"Klaus Barbie" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ohmsr41jrds10086k...@4ax.com...
At least he's an American, Klaus Saurkraut.
The Lone Weasel
<klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mar 15, 9:56 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
> >wrote:
> >> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for Nader, but
> >> >Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
> >> >voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
> >> >have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
>
> >> I regret Obama winning
>
> >Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
> >saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
>
> I'd imagine those numbers are steadily growing. Check back in a year.
>
> >There wasn't an option to say
> >"I'm sorry I didn't vote for Obama", so it's your typical rightwing
> >trap poll.
>
> Awwwwww, an unfair poll? A poll designed to be biased? Kinda like
> those polls Clinton used to steer the ship of state by, instead of
> doing what was right?
Cheney/Bush lied to Congress and the American people, got thousands of
our troops killed based on that lie and all you can do is giggle about
it.
Obviously the neocons come before your country, eh Lardtard?
> >I think your regret is hilarious, Clownsnout...
>
> The list of people who care what you think is steadily shrinking. Soon
> it will just be you, and your talking dog.
That's good enough for me. The dog is far more intelligent than a
stinkin neocon like you, Mr. Frenchurp.
> > Second, Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second
> > Amendment will have almost no effect on federal law. No
> > firearms statute will be overturned.
Cite 5 gun control statutes repealed because of anything Scalia said
in DC v. Heller, Slobbert.
Just post them right here, blubberball.
Gray Ghost
news:o%vvl.3606$Lr6....@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com:
Sorry stupid. One does not follow the other. But when one has nothing
intelligent to say that often happens.
Large mouth + empty brain = pointless ad hominem.
First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence that is counter to his
preconceived world view and the more difficult it becomes for him to refute
it without losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned race or sexual
preference in any way that is relevant to the subject
--
Always remember:
Bull Connor was a Democrat!
Klaus Schadenfreude
Klaus Schadenfreude
>On Mar 15, 11:10 am, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Mar 15, 9:56 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelonewea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >If Obama had lost the election I might have regretted voting for Nader, but
>> >> >Obama won and Republicans lost by a clear majority; so I don't regret not
>> >> >voting for Obama. Now I think he's a better president than Nader would
>> >> >have been so it's kind of "blessed if you did, blessed if you didn't."
>>
>> >> I regret Obama winning
>>
>> >Too bad. I've seen this stupid ad with Obama looking bored and text
>> >saying DO YOU REGRET VOTING FOR OBAMA?
>>
>> I'd imagine those numbers are steadily growing. Check back in a year.
>>
>> >There wasn't an option to say
>> >"I'm sorry I didn't vote for Obama", so it's your typical rightwing
>> >trap poll.
>>
>> Awwwwww, an unfair poll? A poll designed to be biased? Kinda like
>> those polls Clinton used to steer the ship of state by, instead of
>> doing what was right?
>
>Cheney/Bush lied to Congress
We're talking about polls, Your Lardness. Try to stay on track.
>> >I think your regret is hilarious, Clownsnout...
>>
>> The list of people who care what you think is steadily shrinking. Soon
>> it will just be you, and your talking dog.
>
>That's good enough for me.
That's good enough for us, too.
>> > Second, Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second
>> > Amendment will have almost no effect on federal law. No
>> > firearms statute will be overturned.
>
>Cite 5 gun control statutes repealed because of anything Scalia said
>in DC v. Heller, Slobbert.
I only have to cite one. Washington D.C. Heller. You lose, Jabba.
SaPeIsMa_On_the_Road
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:teesr4plk2rhm7qvo...@4ax.com...
>
> I'm still waiting to hear how you were born a citizen of two
> countries, slick.
>
That's easy
US citizens living in a country like Canada, giving birth
The Child is Canadian citizen by birth, and US citizen by parents
The reverse is also true.
Lots of other countries do that too
Klaus Schadenfreude
wrote:
Like I said, I'm still waiting to *hear* it, since he seems to be
afraid to *say* it.
The Lone Weasel
Guess you didn't read the NYT article posted by "Too Many Tools" that
said DC v Heller's effect on Federal Courts and especially on pre-
eisting gun control laws has been nill.
That's probably more factual information than you can handle at this
time, eh Blobberto?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Guess you didn't see Heller's gun. You're dismissed, lard-ass.
nraclaptrap
Where were you when this contemporaneous article appeared describing the
event just as I said:
[begin excerpt]
DC Rejects Handgun Application
July 17, 2008
WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- District residents can start registering their guns
today. But at least one very high profile application was already
rejected.
Dick Heller is the man who brought the lawsuit against the District's 32-
year-old ban on handguns. He was among the first in line Thursday morning
to apply for a handgun permit.
But when he tried to register his semi-automatic weapon, he says he was
rejected. He says his gun has seven bullet clip. Heller says the City
Council legislation allows weapons with fewer than eleven bullets in the
clip. A spokesman for the DC Police says the gun was a bottom-loading
weapon, and according to their interpretation, all bottom-loading guns
are outlawed because they are grouped with machine guns.
Besides obtaining paperwork to buy new handguns, residents also can
register firearms they've had illegally under a 180-day amnesty period.
Though residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits,
city officials have said the entire process could take weeks or months.
http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=74036&catid=158
[end excerpt]
POINT PROVEN!
Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh...
--
NRACLAPTRAP
Klaus Schadenfreude
I guess you didn't read your own article. Let me repeat the relevant
section for you, dumbass...
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
Did that sink in? LOL
POINT PROVEN!
Gray Ghost
Maybe you should carve it into a baseball bat and beat him with it.
Klaus Schadenfreude
wrote:
<SNIP>
>> I guess you didn't read your own article. Let me repeat the relevant
>> section for you, dumbass...
>>
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>
>> Did that sink in? LOL
>>
>> POINT PROVEN!
>>
>
>Maybe you should carve it into a baseball bat and beat him with it.
Might be a good application for all that bullet micro-engraving
technology we keep hearing about.
The Lone Weasel
wrote:
> In talk.politics.guns nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >news:fh23s4l4cm3tfieps...@4ax.com:
That's right, handgun permits that allow DC residents to have single-
action .22 revolvers and carry them in their own homes, which is all
DC v. Heller allows.
Is that all there is, Bobby? Apparently so...
Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh...
POINT PROVEN!
The Lone Weasel
wrote:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:u5e4s4doqm1dbisuu...@4ax.com:
>
>
>
> > In talk.politics.guns nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>news:fh23s4l4cm3tfieps...@4ax.com:
Maybe you could just accept the true facts and move on, eh Frank?
Next please.
Klaus Schadenfreude
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>
>> Did that sink in? LOL
>
>That's right, handgun permits that allow DC residents to have single-
>action .22 revolvers and carry them in their own homes, which is all
>DC v. Heller allows.
That contradicts the opinion *this* asshole spouted then....
>Second, Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second
>Amendment will have almost no effect on federal law. No
>firearms statute will be overturned.
-Constitutional Scholar Lee Harrison
Oh wait, that asshole was *you.*
tankfixer
@d19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, thelon...@yahoo.com says...
You really must work on your reading comprehension.
--
Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste
Goode with Ketchup.
Gray Ghost
news:bc39774e-cdb2-48c7...@j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
You're right, your stupidity seems terminal, nothing can educate you.
SaPeIsMa
"Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9BD391870103BWe...@216.196.97.142...
>
>> The Lone Weasel
>>
>
> You're right, your stupidity seems terminal, nothing can educate you.
>
So when are you guys going to stop feeding the stupid troll ?
nraclaptrap
> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>
>>> Did that sink in? LOL
>>
>> That's right, handgun permits that allow DC residents to have single-
>> action .22 revolvers and carry them in their own homes, which is all
>> DC v. Heller allows.
>
> That contradicts the opinion *this* asshole spouted then....
Nope, it's from DC v. Heller; check the actual text for details, Blobbo.
>> Second, Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second
>> Amendment will have almost no effect on federal law. No
>> firearms statute will be overturned.
> -Constitutional Scholar Lee Harrison
>
> Oh wait, that asshole was *you.*
Okay, cite any federal gun control statute that's been overturned. If
you recally, DC pretty much ignored the US Supreme Court and I expect
Congress urged them to do so.
Because really the USSC has no enforcement power anywhere in the country,
including a federal district. They rely on the Executive or Congress to
provide enforcement.
Who controls the Executive and Congress, Bobby?
Point proven.
--
NRACLAPTRAP
nraclaptrap
news:MPG.242c0a131...@news.bytemine.net:
You clowns still have not read DC v. Heller, eh SmallPaul?
Pages 3, 56-59.
Point proven, illiterate gunBORG.
--
NRACLAPTRAP
Klaus Schadenfreude
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:tdm4s4hbfahui3d2s...@4ax.com:
>
>> In talk.politics.guns The Lone Weasel <thelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>> >residents will be allowed to begin applying for handgun permits
>>>>
>>>> Did that sink in? LOL
>>>
>>> That's right, handgun permits that allow DC residents to have single-
>>> action .22 revolvers and carry them in their own homes, which is all
>>> DC v. Heller allows.
>>
>> That contradicts the opinion *this* asshole spouted then....
>
>Nope, it's from DC v. Heller; check the actual text for details, Blobbo.
No, it's not, shit for Brains.
>>> Second, Scalia's grant of an individual right under the Second
>>> Amendment will have almost no effect on federal law. No
>>> firearms statute will be overturned.
>> -Constitutional Scholar Lee Harrison
This isn't from DC v. Heller. This is from the lard-lined pit Lee
Harrison calls a brain.
>>
>> Oh wait, that asshole was *you.*
>
>Okay, cite any federal gun control statute that's been overturned.
Already did. Try and keep up.
nraclaptrap
Then you'll have no trouble citing DC v Heller's literal verbatim text
saying that carrying guns for self-defense outside your home is a right
under the Second Amendment in the federal district aka DC.
You lack the ability to prove it and I'll give you a week to prove that
to our readers, Lardloon.
Begin now.
--
NRACLAPTRAP
nraclaptrap
W8cXQl_UnZ2d...@posted.cpinternet:
>> You're right, your stupidity seems terminal, nothing can educate you.
>
> So when are you guys going to stop feeding the stupid troll ?
When they can think critically for themselves without our help.
Never.
--
NRACLAPTRAP
Klaus Schadenfreude
Why should I, you fat drunk? All I had to do is counter this stupid
comment, already proven hilariously wrong: