info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Shouldn't the voters be selecting our President?
1,017 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
NoEinstein
Nov 22, 2012, 8:27:57 PM11/22/12
to
On Nov 18, 5:11 pm, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
On Nov. 20, 2012 Morgoth Bauglir wrote, while seeking removal of his
reply after 'five days':
Hoo, boy!
And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
(Copied by J. A. A.)
>
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
> Hoo, boy!
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
>
On Nov. 20, 2012 Morgoth Bauglir wrote, while seeking removal of his
reply after 'five days':
Hoo, boy!
And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
(Copied by J. A. A.)
>
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
> Hoo, boy!
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
NoEinstein
Nov 22, 2012, 8:41:08 PM11/22/12
to
On Nov 20, 7:12 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
aimed mortar rounds and RPGs, our military leaders knew that the lives
of Americans where being threatened. That was in the middle of the
night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
military, if only our pseudo “president” can make a decision? For
Geraldo’s edification, our forces are superbly equipped to fight at
night—which has often been the preferred time for the launching of
attacks! Such was the case for the launching of paratroopers at the
beginning of the Normandy Invasion. That was nearly half a century
before the development of night vision goggles.
The general being interviewed, using just his authority as general,
should have SCRAMBLED and launched, say, two heavily armored ‘Warthog’
aircraft, with a total of four intelligent men on board. In a little
over two hours, those two planes could have been circling the embassy
compound, and upon seeing the attacking militants, could have, within
minutes, stopped that attack with their machine gun, cannon and rocket
fire. Due to the heavy armament and high survivability of those
Warthog aircraft, it would have been unlikely that the four men on
board would not have been able to arrive, safely, back at the base
from which they were launched. Once there, the commanding general
would have simply informed the White House that an invasion on a US
Embassy has just been repelled. Would that general have been court-
marshaled for not asking the “president”, first? Ha, ha, HA! It is
no laughing matter that so few, in the “chain-of-command” are willing
to even suggest that logical actions should prevail, when we have a
squatting, dictatorial “president” in the White House.
Patriotism, more often than not, involves independent, logical-minded
people who realize what needs to be done. Such will enlist more timid
souls to join the cause, or they will take action themselves. When
that iceberg was struck by the Titanic, people heard the thump and the
grind. Most just looked about at the reactions of others, and seeing
no panic, chose to dismiss the noise as harmless. Obama’s fraudulent
election, November 6, could be a mortal blow to the ship that is the
USA. But most in the media are talking about four more years as
though all-is-well. Every unwise suggestion of the latter can cause
millions of angry, suburban Americans to be resigned to the status quo
that is our FAILED system of government. On The Five, Greg Gutfeld
makes IQ veiling wisecracks, implying that “losing” is quite OK.
While socialist Bob Beckel seems almost embarrassed by Obama’s “win”.
My message to the Democrats: Be careful what you wish for: you just
might get it! The socialism-induced, economic collapse of the USA
should be the wish of no one.
Mitt Romney is, perhaps, the person most “locked into” his “defeat” in
the November 6 fraudulent election. Other than his saying,
rightfully, that Obama “won” because of millions of promises of
entitlement “gifts“, Romney should have said: Obama is a lying,
bribing traitor to the USA! Obama values his image with the Muslims
of the world more than he values the lives of Americans abroad! He
thinks Burma is important because that country is located between
populous China and India. Why is Obama so interested in those
countries when the USA is going down-the-tubes, because so many of our
manufacturing jobs are being shipped abroad? It is because Obama
wants his socialism to encompass the entire world. He is, slickly,
trying to lie his way to be the dictator-in-chief of every person in
the world! But he must be STOPPED!!!
Obama’s main defense, consistent with his criminal proclivity, is the
pathological way that he can keep a straight face, and un quivering
voice while lying at every turn. It is being claimed—as evidence of
USA normalcy following the thump and grind of the Nov. 6 “election”—
that Obama and Hillary have successfully “negotiated a ceasefire”
between Israelis and Palestinians. That largely tacit claim happened
after Israel massed their tanks and troops for a pending attack. The
less well armed Palestinians were cowering in fear. It was Israeli-
induced FEAR, and nothing that Obama nor Hillary have done that,
hopefully, will lead to a ceasefire.
The esprit de corps in Washington is not to make waves, lest some
other faction will make waves against you. The quickest resolution of
the USA-Obama collision, Nov. 6, would be for a lone member of the US
Secret Service to start getting his fellow agents to ask these
questions: Who do we work for, the government or the People? Is it
‘our duty’ to protect a ‘president’ if he isn’t, legally our
President? If, as Obama claims, he was born in Hawaii, just 50 years
ago, why isn’t his birth certificate, in paper form, available for
public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates for President
thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
background ever made?
The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
including risking their own lives to save the life of the President.
They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and give our
fraudulent president the same “respect” that Mitt Romney should be
given, as the only legally-voted-in President of the USA.
In the Spirit of our original Constitution, my New Constitution says:
“It is treason to foster corruption in any arm of government, to levy
war against the USA, adhere to her enemies, or to give them aid and
comfort. The former must show abuse of power that subverts the New
Constitution, such as by enlisting subordinates into unlawfulness that
violates the civil rights of any Citizen or group. No person shall be
convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the
same overt act, or by confession in court. The House sets punishment
for treason, if the civil rights of innocent relatives aren’t
affected.”
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. Legal authority of law enforcement or the
courts over the Citizens is voided if used in support of corruption.
Local, state and federal law enforcement agencies shall not be
organizationally affiliated, and persons or groups, therein, shall not
be presumed by law enforcement to be acting lawfully solely because of
such auspices.”
“No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for making
complaints against another office holder, employee or superior. No
government employee nor office holder shall be coerced into
wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real or
implied threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, nor by
any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a threat,
bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year prison
sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes or
promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
Note: The important directive in the above is the mandate to ACT.
When a ‘president’ is corrupt, it is crucial to report that fact to
the People, who have final authority over both the Executive Branch
and the Courts. *** Make you findings PUBLIC and all of those who are
corrupt, including the majority on the US Supreme Court, will be
brought to justice. Not reporting observed corruption will send those
of you, like blindly-loyal Secret Service agents, to prison for three
years. Are those custom tailored suits worth three years of your
lives?
As the country becomes caught up in the hustle and bustle of the
Holidays know this: Hear the Patriots call! The survival of the USA
depends on having as many of you as possible to act accordingly.
The Patriots’ Call
By: John A. Armistead
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Spring-up to our defense!
Stand tall to take the task anew;
Fear not unworthiness.
Feel strength within your veins,
From the blood of ancestors proud.
Feel strength to take and wield,
‘The blind-folded-one’s sword’.
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Be a match for any task.
Defend-not unworthiness.
Order-up our Nation’s best.
Fear not what need be done,
For God has made us all—
And God can still inspire;
So light-up the patriots’ fires!!
__________
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 18, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> The Media,ourmirror-of-doom.
>
> Immediately after the HMS Titanic hit that iceberg 100 years ago,
> there was a period of calm during which people looked about them to
> observe the reactions of others. Since few people seemed to be in
> panic and the ship was still traveling under her own power, people
> continued with what they had been doing as though the collision was
> just a thud and a grind in the night. Some of the passengers who had
> been strolling near the front deck started kicking blocks of the ice
> that had fallen down from the tall iceberg. It was all just an
> amusing game of ice hockey.
>
> Following the numbing thud and grind of the November 6th “election”,
> the media immediately started talking about “the next four years”
> under Obama. Since the popular vote total was about 3.5 million more
> for Obama than for Romney, the mistaken conclusion seems to be that
> thevotershave just legitimized havingourgovernment keep growing,
> like a cancer, toourvery doom. *** In reality, well over 50% of the
> votes for Obama were, essentially, votes for UNCONSTITUTIONAL
> socialism, and thus SHALL NOT BE COUNTED! Nowhere in the Constitution
> is government authorized to force half of the population, who are
> successful, to pay even part of the living expenses of lazy and less
> industrious freeloaders. Such a voter decision cannot be made,
> because that would require the scrapping ofourpresent Constitution.
> And the latter can’t be done with just a 51% vote. It would require
> ratification by 75% of the states. Based on the RED vs. BLUE map of
> the states, Democrats have zero chance of changingourconstitution to
> outlaw the attainment of wealth. No ’gradual’ thud and grind can make
> such doings constitutional!
>
> There is a movement in Texas to have that ‘nation-size’ state secede
> from the Union. Independent-minded Texans don’t like paying one penny
> of their money to freeloaders. I would propose, for the sake of
> arguing, that all BLUE states be required to secede! That way, those
> living in the large urban areas, who ARE the cancer of America, will
> be amputated before the rest of the USA dies from the blood poisoning
> that the BLUE seems destined to cause.
>
> Ron Paul had the right ideas, but he has, obviously, been corrupted—
> because of being a political insider—to seek to make the needed
> changes withinourpresent, failed governmental system. He showed
> himself to be too much of a wimp to lead the “revolution” that he once
> had hinted he was preparing to lead. Why is it that so many should-be-
> smart Republican politicians think that the “magical” solution toour
> too big government is to mimic the Democrats—the way George Will,
> Bobby Jindal and Newt Gingrich propose? Since Democraticvotershave
> been “bought’ or were given “gifts” (bribed), and since bribery is a
> high CRIME, why is there not yet a single soul who is in the media
> spotlight willing to say: The election is INVALID, because votes
> obtained by making unconstitutional bribes and promises (of
> entitlements) shall never be constitutional.
>
> Obama, has been “acting presidential” by traveling to Burma. In a
> speech, there, he stated that Burma is ’important’, because it is
> located between two populous regions (China and India). He continues
> to be guarded, at great expense, by the US Secret Service—that has yet
> to exercise its duty to verify Obama’s “proof” of American
> citizenship. As on the Titanic, the Secret Service looks around, and
> seeing the liar-in-chief acting ”presidential”, they wrongly assume,
> due to the normalness of their daily scene, thatoursinking ship must
> be safe to be on. In reality, every member of the Secret Service
> takes an oath to support the Constitution. And the Constitution
> REQUIRES that Presidents of the USA be natural born citizens. Arnold
> Schwarzenegger would have liked to bePresident, but he wasn’t born in
> the USA. Neither was Obama.
>
> It is being stated that the reason Obama’s school records aren’t being
> made public (probably indicating that he is a foreign exchange
> student), is because of his… ’right to privacy’. Tell me, folks, does
> the right to privacy of a CRIMINAL protect him from being brought to
> justice? Isn’t the survival of the USA more important than the
> privacy rights of the anti-Christ???
>
> Many in the media, and in the country at large, are having their
> attention drawn away from the should-never-happen 2013 swearing-in of
> Obama. The crisis in the Middle East has shallows like Gov. Mike
> Huckabee proclaiming, on his weekend Fox show, how justified the Jews
> were in taking land that HAD been theirs, and in defending that land
> as theirs, when much of it—by any stretch of the imagination—isn’t
> legally theirs. Admittedly, Jews are less like “bulls in a china
> shop” than Muslims. But such fact does not give Israel claim to a
> nation that was improperly obtained by war. Repeated statements of
> support for Israel, by many politicians in this country, are mainly
> because of the huge, and largely unconstitutional, influence of biased
> Jews who control most of the media in this country.
>
> Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., is probably rehearsing, over and
> over, giving Obama the Oath of Office—which he had badly botched four
> years ago. Roberts, like so many on the Washington scene, has been
> seduced into believing that what gets done “must be right”, because it
> keeps getting done. So long asourliar-in-chief keeps a pathologic
> straight face while he plotsourdemise, Roberts will try to be… “all
> smiles”, too. But if he gives Obama that oath, Roberts will, from the
> first word, be committing capital TREASON. His earlier
> characterization of the “fine” in Obama care as a “tax” shows Robert’s
> corruptness. A “tax” that applies only to those who don’t do
> something is exactly the same as a “fine”. The Constitution
> authorizes (some) taxation, but not as punishment for not buying what
> government has no authority to require anyone to buy.
>
> So far, none of you media insiders have gotten angry enough about what
> your bosses make you report to cause you to throw open the window and
> yell, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!!!”
> The effect of doing such a thing, on-the-air, would be to BREAK the
> calm that continues to seduce this SINKING country into thinking… all
> is well. Last week I got ‘not smiling’ vibes from Obama that
> coincided with my descriptions of how he should be hanged, over the
> Washington Mall reflection pool, in a most public way. Recently, I’ve
> gotten vibes from Sen. Rand Paul and up-and-coming US Representative
> Trey Gowdy, from SC. Might it be that those two, relative newcomers
> value America more than they valueourpresent failed system of
> government? If so, then lead the charge, men; millions will follow
> you!
>
> The time has come for ACTION, not just thoughts, overourACE IN THE
> HOLE that is my penned and polished ‘New Constitution of the United
> States of America‘. By its dictates, no person, left or right, will
> be slighted, because: “Democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in
> the USA!” Long live the USA!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
> > the Nation’ and ‘This Week’, today. Experience has shown that both
> > of those shows are platforms intended to allow Democratic Party
> > insiders to brainwash the viewers regarding the ‘news‘ of the day.
> > Typically, each of those shows will have an “almost” conservative like
> > George Will on their expert panel list in order to make their 75% left-
> > leaning guests seem to be… ’fair’.
>
> > Ubiquitous Senator John McCain was on Bob Schieffer’s show. McCain
> > repeated his usual questions: “What did ’president’ Obama know (about
> > Benghazi)” ? And… “When did he know it?” McCain seemed ’pained’ to
> > add that the “reason” we need such information is “for the benefit of
> > the families of those who were killed“; and to work, with Congress, to
> > “make sure such things don’t happen again.” Throughout all of this,
> > Bob Schieffer had on his quite-often revealing, frozen-in-place, “used
> > car salesman” smile. Though biased for the left, Schieffer is smart
> > enough to know that the implications for Obama are much more DIRE than
> > his simply being an instrument for understanding why the White House
> > goofed up. McCain knows that, too. But because McCain needs forums
> > for getting-out his messages, he always includes the required liberal
> > “CURL” somewhere within his remarks so that it will be likely he will
> > be invited back on those corrupt, and under my “NC”, UNCONSTITUTIONAL
> > shows, again.
>
> > On ‘This Week', a video of Governor Bobby Jindal was shown as he
> > stated that Republicansshouldn’tbe saying that “Democrats were
> > ’bought’ (in the election).” I was pleased to see that Mitt Romney
> > has, apparently, agreed with me that it was the “gifts” of the
> > Democrats (Obama) that had resulted in his (appearance of, but not
> > LEGAL) victory in the election. For the liberal producers of that
> > show, leaving Romney’s photo on the screen for so long, with the word
> > “gifts” in the caption, was their way of setting-up USA-traitor-guest
> > Donna Brazile to say (I paraphrase): “People are asking me: ’Where are
> > my gifts?” Exactly!!! Obama made only PROMISES OF GIFTS in order to
> > get the corrupt votes he needed for his ILLEGAL victory. A promise
> > is every bit as much a BRIBE as is
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>
Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
aimed mortar rounds and RPGs, our military leaders knew that the lives
of Americans where being threatened. That was in the middle of the
night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
military, if only our pseudo “president” can make a decision? For
Geraldo’s edification, our forces are superbly equipped to fight at
night—which has often been the preferred time for the launching of
attacks! Such was the case for the launching of paratroopers at the
beginning of the Normandy Invasion. That was nearly half a century
before the development of night vision goggles.
The general being interviewed, using just his authority as general,
should have SCRAMBLED and launched, say, two heavily armored ‘Warthog’
aircraft, with a total of four intelligent men on board. In a little
over two hours, those two planes could have been circling the embassy
compound, and upon seeing the attacking militants, could have, within
minutes, stopped that attack with their machine gun, cannon and rocket
fire. Due to the heavy armament and high survivability of those
Warthog aircraft, it would have been unlikely that the four men on
board would not have been able to arrive, safely, back at the base
from which they were launched. Once there, the commanding general
would have simply informed the White House that an invasion on a US
Embassy has just been repelled. Would that general have been court-
marshaled for not asking the “president”, first? Ha, ha, HA! It is
no laughing matter that so few, in the “chain-of-command” are willing
to even suggest that logical actions should prevail, when we have a
squatting, dictatorial “president” in the White House.
Patriotism, more often than not, involves independent, logical-minded
people who realize what needs to be done. Such will enlist more timid
souls to join the cause, or they will take action themselves. When
that iceberg was struck by the Titanic, people heard the thump and the
grind. Most just looked about at the reactions of others, and seeing
no panic, chose to dismiss the noise as harmless. Obama’s fraudulent
election, November 6, could be a mortal blow to the ship that is the
USA. But most in the media are talking about four more years as
though all-is-well. Every unwise suggestion of the latter can cause
millions of angry, suburban Americans to be resigned to the status quo
that is our FAILED system of government. On The Five, Greg Gutfeld
makes IQ veiling wisecracks, implying that “losing” is quite OK.
While socialist Bob Beckel seems almost embarrassed by Obama’s “win”.
My message to the Democrats: Be careful what you wish for: you just
might get it! The socialism-induced, economic collapse of the USA
should be the wish of no one.
Mitt Romney is, perhaps, the person most “locked into” his “defeat” in
the November 6 fraudulent election. Other than his saying,
rightfully, that Obama “won” because of millions of promises of
entitlement “gifts“, Romney should have said: Obama is a lying,
bribing traitor to the USA! Obama values his image with the Muslims
of the world more than he values the lives of Americans abroad! He
thinks Burma is important because that country is located between
populous China and India. Why is Obama so interested in those
countries when the USA is going down-the-tubes, because so many of our
manufacturing jobs are being shipped abroad? It is because Obama
wants his socialism to encompass the entire world. He is, slickly,
trying to lie his way to be the dictator-in-chief of every person in
the world! But he must be STOPPED!!!
Obama’s main defense, consistent with his criminal proclivity, is the
pathological way that he can keep a straight face, and un quivering
voice while lying at every turn. It is being claimed—as evidence of
USA normalcy following the thump and grind of the Nov. 6 “election”—
that Obama and Hillary have successfully “negotiated a ceasefire”
between Israelis and Palestinians. That largely tacit claim happened
after Israel massed their tanks and troops for a pending attack. The
less well armed Palestinians were cowering in fear. It was Israeli-
induced FEAR, and nothing that Obama nor Hillary have done that,
hopefully, will lead to a ceasefire.
The esprit de corps in Washington is not to make waves, lest some
other faction will make waves against you. The quickest resolution of
the USA-Obama collision, Nov. 6, would be for a lone member of the US
Secret Service to start getting his fellow agents to ask these
questions: Who do we work for, the government or the People? Is it
‘our duty’ to protect a ‘president’ if he isn’t, legally our
President? If, as Obama claims, he was born in Hawaii, just 50 years
ago, why isn’t his birth certificate, in paper form, available for
public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates for President
thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
background ever made?
The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
including risking their own lives to save the life of the President.
They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and give our
fraudulent president the same “respect” that Mitt Romney should be
given, as the only legally-voted-in President of the USA.
In the Spirit of our original Constitution, my New Constitution says:
“It is treason to foster corruption in any arm of government, to levy
war against the USA, adhere to her enemies, or to give them aid and
comfort. The former must show abuse of power that subverts the New
Constitution, such as by enlisting subordinates into unlawfulness that
violates the civil rights of any Citizen or group. No person shall be
convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the
same overt act, or by confession in court. The House sets punishment
for treason, if the civil rights of innocent relatives aren’t
affected.”
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. Legal authority of law enforcement or the
courts over the Citizens is voided if used in support of corruption.
Local, state and federal law enforcement agencies shall not be
organizationally affiliated, and persons or groups, therein, shall not
be presumed by law enforcement to be acting lawfully solely because of
such auspices.”
“No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for making
complaints against another office holder, employee or superior. No
government employee nor office holder shall be coerced into
wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real or
implied threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, nor by
any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a threat,
bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year prison
sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes or
promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
Note: The important directive in the above is the mandate to ACT.
When a ‘president’ is corrupt, it is crucial to report that fact to
the People, who have final authority over both the Executive Branch
and the Courts. *** Make you findings PUBLIC and all of those who are
corrupt, including the majority on the US Supreme Court, will be
brought to justice. Not reporting observed corruption will send those
of you, like blindly-loyal Secret Service agents, to prison for three
years. Are those custom tailored suits worth three years of your
lives?
As the country becomes caught up in the hustle and bustle of the
Holidays know this: Hear the Patriots call! The survival of the USA
depends on having as many of you as possible to act accordingly.
The Patriots’ Call
By: John A. Armistead
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Spring-up to our defense!
Stand tall to take the task anew;
Fear not unworthiness.
Feel strength within your veins,
From the blood of ancestors proud.
Feel strength to take and wield,
‘The blind-folded-one’s sword’.
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Be a match for any task.
Defend-not unworthiness.
Order-up our Nation’s best.
Fear not what need be done,
For God has made us all—
And God can still inspire;
So light-up the patriots’ fires!!
__________
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 18, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> The Media,ourmirror-of-doom.
>
> Immediately after the HMS Titanic hit that iceberg 100 years ago,
> there was a period of calm during which people looked about them to
> observe the reactions of others. Since few people seemed to be in
> panic and the ship was still traveling under her own power, people
> continued with what they had been doing as though the collision was
> just a thud and a grind in the night. Some of the passengers who had
> been strolling near the front deck started kicking blocks of the ice
> that had fallen down from the tall iceberg. It was all just an
> amusing game of ice hockey.
>
> Following the numbing thud and grind of the November 6th “election”,
> the media immediately started talking about “the next four years”
> under Obama. Since the popular vote total was about 3.5 million more
> for Obama than for Romney, the mistaken conclusion seems to be that
> thevotershave just legitimized havingourgovernment keep growing,
> like a cancer, toourvery doom. *** In reality, well over 50% of the
> votes for Obama were, essentially, votes for UNCONSTITUTIONAL
> socialism, and thus SHALL NOT BE COUNTED! Nowhere in the Constitution
> is government authorized to force half of the population, who are
> successful, to pay even part of the living expenses of lazy and less
> industrious freeloaders. Such a voter decision cannot be made,
> because that would require the scrapping ofourpresent Constitution.
> And the latter can’t be done with just a 51% vote. It would require
> ratification by 75% of the states. Based on the RED vs. BLUE map of
> the states, Democrats have zero chance of changingourconstitution to
> outlaw the attainment of wealth. No ’gradual’ thud and grind can make
> such doings constitutional!
>
> There is a movement in Texas to have that ‘nation-size’ state secede
> from the Union. Independent-minded Texans don’t like paying one penny
> of their money to freeloaders. I would propose, for the sake of
> arguing, that all BLUE states be required to secede! That way, those
> living in the large urban areas, who ARE the cancer of America, will
> be amputated before the rest of the USA dies from the blood poisoning
> that the BLUE seems destined to cause.
>
> Ron Paul had the right ideas, but he has, obviously, been corrupted—
> because of being a political insider—to seek to make the needed
> changes withinourpresent, failed governmental system. He showed
> himself to be too much of a wimp to lead the “revolution” that he once
> had hinted he was preparing to lead. Why is it that so many should-be-
> smart Republican politicians think that the “magical” solution toour
> too big government is to mimic the Democrats—the way George Will,
> Bobby Jindal and Newt Gingrich propose? Since Democraticvotershave
> been “bought’ or were given “gifts” (bribed), and since bribery is a
> high CRIME, why is there not yet a single soul who is in the media
> spotlight willing to say: The election is INVALID, because votes
> obtained by making unconstitutional bribes and promises (of
> entitlements) shall never be constitutional.
>
> Obama, has been “acting presidential” by traveling to Burma. In a
> speech, there, he stated that Burma is ’important’, because it is
> located between two populous regions (China and India). He continues
> to be guarded, at great expense, by the US Secret Service—that has yet
> to exercise its duty to verify Obama’s “proof” of American
> citizenship. As on the Titanic, the Secret Service looks around, and
> seeing the liar-in-chief acting ”presidential”, they wrongly assume,
> due to the normalness of their daily scene, thatoursinking ship must
> be safe to be on. In reality, every member of the Secret Service
> takes an oath to support the Constitution. And the Constitution
> REQUIRES that Presidents of the USA be natural born citizens. Arnold
> Schwarzenegger would have liked to bePresident, but he wasn’t born in
> the USA. Neither was Obama.
>
> It is being stated that the reason Obama’s school records aren’t being
> made public (probably indicating that he is a foreign exchange
> student), is because of his… ’right to privacy’. Tell me, folks, does
> the right to privacy of a CRIMINAL protect him from being brought to
> justice? Isn’t the survival of the USA more important than the
> privacy rights of the anti-Christ???
>
> Many in the media, and in the country at large, are having their
> attention drawn away from the should-never-happen 2013 swearing-in of
> Obama. The crisis in the Middle East has shallows like Gov. Mike
> Huckabee proclaiming, on his weekend Fox show, how justified the Jews
> were in taking land that HAD been theirs, and in defending that land
> as theirs, when much of it—by any stretch of the imagination—isn’t
> legally theirs. Admittedly, Jews are less like “bulls in a china
> shop” than Muslims. But such fact does not give Israel claim to a
> nation that was improperly obtained by war. Repeated statements of
> support for Israel, by many politicians in this country, are mainly
> because of the huge, and largely unconstitutional, influence of biased
> Jews who control most of the media in this country.
>
> Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., is probably rehearsing, over and
> over, giving Obama the Oath of Office—which he had badly botched four
> years ago. Roberts, like so many on the Washington scene, has been
> seduced into believing that what gets done “must be right”, because it
> keeps getting done. So long asourliar-in-chief keeps a pathologic
> straight face while he plotsourdemise, Roberts will try to be… “all
> smiles”, too. But if he gives Obama that oath, Roberts will, from the
> first word, be committing capital TREASON. His earlier
> characterization of the “fine” in Obama care as a “tax” shows Robert’s
> corruptness. A “tax” that applies only to those who don’t do
> something is exactly the same as a “fine”. The Constitution
> authorizes (some) taxation, but not as punishment for not buying what
> government has no authority to require anyone to buy.
>
> So far, none of you media insiders have gotten angry enough about what
> your bosses make you report to cause you to throw open the window and
> yell, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!!!”
> The effect of doing such a thing, on-the-air, would be to BREAK the
> calm that continues to seduce this SINKING country into thinking… all
> is well. Last week I got ‘not smiling’ vibes from Obama that
> coincided with my descriptions of how he should be hanged, over the
> Washington Mall reflection pool, in a most public way. Recently, I’ve
> gotten vibes from Sen. Rand Paul and up-and-coming US Representative
> Trey Gowdy, from SC. Might it be that those two, relative newcomers
> value America more than they valueourpresent failed system of
> government? If so, then lead the charge, men; millions will follow
> you!
>
> The time has come for ACTION, not just thoughts, overourACE IN THE
> HOLE that is my penned and polished ‘New Constitution of the United
> States of America‘. By its dictates, no person, left or right, will
> be slighted, because: “Democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in
> the USA!” Long live the USA!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The “spin” of corruption.
>
> > Being a very busy person, I almost had to force myself to watch ‘Face
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The “spin” of corruption.
>
> > the Nation’ and ‘This Week’, today. Experience has shown that both
> > of those shows are platforms intended to allow Democratic Party
> > insiders to brainwash the viewers regarding the ‘news‘ of the day.
> > Typically, each of those shows will have an “almost” conservative like
> > George Will on their expert panel list in order to make their 75% left-
> > leaning guests seem to be… ’fair’.
>
> > Ubiquitous Senator John McCain was on Bob Schieffer’s show. McCain
> > repeated his usual questions: “What did ’president’ Obama know (about
> > Benghazi)” ? And… “When did he know it?” McCain seemed ’pained’ to
> > add that the “reason” we need such information is “for the benefit of
> > the families of those who were killed“; and to work, with Congress, to
> > “make sure such things don’t happen again.” Throughout all of this,
> > Bob Schieffer had on his quite-often revealing, frozen-in-place, “used
> > car salesman” smile. Though biased for the left, Schieffer is smart
> > enough to know that the implications for Obama are much more DIRE than
> > his simply being an instrument for understanding why the White House
> > goofed up. McCain knows that, too. But because McCain needs forums
> > for getting-out his messages, he always includes the required liberal
> > “CURL” somewhere within his remarks so that it will be likely he will
> > be invited back on those corrupt, and under my “NC”, UNCONSTITUTIONAL
> > shows, again.
>
> > On ‘This Week', a video of Governor Bobby Jindal was shown as he
> > stated that Republicansshouldn’tbe saying that “Democrats were
> > ’bought’ (in the election).” I was pleased to see that Mitt Romney
> > has, apparently, agreed with me that it was the “gifts” of the
> > Democrats (Obama) that had resulted in his (appearance of, but not
> > LEGAL) victory in the election. For the liberal producers of that
> > show, leaving Romney’s photo on the screen for so long, with the word
> > “gifts” in the caption, was their way of setting-up USA-traitor-guest
> > Donna Brazile to say (I paraphrase): “People are asking me: ’Where are
> > my gifts?” Exactly!!! Obama made only PROMISES OF GIFTS in order to
> > get the corrupt votes he needed for his ILLEGAL victory. A promise
> > is every bit as much a BRIBE as is
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
NoEinstein
Nov 22, 2012, 9:02:58 PM11/22/12
to
On Nov 18, 5:11 pm, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
> Hoo, boy!
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
Dear M. B.: Most morons think intellectuals are 'crazy'. From a
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
brief search, it seems that David Hartung is an intellectual. I
invite him to reply, here. — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Nov 24, 2012, 4:27:15 PM11/24/12
to
On Nov 22, 8:41 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Of Stamps and Trash.
My primary civic goal is to save the USA from socialism and from
financial ruin. Both are being caused by the hugely mistaken notion
of close to half of the citizens that government is the cradle-to-
grave answer to all woes that might befall.
Last night I got vibes from Rudy Giuliani—probably relative to these
same essays which a great many people in-the-public-eye are reading.
There was a thoughtful, slightly smiling look on his face. In
thinking back about Rudy, beyond his historic connection to the events
and aftermath of 9/11, I recall how wise he must have been, as a
salesman, to garner the votes necessary to be elected Mayor of New
York in such a liberal stronghold as that city. I’m disappointed how
the pendulum-swing to Mayor Bloomberg has mostly fomented group-
against-group divisiveness. As in my New Constitution and as I
explained in my meaty little book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony
Through Prosperity’, the secret of getting huge numbers of people to
peacefully coexist is by playing up the commonality while downplaying
the (group) differences. That is what Rudy had to have done very
well.
Another New Yorker I’ve gotten vibes from in the last few weeks is
Mort Zuckerman. In my mind, he had just his normal, stoic facial
expression. Since I’ve gotten none of those vides, recently, its
probably due to my “Hark the Patriots’ Call!” not reaching a high
enough threshold to get him to act for the sake of America. Zuckerman
is being tugged in three directions. Capitalism has made him
extremely wealthy. But since capitalism and socialism can’t
peacefully coexist, he is in a quandary. Jews are playing both ends
against the middle by wanting ’liberal’ influence in government,
because of their persecuted minority status, and because Jews have had
considerable capitalist successes due in large measure to nepotism.
Jews as individuals, I like. But Jews as a race-against-the-world, I
don’t like very much. If you want to be loved by yours truly, LOSE
your group identities and join together as members of the human
race! The third way Zuckerman is being tugged is to always be on
both sides of the fence on the issues of the day in order to reach the
widest possible audience with his otherwise excellent editorials. He
could start a peaceful revolution by simply stating in his magazine:
“A SC man has penned and polished a New Constitution of the United
States of America. From what I’ve seen in the excerpts, there has
been a huge amount of thought, by an obviously very intelligent man,
how to optimize government to have the maximum benefit for the largest
possible number of Americans, left and right.”
‘The Donald’ is a regular guest—sometimes electronically-linked—on
Greta Van Susteren’s Fox show. Prior to the election he offered to
pay five million dollars to the charity of Obama’s choice if Obama
would simply release his college records for public scrutiny. That,
of course, didn’t happen. But it is what I, as a law-abiding citizen
and Patriot, am demanding (to the US Secret Service) must happen
before anyone even considers that Obama meets (Ha!) the Constitution’s
requirement of his being a native born citizen. Valid SS numbers
reflect the state of residence and chronological placement of the
particular applicant. Can we have a “President” without a valid SS
number? Of course not! So, Secret Service, DO YOUR JOBS!! These
issues are NOT going to go away! Your protecting of Obama (as your
esprit de corps responsibility) will be less risky to your own lives,
if you will simply say to Obama: “You are under arrest for FRAUD
relative to your becoming President in 2009. And you are under arrest
for TREASON, for consistently subverting and bypassing the US
Constitution to the economic and social detriment of most of the US
population.” The citizens will see such actions as HEROIC! I know
that being strong, intelligent and having fast reactions are
requirements for becoming a Secret Service Agent. But as in any
“military engagement” failure to act, decisively, can spell doom. So
don’t keep burying-your-heads-in-the-sand, ACT!!!
I’ve may have gotten vibes from ‘The Donald’ numbers of times. But I
can’t be sure that is because he has read even one of my essays over
the last six years. I, as an architect, have a master plan for the
redevelopment of a large portion of the center of my hometown of
Easley, SC. His organizations (He’s an executive; you know!) have
real estate projects of all scales and types under way across
America. For a number of years I have supposed that if I can get
recognition for either my New Science (that has so easily disproved
Einstein and much of status quo physics and cosmology) or my New
Constitution, that I might could get up my nerve to ask Donald Trump
to buy the central portion of the town of Easley. My plan is pre1930
retro rather than obsolete-tomorrow, glass and brass. Big cities have
effective towns in single buildings. So, those who live in the latter
are able to shop for their major daily supplies without having to get
in cars or take cabs.
In the 1950s, two automobiles in every family killed the mercantile
mix of central downtowns all across America. Malls are sometimes-
successful alternatives to the balanced businesses in the downtowns of
old. My master plan is to place the entire ownership of the
commercial portion of the town center under a single ownership. That
way, the crucial MIX of businesses necessary to make people from far
and wide come to Easley can be assured. What present generation
family wouldn’t enjoy bringing their kids to see how charming and
authentic looking a 1920’s town can be? It would be like taking a
trip in a Time Machine! But fear not, demanding shoppers, beneath the
scene, linked by computers to automated warehousing, the product you
purchase will be delivered to central pickup stations convenient to
the two thousand, mostly on grade, new parking spaces. Those are
within easy walking distance. But people who prefer not to walk, can
catch free rides in stretch “Woody” Ford replicas that circle the
town. The police serving the central town will dress like ‘in the
movies’ and will drive authentic (but under-the-hood advanced) period
cars. The FLAVOR of the place will be incredible! The USA could be on
the verge of having wonderful things happening all over (!), if
socialism can forever be gotten off of capitalism’s back.
During the seemingly interminable presidential campaign, I happened to
be tuned-in with higher probability to Greta’s show than most of the
others. I would say that she does more behind-the-scenes research,
especially, relative to what questions she will ask her guests, than
perhaps any other host or hostess in the media. Initially, because
of the way she ‘grilled’ conservatives, I sensed that her heart was
liberal. However, as the campaign wore on, the simple economics of
socialism must have swayed her to the same conclusion that I reached
thirty years ago: The cost of having government continue to provide
more and more things is simply too great!
I, and my New Constitution, are very ’liberal’ regarding protecting
the environment and protecting our rights to control our own bodies.
For years I called myself a social liberal and a fiscal ULTRA
conservative.
“Preface:
The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; and divorced from
politics. The federal government shall not be considered to be
synonymous with the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor
are they dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall
be answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens
thereof. We honor these objectives for the benefit of ourselves and
our posterity.”
“Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in the best
interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed,
enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed
to prosper.”
“Businesses and professions shall be fair to their employees and to
their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the
charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be
discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor
shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who
perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business
practices require that management be forthright with employees and
customers without coercion.”
The USPS is offering for sale rolls of 100 stamps with the following
four words being alternated from stamp to stamp: Freedom; Liberty;
‘Equality’; and ‘Justice’. Fifty years ago the latter two words
would ring clear. But today, with the ungodly messages being
delivered by minority churches, Equality and Justice are catchwords
for… socialism. To liberals, Equality means having matching
lifestyles, however low. And Justice means punishing the successful
who must have somehow achieved success because… “You didn’t build
that.”
Quite literally, Barack Obama stole my catchphrase that government be
fair. A zillion times he said “…pay their fair share”. But there
never has been any fairness in STEALING from the rich to give to
freeloaders—such as those on food stamps—simply so that the
freeloaders will vote Democratic!!!!! Know this, liberals:
Republicans like Romney-Ryan have figured out how to continue to
protect those needing Social Security and Medicare in order to
survive. It will take at least a quarter century to phase out both of
those SOCIALIST programs so that the USA will be back on the right
course. For me, we’ll know the course is right when no more than 10%
of the GDP is being spent for the combined federal, state and local
taxes of hardworking Americans. I dream BIG, don’t I.
One of the more recent inclusions, relative to the above, that I’ve
put into my New Constitution is the following:
“The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. Principles of
fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. Any public
office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the latter
shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished up to
and including the death penalty. Any government employee, media
figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or influence of
their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy and fair
play shall be guilty of a felony. *** Note: Fair play shall be
defined as any individual or group action that achieves positive
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of opportunity for self determination of
one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement within our Free
Enterprise System without requiring government oversight.”
“Pay It Forward!” And… “Long live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> Geraldo’s edification,ourforces are superbly equipped to fight at
> that isourFAILED system of government. On The Five, Greg Gutfeld
> ‘ourduty’ to protect a ‘president’ if he isn’t, legallyourPresident? If, as Obama claims, he was born in Hawaii, just 50 years
> given, as the only legally-voted-inPresidentof the USA.
> ...
>
> read more »
>
Of Stamps and Trash.
My primary civic goal is to save the USA from socialism and from
financial ruin. Both are being caused by the hugely mistaken notion
of close to half of the citizens that government is the cradle-to-
grave answer to all woes that might befall.
Last night I got vibes from Rudy Giuliani—probably relative to these
same essays which a great many people in-the-public-eye are reading.
There was a thoughtful, slightly smiling look on his face. In
thinking back about Rudy, beyond his historic connection to the events
and aftermath of 9/11, I recall how wise he must have been, as a
salesman, to garner the votes necessary to be elected Mayor of New
York in such a liberal stronghold as that city. I’m disappointed how
the pendulum-swing to Mayor Bloomberg has mostly fomented group-
against-group divisiveness. As in my New Constitution and as I
explained in my meaty little book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony
Through Prosperity’, the secret of getting huge numbers of people to
peacefully coexist is by playing up the commonality while downplaying
the (group) differences. That is what Rudy had to have done very
well.
Another New Yorker I’ve gotten vibes from in the last few weeks is
Mort Zuckerman. In my mind, he had just his normal, stoic facial
expression. Since I’ve gotten none of those vides, recently, its
probably due to my “Hark the Patriots’ Call!” not reaching a high
enough threshold to get him to act for the sake of America. Zuckerman
is being tugged in three directions. Capitalism has made him
extremely wealthy. But since capitalism and socialism can’t
peacefully coexist, he is in a quandary. Jews are playing both ends
against the middle by wanting ’liberal’ influence in government,
because of their persecuted minority status, and because Jews have had
considerable capitalist successes due in large measure to nepotism.
Jews as individuals, I like. But Jews as a race-against-the-world, I
don’t like very much. If you want to be loved by yours truly, LOSE
your group identities and join together as members of the human
race! The third way Zuckerman is being tugged is to always be on
both sides of the fence on the issues of the day in order to reach the
widest possible audience with his otherwise excellent editorials. He
could start a peaceful revolution by simply stating in his magazine:
“A SC man has penned and polished a New Constitution of the United
States of America. From what I’ve seen in the excerpts, there has
been a huge amount of thought, by an obviously very intelligent man,
how to optimize government to have the maximum benefit for the largest
possible number of Americans, left and right.”
‘The Donald’ is a regular guest—sometimes electronically-linked—on
Greta Van Susteren’s Fox show. Prior to the election he offered to
pay five million dollars to the charity of Obama’s choice if Obama
would simply release his college records for public scrutiny. That,
of course, didn’t happen. But it is what I, as a law-abiding citizen
and Patriot, am demanding (to the US Secret Service) must happen
before anyone even considers that Obama meets (Ha!) the Constitution’s
requirement of his being a native born citizen. Valid SS numbers
reflect the state of residence and chronological placement of the
particular applicant. Can we have a “President” without a valid SS
number? Of course not! So, Secret Service, DO YOUR JOBS!! These
issues are NOT going to go away! Your protecting of Obama (as your
esprit de corps responsibility) will be less risky to your own lives,
if you will simply say to Obama: “You are under arrest for FRAUD
relative to your becoming President in 2009. And you are under arrest
for TREASON, for consistently subverting and bypassing the US
Constitution to the economic and social detriment of most of the US
population.” The citizens will see such actions as HEROIC! I know
that being strong, intelligent and having fast reactions are
requirements for becoming a Secret Service Agent. But as in any
“military engagement” failure to act, decisively, can spell doom. So
don’t keep burying-your-heads-in-the-sand, ACT!!!
I’ve may have gotten vibes from ‘The Donald’ numbers of times. But I
can’t be sure that is because he has read even one of my essays over
the last six years. I, as an architect, have a master plan for the
redevelopment of a large portion of the center of my hometown of
Easley, SC. His organizations (He’s an executive; you know!) have
real estate projects of all scales and types under way across
America. For a number of years I have supposed that if I can get
recognition for either my New Science (that has so easily disproved
Einstein and much of status quo physics and cosmology) or my New
Constitution, that I might could get up my nerve to ask Donald Trump
to buy the central portion of the town of Easley. My plan is pre1930
retro rather than obsolete-tomorrow, glass and brass. Big cities have
effective towns in single buildings. So, those who live in the latter
are able to shop for their major daily supplies without having to get
in cars or take cabs.
In the 1950s, two automobiles in every family killed the mercantile
mix of central downtowns all across America. Malls are sometimes-
successful alternatives to the balanced businesses in the downtowns of
old. My master plan is to place the entire ownership of the
commercial portion of the town center under a single ownership. That
way, the crucial MIX of businesses necessary to make people from far
and wide come to Easley can be assured. What present generation
family wouldn’t enjoy bringing their kids to see how charming and
authentic looking a 1920’s town can be? It would be like taking a
trip in a Time Machine! But fear not, demanding shoppers, beneath the
scene, linked by computers to automated warehousing, the product you
purchase will be delivered to central pickup stations convenient to
the two thousand, mostly on grade, new parking spaces. Those are
within easy walking distance. But people who prefer not to walk, can
catch free rides in stretch “Woody” Ford replicas that circle the
town. The police serving the central town will dress like ‘in the
movies’ and will drive authentic (but under-the-hood advanced) period
cars. The FLAVOR of the place will be incredible! The USA could be on
the verge of having wonderful things happening all over (!), if
socialism can forever be gotten off of capitalism’s back.
During the seemingly interminable presidential campaign, I happened to
be tuned-in with higher probability to Greta’s show than most of the
others. I would say that she does more behind-the-scenes research,
especially, relative to what questions she will ask her guests, than
perhaps any other host or hostess in the media. Initially, because
of the way she ‘grilled’ conservatives, I sensed that her heart was
liberal. However, as the campaign wore on, the simple economics of
socialism must have swayed her to the same conclusion that I reached
thirty years ago: The cost of having government continue to provide
more and more things is simply too great!
I, and my New Constitution, are very ’liberal’ regarding protecting
the environment and protecting our rights to control our own bodies.
For years I called myself a social liberal and a fiscal ULTRA
conservative.
“Preface:
The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; and divorced from
politics. The federal government shall not be considered to be
synonymous with the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor
are they dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall
be answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens
thereof. We honor these objectives for the benefit of ourselves and
our posterity.”
“Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in the best
interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed,
enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed
to prosper.”
“Businesses and professions shall be fair to their employees and to
their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the
charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be
discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor
shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who
perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business
practices require that management be forthright with employees and
customers without coercion.”
The USPS is offering for sale rolls of 100 stamps with the following
four words being alternated from stamp to stamp: Freedom; Liberty;
‘Equality’; and ‘Justice’. Fifty years ago the latter two words
would ring clear. But today, with the ungodly messages being
delivered by minority churches, Equality and Justice are catchwords
for… socialism. To liberals, Equality means having matching
lifestyles, however low. And Justice means punishing the successful
who must have somehow achieved success because… “You didn’t build
that.”
Quite literally, Barack Obama stole my catchphrase that government be
fair. A zillion times he said “…pay their fair share”. But there
never has been any fairness in STEALING from the rich to give to
freeloaders—such as those on food stamps—simply so that the
freeloaders will vote Democratic!!!!! Know this, liberals:
Republicans like Romney-Ryan have figured out how to continue to
protect those needing Social Security and Medicare in order to
survive. It will take at least a quarter century to phase out both of
those SOCIALIST programs so that the USA will be back on the right
course. For me, we’ll know the course is right when no more than 10%
of the GDP is being spent for the combined federal, state and local
taxes of hardworking Americans. I dream BIG, don’t I.
One of the more recent inclusions, relative to the above, that I’ve
put into my New Constitution is the following:
“The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. Principles of
fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. Any public
office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the latter
shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished up to
and including the death penalty. Any government employee, media
figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or influence of
their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy and fair
play shall be guilty of a felony. *** Note: Fair play shall be
defined as any individual or group action that achieves positive
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of opportunity for self determination of
one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement within our Free
Enterprise System without requiring government oversight.”
“Pay It Forward!” And… “Long live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 20, 7:12 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
>
> Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
> Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
> had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
> that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
> Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
> aimed mortar rounds and RPGs,ourmilitary leaders knew that the lives
>
> Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
>
> Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
> Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
> had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
> that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
> Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
> of Americans where being threatened. That was in the middle of the
> night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
> military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
> without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
> sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
> the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
> scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
> think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
> sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
> of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
>
> I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
> general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
> protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
> American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
> the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
> military, if onlyourpseudo “president” can make a decision? For
> night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
> military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
> without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
> sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
> the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
> scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
> think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
> sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
> of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
>
> I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
> general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
> protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
> American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
> the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
> Geraldo’s edification,ourforces are superbly equipped to fight at
> ago, why isn’t his birth certificate, in paper form, available for
> public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
> in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
> records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
> People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates forPresident
> thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
> background ever made?
>
> The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
> public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
> made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
> serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
> their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
> were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
> including risking their own lives to save the life of thePresident.
> They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
> agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
> So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and giveour
> fraudulentpresidentthe same “respect” that Mitt Romney should be
> public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
> in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
> records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
> People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates forPresident
> thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
> background ever made?
>
> The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
> public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
> made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
> serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
> their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
> were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
> including risking their own lives to save the life of thePresident.
> They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
> agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
> So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and giveour
> given, as the only legally-voted-inPresidentof the USA.
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Nov 26, 2012, 8:57:00 PM11/26/12
to
On Nov 24, 4:27 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The status quo inertia has most people afraid to consider better
alternatives.
It is symptomatic that Democrats are attacking John McCain for
questioning Susan Rice’s “qualifications” (HA!) to be Secretary of
State. They call him a racist for accepting Sarah Palin, a white, as
his VP choice, while rejecting Susan Rice, a semi-Black, as a possible
for Secretary of State. The rationale of the Democrats, with their
angry-seeming BLACK spokespersons, is that RACE is the only possible
determinate of why whites do or don’t do anything.
For me—an expert on reading a person’s body language—Susan rice KNEW
she was lying from hour one, regarding that spurious claim about the
Muhammad video. Her shallow defense, by Obama and a dozen others, is
that she only repeated what intelligence had told her. Yet, on those
five TV broadcasts, never once did she say: “I have been TOLD such and
such.” What she said was: “(hick-up) The raid was because of the
video, and only because of the video.” If anyone had told an honest
person to state “facts” without her having been given every detail,
then she knowingly LIED through her teeth!
Obama, that traitor to the USA, wants a Secretary of State who WILL
lie for him at every turn. He is already campaigning to assume
control of China and India. He couldn’t care less whether Burma votes
for Freedom and Democracy. In reality, without a Constitution, like
mine, that outlaws, under penalty of death, the promoting of anything
socialistic, a “democracy” will only allow ‘two wolves and a sheep to
decide what is for supper‘. But the latter shall not be allowed to
happen! My “NC” is a Democracy-on-demand Republic. Any issue, like
abortions and marijuana freedom will simply be voted on by the people—
no discussion needed. If the arguments are for more entitlements,
since that is unconstitutional, no such vote would be valid.
Some are wondering if Benghazi is Obama’s “Watergate”. Nixon resigned
over a break-in to get classified information on people he considered
to be his enemies. But his ego had wanted to document everything that
was said for the history books. When those tapes were realized to
obtain damning material, they were “erased”, or so they thought. The
tapes had enough of a ghost charge to still be understood. And so,
Nixon resigned.
There isn’t a soul in the world who supposes that Obama would resign
over anything. Hell, if this whole Benghazi fiasco breaks wide open
the night before Obama is to be sworn in, unless the Secret Service
arrests him, Obama will put on his bullet resistant black coat and go
out there amongst his lying Democrat friends on the capital steps to
get sworn in by his favorite co-traitor to the USA, Chief Justice John
G. Roberts, Jr. Both of those rascals are outlaws. Under my New
Constitution anyone who employs the $2.75 solution on either of those
men won’t even be detained by law enforcement for a single minute!
Their choice is death by bloodshed, or death by the hangman’s noose.
They get to choose.
The battle lines are now drawn between those who are being stolen from
by government edict, and thieves who have already been BOUGHT by
“gifts” (bribes). The status quo in Washington has been corrupt for
so long, the stone-heads, like most in the Secret Service, must
believe that wrong is right because the “leaders” say so. Well, in
the USA, the leaders in a REPUBLIC is the People! And at last count,
at least 65% of the People aren’t happy with the way government is
headed.
Mark Steyn is filling in for Limbaugh for a few days. He correctly
sees socialism as a cultural issue. He says there are 40 million
people getting (bribes) food stamps. In the supermarket checkout
lines I’ve not seen a one of those handing over those check-like
pieces of paper who doesn’t look fit enough to hold down a job. Most
have a born-out-of-wedlock child that “justifies”, at least in our
socialist government’s mind, having those who still work be slaves to
the immoral and the lazy. I can assure seniors that Granny shall
never be pushed over the cliff! But able bodied people who won’t work
can either sink or swim, because most will be thrown overboard on day
one. I’m willing to bet that 95% will swim quite well. They have
been like the “injured” person drawing disability checks. But when
videos show them playing tennis with their should-be-injured right
arm, their ruse falls through.
I’ve gotten vibes from that intelligent Jew, Ben Stein. He is wise-
seeming on economic issues, but I wonder: If Stein had to choose
between saving the USA from socialism and continuing to allow Jews to
have more Influence in Washington than their per capita allotment,
which would Ben Choose? People are so used to literally FIGHTING
group against group, few would know how to act if government gets
castrated, as it should be, and made to be DEFERENTIAL to the People
rather than lords OVER the people.
Right now we have a top-to-bottom corrupt Executive Branch; a majority
corrupt and minority impotent Supreme Court, and a totally
unconstitutional US Senate! That leaves us with just a ‘passable’
House of Representatives. Fortunately, the latter is all that is
required to keep the USA functioning! The original Constitution never
intended for the President to dictate a thing, when there is
sufficient time to allow Congress (now, just the House) to decide
issues. Since most of our woes are taxation related, my NC forever
removes from the House the power to increase taxes without a national
referendum of the people. And it removes from the Supreme Court the
authority to decide anything other than an appeal that has been passed
up through the courts. If 1/3 of the House concurs, the decision
regarding any appeal can be shifted to the vote of the People. And so
long as the People violate no provision of my “NC”, the Supreme Court
will finally be made an effective non entity! The following language
is most important:
“(Article III) Section 2 & 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable
to the People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or
corruption within any arm of government—including the entire judicial
system—judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during
sentencing, favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any
arm(s) of law enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow
judges, justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for
wrongful acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice
fails to respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any
government official or member of the justice system, such judge or
justice may be guilty of a felony. The determination of the above
status shall be made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a
yea vote of 1/3 of the House, a national public trial, televised from
the House, shall be held regarding all named parties—with judgment
being determined via referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered
voters who vote determine that there is guilt, the government
officials, judges, justices and/or members of law enforcement shall be
removed from their former positions and sentenced commensurate with
their crimes, up to and including the death penalty.”
“Judges & justices shall be well mannered, forthright and succinct;
courtrooms aren’t their property nor forums for venting their
feelings. A Citizen can sanction a judge or justice in court for
deviating from this constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior by
any law-abiding Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen so
acting shall be subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to defer
to overly drawn-out legal processes or pending rulings.”
In communist countries, such as Russia, there were ‘eyes’ everywhere
watching the People. Those even suspected of doing a thing not
sanctioned by the powers-that-be would be arrested and sent to the
salt mines or to coldest Siberia. Others, who were more organized in
their disagreements with the state would get held by strong hands
while bullets are sent splashing through their heads. Sometimes I
think that the richer half of Americans are mostly spineless. They
get stolen from and must be thinking: “I have this bad-boy for making
E-Trades.” Since fighting for one’s rights is “frowned-upon in this
establishment”, those with wealth would make a very poor army. They
are just too damn respecting of “the system” which, though corrupt,
must, by some SICK logic, be respected. In other words, they just
don’t give a damn. If someone steals their home, they know insurance
will cover the cost of another one. My message is this: Unless those
who actually EARN their living are willing to speak up, and in unison,
the USA is doomed, 12/21/12 or not.
There aren’t enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
taxpayer’s rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
again!!!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> relative to your becomingPresidentin 2009. And you are under arrest
> the environment and protectingourrights to controlourown bodies.
> Quite literally, ...
>
> read more »
>
The status quo inertia has most people afraid to consider better
alternatives.
It is symptomatic that Democrats are attacking John McCain for
questioning Susan Rice’s “qualifications” (HA!) to be Secretary of
State. They call him a racist for accepting Sarah Palin, a white, as
his VP choice, while rejecting Susan Rice, a semi-Black, as a possible
for Secretary of State. The rationale of the Democrats, with their
angry-seeming BLACK spokespersons, is that RACE is the only possible
determinate of why whites do or don’t do anything.
For me—an expert on reading a person’s body language—Susan rice KNEW
she was lying from hour one, regarding that spurious claim about the
Muhammad video. Her shallow defense, by Obama and a dozen others, is
that she only repeated what intelligence had told her. Yet, on those
five TV broadcasts, never once did she say: “I have been TOLD such and
such.” What she said was: “(hick-up) The raid was because of the
video, and only because of the video.” If anyone had told an honest
person to state “facts” without her having been given every detail,
then she knowingly LIED through her teeth!
Obama, that traitor to the USA, wants a Secretary of State who WILL
lie for him at every turn. He is already campaigning to assume
control of China and India. He couldn’t care less whether Burma votes
for Freedom and Democracy. In reality, without a Constitution, like
mine, that outlaws, under penalty of death, the promoting of anything
socialistic, a “democracy” will only allow ‘two wolves and a sheep to
decide what is for supper‘. But the latter shall not be allowed to
happen! My “NC” is a Democracy-on-demand Republic. Any issue, like
abortions and marijuana freedom will simply be voted on by the people—
no discussion needed. If the arguments are for more entitlements,
since that is unconstitutional, no such vote would be valid.
Some are wondering if Benghazi is Obama’s “Watergate”. Nixon resigned
over a break-in to get classified information on people he considered
to be his enemies. But his ego had wanted to document everything that
was said for the history books. When those tapes were realized to
obtain damning material, they were “erased”, or so they thought. The
tapes had enough of a ghost charge to still be understood. And so,
Nixon resigned.
There isn’t a soul in the world who supposes that Obama would resign
over anything. Hell, if this whole Benghazi fiasco breaks wide open
the night before Obama is to be sworn in, unless the Secret Service
arrests him, Obama will put on his bullet resistant black coat and go
out there amongst his lying Democrat friends on the capital steps to
get sworn in by his favorite co-traitor to the USA, Chief Justice John
G. Roberts, Jr. Both of those rascals are outlaws. Under my New
Constitution anyone who employs the $2.75 solution on either of those
men won’t even be detained by law enforcement for a single minute!
Their choice is death by bloodshed, or death by the hangman’s noose.
They get to choose.
The battle lines are now drawn between those who are being stolen from
by government edict, and thieves who have already been BOUGHT by
“gifts” (bribes). The status quo in Washington has been corrupt for
so long, the stone-heads, like most in the Secret Service, must
believe that wrong is right because the “leaders” say so. Well, in
the USA, the leaders in a REPUBLIC is the People! And at last count,
at least 65% of the People aren’t happy with the way government is
headed.
Mark Steyn is filling in for Limbaugh for a few days. He correctly
sees socialism as a cultural issue. He says there are 40 million
people getting (bribes) food stamps. In the supermarket checkout
lines I’ve not seen a one of those handing over those check-like
pieces of paper who doesn’t look fit enough to hold down a job. Most
have a born-out-of-wedlock child that “justifies”, at least in our
socialist government’s mind, having those who still work be slaves to
the immoral and the lazy. I can assure seniors that Granny shall
never be pushed over the cliff! But able bodied people who won’t work
can either sink or swim, because most will be thrown overboard on day
one. I’m willing to bet that 95% will swim quite well. They have
been like the “injured” person drawing disability checks. But when
videos show them playing tennis with their should-be-injured right
arm, their ruse falls through.
I’ve gotten vibes from that intelligent Jew, Ben Stein. He is wise-
seeming on economic issues, but I wonder: If Stein had to choose
between saving the USA from socialism and continuing to allow Jews to
have more Influence in Washington than their per capita allotment,
which would Ben Choose? People are so used to literally FIGHTING
group against group, few would know how to act if government gets
castrated, as it should be, and made to be DEFERENTIAL to the People
rather than lords OVER the people.
Right now we have a top-to-bottom corrupt Executive Branch; a majority
corrupt and minority impotent Supreme Court, and a totally
unconstitutional US Senate! That leaves us with just a ‘passable’
House of Representatives. Fortunately, the latter is all that is
required to keep the USA functioning! The original Constitution never
intended for the President to dictate a thing, when there is
sufficient time to allow Congress (now, just the House) to decide
issues. Since most of our woes are taxation related, my NC forever
removes from the House the power to increase taxes without a national
referendum of the people. And it removes from the Supreme Court the
authority to decide anything other than an appeal that has been passed
up through the courts. If 1/3 of the House concurs, the decision
regarding any appeal can be shifted to the vote of the People. And so
long as the People violate no provision of my “NC”, the Supreme Court
will finally be made an effective non entity! The following language
is most important:
“(Article III) Section 2 & 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable
to the People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or
corruption within any arm of government—including the entire judicial
system—judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during
sentencing, favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any
arm(s) of law enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow
judges, justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for
wrongful acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice
fails to respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any
government official or member of the justice system, such judge or
justice may be guilty of a felony. The determination of the above
status shall be made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a
yea vote of 1/3 of the House, a national public trial, televised from
the House, shall be held regarding all named parties—with judgment
being determined via referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered
voters who vote determine that there is guilt, the government
officials, judges, justices and/or members of law enforcement shall be
removed from their former positions and sentenced commensurate with
their crimes, up to and including the death penalty.”
“Judges & justices shall be well mannered, forthright and succinct;
courtrooms aren’t their property nor forums for venting their
feelings. A Citizen can sanction a judge or justice in court for
deviating from this constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior by
any law-abiding Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen so
acting shall be subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to defer
to overly drawn-out legal processes or pending rulings.”
In communist countries, such as Russia, there were ‘eyes’ everywhere
watching the People. Those even suspected of doing a thing not
sanctioned by the powers-that-be would be arrested and sent to the
salt mines or to coldest Siberia. Others, who were more organized in
their disagreements with the state would get held by strong hands
while bullets are sent splashing through their heads. Sometimes I
think that the richer half of Americans are mostly spineless. They
get stolen from and must be thinking: “I have this bad-boy for making
E-Trades.” Since fighting for one’s rights is “frowned-upon in this
establishment”, those with wealth would make a very poor army. They
are just too damn respecting of “the system” which, though corrupt,
must, by some SICK logic, be respected. In other words, they just
don’t give a damn. If someone steals their home, they know insurance
will cover the cost of another one. My message is this: Unless those
who actually EARN their living are willing to speak up, and in unison,
the USA is doomed, 12/21/12 or not.
There aren’t enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
taxpayer’s rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
again!!!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> For years I called myself a social liberal and a fiscal ULTRA
> conservative.
>
> “Preface:
> The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
> People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
> government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
> coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
> cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
> be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
> opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
> and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
> focused; considerate ofourenvironment, heritage, peace and
> conservative.
>
> “Preface:
> The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
> People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
> government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
> coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
> cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
> be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
> opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
> and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
>
> read more »
Tom Potter
Nov 27, 2012, 12:00:35 AM11/27/12
to
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6ab5b058-02cc-4b2b...@c14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>
>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>again!!!
>
>Respectfully submitted,
>
>
> John A. Armistead
> Author and Patriot
It is interesting to see that John A. Armistead,
>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>again!!!
>
>Respectfully submitted,
>
>
> John A. Armistead
> Author and Patriot
like many people, has been manipulated by Jews in the Mass Media
and government to promote conflict, revolution and war.
I suggest that John should take a look at the situations
in all of the nations where The Mass Media has instigated
conflicts. revolutions, and wars,
and to read the autobiography of John Allan Wyeth,
a native of his own state who fought for the South during the Civil War,
and described the condition of the South's economy and situation
during and after the war.
As can be seen, most people in the South could not get enough food
to eat, and survived only because of help from relatives in the North,
and from people like Wyeth who worked in the North after the war
in order to survive and send food to his family.
And I might mention that although America and Britain
were so-called victors of W.W.II, that during the war,
there were no new cars, lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
as there were no tires, if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
and there were few decent things folks could buy,
and of course, hundreds of thousands of American and English people
were killed in the war.
And note that before their VICTORY, America was free and prosperous,
and was trusted, respected and emulated by most of the people on the planet,
and the "Sun never set on the British Empire."
It is interesting to see that in a victim-persecutor-rescuer situation,
the victim and the persecutor often turn on the rescuer,
but the world would be a much better place,
if the parties to a conflict turned on the instigator.
In fact, the best strategy for people, groups, and nations
being manipulated by instigators is to have assassination teams
take out the instigators, rather than engage in war or revolution.
For example if Americans had taken out Pulitzer,
there would have been no Spanish-American War, no W.W.I,
no W.W.I and no Cold War and all the associated wars.
It seems to me that people like Henry Ford, Ross Perot, Bill Gates, etc.
ought to find ways to identify the centers of conflict instigation
and go after them, rather than join sides with the left-right, Black-White,
Christian-Muslim, Rich-Poor, etc.
If Ford had had Bennett take out the leaders of the gang instigating
the conflicts in America, rather than confronting Jews and Labor directly,
America would likely be far richer, freer, more respected, productive and
peaceful.
If a few Mass Media heads were rolled,
it is likely that the world would be a much better place,
and the masses could regain control of government, education, and finance.
--
Tom Potter
http://tom-potter.tel
https://tdp1001.jux.com
http://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 27, 2012, 7:18:08 AM11/27/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:6ab5b058-02cc-4b2b...@c14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>>again!!!
>>
>>Respectfully submitted,
>>
>>
>> John A. Armistead
>> Author and Patriot
>
>It is interesting to see that John A. Armistead,
>like many people, has been manipulated by Jews in the Mass Media
>and government to promote conflict, revolution and war.
It is interesting to see that Tom Potter is still around, claiming the
Jews control His World through their Secret Cabal.
>And I might mention that although America and Britain
>were so-called victors of W.W.II, that during the war,
>there were no new cars, lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
>as there were no tires, if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
>and there were few decent things folks could buy,
>and of course, hundreds of thousands of American and English people
>were killed in the war.
>
>And note that before their VICTORY, America was free and prosperous,
>and was trusted, respected and emulated by most of the people on the planet,
>and the "Sun never set on the British Empire."
This is- according to Tom Potter- because of the Jews.
>For example if Americans had taken out Pulitzer,
>there would have been no Spanish-American War, no W.W.I,
>no W.W.I and no Cold War and all the associated wars.
Because Potter feels information is dangerous.
>If a few Mass Media heads were rolled,
>it is likely that the world would be a much better place,
>and the masses could regain control of government, education, and finance.
All information should come through the Nazi Office of Propaganda and
Good News.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:6ab5b058-02cc-4b2b...@c14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>>again!!!
>>
>>Respectfully submitted,
>>
>>
>> John A. Armistead
>> Author and Patriot
>
>It is interesting to see that John A. Armistead,
>like many people, has been manipulated by Jews in the Mass Media
>and government to promote conflict, revolution and war.
Jews control His World through their Secret Cabal.
>And I might mention that although America and Britain
>were so-called victors of W.W.II, that during the war,
>there were no new cars, lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
>as there were no tires, if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
>and there were few decent things folks could buy,
>and of course, hundreds of thousands of American and English people
>were killed in the war.
>
>And note that before their VICTORY, America was free and prosperous,
>and was trusted, respected and emulated by most of the people on the planet,
>and the "Sun never set on the British Empire."
>For example if Americans had taken out Pulitzer,
>there would have been no Spanish-American War, no W.W.I,
>no W.W.I and no Cold War and all the associated wars.
>If a few Mass Media heads were rolled,
>it is likely that the world would be a much better place,
>and the masses could regain control of government, education, and finance.
Good News.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
NoEinstein
Nov 27, 2012, 7:55:07 PM11/27/12
to
On Nov 27, 12:15 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
Dear Tom:
Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
sway voters in any election, because of some endorsement or negative
comment regarding any person running for office. COVERAGE of breaking
news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
says "Our great Democracy." We are a REPUBLIC. Simple democracies,
without strong Constitutions specifically prohibiting socialism, will
always decline into socialism. That is because those who are willing
to STEAL from the successful are given the same voting power as the
lesser-in-number successful.
My New Constitution could have simply banned having Democrats or
liberals vote. But the wisest way is to hang for TREASON any elected
official who even proposes anything socialist. FDR Social Security,
though "nice”, is 100% unconstitutional, because the money to pay for
it, when the population is declining, as now, must be STOLEN from
programs paid for by taxes. And WHO pays the taxes? Those who
actually work for a living rather than freeload.
I suggest that as many of you readers as will go back in this same
thread to read how my New Constitution will phase out all of the
socialistic aspects, and stop any more movement in the failed
socialistic directions. While what I say may seem harsh, flourishing
capitalism will soothe most of the hurts before too many tears can be
shed.
There need be no "assassination teams" like you mention if there is a
STRONG New Constitution, like I have penned and polished, to PREVENT
anyone from having undue influence over government. Jews, as a
'lobby‘, will be forever banned from having more than one-vote-per-
person-fairly-counted. I would love to hear Ben Stein (a Jew) tell us
which is more important, Jewish lobbying power, or eliminating
socialism from the USA, permanently.
The US Secret Service needs to realize that it is the LEGAL voters in
America (not the BRIBED ones) who are actually paying the taxes that
pay their government salaries. The Secret Service should only be
loyal to those taxpayers, and on their behalf, should arrest that
Kenyan SQUATTER in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama. That
bastard anti-Christ is already "campaigning" (in Burma) to take over
the world. When the Secret Service does arrest him, hopefully
yesterday (!), there need not be any bloodshed in America. Our future
as a nation could well be in the thus-far, wrongly-tied hands of those
men in the perfectly tailored gray suits. — John A. Armistead —
Author and Patriot
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
Dear Tom:
Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
sway voters in any election, because of some endorsement or negative
comment regarding any person running for office. COVERAGE of breaking
news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
says "Our great Democracy." We are a REPUBLIC. Simple democracies,
without strong Constitutions specifically prohibiting socialism, will
always decline into socialism. That is because those who are willing
to STEAL from the successful are given the same voting power as the
lesser-in-number successful.
My New Constitution could have simply banned having Democrats or
liberals vote. But the wisest way is to hang for TREASON any elected
official who even proposes anything socialist. FDR Social Security,
though "nice”, is 100% unconstitutional, because the money to pay for
it, when the population is declining, as now, must be STOLEN from
programs paid for by taxes. And WHO pays the taxes? Those who
actually work for a living rather than freeload.
I suggest that as many of you readers as will go back in this same
thread to read how my New Constitution will phase out all of the
socialistic aspects, and stop any more movement in the failed
socialistic directions. While what I say may seem harsh, flourishing
capitalism will soothe most of the hurts before too many tears can be
shed.
There need be no "assassination teams" like you mention if there is a
STRONG New Constitution, like I have penned and polished, to PREVENT
anyone from having undue influence over government. Jews, as a
'lobby‘, will be forever banned from having more than one-vote-per-
person-fairly-counted. I would love to hear Ben Stein (a Jew) tell us
which is more important, Jewish lobbying power, or eliminating
socialism from the USA, permanently.
The US Secret Service needs to realize that it is the LEGAL voters in
America (not the BRIBED ones) who are actually paying the taxes that
pay their government salaries. The Secret Service should only be
loyal to those taxpayers, and on their behalf, should arrest that
Kenyan SQUATTER in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama. That
bastard anti-Christ is already "campaigning" (in Burma) to take over
the world. When the Secret Service does arrest him, hopefully
yesterday (!), there need not be any bloodshed in America. Our future
as a nation could well be in the thus-far, wrongly-tied hands of those
men in the perfectly tailored gray suits. — John A. Armistead —
Author and Patriot
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
NoEinstein
Nov 27, 2012, 7:59:52 PM11/27/12
to
On Nov 27, 7:18 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm- Hide quoted text -
speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
wrote:
> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Apparently K. S. is a Jew or is sympathetic to Jews. If he is
> - Show quoted text -
speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 27, 2012, 9:00:28 PM11/27/12
to
>NoEinstein <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
bedwetters.
>If he is
>speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
>is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
I'm a lobbyist. Call a cop.
[chuckle]
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/potter.html
>Apparently K. S. is a Jew or is sympathetic to Jews.
Or, K.S. thinks nazis are a bunch of glue-huffing child molesting
bedwetters.
>If he is
>speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
>is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
[chuckle]
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/potter.html
Padraigh ProAmerica
Nov 27, 2012, 10:36:51 PM11/27/12
to
Re: Shouldn't the voters be selecting our President?
Group: talk.politics.guns Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2012, 1:00pm (EST+13) From:
tdp...@yahoo.com (Tom Potter)
Of course not. Auto assembly plants were busy turning out trucks, jeeps,
aircraft.
---------------------------
lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
Not food stamps- ration points. Many foodstuffs were rationed as the
armed forces had a huge number to feed, and thus first call on all
supplies.
----------------------
as there were no tires,
Almost all rubber producing areas were under Japanese control, and the
military had firs call on this strategic substance.
-----------------------------------
if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
Gasoline was strictly rationed as th militray needed huge quantities.
----------------------------------
and there were few decent things folks could buy,
Much of the manufacturing capacity was devoted to military contrats-
after all, there was a war going on!
------------------------
"Some things take a set amount of time. You can't get a baby in one
month by getting nine women pregnant."--
Unknown
NoEinstein
Nov 28, 2012, 1:59:31 PM11/28/12
to
On Nov 27, 10:36 pm, ogro...@webtv.net (Padraigh ProAmerica) wrote:
>
Dear P. ProAmerica?????: Without selfish motives, I've worked for 16
years penning and polishing my (our) New Constitution . I say: The
country is PREGNANT from my patriotic efforts 'conceived' decades
ago. [Read my book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’ to understand when and why.] It will take just ONE day
for the voters to give birth to my brain-child that should be a
blessing for the vast majority of Americans, both left and right, and,
by example, for the entire World! — John A. Armistead — Author and
Patriot
>
> Re:Shouldn'tthevotersbeselectingourPresident?
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html
>
Dear P. ProAmerica?????: Without selfish motives, I've worked for 16
years penning and polishing my (our) New Constitution . I say: The
country is PREGNANT from my patriotic efforts 'conceived' decades
ago. [Read my book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’ to understand when and why.] It will take just ONE day
for the voters to give birth to my brain-child that should be a
blessing for the vast majority of Americans, both left and right, and,
by example, for the entire World! — John A. Armistead — Author and
Patriot
>
> Re:Shouldn'tthevotersbeselectingourPresident?
>
> Group: talk.politics.guns Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2012, 1:00pm (EST+13) From:
> tdp1...@yahoo.com (Tom Potter)"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> Group: talk.politics.guns Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2012, 1:00pm (EST+13) From:
NoEinstein
Nov 28, 2012, 2:07:26 PM11/28/12
to
On Nov 27, 7:55 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
On Fox News, ‘Fair and Balanced’ means 50 plus % corrupt.
Numbers of times I have referred to the apparently mandatory “curl”
that those on Fox News put on their otherwise-might-have-been-
conservative stance against Obama’s socialism. Yesterday, on Bill
O’Reilly’s Fox show, that pretty, but apparently mushroom poison, Dana
Perino, said: “Obama won ‘fair and square‘…” so Republicans must do
this-and-that. ‘The Five’ had been moderately fun to watch, because
Bob Beckel was being required to keep repeating his obviously lying
defenses of Obama. For fat Slavs like Beckel, and nearly all of the
spinners for the Democrats, lying is an accepted ploy. For them, any
means—fraudulent citizenship documents, lies and innuendo against
opponents, and ballot box tampering—are acceptable. But those are
“acceptable” only if the SPIRIT of fairness in our Constitution is
ignored to the great detriment of the whole country! Here are
clarifications of acceptable campaign practices, consistent with the
SPIRIT of the original Constitution, and as are spelled-out in my New
Constitution:
“Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice Pres., representatives,
and civil officers of the USA shall be fired if they are convicted of
a high crime or felony, or if *** they willfully violate any provision
of this constitution [as, for example, not supporting the Constitution
after having taken the Oath of Office saying otherwise]. Such person
shall never again hold public office[!]. It is a felony for any of
the latter to use public services, departments or resources for their
personal purposes above what any Citizen can use.”
[To wit: Using Air force One and the US Secret Service while
campaigning for a second term is prohibited! That is what Obama did,
at least weekly, for four years, at hundreds of millions of dollars of
expense to the taxpayers!]
“No representative shall be transported nor boarded at public expense
without House assent. It is a felony [!] to give or receive money,
gifts, travel or board germane to an issue presently up for vote in
the House, or knowingly, which might be voted on in the foreseeable
future; *** or for a government official to defend unlawful acts [like
Obama’s overall Benghazi fiasco] that they or anyone they know has
committed or expects to commit by targeting any Citizen or group for
an investigation or suspicion of wrongdoing, or by denying to any
Citizen(s) full civil and constitutional rights.
[Note: Beginning in 1996, I was personally investigated by both the US
Secret Service AND by the FBI on the whim of a high elected official
whom I knew, with certainty, had committed a high crime that should
have sent such person to prison for LIFE! The rationale in most Law
Enforcement agencies is that Elected Officials are never to be held as
accountable for their actions as the Citizens “out there” would be.
So, effectively, Law Enforcement, is (prior to my from-experience-
written New Constitution!) the Gestapo of Government.]
“Law enforcement and the judiciary shall not *** favor wrongdoers—
within government or without—over a plaintiff or Citizen seeking
justice, and shall keep the latter up-to-date on an investigation’s
progress.”
[Oh… but are they ever favoring Obama out of “respect” (vomit!) for
our pseudo president!]
“The former have no authority to act in the support of wrongdoing or
corruption in government and shall suspicion such requests by anyone
in government at personal risk of a similar penalty. *** Exhibiting
ideological bias in a government job terminates the employment.”
[Note: Public officials are supposed to represent ALL of their
constituents, and to do what such want. So, at no point are the
‘ideologies’ of any President allowed to determine anything. The
President is the Chief Executive whose only authority is to see that
laws that have been passed by the House, and are agreeable to the
people, are executed efficiently. His job is ADMINISTRATIVE, never
dictatorial! Since ‘Obama Care’ isn’t agreeable to the People, such
is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!]
“It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or media
idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf of any
candidate for public office or job. Candidates for public office
shall be disqualified for: *** soliciting the votes of any
ideologically-biased group or working to obtain the endorsement of
such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
vote totals, irrespective of State borders.”
[Note: Popular vote totals shall NEVER include the votes of those who
were BRIBED by promises of UNCONSTITUTIONAL entitlements, or who were
given “gifts”! Bribing is a FELONY that automatically disqualifies a
candidate for public office, on a single provable instance!!!!!]
“Therefore, any candidate for such offices shall be *** disqualified
for making campaign appearances to target the voters of any state,
county or city. Voters shall make their decisions based on non-media-
sponsored televised debates and on fair and unscripted candidate
interviews—televised nationally—and held no sooner than four months
before the specific election.”
Dana Perino, in a number of instances, has shown herself to be an
intelligent commentator on Fox. I invite Dana Perino to explain, and
to defend, why anything at all was “fair and square” about the way
Democrats have campaigned, and to explain and defend anything at all
that “president” (finger-down-the-throat) Obama has ever done in his
entire God-damned-bastard life that was Constitutional! *** Wake up,
Secret Service, the time for ARRESTING Obama is now! ***
Respectfully Submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> > Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...- Hide quoted text -
>
On Fox News, ‘Fair and Balanced’ means 50 plus % corrupt.
Numbers of times I have referred to the apparently mandatory “curl”
that those on Fox News put on their otherwise-might-have-been-
conservative stance against Obama’s socialism. Yesterday, on Bill
O’Reilly’s Fox show, that pretty, but apparently mushroom poison, Dana
Perino, said: “Obama won ‘fair and square‘…” so Republicans must do
this-and-that. ‘The Five’ had been moderately fun to watch, because
Bob Beckel was being required to keep repeating his obviously lying
defenses of Obama. For fat Slavs like Beckel, and nearly all of the
spinners for the Democrats, lying is an accepted ploy. For them, any
means—fraudulent citizenship documents, lies and innuendo against
opponents, and ballot box tampering—are acceptable. But those are
“acceptable” only if the SPIRIT of fairness in our Constitution is
ignored to the great detriment of the whole country! Here are
clarifications of acceptable campaign practices, consistent with the
SPIRIT of the original Constitution, and as are spelled-out in my New
Constitution:
“Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice Pres., representatives,
and civil officers of the USA shall be fired if they are convicted of
a high crime or felony, or if *** they willfully violate any provision
of this constitution [as, for example, not supporting the Constitution
after having taken the Oath of Office saying otherwise]. Such person
shall never again hold public office[!]. It is a felony for any of
the latter to use public services, departments or resources for their
personal purposes above what any Citizen can use.”
[To wit: Using Air force One and the US Secret Service while
campaigning for a second term is prohibited! That is what Obama did,
at least weekly, for four years, at hundreds of millions of dollars of
expense to the taxpayers!]
“No representative shall be transported nor boarded at public expense
without House assent. It is a felony [!] to give or receive money,
gifts, travel or board germane to an issue presently up for vote in
the House, or knowingly, which might be voted on in the foreseeable
future; *** or for a government official to defend unlawful acts [like
Obama’s overall Benghazi fiasco] that they or anyone they know has
committed or expects to commit by targeting any Citizen or group for
an investigation or suspicion of wrongdoing, or by denying to any
Citizen(s) full civil and constitutional rights.
[Note: Beginning in 1996, I was personally investigated by both the US
Secret Service AND by the FBI on the whim of a high elected official
whom I knew, with certainty, had committed a high crime that should
have sent such person to prison for LIFE! The rationale in most Law
Enforcement agencies is that Elected Officials are never to be held as
accountable for their actions as the Citizens “out there” would be.
So, effectively, Law Enforcement, is (prior to my from-experience-
written New Constitution!) the Gestapo of Government.]
“Law enforcement and the judiciary shall not *** favor wrongdoers—
within government or without—over a plaintiff or Citizen seeking
justice, and shall keep the latter up-to-date on an investigation’s
progress.”
[Oh… but are they ever favoring Obama out of “respect” (vomit!) for
our pseudo president!]
“The former have no authority to act in the support of wrongdoing or
corruption in government and shall suspicion such requests by anyone
in government at personal risk of a similar penalty. *** Exhibiting
ideological bias in a government job terminates the employment.”
[Note: Public officials are supposed to represent ALL of their
constituents, and to do what such want. So, at no point are the
‘ideologies’ of any President allowed to determine anything. The
President is the Chief Executive whose only authority is to see that
laws that have been passed by the House, and are agreeable to the
people, are executed efficiently. His job is ADMINISTRATIVE, never
dictatorial! Since ‘Obama Care’ isn’t agreeable to the People, such
is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!]
“It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or media
idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf of any
candidate for public office or job. Candidates for public office
shall be disqualified for: *** soliciting the votes of any
ideologically-biased group or working to obtain the endorsement of
such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
vote totals, irrespective of State borders.”
[Note: Popular vote totals shall NEVER include the votes of those who
were BRIBED by promises of UNCONSTITUTIONAL entitlements, or who were
given “gifts”! Bribing is a FELONY that automatically disqualifies a
candidate for public office, on a single provable instance!!!!!]
“Therefore, any candidate for such offices shall be *** disqualified
for making campaign appearances to target the voters of any state,
county or city. Voters shall make their decisions based on non-media-
sponsored televised debates and on fair and unscripted candidate
interviews—televised nationally—and held no sooner than four months
before the specific election.”
Dana Perino, in a number of instances, has shown herself to be an
intelligent commentator on Fox. I invite Dana Perino to explain, and
to defend, why anything at all was “fair and square” about the way
Democrats have campaigned, and to explain and defend anything at all
that “president” (finger-down-the-throat) Obama has ever done in his
entire God-damned-bastard life that was Constitutional! *** Wake up,
Secret Service, the time for ARRESTING Obama is now! ***
Respectfully Submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 27, 12:15 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Tom:
>
> Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
> Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
> 1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
> elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
> any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
> swayvotersin any election, because of some endorsement or negative
>
> Dear Tom:
>
> Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
> Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
> 1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
> elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
> any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
> comment regarding any person running for office. COVERAGE of breaking
> news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
>
> You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
> people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
> Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
> deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
> takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
> says "Ourgreat Democracy." We are a REPUBLIC. Simple democracies,
> news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
>
> You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
> people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
> Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
> deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
> takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
NoEinstein
Nov 30, 2012, 4:14:25 PM11/30/12
to
Dear P. ProAmerica: It is amazing to know that both Tom Potter and
you have enlightened points of view. I myself am a WW II history
buff. Our "victory" on the industrial front was as important as our
"victory" on the war front. I call WW II "The greatest concerted
effort of mankind!" in the history of the world!
Jews, as individuals, were mostly nice people, even in pre WW II
Germany. But the CULTURE of Jews is to assume control of their
working environment. Because the "Holy Land" was at a crucial
crossroads between Europe, Asia and Africa, that area became a banking
center (monetary exchange for profit). Jesus overturned the tables of
the money changers, because he felt those were not fair.
Jews realized that they could control their environment if they
controlled the media. So, in Germany, they were the publishers of
newspapers and of books that consistently disagreed with the political
extremists like Hitler. His not too humane solution was to arrest
those publishing anything that dared to criticize his actions. Being
paranoid, he figured all Jews were, similarly, his enemies, and so he
decided to "cleanse" the races. The Holocaust was the most terrible
thing ever done against humanity, but the Jews could have saved
themselves by not being so... "controlling" in the first place.
Today, Jews control the USA news media; they control the USA
publishing industry; they control the USA film industry; they control
the boards of directors of the Ivy League Universities that are the
"examples" for the rest of the universities; and they control the
textbooks being used throughout the USA.
Bill O'Reilly, that 6'-5" simpleton, supposes that "Christianity" is a
philosophy and NOT a religion. Because of a likely 'slip-up' in the
Holy Bible, Jews are called the "Chosen People". Chosen for what, to
inspire the instigation of terrorism and violence that will destroy
the human race? Should Jews be looked up to for seizing land, by
warring action, justified by the Holocaust, which they, in large
measure, had brought upon themselves?
The Founding Fathers were exceedingly wise when they required that our
government be SECULAR! That means no 'swearing' on the Bible nor on
the Koran. And it means that religious shallows who want to shame
their way into the control of government by championing that life
begins as soon as a man gets a glint in his eyes, are as hurtful to
the USA as the creeping socialism I am bound-and-determined to STOP.
Unlike most who are hamstrung by the mistaken notion that "working
within our broken governmental system" will somehow solve the
problems, I REJECT the broken system and seek prosperity for the
maximum number of people through liberated CAPITALISM! If anyone can
prove that the present constitution condones socialism and allows, by
government laws, the STEALING of the property of those who actually
pay-their-own-way by working for a living, I will eat my hat!
At this time, I haven't seen any other VOICE for America than my own,
that can fairly resolve our broken government, and in the least
hurtful way to those on the left, middle and right! I am likely THE
most intelligent person alive in the world. So, my words mean a lot!
"Pay It Forward!"
— John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
>
> Re:Shouldn'tthevotersbeselectingourPresident?
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html
you have enlightened points of view. I myself am a WW II history
buff. Our "victory" on the industrial front was as important as our
"victory" on the war front. I call WW II "The greatest concerted
effort of mankind!" in the history of the world!
Jews, as individuals, were mostly nice people, even in pre WW II
Germany. But the CULTURE of Jews is to assume control of their
working environment. Because the "Holy Land" was at a crucial
crossroads between Europe, Asia and Africa, that area became a banking
center (monetary exchange for profit). Jesus overturned the tables of
the money changers, because he felt those were not fair.
Jews realized that they could control their environment if they
controlled the media. So, in Germany, they were the publishers of
newspapers and of books that consistently disagreed with the political
extremists like Hitler. His not too humane solution was to arrest
those publishing anything that dared to criticize his actions. Being
paranoid, he figured all Jews were, similarly, his enemies, and so he
decided to "cleanse" the races. The Holocaust was the most terrible
thing ever done against humanity, but the Jews could have saved
themselves by not being so... "controlling" in the first place.
Today, Jews control the USA news media; they control the USA
publishing industry; they control the USA film industry; they control
the boards of directors of the Ivy League Universities that are the
"examples" for the rest of the universities; and they control the
textbooks being used throughout the USA.
Bill O'Reilly, that 6'-5" simpleton, supposes that "Christianity" is a
philosophy and NOT a religion. Because of a likely 'slip-up' in the
Holy Bible, Jews are called the "Chosen People". Chosen for what, to
inspire the instigation of terrorism and violence that will destroy
the human race? Should Jews be looked up to for seizing land, by
warring action, justified by the Holocaust, which they, in large
measure, had brought upon themselves?
The Founding Fathers were exceedingly wise when they required that our
government be SECULAR! That means no 'swearing' on the Bible nor on
the Koran. And it means that religious shallows who want to shame
their way into the control of government by championing that life
begins as soon as a man gets a glint in his eyes, are as hurtful to
the USA as the creeping socialism I am bound-and-determined to STOP.
Unlike most who are hamstrung by the mistaken notion that "working
within our broken governmental system" will somehow solve the
problems, I REJECT the broken system and seek prosperity for the
maximum number of people through liberated CAPITALISM! If anyone can
prove that the present constitution condones socialism and allows, by
government laws, the STEALING of the property of those who actually
pay-their-own-way by working for a living, I will eat my hat!
At this time, I haven't seen any other VOICE for America than my own,
that can fairly resolve our broken government, and in the least
hurtful way to those on the left, middle and right! I am likely THE
most intelligent person alive in the world. So, my words mean a lot!
"Pay It Forward!"
— John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
>
> Re:Shouldn'tthevotersbeselectingourPresident?
>
> Group: talk.politics.guns Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2012, 1:00pm (EST+13) From:
> tdp1...@yahoo.com (Tom Potter)"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> Group: talk.politics.guns Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2012, 1:00pm (EST+13) From:
Tom Potter
Dec 1, 2012, 2:32:37 AM12/1/12
to
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
continues to be a faithful reader of my posts
and that as my message was bullet proof
he was forced to lie and attack the messenger
in an effort to discredit it.
Unlike Schadenfreude, who uses the German word
which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
as his handle in an effort to appear German,
rather than an anti-German phychopath,
who ""Delights in misfortunes of others.".
I use my real name and
"delight in trying to optimize pleasure and minimize pain"
for the greatest number of people.
Considering that Jews have come into conflict with
all of their neighbors throughout history,
and most of the folks on the planet today don't like Jews,
I am surprised to see that Schadenfreude thinks that
portraying someone as anti-Semitic is evil,
unless of course, he thinks that the Germans, Spanish, Moslems,
Russians, and of course the English as their Magna Carte
prohibited Jews from taking advantage of widows and orphans,
are evil.
I might also point out that most folks on the planet
don't like liars, rapists, murderers, thieves, and "schadenfreudes",
and I don't think one would get much milage trying to smear folks
by calling them "anti-schadenfreudes".
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 1, 2012, 7:14:33 AM12/1/12
to
I was not "forced." I did it with my own free will.
>Unlike Schadenfreude, who uses the German word
>which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
your ridiculous, unproven conspiratorial nonsense, I can point out to
EVERYONE that you're just an old, impotent nazi wannabe.
>as his handle in an effort to appear German,
>rather than an anti-German phychopath,
>who ""Delights in misfortunes of others.".
>
>I use my real name and
>"delight in trying to optimize pleasure and minimize pain"
>for the greatest number of people.
the nazi's are, just like it's a pleasure to know where the
cockroaches are.
But I repeat myself.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
NoEinstein
Dec 1, 2012, 9:26:17 AM12/1/12
to
On Dec 1, 2:32 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html- Hide quoted text -
>
Dear Tom: You are one of the more clear thinkers in the world. My
initial run-in with Jews was after I tried to get several Jew-
published science texts to correctly show that Einstein's SRT is
wrong. I got no reply. After realizing that none of the 22 USA
universities was interested in correcting what the Jew-published
textbooks were saying, I realized that Jews are one of if not THE
major problem facing the world. Oh, a lot of them are smart, like Ben
Stein, but because of their secretive, behind-the-scenes dealings to
control far more of the world than they have a right to control, I am
against Jews as a race but NOT as individuals! The theme of my little
book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity’ is that
groups should have little or no influence over anything. If only
INDIVIDUALS voted their minds (with socialism not being on-the-table)
there would only be peace and prosperity in the world! Groups always
divide and anger the masses because of perceived inequities.
My guess is that you butted heads with the Jewish administrators when
you were a teacher. Something really bad had to happen to make you
move to China. Though we seem to talk only about... Jews, I do thank
you for at least reading some of what I work so hard writing. Between
us, maybe the world can be saved. Cross your fingers on that! — John
A. Armistead — AKA NoEinstein
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
Dear Tom: You are one of the more clear thinkers in the world. My
initial run-in with Jews was after I tried to get several Jew-
published science texts to correctly show that Einstein's SRT is
wrong. I got no reply. After realizing that none of the 22 USA
universities was interested in correcting what the Jew-published
textbooks were saying, I realized that Jews are one of if not THE
major problem facing the world. Oh, a lot of them are smart, like Ben
Stein, but because of their secretive, behind-the-scenes dealings to
control far more of the world than they have a right to control, I am
against Jews as a race but NOT as individuals! The theme of my little
book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity’ is that
groups should have little or no influence over anything. If only
INDIVIDUALS voted their minds (with socialism not being on-the-table)
there would only be peace and prosperity in the world! Groups always
divide and anger the masses because of perceived inequities.
My guess is that you butted heads with the Jewish administrators when
you were a teacher. Something really bad had to happen to make you
move to China. Though we seem to talk only about... Jews, I do thank
you for at least reading some of what I work so hard writing. Between
us, maybe the world can be saved. Cross your fingers on that! — John
A. Armistead — AKA NoEinstein
NoEinstein
Dec 1, 2012, 9:41:26 AM12/1/12
to
On Nov 30, 4:14 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Making Obama Shake in His Wingtips!
When a pathological liar like Obama, the anti-Christ, gets in the
spotlight, people respond primarily to his unwavering, self-assured
voice, and to the bouncy, almost musical way that he walks. Since
that devil-possessed demagogue has a humorous tone in many of his
otherwise cutting remarks, the vast majority of listeners equate humor
to reassurance that the “situation” must be well-in-hand. They are
also “calmed” by how at-ease Obama is to always be going on so many
isn’t-that-nice vacations. The latter are spent with his could-have-
been idealic family. But that smiling, photogenic little group is
functioning as a cover for THE most corrupt man ever to be birthed in
Kenya, or in the world for that matter—Hitler included.
A hundred years ago, when the HMS Titanic struck that iceberg in the
middle of the night, those who were still socializing noticed the
rattle of crystal, or heard the thump and the grind. Since for them,
there were no other immediate effects, the people remained calm. And
they were reassured by the similar calm demeanor of the other people
they saw. I’ve mentioned this more than once, because the nearly
complete overthrow of our American way of life has been hastened by
the 51% “victory” of Obama November 6, 2012.
In Washington and in our corrupt media, the message repeated dozens of
times each day is that Obama… won. Instead of disclaiming that fact—
by the Constitution’s standards—there is this resignation that the
party-against-party fights are simply continuing. Three of the five
conservatives on ’The Five’—Dana Perino not among them—should be
exclaiming: “Votes garnered by promises of free college educations and
free contraceptives aren’t LEGAL under the Constitution! Nor is it
LEGAL when our squatting-in-the-White-House president doesn’t even
believe in the most basic premises of the document that he took a
token OATH to protect.”
The Founding Fathers were wise enough to require that all State
Governments make their office-holders swear to defend (not violate)
the Constitution. New agents to the US Secret Service must repeat
similar oaths in their swearing-in ceremonies. But few, including
most judges and justices, realize that no person who isn’t honest and
sincere in what they are swearing to is qualified for the particular
job. Did the Founding Fathers want the president to take… an oath
simply for the ceremony? Why is the highest court official in the
land supposed to administer that oath, if the sincerity, and the
LEGALITY of taking that oath is or was never examined and is or was
just empty ceremony?
I recall, at about age 12, before becoming a member of my Methodist
church, that the minister had us take classes—over about a month‘s
period—in which the significance of church membership was explained.
It was also explained that none of us youngsters taking the classes
should accept membership unless we SINCERELY believed the pretexts of
the Methodist church. In another instance, a dear Sunday School
teacher demonstrated that liquor will quickly kill an earthworm, and
will do similar harm to each of us if we ever drink. She explained
that she hoped each member of that class would sign a document saying
that we won’t drink. But she went further to say that none of us
should ever sign something we don’t sincerely believe. Since I had no
desire to have any portion of my body die like that earthworm, I was
most sincere when I signed her no-drinking document. Years later, on
a Clemson field trip to Atlanta that included a visit to ‘Underground
Atlanta’, several of my classmates kept insisting that I start
drinking. My best defense was: “I signed a document in my church
saying that I will never drink, and I have no intention of breaking
that promise.”
That slimy SLUG of a Chief Justice, John G. Roberts. Jr., is ‘supposed
to’ know the Constitution. But he is so shallow that he doesn’t
realize that our (sought) Representative Republic form of government—
as envisioned by the Founding Fathers—was selected for the expressed
purpose of having “representatives” do the Will of the People WITHOUT
requiring the people to vote on every ‘little thing’ that comes
along. That is why, for me, it is no stretch of reason to include in
my New Constitution the following:
“Passed bills that are constitutional become law, but when possible,
laws shall be probationary for one year to allow more Citizen input—
with no disfavor being shown toward such later input. Laws shall be
revoted and expunged if new information shows such to have been poorly
conceived, or contrary to the Will of the People—especially the law-
abiding Citizens most affected. Officials not honoring the latter or
acting counter to the will of or not in the best interests of their
electorate shall be removed. Except for elections or referenda,
secret ballots shall not be used in governmental nor judicial
proceedings, and no part of any official public meeting shall be held
in private.”
“No bill shall become law without at least a 55% affirmative vote.
All laws on the books shall indicate vote of passage. Laws passing by
fewer than 60% of the representatives shall automatically expire every
four years, but the House shall vote before such expiration date to
determine if such laws are to continue in force. The casting of votes
in the House shall be by a means that is simultaneous, representative
specific, and secure.”
“No person shall be punished for violations of laws that: aren’t
common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral consensus of the
People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first year
and passed by less than 60% of the House.”
“The New Constitution and laws and treaties made under the authority
of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land, and judges
in every state shall be bound thereby. Nothing in a state
constitution can be to the contrary. Before taking a public office or
job, representatives, members of the legislatures, all executive and
judicial officers—of the United States and of the several states and
local governments—and all employees of such who regularly deal with
the Public, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to have read the
entire New Constitution within the last 30 days and to support such.
No religious oath or action shall be used as part of the qualification
for any office, public trust or job.”
“Laws in effect when this New Constitution is ratified shall remain in
effect while such are systematically reviewed, debated and revoted in
the House. Whether for the revoting of existing laws and regulations
or for new bills, early and conspicuous public notice in the media
shall invite Public input. *** Bills passing without broad and
substantiated Public input, especially by those law-abiding Citizens
most affected by the legislation, shall not become laws.”
“Upon request by the Executive or 1/5 of the larger governing body,
federal, state or local law making authority shall defer to the People
on controversial issues where the Will of the People is in doubt. No
law nor previous or subsequent vote on any issue shall usurp the right
of an informed Public to decide controversial issues in direct
referenda; the vote for passage shall be 60%. The apt macro-Will of
the People in elections or referenda, as manifested by their votes,
shall take precedence over any contrary existing or subsequent law,
governmental hierarchy or judicial ruling. Because conditions change,
older laws aren’t necessarily the Will of the People.”
“Laws shall be concise and well defined. If—due to brevity,
simplicity or lack of foresight, etc.—such laws have consequences
outside the intended or implied scope, for justice and expediency, a
judge may decree rightful, specific exceptions without new
legislation. Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in
arbitrary social standards.”
“Articles, Sections and Amendments to this New Constitution—both
herein before and after—are immutable except by the People. The
original Constitution and previous or subsequent laws by local, state,
or federal governments shall not diminish this New Constitution or any
of its parts; nor shall any judge or justice diminish this document
through the interpretation of details, as such shall be subordinate to
the spirit of this document and to *** the absolute right and power of
the People to be contented with their leaders, their laws and with
their governments.”
Justice Roberts, the SLUG, supposes that his allegiance is to our
dictatorial and socialistic pseudo-president, rather than to the
People and to the Constitution. He proved that fact by burning-the-
midnight-oil to conclude that Obama Care—which most polls showed,
overwhelmingly, that the PEOPLE do not want (!)—wouldn’t be
“penalizing” those who don’t purchase the insurance, IF Roberts simply
considers the FINE to be a “constitutional” TAX. Note: “A ROSE by any
other name would be just as sweet!” And a FINE renamed a TAX is
still a FINE!!!
Because Justice Roberts has so violated the Constitution, which he
swore to defend, he is guilty of the highest crime—as are each of
those who voted to uphold Obama Care. Their “authority over the
People” is thus voided.
I can imagine how numbing it must be to the (perhaps overly) dedicated
US Secret Service Agents to have so many in Washington and in the
media, looking-the-other-way to criminality and to treason. Is part
of their esprit de corps to “respect public officials” in violation of
their OATHS to defend the Constitution? *** It will only require ONE
Secret Service agent to side with the People and with the Constitution
to motivate enough of his fellow agents to “check out” Obama’s
purported birth certificate; school records; and Social Security
number once and for all. After doing so, no elaborate speeches need
to be made. Just have someone call a meeting of the press and say:
“The US Secret Service, acting on its own volition, has instigated a
most thorough and conclusive evaluation of Barack Obama’s purported
Birth Certificate. The digital document that was presented by Obama
is, unquestionably, fraudulent. I repeat: Barack Obama’s birth
certificate is fraudulent! Additional proof of Obama not being a
legitimate citizen of the USA is his Social Security Number (say)
being from a state in which he never lived, and having an issue date
inconsistent with his age and date of first employment. We, as
members of the US Secret Service have arrested, and are holding Barack
Obama for fraud and likely treason. While our doing these things has
not been a pleasant task, we feel that our efforts have been in the
best interests of the People of this country—consistent with the
requirements of our Oaths to defend the Constitution. Long live the
USA!”
It will only take ONE media person, with balls, to burst Obama’s
bubble of lies and deceit that are so threatening to this, our once-
great nation. Is there not one HONEST member of the media willing to
say what I keep explaining? I’ve been getting vibes from Bill
Cunningham, whom I’ve only seen on Fox news several times. I’ve not
heard his radio show at all. But he has a clear understanding of how
“off-course” our government has become. I sense he is angry about the
election. All that needs to be done to make Barack Obama not be ‘Mr.
Cool’ any more, is for just a single person, live, on national media
to say: “Barack Obama is a SOCIALIST bent on destroying our once-great
nation! He should be arrested, tried and HANGED for treason!!!” The
latter is the STUFF of true patriotism! Long live the USA!!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> withinourbroken governmental system" will somehow solve the
> > Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...
>
Making Obama Shake in His Wingtips!
When a pathological liar like Obama, the anti-Christ, gets in the
spotlight, people respond primarily to his unwavering, self-assured
voice, and to the bouncy, almost musical way that he walks. Since
that devil-possessed demagogue has a humorous tone in many of his
otherwise cutting remarks, the vast majority of listeners equate humor
to reassurance that the “situation” must be well-in-hand. They are
also “calmed” by how at-ease Obama is to always be going on so many
isn’t-that-nice vacations. The latter are spent with his could-have-
been idealic family. But that smiling, photogenic little group is
functioning as a cover for THE most corrupt man ever to be birthed in
Kenya, or in the world for that matter—Hitler included.
A hundred years ago, when the HMS Titanic struck that iceberg in the
middle of the night, those who were still socializing noticed the
rattle of crystal, or heard the thump and the grind. Since for them,
there were no other immediate effects, the people remained calm. And
they were reassured by the similar calm demeanor of the other people
they saw. I’ve mentioned this more than once, because the nearly
complete overthrow of our American way of life has been hastened by
the 51% “victory” of Obama November 6, 2012.
In Washington and in our corrupt media, the message repeated dozens of
times each day is that Obama… won. Instead of disclaiming that fact—
by the Constitution’s standards—there is this resignation that the
party-against-party fights are simply continuing. Three of the five
conservatives on ’The Five’—Dana Perino not among them—should be
exclaiming: “Votes garnered by promises of free college educations and
free contraceptives aren’t LEGAL under the Constitution! Nor is it
LEGAL when our squatting-in-the-White-House president doesn’t even
believe in the most basic premises of the document that he took a
token OATH to protect.”
The Founding Fathers were wise enough to require that all State
Governments make their office-holders swear to defend (not violate)
the Constitution. New agents to the US Secret Service must repeat
similar oaths in their swearing-in ceremonies. But few, including
most judges and justices, realize that no person who isn’t honest and
sincere in what they are swearing to is qualified for the particular
job. Did the Founding Fathers want the president to take… an oath
simply for the ceremony? Why is the highest court official in the
land supposed to administer that oath, if the sincerity, and the
LEGALITY of taking that oath is or was never examined and is or was
just empty ceremony?
I recall, at about age 12, before becoming a member of my Methodist
church, that the minister had us take classes—over about a month‘s
period—in which the significance of church membership was explained.
It was also explained that none of us youngsters taking the classes
should accept membership unless we SINCERELY believed the pretexts of
the Methodist church. In another instance, a dear Sunday School
teacher demonstrated that liquor will quickly kill an earthworm, and
will do similar harm to each of us if we ever drink. She explained
that she hoped each member of that class would sign a document saying
that we won’t drink. But she went further to say that none of us
should ever sign something we don’t sincerely believe. Since I had no
desire to have any portion of my body die like that earthworm, I was
most sincere when I signed her no-drinking document. Years later, on
a Clemson field trip to Atlanta that included a visit to ‘Underground
Atlanta’, several of my classmates kept insisting that I start
drinking. My best defense was: “I signed a document in my church
saying that I will never drink, and I have no intention of breaking
that promise.”
That slimy SLUG of a Chief Justice, John G. Roberts. Jr., is ‘supposed
to’ know the Constitution. But he is so shallow that he doesn’t
realize that our (sought) Representative Republic form of government—
as envisioned by the Founding Fathers—was selected for the expressed
purpose of having “representatives” do the Will of the People WITHOUT
requiring the people to vote on every ‘little thing’ that comes
along. That is why, for me, it is no stretch of reason to include in
my New Constitution the following:
“Passed bills that are constitutional become law, but when possible,
laws shall be probationary for one year to allow more Citizen input—
with no disfavor being shown toward such later input. Laws shall be
revoted and expunged if new information shows such to have been poorly
conceived, or contrary to the Will of the People—especially the law-
abiding Citizens most affected. Officials not honoring the latter or
acting counter to the will of or not in the best interests of their
electorate shall be removed. Except for elections or referenda,
secret ballots shall not be used in governmental nor judicial
proceedings, and no part of any official public meeting shall be held
in private.”
“No bill shall become law without at least a 55% affirmative vote.
All laws on the books shall indicate vote of passage. Laws passing by
fewer than 60% of the representatives shall automatically expire every
four years, but the House shall vote before such expiration date to
determine if such laws are to continue in force. The casting of votes
in the House shall be by a means that is simultaneous, representative
specific, and secure.”
“No person shall be punished for violations of laws that: aren’t
common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral consensus of the
People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first year
and passed by less than 60% of the House.”
“The New Constitution and laws and treaties made under the authority
of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land, and judges
in every state shall be bound thereby. Nothing in a state
constitution can be to the contrary. Before taking a public office or
job, representatives, members of the legislatures, all executive and
judicial officers—of the United States and of the several states and
local governments—and all employees of such who regularly deal with
the Public, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to have read the
entire New Constitution within the last 30 days and to support such.
No religious oath or action shall be used as part of the qualification
for any office, public trust or job.”
“Laws in effect when this New Constitution is ratified shall remain in
effect while such are systematically reviewed, debated and revoted in
the House. Whether for the revoting of existing laws and regulations
or for new bills, early and conspicuous public notice in the media
shall invite Public input. *** Bills passing without broad and
substantiated Public input, especially by those law-abiding Citizens
most affected by the legislation, shall not become laws.”
“Upon request by the Executive or 1/5 of the larger governing body,
federal, state or local law making authority shall defer to the People
on controversial issues where the Will of the People is in doubt. No
law nor previous or subsequent vote on any issue shall usurp the right
of an informed Public to decide controversial issues in direct
referenda; the vote for passage shall be 60%. The apt macro-Will of
the People in elections or referenda, as manifested by their votes,
shall take precedence over any contrary existing or subsequent law,
governmental hierarchy or judicial ruling. Because conditions change,
older laws aren’t necessarily the Will of the People.”
“Laws shall be concise and well defined. If—due to brevity,
simplicity or lack of foresight, etc.—such laws have consequences
outside the intended or implied scope, for justice and expediency, a
judge may decree rightful, specific exceptions without new
legislation. Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in
the best interest of the People and the world environment shall be
passed, enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be
allowed to prosper.”
“Laws shall respect the People’s diverse mores without setting
passed, enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be
allowed to prosper.”
arbitrary social standards.”
“Articles, Sections and Amendments to this New Constitution—both
herein before and after—are immutable except by the People. The
original Constitution and previous or subsequent laws by local, state,
or federal governments shall not diminish this New Constitution or any
of its parts; nor shall any judge or justice diminish this document
through the interpretation of details, as such shall be subordinate to
the spirit of this document and to *** the absolute right and power of
the People to be contented with their leaders, their laws and with
their governments.”
Justice Roberts, the SLUG, supposes that his allegiance is to our
dictatorial and socialistic pseudo-president, rather than to the
People and to the Constitution. He proved that fact by burning-the-
midnight-oil to conclude that Obama Care—which most polls showed,
overwhelmingly, that the PEOPLE do not want (!)—wouldn’t be
“penalizing” those who don’t purchase the insurance, IF Roberts simply
considers the FINE to be a “constitutional” TAX. Note: “A ROSE by any
other name would be just as sweet!” And a FINE renamed a TAX is
still a FINE!!!
Because Justice Roberts has so violated the Constitution, which he
swore to defend, he is guilty of the highest crime—as are each of
those who voted to uphold Obama Care. Their “authority over the
People” is thus voided.
I can imagine how numbing it must be to the (perhaps overly) dedicated
US Secret Service Agents to have so many in Washington and in the
media, looking-the-other-way to criminality and to treason. Is part
of their esprit de corps to “respect public officials” in violation of
their OATHS to defend the Constitution? *** It will only require ONE
Secret Service agent to side with the People and with the Constitution
to motivate enough of his fellow agents to “check out” Obama’s
purported birth certificate; school records; and Social Security
number once and for all. After doing so, no elaborate speeches need
to be made. Just have someone call a meeting of the press and say:
“The US Secret Service, acting on its own volition, has instigated a
most thorough and conclusive evaluation of Barack Obama’s purported
Birth Certificate. The digital document that was presented by Obama
is, unquestionably, fraudulent. I repeat: Barack Obama’s birth
certificate is fraudulent! Additional proof of Obama not being a
legitimate citizen of the USA is his Social Security Number (say)
being from a state in which he never lived, and having an issue date
inconsistent with his age and date of first employment. We, as
members of the US Secret Service have arrested, and are holding Barack
Obama for fraud and likely treason. While our doing these things has
not been a pleasant task, we feel that our efforts have been in the
best interests of the People of this country—consistent with the
requirements of our Oaths to defend the Constitution. Long live the
USA!”
It will only take ONE media person, with balls, to burst Obama’s
bubble of lies and deceit that are so threatening to this, our once-
great nation. Is there not one HONEST member of the media willing to
say what I keep explaining? I’ve been getting vibes from Bill
Cunningham, whom I’ve only seen on Fox news several times. I’ve not
heard his radio show at all. But he has a clear understanding of how
“off-course” our government has become. I sense he is angry about the
election. All that needs to be done to make Barack Obama not be ‘Mr.
Cool’ any more, is for just a single person, live, on national media
to say: “Barack Obama is a SOCIALIST bent on destroying our once-great
nation! He should be arrested, tried and HANGED for treason!!!” The
latter is the STUFF of true patriotism! Long live the USA!!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> problems, I REJECT the broken system and seek prosperity for the
> maximum number of people through liberated CAPITALISM! If anyone can
> prove that the present constitution condones socialism and allows, by
> government laws, the STEALING of the property of those who actually
> pay-their-own-way by working for a living, I will eat my hat!
>
> At this time, I haven't seen any other VOICE for America than my own,
> that can fairly resolveourbroken government, and in the least
> maximum number of people through liberated CAPITALISM! If anyone can
> prove that the present constitution condones socialism and allows, by
> government laws, the STEALING of the property of those who actually
> pay-their-own-way by working for a living, I will eat my hat!
>
> At this time, I haven't seen any other VOICE for America than my own,
>
> > --
> > "Some things take a set amount of time. You can't get a baby in one
> > month by getting nine women pregnant."--
>
> > Unknown- Hide quoted text -
> > --
> > "Some things take a set amount of time. You can't get a baby in one
> > month by getting nine women pregnant."--
>
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 1, 2012, 6:06:01 PM12/1/12
to
if "Huyghens, Liebniz and Coriolis were wrong about kinetic energy,"
as you haltingly insist without even knowing what a linear equation
is,
then Einstein would, of course, have to also be wrong.
however, that is not even wrongsville.
anyway, like I said on the other item, if
you are not going to bother to actually address *any*
of the criticisms, I will not reply.
end of sad story, I hope.
as you haltingly insist without even knowing what a linear equation
is,
then Einstein would, of course, have to also be wrong.
however, that is not even wrongsville.
anyway, like I said on the other item, if
you are not going to bother to actually address *any*
of the criticisms, I will not reply.
end of sad story, I hope.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 1, 2012, 6:53:32 PM12/1/12
to
NB, "armistead" is, like, the opposite of "armistice;"
tres etrange' -- n'est-ce pas?
tres etrange' -- n'est-ce pas?
G=EMC^2
Dec 1, 2012, 7:11:32 PM12/1/12
to
On Dec 1, 2:32 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
bjacoby
Dec 2, 2012, 2:04:40 AM12/2/12
to
On 12/1/2012 7:11 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
> 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
When you end up as Soilent Green, Treeb, a LOT of people are going to
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
> 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
get sick!
SaPeIsMa
Dec 2, 2012, 11:06:04 AM12/2/12
to
"G=EMC^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:896a13d6-b3de-4c3c...@bq2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
#
#
# Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
# start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
# 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
<sigh>
Another pinky idiot suffering from the delusion that stringing a bunch of
emotion-loaded words together will automatically make sense and be true
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:05:02 PM12/2/12
to
On Dec 1, 6:06 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Dear 1tree:
For you 'science' is just banter and armchair recreation. For me it
is save-the-human race serious. Vector analysis is a big portion of
structural design, my major in architecture. Linear equations plot as
straight lines. When you try to "dumb-me-out" you only make yourself
look stupid. Have a nice Holiday, and as a resolution, you should
give up on attacking the number one science mind in the world, me. I
am unassailable. — NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead
wrote:
For you 'science' is just banter and armchair recreation. For me it
is save-the-human race serious. Vector analysis is a big portion of
structural design, my major in architecture. Linear equations plot as
straight lines. When you try to "dumb-me-out" you only make yourself
look stupid. Have a nice Holiday, and as a resolution, you should
give up on attacking the number one science mind in the world, me. I
am unassailable. — NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:34:04 PM12/2/12
to
>
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
> 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet- Hide quoted text -
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear "G": Effectively, law enforcement functions like the Gestapo.
> - Show quoted text -
But that is mostly because of the cultural misunderstanding of law
enforcement just who their "bosses" are. There is a wrong motion that
those in tailored suits and power ties, who are so much in the media
eye, are the "good guys". And those in torn jeans and tie-died tee
shirts are the crooks. They also wrongly believe that the victors in
elections are somehow validated as being above the law. One reason
that so few in politics will blow the whistle on another politician,
is because they know that their "goodness" couldn't stand scrutiny,
either. So those in government just look the other way to corruption.
Another reason that law enforcement sometimes goofs is because of the
perception that there is this "game" between the good guys and the bad
guys. That black or white classification, causes individuals in L. E.
to put too much devotion to the often wrong esprit de corps. At least
10% of my New Constitution is for correcting the overbearing nature of
both L. E. and the courts. In fact, it was because of unforgivable
mistakes in L. E., like sending innocent people to jail for crimes
they didn't commit, that inspired me to start writing us a new and
better (stronger and more deferential to the People) constitution in
the first place.
After our government is fixed, I know how to attack global warming
WITHOUT stopping the use of fossil fuels. It's a shame, that there
are so few who know a true fix for our broken government when they see
it. The nutshell: We must STOP supposing that continuing to play
politics as usual, when that is what got us into our mess in the first
place, will magically 'fix' things in the next 2, 4 or 6 years. That
ain't happening. So, wake up America. My New Constitution is ON YOUR
SIDE! — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:43:32 PM12/2/12
to
if the profit motive is still functioning. With so many getting food
stamps, those who make the groceries have less and less movie to stay
in the business. In cold war Russia, a person had to stand in line
for an hour or more just to buy a loaf of bread. We aren't quite to
the point of eating "human" cookies. But we need to FIX our broken
government BEFORE things get any worse. My "NC" will do that in a
single day! Read back into the thread. Writing is my forte
(pronounced FORT!). — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:52:56 PM12/2/12
to
On Dec 2, 11:06 am, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Dear SPM: Words are better than bullets, don't you think? My "NC" is
the ONLY plan out there while will allow at least 90% of the people to
be better off. Capitalism caused the flourishing economy in the
1950s, and such can save us again, IF government will simply get off
the backs of businesses and (non-polluting) industries. If businesses
knew, tomorrow, that Obama Care has been nixed, there would be a mini
boom from that, alone! Read ‘Atlas Shrugged’, and LEARN. — John A.
Armistead —
> "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
the ONLY plan out there while will allow at least 90% of the people to
be better off. Capitalism caused the flourishing economy in the
1950s, and such can save us again, IF government will simply get off
the backs of businesses and (non-polluting) industries. If businesses
knew, tomorrow, that Obama Care has been nixed, there would be a mini
boom from that, alone! Read ‘Atlas Shrugged’, and LEARN. — John A.
Armistead —
Tom Potter
Dec 2, 2012, 9:47:27 PM12/2/12
to
>news:6113e0f8-2bc7-4474...@e25g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>us, maybe the world can be saved. Cross your fingers on that! - John
>A. Armistead - AKA NoEinstein
I suggest that one does not have to be a "clear thinker"
to understand why Jews have come into conflict with all of their neighbors
throughout history and that most folks on the planet today don't like Jews.
All one has to do is read history books and current events with an open
mind,
read what Jews post on the Internet, observe what Jews in government and the
Mass Media say and do, and observe who is trashing the culture and
how Jews interact with their neighbors when there are no constraints on
them, and they can understand that Judaism why Jews come into conflict
with all of their neighbors.
I have observed that most Muslims, Blacks, Latinos and Asians pretty much
understand what Jews are like. ( Maybe most Whites are not "clear
thinkers??? )
I have also observed that people in the nations where Jews dominate the Mass
Media are afraid to speak the truth about Jews because they know that Jews
will
"Henry Ford", "Jimmy Carter", "Mel Gibson" and "Helen Brown" them.
( Damage their business, get them fired, smear them, sue them, etc.)
Observe that even Henry Ford was compelled to quit trying to
call attention to the fact that Jews were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate the Class Wars that caused
the Great Depression, W.W.II, the Cold War, etc.
as Jews had targeted him, his business, and perhaps his family,
rather than address the points he raised.
I have never "butted heads" with any of my supervisors or co-workers
in the service, in the various jobs I have held,
nor when operating my own businesses.
In fact, in all of my jobs, including the service,
and in my teaching jobs at the Military school, high school,
college and seminar levels, I got along very well with my
supervisors and they generally let me do as I liked.
Until 911, and clashing with the Jews in the newsgroups
who were working hard to get America to invade Iraq,
I gave Jews the benefit of the doubt,
and turned the other cheek,
The world is too small and dangerous to continue to allow
Jews to continue to instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Some GOOD things compelled me to move to China.
I married a beautiful, intelligent, Chinese TV Director,
and to top it off, China is the most dynamic nation on the planet,
has great food, great massages, numerous fantastic sights,
and there are thousands of interesting things to do.
China is like Disney World every day.
Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
and there is less government intrusion into the
private lives of the citizens. If you don't commit a crime
or try to disrupt society, you can do pretty much what
you like in China.
For example, Chinese cops don't carry guns and clubs
and they are very helpful and non-threatening,
and government employees in China work hard and serve the people,
rather than demand higher pay, greater benefits, early retirement,
and immunity from their errors, omissions, commissions,
and from actually doing useful work.
In America, the government contracts out the dirty work
to folks who do not get the income, benefits, and early retirement
that government employees get, and most cops
are on sick leave, vacation, desk duty, or operating speed traps
rather than fighting crime in high crime areas at high crime times.
I might also point out that China has better overall
health care, dental care and transportation systems.
China is now what America was like
before the Class Wars screwed up America.
I suggest that rational, intelligent, MORAL folks
should resist the urge to engage in revolutions and wars.
Just look at what happened, and what is happening,
in the nations that allow the Mass Media and outsiders
instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Instigating revolutions and wars should be a capital crime in all nations.
>A. Armistead - AKA NoEinstein
I suggest that one does not have to be a "clear thinker"
to understand why Jews have come into conflict with all of their neighbors
throughout history and that most folks on the planet today don't like Jews.
All one has to do is read history books and current events with an open
mind,
read what Jews post on the Internet, observe what Jews in government and the
Mass Media say and do, and observe who is trashing the culture and
how Jews interact with their neighbors when there are no constraints on
them, and they can understand that Judaism why Jews come into conflict
with all of their neighbors.
I have observed that most Muslims, Blacks, Latinos and Asians pretty much
understand what Jews are like. ( Maybe most Whites are not "clear
thinkers??? )
I have also observed that people in the nations where Jews dominate the Mass
Media are afraid to speak the truth about Jews because they know that Jews
will
"Henry Ford", "Jimmy Carter", "Mel Gibson" and "Helen Brown" them.
( Damage their business, get them fired, smear them, sue them, etc.)
Observe that even Henry Ford was compelled to quit trying to
call attention to the fact that Jews were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate the Class Wars that caused
the Great Depression, W.W.II, the Cold War, etc.
as Jews had targeted him, his business, and perhaps his family,
rather than address the points he raised.
I have never "butted heads" with any of my supervisors or co-workers
in the service, in the various jobs I have held,
nor when operating my own businesses.
In fact, in all of my jobs, including the service,
and in my teaching jobs at the Military school, high school,
college and seminar levels, I got along very well with my
supervisors and they generally let me do as I liked.
Until 911, and clashing with the Jews in the newsgroups
who were working hard to get America to invade Iraq,
I gave Jews the benefit of the doubt,
and turned the other cheek,
The world is too small and dangerous to continue to allow
Jews to continue to instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Some GOOD things compelled me to move to China.
I married a beautiful, intelligent, Chinese TV Director,
and to top it off, China is the most dynamic nation on the planet,
has great food, great massages, numerous fantastic sights,
and there are thousands of interesting things to do.
China is like Disney World every day.
Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
and there is less government intrusion into the
private lives of the citizens. If you don't commit a crime
or try to disrupt society, you can do pretty much what
you like in China.
For example, Chinese cops don't carry guns and clubs
and they are very helpful and non-threatening,
and government employees in China work hard and serve the people,
rather than demand higher pay, greater benefits, early retirement,
and immunity from their errors, omissions, commissions,
and from actually doing useful work.
In America, the government contracts out the dirty work
to folks who do not get the income, benefits, and early retirement
that government employees get, and most cops
are on sick leave, vacation, desk duty, or operating speed traps
rather than fighting crime in high crime areas at high crime times.
I might also point out that China has better overall
health care, dental care and transportation systems.
China is now what America was like
before the Class Wars screwed up America.
I suggest that rational, intelligent, MORAL folks
should resist the urge to engage in revolutions and wars.
Just look at what happened, and what is happening,
in the nations that allow the Mass Media and outsiders
instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Instigating revolutions and wars should be a capital crime in all nations.
Tom Potter
Dec 2, 2012, 10:26:30 PM12/2/12
to
news:nusjb8dqf9ukba6gp...@4ax.com...
It appears that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude,
who uses the German word Schadenfreude
has been brainwashed by Jews in the Mass Media
to equate Nazi with evil,
and to lie, distort, and smear folks who express facts
that he has been conditioned to reject.
The fact of the matter is that the Nazi Party
was franchised and supported by the vast majority
of the German people to take a stand against the gang
that had massacred the Russian Royal Family,
co-opted the Russian government,
and were using Russia as a base from where to
train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over the world.
It is clear that the German people franchised the Nazi Party
because it vowed to prevent the Class Wars Instigators
from doing to the German people
what they had done to the Russian people.
take away their wealth, liberties and lives.
As can be seen that the Nazi Party performed well.
In three years they transformed Germany from a divided nation
with the highest unemployment to full employment,
improved the infrastructure, built homes and vacation homes
for the workers, united the German people,
and into becoming the most united, most dynamic, most
powerful nation on the planet.
all while the nations
whose leaders had sold out to the Class Wars Instigators
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
I suggest that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude
should make an effort to prevent the Mass Media
from brainwashing him to a slanted, self-serving
view of reality.
As can be seen by his posts,
Schadenfreude is not a German,
but is a psychotic hater of Germans,
and an opponent of truth, civility, and morality.
who uses the German word Schadenfreude
which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
as his handle,
has been brainwashed by Jews in the Mass Media
to equate Nazi with evil,
and to lie, distort, and smear folks who express facts
that he has been conditioned to reject.
The fact of the matter is that the Nazi Party
was franchised and supported by the vast majority
of the German people to take a stand against the gang
that had massacred the Russian Royal Family,
co-opted the Russian government,
and were using Russia as a base from where to
train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over the world.
It is clear that the German people franchised the Nazi Party
because it vowed to prevent the Class Wars Instigators
from doing to the German people
what they had done to the Russian people.
take away their wealth, liberties and lives.
As can be seen that the Nazi Party performed well.
In three years they transformed Germany from a divided nation
with the highest unemployment to full employment,
improved the infrastructure, built homes and vacation homes
for the workers, united the German people,
and into becoming the most united, most dynamic, most
powerful nation on the planet.
all while the nations
whose leaders had sold out to the Class Wars Instigators
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
I suggest that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude
should make an effort to prevent the Mass Media
from brainwashing him to a slanted, self-serving
view of reality.
As can be seen by his posts,
Schadenfreude is not a German,
but is a psychotic hater of Germans,
and an opponent of truth, civility, and morality.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 3, 2012, 7:59:23 AM12/3/12
to
>> And you *are* providing pleasure. It's always a pleasure to know where
>> the nazi's are, just like it's a pleasure to know where the
>> cockroaches are.
>>
>> But I repeat myself.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It appears that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude,
>who uses the German word Schadenfreude
>which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
>as his handle,
You're repeating yourself, old man.
>> the nazi's are, just like it's a pleasure to know where the
>> cockroaches are.
>>
>> But I repeat myself.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It appears that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude,
>who uses the German word Schadenfreude
>which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
>as his handle,
>has been brainwashed by Jews in the Mass Media
>to equate Nazi with evil,
they're NOT evil by being STUPID, and while that works well for you,
Tommy, if doesn't work for the organization.
>and to lie, distort, and smear folks who express facts
>that he has been conditioned to reject.
>As can be seen by his posts,
>Schadenfreude is not a German,
>but is a psychotic hater of Germans,
>and an opponent of truth, civility, and morality.
your nazi propaganda telling you what to believe, but you see how
idiotic you sound?
Luckily for the world, nazis have been bitch-slapped into submission
forever. They only exist on the internet now, where they cower behind
their keyboards murmuring about the things they'd LIKE to do if
only... if only..... if only they had the balls to do them.
Then they go back to huffing glue out of a sock and beating off to the
kiddie porn, huh Tommy?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 3, 2012, 8:00:52 AM12/3/12
to
>Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
>and there is less government intrusion into the
>private lives of the citizens.
More proof that Tom Potter huffs glue.
>and there is less government intrusion into the
>private lives of the citizens.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
Tom Potter
Dec 4, 2012, 4:58:23 AM12/4/12
to
news:268pb81g0tavkk7pi...@4ax.com...
More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
to find and photoshop pictures that he can use
to try to discredit folks who post FACTS
that his handlers do not want the public exposed to,
like the FACTS below.
Observe that the policies of the Nazi Party
achieved an economic miracle in three years,
while the nations whose political leaders sold out
to the gang that had massacred the Russian Family,
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
"Two days after taking office as Chancellor, Hitler addressed the nation by
radio. Although he and other leaders of his movement had made clear their
intention to reorganize the nation's social, political, cultural and
educational life in accord with National Socialist principles, everyone knew
that, with some six million jobless and the national economy in paralysis,
the great priority of the moment was to restore the nation's economic life,
above all by tackling unemployment and providing productive work.
"The misery of our people is horrible to behold!," said Hitler in this
inaugural address. / 5 "Along with the hungry unemployed millions of
industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
reorganizing our nation's economy by means of two great four-year plans. The
German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation's food supply and, in
consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
"Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
years and then pass judgment upon us!"
Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
Socialist, Hitler appointed him President of Germany's central bank, the
Reichsbank, and then as Minister of Economics.
After taking power, writes Prof. John Garraty, a prominent American
historian, Hitler and his new government "immediately launched an all-out
assault on unemployment . They stimulated private industry through subsidies
and tax rebates, encouraged consumer spending by such means as marriage
loans, and plunged into the massive public-works program that produced the
autobahn [highway system], and housing, railroad and navigation projects." /
6
The regime's new leaders also succeeded in persuading formerly skeptical and
even hostile Germans of their sincerity, resolve and ability. This fostered
trust and confidence, which in turn encouraged businessmen to hire and
invest, and consumers to spend with an eye to the future.
As he had promised, Hitler and his National Socialist government banished
unemployment within four years. The number of jobless was cut from six
million at the beginning of 1933, when he took power, to one million by
1936. / 7 So rapidly was the jobless rate reduced that by 1937-38 there was
a national labor shortage. / 8
For the great mass of Germans, wages and working conditions improved
steadily. From 1932 to 1938 gross real weekly earnings increased by 21
percent. After taking into account tax and insurance deductions and
adjustments to the cost of living, the increase in real weekly earnings
during this period was 14 percent. At the same time, rents remained stable,
and there was a relative decline in the costs of heating and light. Prices
actually declined for some consumer goods, such as electrical appliances,
clocks and watches, as well as for some foods. "Consumer prices rose at an
average annual rate of just 1.2 percent between 1933 and 1939," notes
British historian Niall Ferguson. "This meant that Germans workers were
better off in real as well as nominal terms: between 1933 and 1938, weekly
net earnings (after tax) rose by 22 percent, while the cost of living rose
by just seven percent." Even after the outbreak of war in September 1939,
workers' income continued to rise. By 1943 average hourly earnings of German
workers had risen by 25 percent, and weekly earnings by 41 percent. / 9
The "normal" work day for most Germans was eight hours, and pay for overtime
work was generous. / 10 In addition to higher wages, benefits included
markedly improved working conditions, such as better health and safety
conditions, canteens with subsidized hot meals, athletic fields, parks,
subsidized theater performances and concerts, exhibitions, sports and hiking
groups, dances, adult education courses, and subsidized tourism. / 11 An
already extensive network of social welfare programs, including old age
insurance and a national health care program, was expanded.
Hitler wanted Germans to have "the highest possible standard of living," he
said in an interview with an American journalist in early 1934. "In my
opinion, the Americans are right in not wanting to make everyone the same
but rather in upholding the principle of the ladder. However, every single
person must be granted the opportunity to climb up the ladder." / 12 In
keeping with this outlook, Hitler's government promoted social mobility,
with wide opportunities to improve and advance. As Prof. Garraty notes: "It
is beyond argument that the Nazis encouraged working-class social and
economic mobility." To encourage acquisition of new skills, the government
greatly expanded vocational training programs, and offered generous
incentives for further advancement of efficient workers. / 13
Both National Socialist ideology and Hitler's basic outlook, writes
historian John Garraty, "inclined the regime to favor the ordinary German
over any elite group. Workers . had an honored place in the system." In
accord with this, the regime provided substantive fringe benefits for
workers that included subsidized housing, low-cost excursions, sports
programs, and more pleasing factory facilities. / 14
In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, historian Joachim Fest
acknowledged: "The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social
class above all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it
in fact demonstrated class neutrality . These measures did indeed break
through the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved the
material condition of much of the population." / 15
A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years." / 20
Although German businesses flourished, profits were controlled and by law
were kept within moderate limits. / 21 Beginning in 1934, dividends for
stockholders of German corporations were limited to six percent annually.
Undistributed profits were invested in Reich government bonds, which had an
annual interest yield of six percent, and then, after 1935, of four and a
half percent. This policy had the predictable effect of encouraging
corporate reinvestment and self-financing, and thereby of reducing borrowing
from banks and, more generally, of diminishing the influence of commercial
capital. / 22
Corporation tax rates were steadily raised, from 20 percent in 1934 to 25
percent in 1936, and to 40 percent in 1939-40. Directors of German companies
could grant bonuses to managers, but only if these were directly
proportionate to profits and they also authorized corresponding bonuses or
"voluntary social contributions" to employees. / 23
Between 1934 and 1938, the gross taxable income of German businessmen
increased by 148 percent, and overall tax volume increased during this
period by 232 percent. The number of taxpayers in the highest income tax
bracket -- those earning more than 100,000 marks annually -- increased
during this period by 445 percent. (By contrast, the number of taxpayers in
the lowest income bracket -- those earning less than 1500 marks yearly --
increased by only five percent.) / 24
Taxation in National Socialist Germany was sharply "progressive," with those
of higher income paying proportionately more than those in the lower income
brackets. Between 1934 and 1938, the average tax rate on incomes of more
than 100,000 marks rose from 37.4 percent to 38.2 percent. In 1938 Germans
in the lowest tax brackets were 49 percent of the population and had 14
percent of the national income, but paid only 4.7 percent of the tax burden.
Those in the highest income category, who were just one percent of the
population but with 21 percent of the income, paid 45 percent of the tax
burden. / 25
Jews made up about one percent of Germany's total population when Hitler
came to power. While the new government moved quickly to remove them from
the nation's political and cultural life, Jews were permitted to carry on in
economic life, at least for several years. In fact, many Jews benefited from
the regime's recovery measures and the general economic revival. In June
1933, for example, Hitler approved a large-scale government investment of
14.5 million marks in the Jewish-owned firm Hertie, a Berlin department
store chain. This "bail out" was done to prevent the ruin of the large
firm's suppliers, financiers, and, above all, its 14,000 employees."
It does not take a system engineer to comprehend, that
the ignorance and prejudice of German haters like "Klaus Schadenfreude"
not only prevents the public from being exposed to FACTS,
they prevent the most effective social, government and economic models
from being rtionally considered and used.
The Nazi Party was the most successful and most popular
political party of all time, because they worked social and economic
miracles, and prevented the gang that had massacred the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government and were using Russia
what they did to the Native Russians,
take away their wealth, lives, limbs and liberties.
It is interesting to see that after their Class Wars were discredited
and the Native Russians regained control of their government,
the Gang instituted a phony "Free Jews" scam and millions
migrated to Israel, America, and England with trillions of dollars in loot,
from where they began to instigate Religious Wars between
Christians and Muslims.
As can be seen, the "Klaus Schadenfreudes" of the world
get all bent out of shape and resort to all kinds of lies
and distortions when anyone expresses FACTS
that they don't want the public exposed to.
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
to find and photoshop pictures that he can use
to try to discredit folks who post FACTS
that his handlers do not want the public exposed to,
like the FACTS below.
Observe that the policies of the Nazi Party
achieved an economic miracle in three years,
while the nations whose political leaders sold out
to the gang that had massacred the Russian Family,
co-opted the Russian government,
and were using Russia as a base from where to train terrorists
and instigate Class Wars all over the world,
and were using Russia as a base from where to train terrorists
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
"Two days after taking office as Chancellor, Hitler addressed the nation by
radio. Although he and other leaders of his movement had made clear their
intention to reorganize the nation's social, political, cultural and
educational life in accord with National Socialist principles, everyone knew
that, with some six million jobless and the national economy in paralysis,
the great priority of the moment was to restore the nation's economic life,
above all by tackling unemployment and providing productive work.
"The misery of our people is horrible to behold!," said Hitler in this
inaugural address. / 5 "Along with the hungry unemployed millions of
industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
reorganizing our nation's economy by means of two great four-year plans. The
German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation's food supply and, in
consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
"Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
years and then pass judgment upon us!"
Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
Socialist, Hitler appointed him President of Germany's central bank, the
Reichsbank, and then as Minister of Economics.
After taking power, writes Prof. John Garraty, a prominent American
historian, Hitler and his new government "immediately launched an all-out
assault on unemployment . They stimulated private industry through subsidies
and tax rebates, encouraged consumer spending by such means as marriage
loans, and plunged into the massive public-works program that produced the
autobahn [highway system], and housing, railroad and navigation projects." /
6
The regime's new leaders also succeeded in persuading formerly skeptical and
even hostile Germans of their sincerity, resolve and ability. This fostered
trust and confidence, which in turn encouraged businessmen to hire and
invest, and consumers to spend with an eye to the future.
As he had promised, Hitler and his National Socialist government banished
unemployment within four years. The number of jobless was cut from six
million at the beginning of 1933, when he took power, to one million by
1936. / 7 So rapidly was the jobless rate reduced that by 1937-38 there was
a national labor shortage. / 8
For the great mass of Germans, wages and working conditions improved
steadily. From 1932 to 1938 gross real weekly earnings increased by 21
percent. After taking into account tax and insurance deductions and
adjustments to the cost of living, the increase in real weekly earnings
during this period was 14 percent. At the same time, rents remained stable,
and there was a relative decline in the costs of heating and light. Prices
actually declined for some consumer goods, such as electrical appliances,
clocks and watches, as well as for some foods. "Consumer prices rose at an
average annual rate of just 1.2 percent between 1933 and 1939," notes
British historian Niall Ferguson. "This meant that Germans workers were
better off in real as well as nominal terms: between 1933 and 1938, weekly
net earnings (after tax) rose by 22 percent, while the cost of living rose
by just seven percent." Even after the outbreak of war in September 1939,
workers' income continued to rise. By 1943 average hourly earnings of German
workers had risen by 25 percent, and weekly earnings by 41 percent. / 9
The "normal" work day for most Germans was eight hours, and pay for overtime
work was generous. / 10 In addition to higher wages, benefits included
markedly improved working conditions, such as better health and safety
conditions, canteens with subsidized hot meals, athletic fields, parks,
subsidized theater performances and concerts, exhibitions, sports and hiking
groups, dances, adult education courses, and subsidized tourism. / 11 An
already extensive network of social welfare programs, including old age
insurance and a national health care program, was expanded.
Hitler wanted Germans to have "the highest possible standard of living," he
said in an interview with an American journalist in early 1934. "In my
opinion, the Americans are right in not wanting to make everyone the same
but rather in upholding the principle of the ladder. However, every single
person must be granted the opportunity to climb up the ladder." / 12 In
keeping with this outlook, Hitler's government promoted social mobility,
with wide opportunities to improve and advance. As Prof. Garraty notes: "It
is beyond argument that the Nazis encouraged working-class social and
economic mobility." To encourage acquisition of new skills, the government
greatly expanded vocational training programs, and offered generous
incentives for further advancement of efficient workers. / 13
Both National Socialist ideology and Hitler's basic outlook, writes
historian John Garraty, "inclined the regime to favor the ordinary German
over any elite group. Workers . had an honored place in the system." In
accord with this, the regime provided substantive fringe benefits for
workers that included subsidized housing, low-cost excursions, sports
programs, and more pleasing factory facilities. / 14
In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, historian Joachim Fest
acknowledged: "The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social
class above all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it
in fact demonstrated class neutrality . These measures did indeed break
through the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved the
material condition of much of the population." / 15
A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years." / 20
Although German businesses flourished, profits were controlled and by law
were kept within moderate limits. / 21 Beginning in 1934, dividends for
stockholders of German corporations were limited to six percent annually.
Undistributed profits were invested in Reich government bonds, which had an
annual interest yield of six percent, and then, after 1935, of four and a
half percent. This policy had the predictable effect of encouraging
corporate reinvestment and self-financing, and thereby of reducing borrowing
from banks and, more generally, of diminishing the influence of commercial
capital. / 22
Corporation tax rates were steadily raised, from 20 percent in 1934 to 25
percent in 1936, and to 40 percent in 1939-40. Directors of German companies
could grant bonuses to managers, but only if these were directly
proportionate to profits and they also authorized corresponding bonuses or
"voluntary social contributions" to employees. / 23
Between 1934 and 1938, the gross taxable income of German businessmen
increased by 148 percent, and overall tax volume increased during this
period by 232 percent. The number of taxpayers in the highest income tax
bracket -- those earning more than 100,000 marks annually -- increased
during this period by 445 percent. (By contrast, the number of taxpayers in
the lowest income bracket -- those earning less than 1500 marks yearly --
increased by only five percent.) / 24
Taxation in National Socialist Germany was sharply "progressive," with those
of higher income paying proportionately more than those in the lower income
brackets. Between 1934 and 1938, the average tax rate on incomes of more
than 100,000 marks rose from 37.4 percent to 38.2 percent. In 1938 Germans
in the lowest tax brackets were 49 percent of the population and had 14
percent of the national income, but paid only 4.7 percent of the tax burden.
Those in the highest income category, who were just one percent of the
population but with 21 percent of the income, paid 45 percent of the tax
burden. / 25
Jews made up about one percent of Germany's total population when Hitler
came to power. While the new government moved quickly to remove them from
the nation's political and cultural life, Jews were permitted to carry on in
economic life, at least for several years. In fact, many Jews benefited from
the regime's recovery measures and the general economic revival. In June
1933, for example, Hitler approved a large-scale government investment of
14.5 million marks in the Jewish-owned firm Hertie, a Berlin department
store chain. This "bail out" was done to prevent the ruin of the large
firm's suppliers, financiers, and, above all, its 14,000 employees."
It does not take a system engineer to comprehend, that
the ignorance and prejudice of German haters like "Klaus Schadenfreude"
not only prevents the public from being exposed to FACTS,
they prevent the most effective social, government and economic models
from being rtionally considered and used.
The Nazi Party was the most successful and most popular
political party of all time, because they worked social and economic
miracles, and prevented the gang that had massacred the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government and were using Russia
as a base from where to train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over
the world from taking over Germany and doing to the German people
what they did to the Native Russians,
take away their wealth, lives, limbs and liberties.
It is interesting to see that after their Class Wars were discredited
and the Native Russians regained control of their government,
the Gang instituted a phony "Free Jews" scam and millions
migrated to Israel, America, and England with trillions of dollars in loot,
from where they began to instigate Religious Wars between
Christians and Muslims.
As can be seen, the "Klaus Schadenfreudes" of the world
get all bent out of shape and resort to all kinds of lies
and distortions when anyone expresses FACTS
that they don't want the public exposed to.
Tom Potter
Dec 4, 2012, 4:59:39 AM12/4/12
to
news:3j8pb89ri43g7uo15...@4ax.com...
and the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
he is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
from being examined and used.
More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
is not only ignorant about China
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
and the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
he is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 4, 2012, 7:13:22 AM12/4/12
to
>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
Prove it's a phony handle, "Tom Potter."
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others
,
>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
Not too many people are ignorant about the nazis. You people are all
>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.
http://klaus.webege.com/nazi/dead_nazis.html
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 4, 2012, 7:18:58 AM12/4/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:3j8pb89ri43g7uo15...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
>>>and there is less government intrusion into the
>>>private lives of the citizens.
>>
>> More proof that Tom Potter huffs glue.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
"Tom Potter" lies when he claims I'm using a "phony handle."
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:3j8pb89ri43g7uo15...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
>>>and there is less government intrusion into the
>>>private lives of the citizens.
>>
>> More proof that Tom Potter huffs glue.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
>is not only ignorant about China
>and the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
>he is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
>to find and photoshop pictures that he can use
>to try to discredit folks who post FACTS
>that his handlers do not want the public exposed to,
>like the FACTS below.
>Observe that the policies of the Nazi Party
>achieved an economic miracle in three years,
Between February 1933 and the start of World War
Two, Nazi Germany underwent an 'economic miracle' - or so the leaders
of Nazi Germany wanted their people to believe. Not only was the idea
of an economic miracle sold to the people of Germany,
the propaganda element also wanted the idea sold to Europe and to the
wider world. But was there really an economic miracle in Nazi Germany
or was it merely a card trick - one that appeared to happen but really
did not?
Using the most basic of statistics, Nazi Germany certainly underwent
major economic change. Like most other countries in
Europe, Weimar Germany had suffered from a very high unemployment
record and Nazi Germany inherited this. By the time World War Two
started the unemployment rate in Germany had tumbled: trade unionshad
been tamed, the work force had seemingly developed a positive work
ethic and job prospects were better - on paper at least.
But when certain data is factored into the equation, the issue of job
creation is not quite as clear cut.
Between January 1933 and 1939, a series of laws were introduced that
made it effectively impossible for Jews to work in Nazi Germany. Those
that fled abroad in fear of their lives left behind jobs that were
filled. Those who remained in Germany simply could not work and once
again their previous employment was taken over by 'approved' Germans.
Over time, many women were also excluded from many areas of work.
Hitler had made it clear where his beliefs were: women true to the
Aryan race should stay at home and look after children. This again
reduced the unemployment rate.
Another 'card trick' was the introduction of compulsory military
service for young men. If you wanted to attend a university, for
example, you had to have done some form of either youth service or
military training before attending university. Once again, those who
were engaged in compulsory military service were removed from
unemployment figures.
The final factor with regards to the huge drop in unemployment was
fear - anyone who was found guilty of being 'work shy' could be
condemned to the concentration camps that were found throughout Nazi
Germany. While Hitler frequently referred to the "economic miracle" of
Nazi Germany, people previously employed in what could be classed as
professional employment ended up doing manual labour on the autobahns,
for example. If such a job was refused, you could be accused of being
'work shy' with the known associated punishments.
Therefore, when the above is taken into account, it is true that
unemployment figures tumbled. In 1932, in the dying days of the Weimar
Republic, 5.6 million people were unemployed - many of whom gave their
support to the Nazi Party as the only party that offered them hope. By
1934, this figure had fallen to 2.7 million - a seemingly impossible
decrease. By 1936, only 1.6 million people were unemployed and by 1938
the figure was 0.4 million. Therefore in five years, unemployment had
fallen by 5.4 million - 96%. No other west European country came
anywhere near this figure - hence why it was labelled a "miracle".
Possibly the only surprise in this is that 400,000 remained
unemployed.
Another issue that has to be studied to explain this 'economic
miracle' is the simple fact that Hitler put Nazi Germany onto a war
economy much earlier than the September 1939 outbreak of war. From
1935 on, a huge proportion of government spending was on the military.
Therefore labour intensive industries such as steel production and
coal mining prospered as there were needed in very large amounts to
fuel the expansion of the military. In 1933, Krupp's made a profit of
6.65 million Reichmarks. In just one year this had nearly doubled to
11.40 million Reichmarks. By 1937, the company had an annual profit of
17.80 million Reichmarks.
In 1933, Germany spent just 3% of her GDP on the military. By 1939,
this had grown to 32% and 22% of the work force was directly employed
in an industry somehow associated with military production. However,
the production of consumer goods was not ignored - on the orders of
Hitler. He wanted the German people to believe that they themselves
were directly benefitting from the 'economic miracle' that he had
fostered. For this reason there was a steady increase in consumer
goods as 1939 approached, which continued into World War Two. It led
to one unnamed general stating that Nazi Germany had to fight the war
with refrigerators.
If Nazi Germany underwent an 'economic miracle' then a logical
assumption was that the workers themselves benefitted in material
terms. Many had employment under Hitler - but few dared to refuse what
was offered. In fact if the figures are analysed in terms of the wages
paid, workers were worse off under Hitler than they had been before
the Wall Street Crash. 1934 was the only year from 1933 to 1939 when
the wages paid to the workers equalled what an employed person earned
in 1928. Other than this year, in every other year they got paid less.
So while there was a steady increase in the production of consumer
goods, how many workers could afford them? When compared to workers in
America, the UK, Sweden and France, workers in Nazi Germany were paid
the least.
However, in the area of imports/exports, Nazi Germany did quite well.
In 1933, 1935, 1936 and 1937 there was a trade surplus while the
annual trade deficit of 1934 and 1937 were relatively small.
However, whether Nazi Germany experienced an "economic miracle"
depends on what stance you make. Was it merely a card trick whereby
industry was mainly stimulated by the vast growth in the requirements
of the military? Was it an "economic miracle" that the unemployment
figures fell so drastically when groups were excluded from the data
and others forcibly made to work in areas they were not trained for?
Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
NoEinstein
Dec 4, 2012, 11:37:37 AM12/4/12
to
On Dec 1, 9:41 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Avoiding the Fiscal Cliff ‘Smoke Screen’.
Those in the media, and the stones-for-brains people in Congress are
focusing on a problem, and not considering THE best solution to most
problems—eliminating them! There need be no long-term detriment to
either the left or right factions if—instead of accepting that some
God damned law that’s set to take effect will have dire consequences,
regardless of what gets decided—consider THIS fact: There is no such
thing as a “law” that doesn’t have the approval of the majority of the
American People; and no such thing as a “law” that doesn’t conform to
the letter and the SPIRIT of our Constitution!
The last time I checked, the SPIRIT of our Constitution requires that
there be close parity of the influence of the voters on the laws that
can be passed. Since the US Senate, as a “branch” of government,
resulted from extortion by the low population states to have power
equal to that of the larger population states, then the US Senate,
which has always been an oligarchy, is 100% unconstitutional! And It
doesn’t matter one lick that there is an entire Article in the
Constitution explaining about the Senate!
From day one, there was a conflict of purposes between our sought (but
never achieved) Representative Republic and an oligarchy. When any
document has conflicts, or is saying two opposing things, the first
order of business should have been to have the PEOPLE decide whether
they wanted to have power, close to parity, individual-to-individual,
or whether—as things regrettably have remained—they wanted to be
governed, primarily, by an elitist group, such as the US Senate, whose
power is totally disproportionate to the populations represented.
Isn’t it ironic that “small states” and “small minorities” have been
wagging-the-dog of this country for its entire HISTORY?
Anyone, who like me, has transcribed, word-for-word, the entire
original Constitution, will realize that there are a great many
clauses in that document intended to either LIMIT the power of
government, or to make certain that the People are treated FAIRLY by
government. The Bill of Rights wasn’t just some afterthought. It was
a convenient device for placing the important “People” issues apart
from the “mechanics” issues of how government is to function. The
over-riding SPIRIT of the Constitution can be summed up in one short
sentence: “Democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in the USA!”
Simply by applying that latter SPIRIT of the Constitution to every
sentence, clause and modifier that I wrote while penning and polishing
my (our) New Constitution, I am certain that the Founding Fathers are
now applauding my document from on-high! I’m well aware of the
inertia (fear) that the American People have of most changes. In
spite of that inertia and fear, over decades, small changes—that were
just below the threshold of alarm—have allowed the USA to get into its
present morass.
In the recent election, I would estimate that 25% of the total votes
got cast either to protect a present “entitlement” or to gain some
promised “entitlement” or “gift”. No, that should NOT be 51% of the
voters! The disparity is largely due to non-monetary issues such as
gay rights and a woman’s right to choose. At least 65% of the
’liberal’ voters are secure enough and proud enough—earning a living
by their own hands—that they don’t, personally, need any
entitlements! Of course there will be security and pride so long as
they are working and can afford to purchase health and life
insurance. The reason there was a 51% liberal vote was due to the
kind-hearted sympathy of about 26% of the total number of voters for
relatives, friends or acquaintances who “seem to” need government
assistance of one or more kinds. That means that at least 75% of
Americans can survive perfectly well without getting any handouts from
government! So, the “mandate” for socialism isn’t there! Only the
‘social issues’ allow the ‘progressives and socialists’—clandestinely
led by our pseudo president, Barack Obama—to think that they can now
come out of their socialist CLOSETS and… take over the world. But ha,
ha, HA!!!
For the last eight decades, in particular, Republicans have realized
that in order to get elected to office, they must not offend anyone
who is getting an “entitlement”, lest those people not vote their
way. Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan campaigned based on the MISCONCEPTION
that broken government can be fixed, fiscally, while retaining
“entitlements” like Social Security. Deep in their hearts, that isn’t
what they wanted to campaign to do. They were, effectively,
blackmailed by those getting entitlements into putting bandaids on the
economic problems that entitlements cause. Isn’t it sad that from
‘day one’ the USA has been controlled by minorities seeking influence
or “entitlements” greater than one-person-one-vote-fairly-counted
should ever provide.
A huge part of the fraudulent and unconstitutional campaigning, both
in the speeches and in the ads of Democrats, was that Republicans were
somehow these heartless souls willing to “push Grammy over the
cliff”. My New Constitution, wisely, RETAINS all existing laws while
still be mailed out; and Medicare will still help seniors with their
medical bills. *** The government has a moral obligation to be sure
that no person is disadvantaged due to the unwise promises of a
government past. *** I estimate that it will require 25 to 30 years
of having partial, but diminishing, socialism before a true 100%
capitalism-based government, estimated to cost about 15% of the GNP,
will be in place and flourishing!
As I’ve mentioned before, close to 100% of conservatives are already
backing my “NC”—based solely on its philosophy of having minimum
government. And a large portion of liberals will be supporting my
“NC” because of the multiplicity of non discrimination clauses,
therein. My inclusion of very strong limits on government’s abused
authority to send people to prison for crimes never proved to have
been committed, will cause a high percentage of Blacks to support my
“NC” based on those provisions, alone. There are simply too many
Blacks convicted of crimes because of their skin. That inequity must
stop!
One day after the ratification of my New Constitution, the citizens
should immediately notice that they are being treated more
considerately, and in a non bossy way, by government employees. That
will be because of the swift loss of the latter’s jobs; possible
felony charges; or possibly being hanged for treason in those extreme
instances of their not fully respecting the now well-defined civil
rights of all law-abiding citizens. Suddenly, law-abiding citizens
will be treated like the employer, rather than like serfs under a
regal government. I can assure you that nothing about government
shall ever again have a “regal” quality!
A Secret Service agent(s) teetering on arresting Barack Obama for
fraud, and etc., should be heartened to know that a clearer and much
more definitive New Constitution is in the offing that does NOT
diminish the high principles on which America was founded. Things will
just be more fair, better defined, and less discriminatory. The new
laws that get passed will assure that our liberated capitalist system
will have enough jobs and high demand for one’s labors to, once again,
make the USA the Greatest Nation in the World! “Pay It Forward!”
And “Long live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> US Secret Service Agents to have ...
>
> read more »
>
Avoiding the Fiscal Cliff ‘Smoke Screen’.
Those in the media, and the stones-for-brains people in Congress are
focusing on a problem, and not considering THE best solution to most
problems—eliminating them! There need be no long-term detriment to
either the left or right factions if—instead of accepting that some
God damned law that’s set to take effect will have dire consequences,
regardless of what gets decided—consider THIS fact: There is no such
thing as a “law” that doesn’t have the approval of the majority of the
American People; and no such thing as a “law” that doesn’t conform to
the letter and the SPIRIT of our Constitution!
The last time I checked, the SPIRIT of our Constitution requires that
there be close parity of the influence of the voters on the laws that
can be passed. Since the US Senate, as a “branch” of government,
resulted from extortion by the low population states to have power
equal to that of the larger population states, then the US Senate,
which has always been an oligarchy, is 100% unconstitutional! And It
doesn’t matter one lick that there is an entire Article in the
Constitution explaining about the Senate!
From day one, there was a conflict of purposes between our sought (but
never achieved) Representative Republic and an oligarchy. When any
document has conflicts, or is saying two opposing things, the first
order of business should have been to have the PEOPLE decide whether
they wanted to have power, close to parity, individual-to-individual,
or whether—as things regrettably have remained—they wanted to be
governed, primarily, by an elitist group, such as the US Senate, whose
power is totally disproportionate to the populations represented.
Isn’t it ironic that “small states” and “small minorities” have been
wagging-the-dog of this country for its entire HISTORY?
Anyone, who like me, has transcribed, word-for-word, the entire
original Constitution, will realize that there are a great many
clauses in that document intended to either LIMIT the power of
government, or to make certain that the People are treated FAIRLY by
government. The Bill of Rights wasn’t just some afterthought. It was
a convenient device for placing the important “People” issues apart
from the “mechanics” issues of how government is to function. The
over-riding SPIRIT of the Constitution can be summed up in one short
sentence: “Democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in the USA!”
Simply by applying that latter SPIRIT of the Constitution to every
sentence, clause and modifier that I wrote while penning and polishing
my (our) New Constitution, I am certain that the Founding Fathers are
now applauding my document from on-high! I’m well aware of the
inertia (fear) that the American People have of most changes. In
spite of that inertia and fear, over decades, small changes—that were
just below the threshold of alarm—have allowed the USA to get into its
present morass.
In the recent election, I would estimate that 25% of the total votes
got cast either to protect a present “entitlement” or to gain some
promised “entitlement” or “gift”. No, that should NOT be 51% of the
voters! The disparity is largely due to non-monetary issues such as
gay rights and a woman’s right to choose. At least 65% of the
’liberal’ voters are secure enough and proud enough—earning a living
by their own hands—that they don’t, personally, need any
entitlements! Of course there will be security and pride so long as
they are working and can afford to purchase health and life
insurance. The reason there was a 51% liberal vote was due to the
kind-hearted sympathy of about 26% of the total number of voters for
relatives, friends or acquaintances who “seem to” need government
assistance of one or more kinds. That means that at least 75% of
Americans can survive perfectly well without getting any handouts from
government! So, the “mandate” for socialism isn’t there! Only the
‘social issues’ allow the ‘progressives and socialists’—clandestinely
led by our pseudo president, Barack Obama—to think that they can now
come out of their socialist CLOSETS and… take over the world. But ha,
ha, HA!!!
For the last eight decades, in particular, Republicans have realized
that in order to get elected to office, they must not offend anyone
who is getting an “entitlement”, lest those people not vote their
way. Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan campaigned based on the MISCONCEPTION
that broken government can be fixed, fiscally, while retaining
“entitlements” like Social Security. Deep in their hearts, that isn’t
what they wanted to campaign to do. They were, effectively,
blackmailed by those getting entitlements into putting bandaids on the
economic problems that entitlements cause. Isn’t it sad that from
‘day one’ the USA has been controlled by minorities seeking influence
or “entitlements” greater than one-person-one-vote-fairly-counted
should ever provide.
A huge part of the fraudulent and unconstitutional campaigning, both
in the speeches and in the ads of Democrats, was that Republicans were
somehow these heartless souls willing to “push Grammy over the
cliff”. My New Constitution, wisely, RETAINS all existing laws while
such are systematically reviewed, debated and re voted in the House.
(There will no longer be a US Senate.) That means that SS checks will
still be mailed out; and Medicare will still help seniors with their
medical bills. *** The government has a moral obligation to be sure
that no person is disadvantaged due to the unwise promises of a
government past. *** I estimate that it will require 25 to 30 years
of having partial, but diminishing, socialism before a true 100%
capitalism-based government, estimated to cost about 15% of the GNP,
will be in place and flourishing!
As I’ve mentioned before, close to 100% of conservatives are already
backing my “NC”—based solely on its philosophy of having minimum
government. And a large portion of liberals will be supporting my
“NC” because of the multiplicity of non discrimination clauses,
therein. My inclusion of very strong limits on government’s abused
authority to send people to prison for crimes never proved to have
been committed, will cause a high percentage of Blacks to support my
“NC” based on those provisions, alone. There are simply too many
Blacks convicted of crimes because of their skin. That inequity must
stop!
One day after the ratification of my New Constitution, the citizens
should immediately notice that they are being treated more
considerately, and in a non bossy way, by government employees. That
will be because of the swift loss of the latter’s jobs; possible
felony charges; or possibly being hanged for treason in those extreme
instances of their not fully respecting the now well-defined civil
rights of all law-abiding citizens. Suddenly, law-abiding citizens
will be treated like the employer, rather than like serfs under a
regal government. I can assure you that nothing about government
shall ever again have a “regal” quality!
A Secret Service agent(s) teetering on arresting Barack Obama for
fraud, and etc., should be heartened to know that a clearer and much
more definitive New Constitution is in the offing that does NOT
diminish the high principles on which America was founded. Things will
just be more fair, better defined, and less discriminatory. The new
laws that get passed will assure that our liberated capitalist system
will have enough jobs and high demand for one’s labors to, once again,
make the USA the Greatest Nation in the World! “Pay It Forward!”
And “Long live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 30, 4:14 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Making Obama Shake in His Wingtips!
>
> When a pathological liar like Obama, the anti-Christ, gets in the
> spotlight, people respond primarily to his unwavering, self-assured
> voice, and to the bouncy, almost musical way that he walks. Since
> that devil-possessed demagogue has a humorous tone in many of his
> otherwise cutting remarks, the vast majority of listeners equate humor
> to reassurance that the “situation” must be well-in-hand. They are
> also “calmed” by how at-ease Obama is to always be going on so many
> isn’t-that-nice vacations. The latter are spent with his could-have-
> been idealic family. But that smiling, photogenic little group is
> functioning as a cover for THE most corrupt man ever to be birthed in
> Kenya, or in the world for that matter—Hitler included.
>
> A hundred years ago, when the HMS Titanic struck that iceberg in the
> middle of the night, those who were still socializing noticed the
> rattle of crystal, or heard the thump and the grind. Since for them,
> there were no other immediate effects, the people remained calm. And
> they were reassured by the similar calm demeanor of the other people
> they saw. I’ve mentioned this more than once, because the nearly
> complete overthrow ofourAmerican way of life has been hastened by
>
> Making Obama Shake in His Wingtips!
>
> When a pathological liar like Obama, the anti-Christ, gets in the
> spotlight, people respond primarily to his unwavering, self-assured
> voice, and to the bouncy, almost musical way that he walks. Since
> that devil-possessed demagogue has a humorous tone in many of his
> otherwise cutting remarks, the vast majority of listeners equate humor
> to reassurance that the “situation” must be well-in-hand. They are
> also “calmed” by how at-ease Obama is to always be going on so many
> isn’t-that-nice vacations. The latter are spent with his could-have-
> been idealic family. But that smiling, photogenic little group is
> functioning as a cover for THE most corrupt man ever to be birthed in
> Kenya, or in the world for that matter—Hitler included.
>
> A hundred years ago, when the HMS Titanic struck that iceberg in the
> middle of the night, those who were still socializing noticed the
> rattle of crystal, or heard the thump and the grind. Since for them,
> there were no other immediate effects, the people remained calm. And
> they were reassured by the similar calm demeanor of the other people
> they saw. I’ve mentioned this more than once, because the nearly
> the 51% “victory” of Obama November 6, 2012.
>
> In Washington and inourcorrupt media, the message repeated dozens of
>
> times each day is that Obama… won. Instead of disclaiming that fact—
> by the Constitution’s standards—there is this resignation that the
> party-against-party fights are simply continuing. Three of the five
> conservatives on ’The Five’—Dana Perino not among them—should be
> exclaiming: “Votes garnered by promises of free college educations and
> free contraceptives aren’t LEGAL under the Constitution! Nor is it
> LEGAL whenoursquatting-in-the-White-Housepresidentdoesn’t even
> by the Constitution’s standards—there is this resignation that the
> party-against-party fights are simply continuing. Three of the five
> conservatives on ’The Five’—Dana Perino not among them—should be
> exclaiming: “Votes garnered by promises of free college educations and
> free contraceptives aren’t LEGAL under the Constitution! Nor is it
> believe in the most basic premises of the document that he took a
> token OATH to protect.”
>
> The Founding Fathers were wise enough to require that all State
> Governments make their office-holders swear to defend (not violate)
> the Constitution. New agents to the US Secret Service must repeat
> similar oaths in their swearing-in ceremonies. But few, including
> most judges and justices, realize that no person who isn’t honest and
> sincere in what they are swearing to is qualified for the particular
> job. Did the Founding Fathers want thepresidentto take… an oath
> token OATH to protect.”
>
> The Founding Fathers were wise enough to require that all State
> Governments make their office-holders swear to defend (not violate)
> the Constitution. New agents to the US Secret Service must repeat
> similar oaths in their swearing-in ceremonies. But few, including
> most judges and justices, realize that no person who isn’t honest and
> sincere in what they are swearing to is qualified for the particular
> simply for the ceremony? Why is the highest court official in the
> land supposed to administer that oath, if the sincerity, and the
> LEGALITY of taking that oath is or was never examined and is or was
> just empty ceremony?
>
> I recall, at about age 12, before becoming a member of my Methodist
> church, that the minister had us take classes—over about a month‘s
> period—in which the significance of church membership was explained.
> It was also explained that none of us youngsters taking the classes
> should accept membership unless we SINCERELY believed the pretexts of
> the Methodist church. In another instance, a dear Sunday School
> teacher demonstrated that liquor will quickly kill an earthworm, and
> will do similar harm to each of us if we ever drink. She explained
> that she hoped each member of that class would sign a document saying
> that we won’t drink. But she went further to say that none of us
> should ever sign something we don’t sincerely believe. Since I had no
> desire to have any portion of my body die like that earthworm, I was
> most sincere when I signed her no-drinking document. Years later, on
> a Clemson field trip to Atlanta that included a visit to ‘Underground
> Atlanta’, several of my classmates kept insisting that I start
> drinking. My best defense was: “I signed a document in my church
> saying that I will never drink, and I have no intention of breaking
> that promise.”
>
> That slimy SLUG of a Chief Justice, John G. Roberts. Jr., is ‘supposed
> to’ know the Constitution. But he is so shallow that he doesn’t
> realize thatour(sought) Representative Republic form of government—
> land supposed to administer that oath, if the sincerity, and the
> LEGALITY of taking that oath is or was never examined and is or was
> just empty ceremony?
>
> I recall, at about age 12, before becoming a member of my Methodist
> church, that the minister had us take classes—over about a month‘s
> period—in which the significance of church membership was explained.
> It was also explained that none of us youngsters taking the classes
> should accept membership unless we SINCERELY believed the pretexts of
> the Methodist church. In another instance, a dear Sunday School
> teacher demonstrated that liquor will quickly kill an earthworm, and
> will do similar harm to each of us if we ever drink. She explained
> that she hoped each member of that class would sign a document saying
> that we won’t drink. But she went further to say that none of us
> should ever sign something we don’t sincerely believe. Since I had no
> desire to have any portion of my body die like that earthworm, I was
> most sincere when I signed her no-drinking document. Years later, on
> a Clemson field trip to Atlanta that included a visit to ‘Underground
> Atlanta’, several of my classmates kept insisting that I start
> drinking. My best defense was: “I signed a document in my church
> saying that I will never drink, and I have no intention of breaking
> that promise.”
>
> That slimy SLUG of a Chief Justice, John G. Roberts. Jr., is ‘supposed
> to’ know the Constitution. But he is so shallow that he doesn’t
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Dec 4, 2012, 12:04:05 PM12/4/12
to
On Dec 4, 4:58 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:268pb81g0tavkk7pi...@4ax.com...
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> "The misery ofourpeople is horrible to behold!," said Hitler in this
Dear Tom: Thanks for showing the "good", but earlier side of Hitler.
The conditions leading to war must have come on quickly, because there
was high unemployment and social dissatisfaction that Hitler was able
to blame on outsiders. His taxing, so highly, the top money earners
probably caused businesses to start closing. The latter were then
forced to remain open manufacturing the machinery of war. Doing that
was financed by an inflationary over-printing of money, and the
devaluing of currency. It was the latter that made Hitler fall over
the loony edge and see going to war as a "solution". Because Germany
had an oil deficit, they planned war on the eastern front as a quick
fix. But when that didn't come quick enough, a protracted war was
their doom.
It is true that there is some good in even the worst person. But the
proof of one's worth is in whether or not there are many sincere
mourners when one dies. Hitler had next to none.
Your friend, John A. Armistead
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:268pb81g0tavkk7pi...@4ax.com...
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> inaugural address. / 5 "Along with the hungry unemployed millions of
> industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
> the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
> we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
> just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
> some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
>
> The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
> reorganizingournation's economy by means of two great four-year plans. The
> industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
> the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
> we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
> just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
> some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
>
> The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
> German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation's food supply and, in
> consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
> from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
>
> "Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
> The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
> do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
> years and then pass judgment upon us!"
>
> Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
> activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
> competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
> prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
> business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
> Socialist, Hitler appointed himPresidentof Germany's central bank, the
> consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
> from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
>
> "Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
> The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
> do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
> years and then pass judgment upon us!"
>
> Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
> activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
> competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
> prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
> business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
The conditions leading to war must have come on quickly, because there
was high unemployment and social dissatisfaction that Hitler was able
to blame on outsiders. His taxing, so highly, the top money earners
probably caused businesses to start closing. The latter were then
forced to remain open manufacturing the machinery of war. Doing that
was financed by an inflationary over-printing of money, and the
devaluing of currency. It was the latter that made Hitler fall over
the loony edge and see going to war as a "solution". Because Germany
had an oil deficit, they planned war on the eastern front as a quick
fix. But when that didn't come quick enough, a protracted war was
their doom.
It is true that there is some good in even the worst person. But the
proof of one's worth is in whether or not there are many sincere
mourners when one dies. Hitler had next to none.
Your friend, John A. Armistead
Lookout
Dec 4, 2012, 3:17:50 PM12/4/12
to
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:37:37 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
<noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>On Dec 1, 9:41 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
Ya, I read it.
<noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>On Dec 1, 9:41 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
You're fucking nuts.
Now go shoot at the black helicopters circling over your house.
NoEinstein
Dec 5, 2012, 8:25:59 PM12/5/12
to
On Dec 4, 3:17 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:37:37 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:37:37 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
> <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >On Dec 1, 9:41 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Ya, I read it.
> You're fucking nuts.
>
> Now go shoot at the black helicopters circling over your house.
>
>
>
> >Avoiding the Fiscal Cliff Smoke Screen .
>
> >Those in the media, and the stones-for-brains people in Congress are
> >focusing on a problem, and not considering THE best solution to most
> >problems eliminating them! There need be no long-term detriment to
> >either the left or right factions if instead of accepting that some
> >God damned law that s set to take effect will have dire consequences,
> >regardless of what gets decided consider THIS fact: There is no such
> >thing as a law that doesn t have the approval of the majority of the
> >American People; and no such thing as a law that doesn t conform to
> >the letter and the SPIRIT ofourConstitution!
>
> >The last time I checked, the SPIRIT ofourConstitution requires that
> >On Dec 1, 9:41 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Ya, I read it.
> You're fucking nuts.
>
> Now go shoot at the black helicopters circling over your house.
>
>
>
> >Avoiding the Fiscal Cliff Smoke Screen .
>
> >Those in the media, and the stones-for-brains people in Congress are
> >focusing on a problem, and not considering THE best solution to most
> >problems eliminating them! There need be no long-term detriment to
> >either the left or right factions if instead of accepting that some
> >God damned law that s set to take effect will have dire consequences,
> >regardless of what gets decided consider THIS fact: There is no such
> >thing as a law that doesn t have the approval of the majority of the
> >American People; and no such thing as a law that doesn t conform to
> >the letter and the SPIRIT ofourConstitution!
>
> >there be close parity of the influence of thevoterson the laws that
> >can be passed. Since the US Senate, as a branch of government,
> >resulted from extortion by the low population states to have power
> >equal to that of the larger population states, then the US Senate,
> >which has always been an oligarchy, is 100% unconstitutional! And It
> >doesn t matter one lick that there is an entire Article in the
> >Constitution explaining about the Senate!
>
> >From day one, there was a conflict of purposes betweenoursought (but
> >resulted from extortion by the low population states to have power
> >equal to that of the larger population states, then the US Senate,
> >which has always been an oligarchy, is 100% unconstitutional! And It
> >doesn t matter one lick that there is an entire Article in the
> >Constitution explaining about the Senate!
>
> >by their own hands that they don t, personally, need any
> >entitlements! Of course there will be security and pride so long as
> >they are working and can afford to purchase health and life
> >insurance. The reason there was a 51% liberal vote was due to the
> >kind-hearted sympathy of about 26% of the total number ofvotersfor
> >relatives, friends or acquaintances who seem to need government
> >assistance of one or more kinds. That means that at least 75% of
> >Americans can survive perfectly well without getting any handouts from
> >government! So, the mandate for socialism isn t there! Only the
> > social issues allow the progressives and socialists clandestinely
> >led byourpseudopresident, Barack Obama to think that they can now
> >entitlements! Of course there will be security and pride so long as
> >they are working and can afford to purchase health and life
> >insurance. The reason there was a 51% liberal vote was due to the
> >kind-hearted sympathy of about 26% of the total number ofvotersfor
> >relatives, friends or acquaintances who seem to need government
> >assistance of one or more kinds. That means that at least 75% of
> >Americans can survive perfectly well without getting any handouts from
> >government! So, the mandate for socialism isn t there! Only the
> > social issues allow the progressives and socialists clandestinely
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Lookout (Is that a warning!): "Sticks and stones may break my
> - Show quoted text -
bones but words will never hurt me." Thanks for letting me know that
my messages are getting under the skin of the socialist liberals out
there. A fumigation bomb should help to rid your home of fleas. Pass
it on! Ha, ha, HA! — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Dec 5, 2012, 8:36:47 PM12/5/12
to
On Dec 4, 11:37 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
‘Respecting’ the unrespectable is lunacy!
Barack Obama is a constitutionally unqualified snake-in-the-grass who
is pretending to be our ‘president’. It was known (pre 2008) that
Obama did not believe in our Constitution’s well-defined,
philosophically LIMITED government. He expressed disappointment that
the Constitution didn’t dictate ’redistribution’ of wealth. From day
one, Obama has worked to overthrow the capitalist system that is the
basis for all self-determination freedoms. He has assumed
unconstitutional presidential authority that he, even as our pseudo
president, is the dictator of not only what Congress does, but what
his socialist plants in the US Supreme Court will subsequently
“rule”. The majority of the more recent rulings are unconstitutional,
helping to proves that Obama is THE most criminal and hurtful non-
human or human to ever set foot in, or drag its torso in, this
country! Amazingly, millions and millions of Americans—who should be
upset to the point of revolution—keep wondering how they can bend over
backwards and kiss their asses goodbye, because, to-the-death, they
will “respect” the office of our non-respect-worthy pseudo president.
For at least two decades, Supreme Court rulings have been seen as an
alternate route to accomplish ends that AREN’T constitutional. For
example: Their having ruled that only the Federal Government has the
authority to act (or not act) to limit having illegal aliens be
identified. Quite to the contrary, the Constitution allows states to
protect themselves from danger. When the Federal Government isn’t
adequately protecting the states, then each and every state has the
right to take over that role, to whatever extent necessary. It is the
same principle that allows every law-abiding citizen to use deadly
force, if necessary, to protect their own life or the life of another
law-abiding citizen being threatened with great bodily harm.
When new people get nominated to the US Supreme Court, the various
rulings made by a particular judge are opened for scrutiny. As soon
as any person decides to campaign for President, that person is vetted
to see what skeletons can be found in their closets. More often than
not this is done as a vengeful ploy, by the liberal press, to somehow
embarrass any conservative so as to cause him or her to drop out of
the contest. Herman Cain was one such example. Because of what
happened to him, I added the following to my New Constitution:
“No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective
judgments about any pending election or referendum, nor badger a
candidate or office-holder with acrid questions, *** nor violate the
latter’s right to privacy by intentionally revealing non criminal
interpersonal dealings. Any person(s) who does the latter is
committing a felony. However, factual, thorough coverage of the
candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
provided there are no comments nor actions, as above, and provided the
same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of
the referenda issues. No medium’s programs or formats, nor the status
of any of its associated employees shall unduly influence any election
or governmental process, or the business shall be closed.”
Why wasn’t Barack Obama investigated by anyone? He named the supposed
Hawaiian hospital where he was born, yet no first hand person has
actually seen either his mother’s name, or his name on any record.
Investigations of ALL of the hospitals in Hawaii have none that list
his mother as having ever been a patient there. In Hawaii, the second
most liberal state in the union, behind IL, there were second hand
reports that Obama’s birth certificate had been witnessed. But why
can’t others personally confirm that? After much pressure to PROVE he
is an American citizen, Obama sent out a digital file to the media
that turned out to be a layered PDF file. The latter technology
wasn’t available fifty years ago! If Obama has THE physical paper
birth certificate, which was then photocopied, why wasn’t the
resulting file type one that is used by copy machines, today, to
record files? The layered PDF, if turned out, had a base layer that
showed ERASURES where the data would be entered. That was obvious,
because the erased file had paper similar to what checks are printed
on, today, that has squiggly, colored background lines that easily get
removed to indicate just the white paper beneath and clearly point out
FRAUD. All of the data entries can be removed as a layer, except for
the “officiating signature” of the doctor, which was on a separate
layer. If as some non-experts hurried to explain, the copied file was
converted to a PDF file, such would have been a SINGLE layer PDF, NOT
a four layer PDF (including a mask or frame around the border.)
Two years ago, I was amazed by how willing “major” talk-show hosts,
such as Rush Limbaugh, were to just dismiss the birthing issue.
Limbaugh is so technology shallow, that he dismisses global warming as
a “liberal” political ploy, even though the ocean levels have risen 8”
in the past 100 years. If so many, obviously, technically non savvy
media people, had stayed ON this issue, Obama would already, long-
since, have been hanged for treason. The conservative media’s
reaction is extremely detrimental to the USA, because nice, but mostly
lock-step Secret Service agents are hearing primarily just from me
calling for a thorough investigation. The Donald, with all of his
personal self-confidence, knows that Obama is a crook, but Trump
doesn’t want his entire public persona to be hurt, if the technology
ignorant masses simply look the other way.
That CROOK, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., responds to the ‘air’
of the Washington scene, not to any moral imperative—because he has no
morals. As one of the supposed conservatives on the high court, he
was all smiles when he came out of the Capital, in 2009, to deliver a
pointless Oath of Office. It was pointless, because Obama believed
nothing about the Constitution, and Roberts knew it. That is why BOTH
of them botched the oath; and that was because I had told Roberts, in
essays such as this, that Obama was THE Manchurian candidate who is
unqualified to be President because he DOES NOT SUPPORT OUR
CONSTITUTION! But Roberts probably feels that is perfectly OK,
because at least 60% of those in Washington don’t support the
Constitution, nor does he!
I keep explaining these things hoping to catch the ear of just one
person in the media who has the patriotic BALLS to call a traitor a
traitor—and one who should be hanged at the next high noon! Ron Paul
promised a revolution. And he had followers, like me, expecting a
revolution. But if Washington does anything it is to excise the
SPINES of those who got elected expecting to straighten out the
corruption. In less than two years, they discover that because of
unconstitutionally allocated power in committees, that they become the
pawns in our corrupt government. In the smoke-filled rooms, so many
bribes for votes get offered, that those with moral principles quickly
get laughed out of town. The reason John Boehner cries so much is
because of the smoke.
The only smoke that matters will be the six weeks of fumigation bombs
needed to rid the Capital of its many fleas, once my “NC” is
ratified. With the liberal media pointing the “news” in so many
different directions, it seems unlikely that Benghazi will become
Obama’s Watergate. Obama knows that American’s have short memories.
At the last W. H. Press Conference—relative mainly to Susan Rice’s
intentionally misleading statements—one of the reporters asked when
the results of the investigation will be released? To which Obama
replied: “The families (of those who were killed) will be told, but
not in a meeting such as this.” It is obvious that Obama—the
“charming” anti-Christ that he is—can manipulate those around him so
easily that he need not be too ‘worried’ that he has been declared, by
me—one of the last law-abiding citizens left—to be an outlaw who can
be shot-on-sight with impunity (in lieu of hanging). Sodom and
Gomorra got flattened because they were such immoral and sinful
places. The fluted columns and alabaster walls of Washington, with
four or more flag poles on every block, can’t give “value” to a city
that is so failing the moral ones who are still left. It is my great
hope that just ONE Secret Service agent values his sworn oath to
protect the Constitution MORE than he values the wasteful and unworthy
esprit de corps of the Secret Service to… protect any scoundrel who
manages to strut his bony ass up the W. H. steps. *** Few are called,
but only a few are needed! *** Pay It Forward! And… Long live the
> there be close parity of the influence of thevoterson the laws that
> promised “entitlement” or “gift”. No, that should NOT be 51% of thevoters! The disparity is largely due to non-monetary issues such as
> laws that get passed will assure thatourliberated capitalist system
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
‘Respecting’ the unrespectable is lunacy!
Barack Obama is a constitutionally unqualified snake-in-the-grass who
is pretending to be our ‘president’. It was known (pre 2008) that
Obama did not believe in our Constitution’s well-defined,
philosophically LIMITED government. He expressed disappointment that
the Constitution didn’t dictate ’redistribution’ of wealth. From day
one, Obama has worked to overthrow the capitalist system that is the
basis for all self-determination freedoms. He has assumed
unconstitutional presidential authority that he, even as our pseudo
president, is the dictator of not only what Congress does, but what
his socialist plants in the US Supreme Court will subsequently
“rule”. The majority of the more recent rulings are unconstitutional,
helping to proves that Obama is THE most criminal and hurtful non-
human or human to ever set foot in, or drag its torso in, this
country! Amazingly, millions and millions of Americans—who should be
upset to the point of revolution—keep wondering how they can bend over
backwards and kiss their asses goodbye, because, to-the-death, they
will “respect” the office of our non-respect-worthy pseudo president.
For at least two decades, Supreme Court rulings have been seen as an
alternate route to accomplish ends that AREN’T constitutional. For
example: Their having ruled that only the Federal Government has the
authority to act (or not act) to limit having illegal aliens be
identified. Quite to the contrary, the Constitution allows states to
protect themselves from danger. When the Federal Government isn’t
adequately protecting the states, then each and every state has the
right to take over that role, to whatever extent necessary. It is the
same principle that allows every law-abiding citizen to use deadly
force, if necessary, to protect their own life or the life of another
law-abiding citizen being threatened with great bodily harm.
When new people get nominated to the US Supreme Court, the various
rulings made by a particular judge are opened for scrutiny. As soon
as any person decides to campaign for President, that person is vetted
to see what skeletons can be found in their closets. More often than
not this is done as a vengeful ploy, by the liberal press, to somehow
embarrass any conservative so as to cause him or her to drop out of
the contest. Herman Cain was one such example. Because of what
happened to him, I added the following to my New Constitution:
“No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective
judgments about any pending election or referendum, nor badger a
candidate or office-holder with acrid questions, *** nor violate the
latter’s right to privacy by intentionally revealing non criminal
interpersonal dealings. Any person(s) who does the latter is
committing a felony. However, factual, thorough coverage of the
candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
provided there are no comments nor actions, as above, and provided the
same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of
the referenda issues. No medium’s programs or formats, nor the status
of any of its associated employees shall unduly influence any election
or governmental process, or the business shall be closed.”
Why wasn’t Barack Obama investigated by anyone? He named the supposed
Hawaiian hospital where he was born, yet no first hand person has
actually seen either his mother’s name, or his name on any record.
Investigations of ALL of the hospitals in Hawaii have none that list
his mother as having ever been a patient there. In Hawaii, the second
most liberal state in the union, behind IL, there were second hand
reports that Obama’s birth certificate had been witnessed. But why
can’t others personally confirm that? After much pressure to PROVE he
is an American citizen, Obama sent out a digital file to the media
that turned out to be a layered PDF file. The latter technology
wasn’t available fifty years ago! If Obama has THE physical paper
birth certificate, which was then photocopied, why wasn’t the
resulting file type one that is used by copy machines, today, to
record files? The layered PDF, if turned out, had a base layer that
showed ERASURES where the data would be entered. That was obvious,
because the erased file had paper similar to what checks are printed
on, today, that has squiggly, colored background lines that easily get
removed to indicate just the white paper beneath and clearly point out
FRAUD. All of the data entries can be removed as a layer, except for
the “officiating signature” of the doctor, which was on a separate
layer. If as some non-experts hurried to explain, the copied file was
converted to a PDF file, such would have been a SINGLE layer PDF, NOT
a four layer PDF (including a mask or frame around the border.)
Two years ago, I was amazed by how willing “major” talk-show hosts,
such as Rush Limbaugh, were to just dismiss the birthing issue.
Limbaugh is so technology shallow, that he dismisses global warming as
a “liberal” political ploy, even though the ocean levels have risen 8”
in the past 100 years. If so many, obviously, technically non savvy
media people, had stayed ON this issue, Obama would already, long-
since, have been hanged for treason. The conservative media’s
reaction is extremely detrimental to the USA, because nice, but mostly
lock-step Secret Service agents are hearing primarily just from me
calling for a thorough investigation. The Donald, with all of his
personal self-confidence, knows that Obama is a crook, but Trump
doesn’t want his entire public persona to be hurt, if the technology
ignorant masses simply look the other way.
That CROOK, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., responds to the ‘air’
of the Washington scene, not to any moral imperative—because he has no
morals. As one of the supposed conservatives on the high court, he
was all smiles when he came out of the Capital, in 2009, to deliver a
pointless Oath of Office. It was pointless, because Obama believed
nothing about the Constitution, and Roberts knew it. That is why BOTH
of them botched the oath; and that was because I had told Roberts, in
essays such as this, that Obama was THE Manchurian candidate who is
unqualified to be President because he DOES NOT SUPPORT OUR
CONSTITUTION! But Roberts probably feels that is perfectly OK,
because at least 60% of those in Washington don’t support the
Constitution, nor does he!
I keep explaining these things hoping to catch the ear of just one
person in the media who has the patriotic BALLS to call a traitor a
traitor—and one who should be hanged at the next high noon! Ron Paul
promised a revolution. And he had followers, like me, expecting a
revolution. But if Washington does anything it is to excise the
SPINES of those who got elected expecting to straighten out the
corruption. In less than two years, they discover that because of
unconstitutionally allocated power in committees, that they become the
pawns in our corrupt government. In the smoke-filled rooms, so many
bribes for votes get offered, that those with moral principles quickly
get laughed out of town. The reason John Boehner cries so much is
because of the smoke.
The only smoke that matters will be the six weeks of fumigation bombs
needed to rid the Capital of its many fleas, once my “NC” is
ratified. With the liberal media pointing the “news” in so many
different directions, it seems unlikely that Benghazi will become
Obama’s Watergate. Obama knows that American’s have short memories.
At the last W. H. Press Conference—relative mainly to Susan Rice’s
intentionally misleading statements—one of the reporters asked when
the results of the investigation will be released? To which Obama
replied: “The families (of those who were killed) will be told, but
not in a meeting such as this.” It is obvious that Obama—the
“charming” anti-Christ that he is—can manipulate those around him so
easily that he need not be too ‘worried’ that he has been declared, by
me—one of the last law-abiding citizens left—to be an outlaw who can
be shot-on-sight with impunity (in lieu of hanging). Sodom and
Gomorra got flattened because they were such immoral and sinful
places. The fluted columns and alabaster walls of Washington, with
four or more flag poles on every block, can’t give “value” to a city
that is so failing the moral ones who are still left. It is my great
hope that just ONE Secret Service agent values his sworn oath to
protect the Constitution MORE than he values the wasteful and unworthy
esprit de corps of the Secret Service to… protect any scoundrel who
manages to strut his bony ass up the W. H. steps. *** Few are called,
but only a few are needed! *** Pay It Forward! And… Long live the
USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 1, 9:41 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Avoiding the Fiscal Cliff ‘Smoke Screen’.
>
> Those in the media, and the stones-for-brains people in Congress are
> focusing on a problem, and not considering THE best solution to most
> problems—eliminating them! There need be no long-term detriment to
> either the left or right factions if—instead of accepting that some
> God damned law that’s set to take effect will have dire consequences,
> regardless of what gets decided—consider THIS fact: There is no such
> thing as a “law” that doesn’t have the approval of the majority of the
> American People; and no such thing as a “law” that doesn’t conform to
> the letter and the SPIRIT ofourConstitution!
>
> The last time I checked, the SPIRIT ofourConstitution requires that
>
> Avoiding the Fiscal Cliff ‘Smoke Screen’.
>
> Those in the media, and the stones-for-brains people in Congress are
> focusing on a problem, and not considering THE best solution to most
> problems—eliminating them! There need be no long-term detriment to
> either the left or right factions if—instead of accepting that some
> God damned law that’s set to take effect will have dire consequences,
> regardless of what gets decided—consider THIS fact: There is no such
> thing as a “law” that doesn’t have the approval of the majority of the
> American People; and no such thing as a “law” that doesn’t conform to
> the letter and the SPIRIT ofourConstitution!
>
> there be close parity of the influence of thevoterson the laws that
> can be passed. Since the US Senate, as a “branch” of government,
> resulted from extortion by the low population states to have power
> equal to that of the larger population states, then the US Senate,
> which has always been an oligarchy, is 100% unconstitutional! And It
> doesn’t matter one lick that there is an entire Article in the
> Constitution explaining about the Senate!
>
> From day one, there was a conflict of purposes betweenoursought (but
> resulted from extortion by the low population states to have power
> equal to that of the larger population states, then the US Senate,
> which has always been an oligarchy, is 100% unconstitutional! And It
> doesn’t matter one lick that there is an entire Article in the
> Constitution explaining about the Senate!
>
> gay rights and a woman’s right to choose. At least 65% of the
> ’liberal’votersare secure enough and proud enough—earning a living
> by their own hands—that they don’t, personally, need any
> entitlements! Of course there will be security and pride so long as
> they are working and can afford to purchase health and life
> insurance. The reason there was a 51% liberal vote was due to the
> kind-hearted sympathy of about 26% of the total number ofvotersfor
> relatives, friends or acquaintances who “seem to” need government
> assistance of one or more kinds. That means that at least 75% of
> Americans can survive perfectly well without getting any handouts from
> government! So, the “mandate” for socialism isn’t there! Only the
> ‘social issues’ allow the ‘progressives and socialists’—clandestinely
> led byourpseudopresident, Barack Obama—to think that they can now
> entitlements! Of course there will be security and pride so long as
> they are working and can afford to purchase health and life
> insurance. The reason there was a 51% liberal vote was due to the
> kind-hearted sympathy of about 26% of the total number ofvotersfor
> relatives, friends or acquaintances who “seem to” need government
> assistance of one or more kinds. That means that at least 75% of
> Americans can survive perfectly well without getting any handouts from
> government! So, the “mandate” for socialism isn’t there! Only the
> ‘social issues’ allow the ‘progressives and socialists’—clandestinely
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 3:02:50 AM12/6/12
to
news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
has been well condition by the Mass Media,
and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
He did make a good point when he pointed out
that after Jews migrated out of Germany,
and were prohibited from engaging in activities
that harmed the larger community,
and after women were encouraged to stay home
and take care of the children,
in spite of having fewer people doing the work,
the infrastructure and economy of Germany soared.
They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
the most powerful military on the planet.
And why did the German people build a powerful military?
Because the Jews that had assassinated the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government were using Russia as a base
and would be waging war against them if the Mass Media was able
to make war acceptable to the masses.
Here are some of the FACTS that "Klaus Schadenfreude" is ignorant of
or is trying to obscure as demanded by his handlers.
http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
"A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years."
If FDR and Churchill had opposed the War-for-profit gang,
rather than sell out to them,
and joined with the German people in
going after the Class War instigators,
W.W.II would have lasted six months,
and there would have been no Great Depression,
no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no 911, no Religious Wars, etc.
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
no hyping of war against the Iranian people,
with its' attendant cost, depletion of
non-renewable resources, environmental damage, etc.,
no loss of trust by most nations of the world,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no weakening of NATO, and the G8,
no independent European GPS system,
no independent Chinese GPS system,
no loss of trillion dollar markets by Boeing, G.E. and other American firms,
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
>
> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
has been well condition by the Mass Media,
and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
He did make a good point when he pointed out
that after Jews migrated out of Germany,
and were prohibited from engaging in activities
that harmed the larger community,
and after women were encouraged to stay home
and take care of the children,
in spite of having fewer people doing the work,
the infrastructure and economy of Germany soared.
They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
the most powerful military on the planet.
And why did the German people build a powerful military?
Because the Jews that had assassinated the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government were using Russia as a base
from where to train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over the world,
and because they knew that FDR and Churchill had sold out to Jews,
and would be waging war against them if the Mass Media was able
to make war acceptable to the masses.
Here are some of the FACTS that "Klaus Schadenfreude" is ignorant of
or is trying to obscure as demanded by his handlers.
http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
"A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years."
rather than sell out to them,
and joined with the German people in
going after the Class War instigators,
W.W.II would have lasted six months,
and there would have been no Great Depression,
no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no 911, no Religious Wars, etc.
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
no hyping of war against the Iranian people,
with its' attendant cost, depletion of
non-renewable resources, environmental damage, etc.,
no loss of trust by most nations of the world,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no weakening of NATO, and the G8,
no independent European GPS system,
no independent Chinese GPS system,
no loss of trillion dollar markets by Boeing, G.E. and other American firms,
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 3:54:37 AM12/6/12
to
news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
As my psychotic, dishonest pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
with the most unemployment,
to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
in three years, with full employment,
if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
I suspect that "Klaus Schadenfreude" hates the Nazi Party
because they not only found a way to unite and energize a nation,
but because they recognized that the Jews who had assassinated
the Russian Family and co-opted the Russian government
were using Russia as a base from were to train terrorists
and instigate Class revolutions and wars all over the world,
much as they are instigating religious wars and revolutions today.
I suggest to Klaus that he shouldn't hate the German people
nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
with the most unemployment,
to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
in three years, with full employment,
if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
I suspect that "Klaus Schadenfreude" hates the Nazi Party
because they not only found a way to unite and energize a nation,
but because they recognized that the Jews who had assassinated
the Russian Family and co-opted the Russian government
were using Russia as a base from were to train terrorists
and instigate Class revolutions and wars all over the world,
much as they are instigating religious wars and revolutions today.
I suggest to Klaus that he shouldn't hate the German people
nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
NoEinstein
Dec 6, 2012, 6:56:18 AM12/6/12
to
On Dec 6, 3:54 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> I suggest to Klaus that heshouldn'thate the German people
benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
6/07/08
A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
voted for a qualified woman to be President. By doing so, those same
men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to be
President. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
any whoop-de-do—automatically changes the ideals of those eighteen
million men and women! Their gut feelings—when they went into those
voting booths—surely, helped to guide them in making their decisions.
Now, gut feelings should aid them in deciding WHERE their loyalties
should lie.
New candidates who vie for public office often play-up the fact that
they are political outsiders. There’s a very real, implied corrupting-
influence if an office holder is seen to be one of the political
insiders. Yet, the ‘power’ of being an incumbent favors having the
insiders get re elected. That’s in spite of the fact that those
insiders have been part and parcel to the implied corruption. These
days, corrupt dealings are largely accepted as… the way that things
are done in politics.
I was raised by a Southern Gentleman, to BE a Southern Gentleman.
Having good manners was stressed to me. All of my life I’ve willingly
embraced the virtues—not only of being a gentleman—but of abiding with
the associated formalities. PLAYING FAIR is a big part of being a
gentleman, as is respecting and protecting… the weaker sex.
All during the Democratic Party’s primaries, Hillary Clinton had to
take—without complaint—the many slights to her candidacy. Those were
made on a continual basis by: A biased media; their ideologically
screened pundits; the choose-the-candidate-that-WE-want democratic
party leadership; by Barack Obama, himself; and by his many selfish
endorsers. Clinton couldn’t defend herself… “like a man”, because she
isn’t a man. She knows that a successful nominee for President will
need to have ‘fair and balanced’ media coverage, if such person hopes
to have any chance of being elected. And she knows that only a
Democrat or Republican seems to have much chance of winning the
presidency.
Probably, Ron Paul is the most ideologically well-qualified man in
America to be President. When discussing the Washington scene, Paul
is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
of my supporters will follow along.”
I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
voting for ‘her choice’ for President. EACH of those eighteen million
men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
get any worse.”
Essentially, the problems with our government are personnel issues.
We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
media, and to negatively sway the decisions that our government makes—
supposedly on our behalves. Our government should be an
approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
interests.
The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be elected President probably
won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results from our
government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
Americans to die due to cancer… our government thinks it’s quite OK to
“solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
sending their products to places like China—where there are no
“warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—that our government
lets our businesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
being treated FAIRLY. When our leaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
of Jews who were hurt or killed.
So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
increasing terrorism in the USA and among our allies. But there’s a
most simple solution! CLEAN UP our own act in this country to have
FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowing our businesses to RAPE
(figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US has
already been doing those bad things, we must begin making generous
concessions. If we’ll do the latter, suddenly, the “motive” for
having our much needed businesses, here, move to other countries, just
isn’t there any more. The “economy”—that is issue number one with the
voters—will start to improve, soon!
Much of the 85% discontent of Americans with the direction that this
country is heading results, directly or indirectly, from a
dissatisfaction with the LAWS that are in place, or which just got
enacted. Simply put, the main cause of our discontent is: We have too
many ill-conceived and downright unfair LAWS! My New Constitution,
when ratified, will MANDATE a review and revote of every single law on
that is on the books! And the vote for passage for all laws, old or
new, becomes: 55 percent! Never again will laws get passed that
aren’t liked by more than half of the people. And 55 percent is only
a ‘probationary’ passage. Unless a law passes by 60% or more, it must
be reviewed and revoted every four years. And, if at any time, one
third of the House, or the President alone, thinks that a
controversial law doesn’t meet with the approval of the Citizens, such
law will be put in a referendum—bypassing House authority, completely.
Most Americans will like this: The House will have a ceiling on the
amount of taxes it can raise. Such will be a percentage of the GNP.
And those taxes will be billed, just once a year, to the STATES based
on a state’s population. (Folks, please don’t worry about ‘poor’
states. There will be compensations to even out most inequities.)
Never again will the Federal government keep financial records on any
citizen! And within several years, all of the taxation in the USA
will be sales taxes only. Food and medicines will be tax exempt. The
combined total of all taxes can’t exceed the ceiling without an
amendment to the New Constitution!
The above tidbits from my New Constitution should hint that I want
such document to be user friendly to the People. But it will be:
“Violate at your own peril.” to those in government. There are more
than a dozen circumstances, spelled out, in which a government
official may be either fired, or charged with a felony. Screwing with
democracy in America will have very serious consequences!
My hints of ‘doom’ are mostly cautionary. I’m not walking around with
‘a sign’ saying: “The World will end…” in so many days. On the
contrary, for the past twelve years, I’ve worked to be sure that the
relationships among nations and peoples can become favorable ones.
Simply by ratifying my New Constitution, things will begin to improve,
here. If US companies want to stay in business, the New Constitution
mandates, that such had better start CARING about how those hard
working people in other nations are being treated, and about how World
resources and the environment are being treated. I hope, in the not
too distant future, when FAIRNESS becomes the watchword throughout the
World, that the threat of terrorism and wars will be out-the-window.
At least THAT is my fervent dream!
For now, that plan “B” of Hillary Clinton won’t harm this country,
unless… Barack Obama becomes President. I’m recommending that Obama
and McCain be ignored. Because voters can surely write, when election
day comes, punch or check where it says “Write-In” and print these
clear letters: “RON PAUL” for President of the United States of
America! Those of you who agree with that wisdom, go to Paul’s WEB
page and make a contribution! Ron said, “… a revolution will take
longer.” Hopefully, my New Constitution will speed things up!
Respectfully Submitted,
— NoEinstein —
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
> to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> --
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html- Hide quoted text -
> to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> --
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> - Show quoted text -
benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
6/07/08
A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
voted for a qualified woman to be President. By doing so, those same
men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to be
President. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
any whoop-de-do—automatically changes the ideals of those eighteen
million men and women! Their gut feelings—when they went into those
voting booths—surely, helped to guide them in making their decisions.
Now, gut feelings should aid them in deciding WHERE their loyalties
should lie.
New candidates who vie for public office often play-up the fact that
they are political outsiders. There’s a very real, implied corrupting-
influence if an office holder is seen to be one of the political
insiders. Yet, the ‘power’ of being an incumbent favors having the
insiders get re elected. That’s in spite of the fact that those
insiders have been part and parcel to the implied corruption. These
days, corrupt dealings are largely accepted as… the way that things
are done in politics.
I was raised by a Southern Gentleman, to BE a Southern Gentleman.
Having good manners was stressed to me. All of my life I’ve willingly
embraced the virtues—not only of being a gentleman—but of abiding with
the associated formalities. PLAYING FAIR is a big part of being a
gentleman, as is respecting and protecting… the weaker sex.
All during the Democratic Party’s primaries, Hillary Clinton had to
take—without complaint—the many slights to her candidacy. Those were
made on a continual basis by: A biased media; their ideologically
screened pundits; the choose-the-candidate-that-WE-want democratic
party leadership; by Barack Obama, himself; and by his many selfish
endorsers. Clinton couldn’t defend herself… “like a man”, because she
isn’t a man. She knows that a successful nominee for President will
need to have ‘fair and balanced’ media coverage, if such person hopes
to have any chance of being elected. And she knows that only a
Democrat or Republican seems to have much chance of winning the
presidency.
Probably, Ron Paul is the most ideologically well-qualified man in
America to be President. When discussing the Washington scene, Paul
is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
of my supporters will follow along.”
I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
voting for ‘her choice’ for President. EACH of those eighteen million
men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
get any worse.”
Essentially, the problems with our government are personnel issues.
We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
media, and to negatively sway the decisions that our government makes—
supposedly on our behalves. Our government should be an
approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
interests.
The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be elected President probably
won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results from our
government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
Americans to die due to cancer… our government thinks it’s quite OK to
“solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
sending their products to places like China—where there are no
“warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—that our government
lets our businesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
being treated FAIRLY. When our leaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
of Jews who were hurt or killed.
So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
increasing terrorism in the USA and among our allies. But there’s a
most simple solution! CLEAN UP our own act in this country to have
FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowing our businesses to RAPE
(figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US has
already been doing those bad things, we must begin making generous
concessions. If we’ll do the latter, suddenly, the “motive” for
having our much needed businesses, here, move to other countries, just
isn’t there any more. The “economy”—that is issue number one with the
voters—will start to improve, soon!
Much of the 85% discontent of Americans with the direction that this
country is heading results, directly or indirectly, from a
dissatisfaction with the LAWS that are in place, or which just got
enacted. Simply put, the main cause of our discontent is: We have too
many ill-conceived and downright unfair LAWS! My New Constitution,
when ratified, will MANDATE a review and revote of every single law on
that is on the books! And the vote for passage for all laws, old or
new, becomes: 55 percent! Never again will laws get passed that
aren’t liked by more than half of the people. And 55 percent is only
a ‘probationary’ passage. Unless a law passes by 60% or more, it must
be reviewed and revoted every four years. And, if at any time, one
third of the House, or the President alone, thinks that a
controversial law doesn’t meet with the approval of the Citizens, such
law will be put in a referendum—bypassing House authority, completely.
Most Americans will like this: The House will have a ceiling on the
amount of taxes it can raise. Such will be a percentage of the GNP.
And those taxes will be billed, just once a year, to the STATES based
on a state’s population. (Folks, please don’t worry about ‘poor’
states. There will be compensations to even out most inequities.)
Never again will the Federal government keep financial records on any
citizen! And within several years, all of the taxation in the USA
will be sales taxes only. Food and medicines will be tax exempt. The
combined total of all taxes can’t exceed the ceiling without an
amendment to the New Constitution!
The above tidbits from my New Constitution should hint that I want
such document to be user friendly to the People. But it will be:
“Violate at your own peril.” to those in government. There are more
than a dozen circumstances, spelled out, in which a government
official may be either fired, or charged with a felony. Screwing with
democracy in America will have very serious consequences!
My hints of ‘doom’ are mostly cautionary. I’m not walking around with
‘a sign’ saying: “The World will end…” in so many days. On the
contrary, for the past twelve years, I’ve worked to be sure that the
relationships among nations and peoples can become favorable ones.
Simply by ratifying my New Constitution, things will begin to improve,
here. If US companies want to stay in business, the New Constitution
mandates, that such had better start CARING about how those hard
working people in other nations are being treated, and about how World
resources and the environment are being treated. I hope, in the not
too distant future, when FAIRNESS becomes the watchword throughout the
World, that the threat of terrorism and wars will be out-the-window.
At least THAT is my fervent dream!
For now, that plan “B” of Hillary Clinton won’t harm this country,
unless… Barack Obama becomes President. I’m recommending that Obama
and McCain be ignored. Because voters can surely write, when election
day comes, punch or check where it says “Write-In” and print these
clear letters: “RON PAUL” for President of the United States of
America! Those of you who agree with that wisdom, go to Paul’s WEB
page and make a contribution! Ron said, “… a revolution will take
longer.” Hopefully, my New Constitution will speed things up!
Respectfully Submitted,
— NoEinstein —
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 6, 2012, 7:52:24 AM12/6/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>>
>> Prove it's a phony handle, "Tom Potter."
>
>
[goose-stepping-crickets.wav]
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>>
>> Prove it's a phony handle, "Tom Potter."
>
>
>
>
>>>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others
>>
>> Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance yet again.
>
>
[goose-stepping-crickets.wav]
>
>>>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others
>>
>> Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance yet again.
>
>
>
>
>>>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
>>
>> Not too many people are ignorant about the nazis. You people are all
>> unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.
>>
>> http://klaus.webege.com/nazi/dead_nazis.html
>
>As my psychotic, dishonest pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
>perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
>propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
>with the most unemployment,
>to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
>in three years, with full employment,
>if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
They didn't. Perhaps my glue-sniffing pedophile friend Tom Potter will
>
>>>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
>>
>> Not too many people are ignorant about the nazis. You people are all
>> unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.
>>
>> http://klaus.webege.com/nazi/dead_nazis.html
>
>As my psychotic, dishonest pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
>perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
>propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
>with the most unemployment,
>to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
>in three years, with full employment,
>if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
explain how the Nazi Party propelled Germany into one of the most
devastated nations just a few years later.
"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
©Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 6, 2012, 7:55:40 AM12/6/12
to
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>
>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
It's interesting to see that Tom Potter is well-conditioned by his
>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>
>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
Nazi Masters to accept only their propaganda.
>They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
>many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
>and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
>the most powerful military on the planet.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
http://www.zeitzeugenboerse-koeln.de/uploads/pics/00012002.jbh_01.jpg
I guarantee you he will blame it all on the Jews. That's all his tiny
mind can handle after all those years of huffing glue and beating off
to kiddie porn.
Panda Bear
Dec 6, 2012, 1:50:42 PM12/6/12
to
On Dec 6, 12:54 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
Heil Haby!
Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
Fuehrer, the Gang of Three: Haby
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
Fuehrer, the Gang of Three: Haby
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 11:55:26 PM12/6/12
to
>news:186666d4-b33b-489b...@r20g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
>adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers-
>most of them, I think, from the media-are wondering "where I'm coming
Dear Mr. NoEinstein:
You and I both have ideas on how to make America
and the world better places.
I base my ideas on an exhaustive examination of history,
and you seem to base your's on the fact that
a Black man is president.
Regarding your comment:
"Hate the sin, not the sinner."
and that is what I do.
Some of my best friends and employees were Jewish,
and I personally have never had any particularly bad relationships with
Jews.
In fact some of my favorite comics, Grocho Marx, Milton Berle, George Burns,
Rodney Dangerfield, Chaplin, etc. were/are Jews, and I liked Al Jolson.
I must admit that I never thought that Jack Benny was entertaining.
I am not concerned about why and how you came to your
personal approach to saving the world,
or for that matter why anyone comes to hold the opinions they have.
I am only concerned with causes and effects
and how they affect the lives of ALL people.
I make an effort to find and promote what I consider to be
good causes, and to find and call attention to causes
that I think will have a negative affect on mankind.
I am not interested in parroting, getting on bandwagons,
or massive stable systems. I am only interested in
change and momentum.
I aggressively promoted George Bush when he first ran for office,
but within two months, it was clear to me that he was going
to cause America a lot of trouble.
If you check out my old posts from around 2002
you will see that I and a few people where trying
to call attention to the folly of waging war on Iraq,
and a number of people, who no longer post
were aggressively hyping the war,
just as some are trying to promote a needless war with
Iran at this time.
I was against Jimmy Carter until I came to realize that
he was the most intelligent, honest, loyal. and moral president
that America has ever had.
I was brainwashed to believe that FDR was a great man,
but after getting at the facts and analyzing them,
it became obvious to me that he was the worst president
that America ever had.
You don't have to worry about
"Hatred adversely affect<ing> my physical health."
I am 80 years old and in great health,
and I have no "Hatred" for any thing or anyone.
If you feel the compulsion to analyze me,
all you have to do is note that I try to focus on
things that are growing or diminishing exponentially,
and will have a big impact on the lives of people.
Things like electronics, TV, integrated circuits, microprocessors,
cell phones, GPS, search engines, DNA, war, revolution, China,
smart cards, flash memory, the Internet, Intel's new transducers, etc.
And I take momentum into account,
like the negative momentum that the Bushes and FDR
imparted to America, and the positive momentum
that Jimmy Carter imparted to America.
Where you, I, tj frazir, Archimedes Plutonium, etc.
get our ideas is of no importance.
Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
What is important is
"Are the ideas valid and useful?"
The "source" of an idea is not useful
unless one is interested in the "source"
rather than the "idea".
>most of them, I think, from the media-are wondering "where I'm coming
>from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
>long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
>most of my message is still apt. - John A. Armistead -
>long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
Dear Mr. NoEinstein:
You and I both have ideas on how to make America
and the world better places.
I base my ideas on an exhaustive examination of history,
and you seem to base your's on the fact that
a Black man is president.
Regarding your comment:
"I never learned why you are so anti Jew.
Hatred can adversely affect one's physical health."
My Pappy use to say
Hatred can adversely affect one's physical health."
"Hate the sin, not the sinner."
and that is what I do.
Some of my best friends and employees were Jewish,
and I personally have never had any particularly bad relationships with
Jews.
In fact some of my favorite comics, Grocho Marx, Milton Berle, George Burns,
Rodney Dangerfield, Chaplin, etc. were/are Jews, and I liked Al Jolson.
I must admit that I never thought that Jack Benny was entertaining.
I am not concerned about why and how you came to your
personal approach to saving the world,
or for that matter why anyone comes to hold the opinions they have.
I am only concerned with causes and effects
and how they affect the lives of ALL people.
I make an effort to find and promote what I consider to be
good causes, and to find and call attention to causes
that I think will have a negative affect on mankind.
I am not interested in parroting, getting on bandwagons,
or massive stable systems. I am only interested in
change and momentum.
I aggressively promoted George Bush when he first ran for office,
but within two months, it was clear to me that he was going
to cause America a lot of trouble.
If you check out my old posts from around 2002
you will see that I and a few people where trying
to call attention to the folly of waging war on Iraq,
and a number of people, who no longer post
were aggressively hyping the war,
just as some are trying to promote a needless war with
Iran at this time.
I was against Jimmy Carter until I came to realize that
he was the most intelligent, honest, loyal. and moral president
that America has ever had.
I was brainwashed to believe that FDR was a great man,
but after getting at the facts and analyzing them,
it became obvious to me that he was the worst president
that America ever had.
You don't have to worry about
"Hatred adversely affect<ing> my physical health."
I am 80 years old and in great health,
and I have no "Hatred" for any thing or anyone.
If you feel the compulsion to analyze me,
all you have to do is note that I try to focus on
things that are growing or diminishing exponentially,
and will have a big impact on the lives of people.
Things like electronics, TV, integrated circuits, microprocessors,
cell phones, GPS, search engines, DNA, war, revolution, China,
smart cards, flash memory, the Internet, Intel's new transducers, etc.
And I take momentum into account,
like the negative momentum that the Bushes and FDR
imparted to America, and the positive momentum
that Jimmy Carter imparted to America.
Where you, I, tj frazir, Archimedes Plutonium, etc.
get our ideas is of no importance.
Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
What is important is
"Are the ideas valid and useful?"
The "source" of an idea is not useful
unless one is interested in the "source"
rather than the "idea".
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 11:55:37 PM12/6/12
to
news:u351c89a1n4o0lhan...@4ax.com...
It is interesting to see that my psychotic, obscene pal "Klaus
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
And as rational, intelligent folks
who have studied history with an open mind know,
that FDR and Churchill sold out to the Jews
who had massacred the Russian family and co-opted
the Russian government and were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate revolutions and
and there would have been no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
And as rational, intelligent folks
who have studied history with an open mind know,
that FDR and Churchill sold out to the Jews
who had massacred the Russian family and co-opted
the Russian government and were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate revolutions and
wars all over the world
and if FDR had opposed the War-for-profit gang,
rather than sell out to them,
WWII would have lasted six months,
and there would have been no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no 911, no Religious Wars,
no destruction and looting of Germany, etc.
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
with its' attendant cost, depletion of
non-renewable resources, environmental damage, etc,
no loss of trust by most nations of the world,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no weakening of NATO, the G8,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no independent European GPS system,
no loss of trillion dollar markets by Boeing, G.E. and other American firms,
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 11:55:43 PM12/6/12
to
news:l851c8560e24513q1...@4ax.com...
people who instigate revolution and war
end up like this.
http://www.codrosu.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/auschwitz.jpg
and people who oppose the instigation of war and revolution
end up like this ------ if they lose in their effort.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
It seems to me that the best course for both
is not to tolerate the instigation of revolutions and wars.
It is interesting to see that my psychotic, obscene pal "Klaus
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
Klaus also seems to be asserting that
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
people who instigate revolution and war
end up like this.
http://www.codrosu.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/auschwitz.jpg
and people who oppose the instigation of war and revolution
end up like this ------ if they lose in their effort.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
It seems to me that the best course for both
is not to tolerate the instigation of revolutions and wars.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 7, 2012, 7:58:17 AM12/7/12
to
most interested in.
His inability to prove I'm using what his nazi masters have told him
to refer to as a "phony handle..."
His inability to even discuss the ravaged state of Germany after
WWII...
His inability to even understand what "Schadenfreude" means.....
...All point to excessive abuse of inhalants.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 7, 2012, 7:59:36 AM12/7/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:l851c8560e24513q1...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>
>>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>>>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>>>
>>>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>>>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
>>
>> It's interesting to see that Tom Potter is well-conditioned by his
>> Nazi Masters to accept only their propaganda.
>>
>>>They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
>>>many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
>>>and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
>>>the most powerful military on the planet.
>>
>> Here is how Nazi Germany ended up:
>>
>> http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
>>
>> http://www.zeitzeugenboerse-koeln.de/uploads/pics/00012002.jbh_01.jpg
>>
>> I guarantee you he will blame it all on the Jews. That's all his tiny
>> mind can handle after all those years of huffing glue and beating off
>> to kiddie porn.
>
>It is interesting to see that [..]
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:l851c8560e24513q1...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>
>>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>>>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>>>
>>>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>>>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
>>
>> It's interesting to see that Tom Potter is well-conditioned by his
>> Nazi Masters to accept only their propaganda.
>>
>>>They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
>>>many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
>>>and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
>>>the most powerful military on the planet.
>>
>> Here is how Nazi Germany ended up:
>>
>> http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
>>
>> http://www.zeitzeugenboerse-koeln.de/uploads/pics/00012002.jbh_01.jpg
>>
>> I guarantee you he will blame it all on the Jews. That's all his tiny
>> mind can handle after all those years of huffing glue and beating off
>> to kiddie porn.
>
It is interesting to see that "Tom Potter" doesn't deny that Hitler
destroyed Germany in exchange for a few years of fun.
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 5:46:03 PM12/7/12
to
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> voted for a qualified woman to bePresident. By doing so, those same
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to bePresident. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
> is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> voting for ‘her choice’ forPresident. EACH of those eighteen million
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> Essentially, the problems withourgovernment are personnel issues.
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> media, and to negatively sway the decisions thatourgovernment makes—
> supposedly onourbehalves. Ourgovernment should be an
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> media, and to negatively sway the decisions thatourgovernment makes—
> approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> Americans to die due to cancer…ourgovernment thinks it’s quite OK to
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> “solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> letsourbusinesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> being treated FAIRLY. Whenourleaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
> defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> increasing terrorism in the USA and amongourallies. But there’s a
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> most simple solution! CLEAN UPourown act in this country to have
> FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowingourbusinesses to RAPE
> (figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
> ...
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
CORRECTION: Make that tough ROW to hoe; not "road"! J. A. A.
> - Show quoted text -
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 5:51:48 PM12/7/12
to
> > nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
> > to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> > --
> > Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...
> > to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> > --
>
> Heil Haby!
> Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
> Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
> Fuehrer, the Gang of Three: Haby- Hide quoted text -
> Heil Haby!
> Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
> Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
>
> - Show quoted text -
With people I don't know, talk using "insider" wording, I can only
> - Show quoted text -
stand to the side and wonder whether the message is good or bad. J.
A. Armistead
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 6:09:36 PM12/7/12
to
Seduced by smiles.
Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
‘undecided’ voters who were being most courted. Basically, undecided
voters are those people having such repressed moral judgment, that
they hang-in-there until they can be nearly certain who the victor
will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
unwavering support of about 18 million voters, including me—who
favored her over Obama. But Hillary’s ‘Plan B’, rather than her,
rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
or four others) of her ’possibly’ becoming his choice for Vice
President. The last time I checked, bribery, for undeserved personal
gain is a FELONY. Since felonies are high crimes that the
Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
“headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
—every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
and politicians smile so much?
In the second Romney-Obama televised debate, us voters got to see what
Obama is actually like… under his skin. But when the voters are
angry, they will tend to favor the candidate who sounds angry, too.
Adolph Hitler, Obama’s voice and bearing model, certainly sounded
angry, a lot. When Hitler explained that the reason for the high gas
prices was the Russians ‘unfair’ control of the eastern oil fields,
rather than the reduced value of the currency due to Hitler’s
policies, they believed him. Tone of voice and bearing always mean
more to those of average and sub-average IQs—that constitute the large
majority of the 51% of Americans who voted for Obama, November 6,
2012. Close to half of that number voted for Obama because they were
BRIBED with “stuff”, “gifts”, entitlements and favoritism, just for
the MIDDLE class, rather than for all Americans. Nowhere in the
Constitution is class-against-class divisiveness sanctioned. Check it
out!
The USA has been bitten by the same DOG, Obama, twice. The poles are
showing his popularity, again, jumping toward that 70% approval
rating. That means that there are only 30% of the people having
either the analytical ability, or the morals to stick-to-their-guns
and keep working for what is best for all Americans. The middle class
has become an all-too-convenient-pawn that Democrats have championed
in total disregard of the Constitution.
I continue to appeal to “a” US Secret Service agent to HONOR his sworn
oath to support and defend the Constitution. Yet, I’m aware that
those who are trying to make very important moral judgments often tend
to look at others, or at the masses, in order to get a sense of what
the prevailing mood is. Those who are “now” waving blue banners are
hoping that each of them will get at least co-ownership of one of the
“free” Super-Ball lottery tickets that Obama bribed his way with, back
into the White House. Because of the required quick reflexes and
clear thinking necessary to become a Secret Service agent, I can place
those brave men’s average IQ at about 125—much higher than those
lacking moral fortitude, who are “polling” as now backing Obama. I
urge you to think clearly, just by yourselves, without being seduced
by the… smiles of those waiting for the Power-Balls to be drawn. It
is only AFTER all of those people lose, with Obama, that there will be
few smiling people of the Democratic ilk left.
Perhaps Tom Hanks is (now) a had-been Barack Obama supporter. Quite
constitutionally, Hanks had officiated at one or more fund-raisers for
Obama. But if such had been an expressly for-the-media event(s),
Hanks would have been committing a felony—under my New Constitution,
that is always within the SPIRIT of our present Constitution. [Note:
Using one’s celebrity to sway voters makes the ’voice’ of celebrities
greater than one-person-one-vote-fairly-counted. No democracy nor
republic can allow media celebrities nor entertainment celebrities to
have more influence on the outcome of an election than the American
man (or woman) on the street.] To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech *** of those Citizens who don’t work for the media;
the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the
right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or
group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances… ” [Note: Unedited coverage of news, as it
happens, is always allowed. But those working for any medium shall
never assess or comment on the news as political leverage to
promulgate their personal biased notions or the notions of
management. Doing so is made a serious felony, and willful violation
will CLOSE an offending news medium, permanently.]
On a recent David Letterman Show, Hanks came on stage seeming more
nervous than usual. After sitting down, he joked that he needed the
$300 that the guests on such shows get. Judging by Letterman’s self-
assured, almost gleeful aplomb, it was obvious that Hanks was about to
be asked, within that public medium: “How do you feel, now that ‘your
man’ has won the election? Hanks, having anticipated the question
that would be asked, started volunteering: “I was supporting Newt
Gingrich! When I heard Gingrich delivering a speech suggesting that
the USA should again back the Space Program, and set up a Moon Colony,
THAT is exactly what I’ve wanted since I was a kid—big helmet and all!
…”
There is no higher VIRTUE in any man than to admit having been wrong.
I hope ‘that’ was what Tom Hanks was doing on Letterman’s show. All
of the social ideals of the left won’t matter one wit when, and I hope
only “if”, the USA goes down-the-greasy-financial-tubes. But fear
not! My New Constitution will protect both the social ideals of the
left and the economic ideals of the right. Please read back in this
thread for more excerpts from my “NC”. And… You SMART Secret Service
agents should begin thoroughly investigating Osama’s “evidence” of
citizenship, NOW! Many of you will be in Hawaii for three weeks.
While there, do your sworn DUTY!
May God be with us all! Pay It Forward! And … Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> > Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...Hide quoted text -
> men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to bePresident. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
> America to bePresident. When discussing the Washington scene, Paul
> being treated FAIRLY. Whenourleaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
> most simple solution! CLEAN UPourown act in this country to have
> FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowingourbusinesses to RAPE
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
‘undecided’ voters who were being most courted. Basically, undecided
voters are those people having such repressed moral judgment, that
they hang-in-there until they can be nearly certain who the victor
will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
unwavering support of about 18 million voters, including me—who
favored her over Obama. But Hillary’s ‘Plan B’, rather than her,
rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
or four others) of her ’possibly’ becoming his choice for Vice
President. The last time I checked, bribery, for undeserved personal
gain is a FELONY. Since felonies are high crimes that the
Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
“headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
—every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
and politicians smile so much?
In the second Romney-Obama televised debate, us voters got to see what
Obama is actually like… under his skin. But when the voters are
angry, they will tend to favor the candidate who sounds angry, too.
Adolph Hitler, Obama’s voice and bearing model, certainly sounded
angry, a lot. When Hitler explained that the reason for the high gas
prices was the Russians ‘unfair’ control of the eastern oil fields,
rather than the reduced value of the currency due to Hitler’s
policies, they believed him. Tone of voice and bearing always mean
more to those of average and sub-average IQs—that constitute the large
majority of the 51% of Americans who voted for Obama, November 6,
2012. Close to half of that number voted for Obama because they were
BRIBED with “stuff”, “gifts”, entitlements and favoritism, just for
the MIDDLE class, rather than for all Americans. Nowhere in the
Constitution is class-against-class divisiveness sanctioned. Check it
out!
The USA has been bitten by the same DOG, Obama, twice. The poles are
showing his popularity, again, jumping toward that 70% approval
rating. That means that there are only 30% of the people having
either the analytical ability, or the morals to stick-to-their-guns
and keep working for what is best for all Americans. The middle class
has become an all-too-convenient-pawn that Democrats have championed
in total disregard of the Constitution.
I continue to appeal to “a” US Secret Service agent to HONOR his sworn
oath to support and defend the Constitution. Yet, I’m aware that
those who are trying to make very important moral judgments often tend
to look at others, or at the masses, in order to get a sense of what
the prevailing mood is. Those who are “now” waving blue banners are
hoping that each of them will get at least co-ownership of one of the
“free” Super-Ball lottery tickets that Obama bribed his way with, back
into the White House. Because of the required quick reflexes and
clear thinking necessary to become a Secret Service agent, I can place
those brave men’s average IQ at about 125—much higher than those
lacking moral fortitude, who are “polling” as now backing Obama. I
urge you to think clearly, just by yourselves, without being seduced
by the… smiles of those waiting for the Power-Balls to be drawn. It
is only AFTER all of those people lose, with Obama, that there will be
few smiling people of the Democratic ilk left.
Perhaps Tom Hanks is (now) a had-been Barack Obama supporter. Quite
constitutionally, Hanks had officiated at one or more fund-raisers for
Obama. But if such had been an expressly for-the-media event(s),
Hanks would have been committing a felony—under my New Constitution,
that is always within the SPIRIT of our present Constitution. [Note:
Using one’s celebrity to sway voters makes the ’voice’ of celebrities
greater than one-person-one-vote-fairly-counted. No democracy nor
republic can allow media celebrities nor entertainment celebrities to
have more influence on the outcome of an election than the American
man (or woman) on the street.] To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech *** of those Citizens who don’t work for the media;
the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the
right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or
group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances… ” [Note: Unedited coverage of news, as it
happens, is always allowed. But those working for any medium shall
never assess or comment on the news as political leverage to
promulgate their personal biased notions or the notions of
management. Doing so is made a serious felony, and willful violation
will CLOSE an offending news medium, permanently.]
On a recent David Letterman Show, Hanks came on stage seeming more
nervous than usual. After sitting down, he joked that he needed the
$300 that the guests on such shows get. Judging by Letterman’s self-
assured, almost gleeful aplomb, it was obvious that Hanks was about to
be asked, within that public medium: “How do you feel, now that ‘your
man’ has won the election? Hanks, having anticipated the question
that would be asked, started volunteering: “I was supporting Newt
Gingrich! When I heard Gingrich delivering a speech suggesting that
the USA should again back the Space Program, and set up a Moon Colony,
THAT is exactly what I’ve wanted since I was a kid—big helmet and all!
…”
There is no higher VIRTUE in any man than to admit having been wrong.
I hope ‘that’ was what Tom Hanks was doing on Letterman’s show. All
of the social ideals of the left won’t matter one wit when, and I hope
only “if”, the USA goes down-the-greasy-financial-tubes. But fear
not! My New Constitution will protect both the social ideals of the
left and the economic ideals of the right. Please read back in this
thread for more excerpts from my “NC”. And… You SMART Secret Service
agents should begin thoroughly investigating Osama’s “evidence” of
citizenship, NOW! Many of you will be in Hawaii for three weeks.
While there, do your sworn DUTY!
May God be with us all! Pay It Forward! And … Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> voted for a qualified woman to bePresident. By doing so, those same
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to bePresident. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
> is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> voting for ‘her choice’ forPresident. EACH of those eighteen million
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> Essentially, the problems withourgovernment are personnel issues.
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> media, and to negatively sway the decisions thatourgovernment makes—
> supposedly onourbehalves. Ourgovernment should be an
> approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> Americans to die due to cancer…ourgovernment thinks it’s quite OK to
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> “solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> letsourbusinesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> being treated FAIRLY. Whenourleaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
> defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> increasing terrorism in the USA and amongourallies. But there’s a
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> most simple solution! CLEAN UPourown act in this country to have
> FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowingourbusinesses to RAPE
> (figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
> ...
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 7:14:46 PM12/7/12
to
On Dec 6, 11:55 pm, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
Dear Tom: Thanks for your long narrative!
Like many from academia, you enjoy throwing out Ideas to get others to
agree or disagree. What you are doing is motivated more because of
the "joy" of having a discussion, than because of the ideals you are
pushing or faulting. College debate teams often never know what
position they will be asked to argue. My "NC" requires that attorneys
be open to defending the constitutional rights of anyone entering
their doors—not just those they agree with, philosophically. I had a
bad personal experience in which I wanted to sue government for
protecting a public figure who should have been sent to prison for
life. In those efforts, I went all the way to the, then, Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court, but my "petition" was ignored because
public figures are perceived as being above the law. It was those
personal insights that allowed me to perfect those aspects of my "NC"
that will permanently neutralize our broken courts and remove the off-
base esprit de corps that law enforcement works for government'
When I appeal to the US Secret Service, those guys KNOW that I have
passed their strictest tests of being one of the "good guys"! I know,
that in their hearts, there is goodness, too. I only wish that I had
been standing in the crowd beside John Hinkley when he pulled out his
gun on Reagan. The quick reflexes that go with being a super genius
would have allowed me to assess what was about to happen and to ACT
with the swift pressure of my body to knock Hinkley to the ground. If
enough people are vigilant, many mass murders and terrorists can be
stopped in their tracts. Think, people!
I too, realized Carter was smart. His main weakness was his not
having learned what Newt Gingrich "over-learned"—and that is 'how to
work within the system'. Making wonderful addresses to the people and
asking THEM to pressure Congress isn't the way things are "presently"
done in Washington.
I always said Jimmy Carter would make a great neighbor, but he never
should have figured he could be President. I feel the same way about
George Bush "Jr." Any person who likes fishing, hiking and biking,
and has a huge ranch would make a great friend. He was also amazingly
candid. Enough so, that he could laugh at himself. I always figured
he got "pushed" to be elected because Republicans wanted to show they
can be all things to all people, just like Democrats were claiming to
be. That just ain't so. As a result Bush's economic policies were a
failure.
It is hard to realize that FDR, a man held in high esteem by my
Grandfather Hamilton, was so unwise in his "anti-depression"
policies. When a small plane goes into a tail spin, sometime it is
better to let go of the controls and allow the design characteristics
of the plane to solve the problems. FDR’s big mistake was in having
government do a thing. His actions stretched-out the depression by at
least five years. The lesson: LESS government is always best!
Jews are "bad" as a holier-than-thou race, not because individual Jews
are bad. The over-riding principle of my "NC" is that groups are
always fighting other groups for power, and for control of
government! At our 'personal universe' levels, what we have in common
with other the world over is so great, that there need never again be
any terrorism nor wars!
Blacks are "bad" only because they use racism as a lever to control
the "gifts" and "stuff" from government. I know for a fact, that if
it wasn't for the HARD WORK of blacks, our country would slow to a
crawl in two weeks time. There is a work ethic in Blacks that is
downplayed so that the voting and lobbying power of blacks will be
highest. Blacks, more than Hispanics, have already been assimilated
into our capitalist system. If their "ministers" would just shut up,
things would get friendly PDQ.
I invite others, like Tom, to reveal enough about what drives them to
allow objective comment. Discussion IS a good thing! — John A.
Armistead —
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> >> Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...
> getourideas is of no importance.
>
Dear Tom: Thanks for your long narrative!
Like many from academia, you enjoy throwing out Ideas to get others to
agree or disagree. What you are doing is motivated more because of
the "joy" of having a discussion, than because of the ideals you are
pushing or faulting. College debate teams often never know what
position they will be asked to argue. My "NC" requires that attorneys
be open to defending the constitutional rights of anyone entering
their doors—not just those they agree with, philosophically. I had a
bad personal experience in which I wanted to sue government for
protecting a public figure who should have been sent to prison for
life. In those efforts, I went all the way to the, then, Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court, but my "petition" was ignored because
public figures are perceived as being above the law. It was those
personal insights that allowed me to perfect those aspects of my "NC"
that will permanently neutralize our broken courts and remove the off-
base esprit de corps that law enforcement works for government'
When I appeal to the US Secret Service, those guys KNOW that I have
passed their strictest tests of being one of the "good guys"! I know,
that in their hearts, there is goodness, too. I only wish that I had
been standing in the crowd beside John Hinkley when he pulled out his
gun on Reagan. The quick reflexes that go with being a super genius
would have allowed me to assess what was about to happen and to ACT
with the swift pressure of my body to knock Hinkley to the ground. If
enough people are vigilant, many mass murders and terrorists can be
stopped in their tracts. Think, people!
I too, realized Carter was smart. His main weakness was his not
having learned what Newt Gingrich "over-learned"—and that is 'how to
work within the system'. Making wonderful addresses to the people and
asking THEM to pressure Congress isn't the way things are "presently"
done in Washington.
I always said Jimmy Carter would make a great neighbor, but he never
should have figured he could be President. I feel the same way about
George Bush "Jr." Any person who likes fishing, hiking and biking,
and has a huge ranch would make a great friend. He was also amazingly
candid. Enough so, that he could laugh at himself. I always figured
he got "pushed" to be elected because Republicans wanted to show they
can be all things to all people, just like Democrats were claiming to
be. That just ain't so. As a result Bush's economic policies were a
failure.
It is hard to realize that FDR, a man held in high esteem by my
Grandfather Hamilton, was so unwise in his "anti-depression"
policies. When a small plane goes into a tail spin, sometime it is
better to let go of the controls and allow the design characteristics
of the plane to solve the problems. FDR’s big mistake was in having
government do a thing. His actions stretched-out the depression by at
least five years. The lesson: LESS government is always best!
Jews are "bad" as a holier-than-thou race, not because individual Jews
are bad. The over-riding principle of my "NC" is that groups are
always fighting other groups for power, and for control of
government! At our 'personal universe' levels, what we have in common
with other the world over is so great, that there need never again be
any terrorism nor wars!
Blacks are "bad" only because they use racism as a lever to control
the "gifts" and "stuff" from government. I know for a fact, that if
it wasn't for the HARD WORK of blacks, our country would slow to a
crawl in two weeks time. There is a work ethic in Blacks that is
downplayed so that the voting and lobbying power of blacks will be
highest. Blacks, more than Hispanics, have already been assimilated
into our capitalist system. If their "ministers" would just shut up,
things would get friendly PDQ.
I invite others, like Tom, to reveal enough about what drives them to
allow objective comment. Discussion IS a good thing! — John A.
Armistead —
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
> Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
> Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
>
> What is important is
> "Are the ideas valid and useful?"
>
> The "source" of an idea is not useful
> unless one is interested in the "source"
> rather than the "idea".
>
> --
> Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
> Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
> Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
>
> What is important is
> "Are the ideas valid and useful?"
>
> The "source" of an idea is not useful
> unless one is interested in the "source"
> rather than the "idea".
>
> --
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 7, 2012, 8:24:58 PM12/7/12
to
Jimmy Carter was the first Trilateral Commission President,
because of Zbigniew B.; see larouchepub.com, thank you.
because of Zbigniew B.; see larouchepub.com, thank you.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 7, 2012, 8:28:28 PM12/7/12
to
um, I have never "assailed" you;
I am merely arguing with your inability
to "do fractions."
if you are not going to even try to discover
what the original scientists did to uncover kinetic energy,
or *vis viva*, how can you clain to refute it?
armistead; never give up, no matter how silly it looks!
> am unassailable.
I am merely arguing with your inability
to "do fractions."
if you are not going to even try to discover
what the original scientists did to uncover kinetic energy,
or *vis viva*, how can you clain to refute it?
armistead; never give up, no matter how silly it looks!
> am unassailable.
NoEinstein
Dec 9, 2012, 3:37:35 PM12/9/12
to
On Dec 7, 6:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
had another nice chat. It wouldn’t be too long before he was made
President of the University of NC. Since obtaining finances for
inventions, obviously, wasn’t my forte (pronounced ‘fort’), I decided
to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
(easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
complex problems—like correcting our live-or-die governmental crises.
Over the last century, because of the undue influence of the media
regarding who our elected officials can be, it is mostly ego maniacs
craving the doting attention that the media gives to public figures,
who are willing to devote their lives to getting elected and trying to
stay in office. Rating “high” in the hierarchy of public officials
requires that one be a convincing speech maker. As a result, what we
have in Washington, for good or bad (mostly bad) is a bunch of ego-
maniacs whose main, and too often, only, talent is burning the
speechmaking candle at both ends, while the pressing problems, in-the-
main, go unsolved.
By its nature, architecture requires making myriad decisions wisely
and quickly. Not all architects have that ability, however. Many has
been the time that one of my bosses would propose making such-and-such
(supposed) improvement. But because of my deep understanding how
changes to one aspect of a building or its grounds can affect other
aspects, I could, within seconds, explain numbers of reasons why the
proposal wouldn’t work. To those with IQs mostly in the center part
of the Bell Curve, I probably seemed to be a rude and not too
considerate person. I once got fired from a Charlotte company with
three principals, because I was correcting my boss’s (initials R. M.)
mistakes with such ease, that he was afraid I would squeeze him out of
his job. It was at that point that I realized the best usage of my
very high talents was by inventing improve-the-world products, not by
batting heads with intellectual underlings who so greatly outnumbered
me.
To solve most problems well, at least four or five layers of reasoning
need to be used. Consider each layer to be like a computer program
that only analyzes one small aspect of an issue. Time and again, I
realize that most “average” people, including the majority of in-you-
face media elites, and those in government, are able to apply no more
than 2 to 2½ layers of reasoning. So, what they keep arguing is “the”
solution, won’t correct the problem at all! The near fatal decline of
our government(s) is due to the errant notion that 500 plus ego-
maniacs, who can make good speeches, should be able to solve even a
single problem!!! One super genius, like me, has already SOLVED all
of the problems being argued-over, so pointlessly. Those solutions
are embodied in my ready-to-be-ratified ‘New Constitution of the
United States of America.’ The main reason so few people have heard
about it is because those of average IQs, like the majority in the
media—many of whom, every day, read what I write, without taking
action, are “control valves” of what gets to be considered “News”. A
round-faced South Korean who pretends to be riding a pony (or etc.) is
considered news worthy. But a New Constitution, written by a super
genius, apparently doesn’t rise to the threshold of being mentioned.
That is why I keep soliciting just ONE person in the public eye; and
just ONE agent in the Secret Service.
Albert Einstein was estimated to have an IQ of 220. Yet, I so easily
saw-through his shallow reasoning, that it only took me ONE HOUR, in
my public library, to invalidate the 1887 Michelson-Morley Experiment
on which Einstein based his Special Relativity Theory or SRT! The
actual M-M apparatus that was used for the initial experiment is in a
basement on the campus of Case Western Reserve University in
Cleveland. Probably, because of the “embarrassing” loss of status
that would result from having a “mere” (HA!) architect invalidate an
experiment looked at by tens of thousands, that University has turned
a deaf ear to my discoveries. Is it any wonder that I recommend that
75% of (supposed) universities be CLOSED and only those students
wishing to major in chemistry, industrial and bio-medical or medical
fields ever attend a USELESS university at all!!!
A big news item concerns the (brainless, criminal and
unconstitutional) Supreme Court agreeing to “consider” the gay
“marriage” issue. My “NC” has already SOLVED that problem to the
optimum best interests of all involved! Here is how:
“Except regarding the military, federal, state and local governments
shall make no laws nor have any regulations sanctioning private, or
predominately private, interpersonal relationships. Also, governments
shall not prohibit peaceable sanctions of private interpersonal
relationships of persons or groups, nor prohibit the application of
written, oral or implied contracts to such. The resolution of
disputes related to the above can be through civil courts. Except
regarding the military, no person shall be compelled by any employer
or any court, etc., to testify about their own or another's private
interpersonal relationships, nor shall such be excluded from
employment or punished for being private. Marriage (married) is a
contractual heterosexual union; gaygement (gayged) is a contractual
homosexual union. Personal fitness can be a condition of
employment. No person shall be refused employment for being over-
qualified for a job sought; rather, the more qualified shall be
favored.”
Another, I think laughable, comment in the media today, is how well
(finger-down-the-throat) Hillary Clinton is ‘positioned’ for the 2016
presidential election. First, Hillary is a TURNCOAT who accepted a
BRIBE from Barack Obama to get her to concede to him before the 2008
Democratic National Convention and, subsequently, to endorse him at
that convention, in order to “unify the party”. The first part of the
bribe was her being teased with her being Obama’s VP choice, if she
would concede. The second part of the bribe was her being told
(perhaps tacitly) that if she makes a good-enough convention speech,
she will get to become Secretary of State.
Perhaps it is a sign of “progress” that Mike Huckabee said on his
weekend show what I’ve been saying for 4.5 YEARS: (I paraphrase.) “In
most states it is a felony to offer anything of value (“stuff”,
“gifts”, entitlements) in exchange for votes. Saying: ‘Endorse me and
I’ll appoint you to such-and-such high paying job,’ isn’t right.”
Isn’t it amazing that I am, apparently, the only person with enough
character, patriotism and backbone to say: “Barack Obama has BRIBED
HIS WAY INTO OFFICE TWICE!!! Since Obama, obviously, has never
believed in the Constitution that he took an empty oath to defend; and
since his dictatorial ways have caused THE most social and economic
damage to the USA of any person in our entire history, that TRAITOR
should immediately be arrested and hanged for TREASON!!!!!” Glenn
Beck gets one or two chances to say those words on the air five days a
week. But because he is YELLOW, that seems most unlikely.
The Donald told Gretta Van Susteren that “’Someone’ got elected.” For
me, and perhaps for The Donald, that someone—elected LEGALLY, without
bribes—was Mitt Romney. Trump told Gretta that he continues to stand
by his belief that Obama isn’t a US born citizen as required by the
Constitution. *** So, US Secret Service, consider this: Donald Trump—
who is arguably one of the ten top executives in the country; together
with me, THE most patriotic man in the country, whose relative, Major
George Armistead saved the USA from being overthrown by the British at
Fort McHenry, during the War of 1812, CHALLENGE one or more smarter
and more moral agents among you to leave-no-stone-unturned to either
prove or disprove Obama’s place of birth. Do the latter, and my New
Constitution is ready, willing and able to make things better for the
vast majority of Americans, left and right! Pay It Forward! And…
Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> that is always within the SPIRIT ofourpresent Constitution. [Note:
> Using one’s celebrity to swayvotersmakes the ’voice’ of celebrities
>
Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
had another nice chat. It wouldn’t be too long before he was made
President of the University of NC. Since obtaining finances for
inventions, obviously, wasn’t my forte (pronounced ‘fort’), I decided
to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
(easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
complex problems—like correcting our live-or-die governmental crises.
Over the last century, because of the undue influence of the media
regarding who our elected officials can be, it is mostly ego maniacs
craving the doting attention that the media gives to public figures,
who are willing to devote their lives to getting elected and trying to
stay in office. Rating “high” in the hierarchy of public officials
requires that one be a convincing speech maker. As a result, what we
have in Washington, for good or bad (mostly bad) is a bunch of ego-
maniacs whose main, and too often, only, talent is burning the
speechmaking candle at both ends, while the pressing problems, in-the-
main, go unsolved.
By its nature, architecture requires making myriad decisions wisely
and quickly. Not all architects have that ability, however. Many has
been the time that one of my bosses would propose making such-and-such
(supposed) improvement. But because of my deep understanding how
changes to one aspect of a building or its grounds can affect other
aspects, I could, within seconds, explain numbers of reasons why the
proposal wouldn’t work. To those with IQs mostly in the center part
of the Bell Curve, I probably seemed to be a rude and not too
considerate person. I once got fired from a Charlotte company with
three principals, because I was correcting my boss’s (initials R. M.)
mistakes with such ease, that he was afraid I would squeeze him out of
his job. It was at that point that I realized the best usage of my
very high talents was by inventing improve-the-world products, not by
batting heads with intellectual underlings who so greatly outnumbered
me.
To solve most problems well, at least four or five layers of reasoning
need to be used. Consider each layer to be like a computer program
that only analyzes one small aspect of an issue. Time and again, I
realize that most “average” people, including the majority of in-you-
face media elites, and those in government, are able to apply no more
than 2 to 2½ layers of reasoning. So, what they keep arguing is “the”
solution, won’t correct the problem at all! The near fatal decline of
our government(s) is due to the errant notion that 500 plus ego-
maniacs, who can make good speeches, should be able to solve even a
single problem!!! One super genius, like me, has already SOLVED all
of the problems being argued-over, so pointlessly. Those solutions
are embodied in my ready-to-be-ratified ‘New Constitution of the
United States of America.’ The main reason so few people have heard
about it is because those of average IQs, like the majority in the
media—many of whom, every day, read what I write, without taking
action, are “control valves” of what gets to be considered “News”. A
round-faced South Korean who pretends to be riding a pony (or etc.) is
considered news worthy. But a New Constitution, written by a super
genius, apparently doesn’t rise to the threshold of being mentioned.
That is why I keep soliciting just ONE person in the public eye; and
just ONE agent in the Secret Service.
Albert Einstein was estimated to have an IQ of 220. Yet, I so easily
saw-through his shallow reasoning, that it only took me ONE HOUR, in
my public library, to invalidate the 1887 Michelson-Morley Experiment
on which Einstein based his Special Relativity Theory or SRT! The
actual M-M apparatus that was used for the initial experiment is in a
basement on the campus of Case Western Reserve University in
Cleveland. Probably, because of the “embarrassing” loss of status
that would result from having a “mere” (HA!) architect invalidate an
experiment looked at by tens of thousands, that University has turned
a deaf ear to my discoveries. Is it any wonder that I recommend that
75% of (supposed) universities be CLOSED and only those students
wishing to major in chemistry, industrial and bio-medical or medical
fields ever attend a USELESS university at all!!!
A big news item concerns the (brainless, criminal and
unconstitutional) Supreme Court agreeing to “consider” the gay
“marriage” issue. My “NC” has already SOLVED that problem to the
optimum best interests of all involved! Here is how:
“Except regarding the military, federal, state and local governments
shall make no laws nor have any regulations sanctioning private, or
predominately private, interpersonal relationships. Also, governments
shall not prohibit peaceable sanctions of private interpersonal
relationships of persons or groups, nor prohibit the application of
written, oral or implied contracts to such. The resolution of
disputes related to the above can be through civil courts. Except
regarding the military, no person shall be compelled by any employer
or any court, etc., to testify about their own or another's private
interpersonal relationships, nor shall such be excluded from
employment or punished for being private. Marriage (married) is a
contractual heterosexual union; gaygement (gayged) is a contractual
homosexual union. Personal fitness can be a condition of
employment. No person shall be refused employment for being over-
qualified for a job sought; rather, the more qualified shall be
favored.”
Another, I think laughable, comment in the media today, is how well
(finger-down-the-throat) Hillary Clinton is ‘positioned’ for the 2016
presidential election. First, Hillary is a TURNCOAT who accepted a
BRIBE from Barack Obama to get her to concede to him before the 2008
Democratic National Convention and, subsequently, to endorse him at
that convention, in order to “unify the party”. The first part of the
bribe was her being teased with her being Obama’s VP choice, if she
would concede. The second part of the bribe was her being told
(perhaps tacitly) that if she makes a good-enough convention speech,
she will get to become Secretary of State.
Perhaps it is a sign of “progress” that Mike Huckabee said on his
weekend show what I’ve been saying for 4.5 YEARS: (I paraphrase.) “In
most states it is a felony to offer anything of value (“stuff”,
“gifts”, entitlements) in exchange for votes. Saying: ‘Endorse me and
I’ll appoint you to such-and-such high paying job,’ isn’t right.”
Isn’t it amazing that I am, apparently, the only person with enough
character, patriotism and backbone to say: “Barack Obama has BRIBED
HIS WAY INTO OFFICE TWICE!!! Since Obama, obviously, has never
believed in the Constitution that he took an empty oath to defend; and
since his dictatorial ways have caused THE most social and economic
damage to the USA of any person in our entire history, that TRAITOR
should immediately be arrested and hanged for TREASON!!!!!” Glenn
Beck gets one or two chances to say those words on the air five days a
week. But because he is YELLOW, that seems most unlikely.
The Donald told Gretta Van Susteren that “’Someone’ got elected.” For
me, and perhaps for The Donald, that someone—elected LEGALLY, without
bribes—was Mitt Romney. Trump told Gretta that he continues to stand
by his belief that Obama isn’t a US born citizen as required by the
Constitution. *** So, US Secret Service, consider this: Donald Trump—
who is arguably one of the ten top executives in the country; together
with me, THE most patriotic man in the country, whose relative, Major
George Armistead saved the USA from being overthrown by the British at
Fort McHenry, during the War of 1812, CHALLENGE one or more smarter
and more moral agents among you to leave-no-stone-unturned to either
prove or disprove Obama’s place of birth. Do the latter, and my New
Constitution is ready, willing and able to make things better for the
vast majority of Americans, left and right! Pay It Forward! And…
Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 6, 6:56 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Seduced by smiles.
>
> Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
> after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
> PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
> large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
> the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
> banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
> were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
> their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
> to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
>
> In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
> ‘undecided’voterswho were being most courted. Basically, undecidedvotersare those people having such repressed moral judgment, that
>
> Seduced by smiles.
>
> Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
> after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
> PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
> large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
> the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
> banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
> were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
> their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
> to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
>
> In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
> they hang-in-there until they can be nearly certain who the victor
> will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
> expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
>
> Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
> 2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
> unwavering support of about 18 millionvoters, including me—who
> will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
> expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
>
> Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
> 2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
> favored her over Obama. But Hillary’s ‘Plan B’, rather than her,
> rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
> nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
> to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
> Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
> why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
> SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
> Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
> or four others) of her ’possibly’ becoming his choice for VicePresident. The last time I checked, bribery, for undeserved personal
> rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
> nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
> to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
> Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
> why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
> SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
> Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
> gain is a FELONY. Since felonies are high crimes that the
> Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
> it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
> QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
> considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
> supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
> like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
> John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
> is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
>
> It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
> “headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
> —every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
> a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
> hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
> Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
> movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
> Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
> hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
> even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
> and politicians smile so much?
>
> In the second Romney-Obama televised debate, usvotersgot to see what
> Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
> it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
> QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
> considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
> supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
> like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
> John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
> is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
>
> It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
> “headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
> —every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
> a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
> hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
> Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
> movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
> Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
> hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
> even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
> and politicians smile so much?
>
> Using one’s celebrity to swayvotersmakes the ’voice’ of celebrities
Lookout
Dec 9, 2012, 4:36:27 PM12/9/12
to
You can't bother me one bit. This is the fucking Internet you twerp.
I KNOW I bother all of you..I have from the day I decided to screw
with each and every one of you. YOU keep responding to me..that all I
need for proof.\
Game, set and match!
Lookout
Dec 9, 2012, 4:38:16 PM12/9/12
to
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:36:47 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
<noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Nope..you're fucking troll and your post isn't worth reading
<noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Nope..you're fucking troll and your post isn't worth reading
Johann Sebastian Drosselmeyer
Dec 9, 2012, 9:48:27 PM12/9/12
to
On Dec 6, 8:55 pm, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:u351c89a1n4o0lhan...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> >>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
storming!
The Fuehrer of the Gang of Three: Haby
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:u351c89a1n4o0lhan...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> >>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html
Heil Haby! Thanks Mr. Tom Potter. The NSDAP loves you. Carry on
storming!
The Fuehrer of the Gang of Three: Haby
NoEinstein
Dec 10, 2012, 7:21:42 PM12/10/12
to
On Dec 9, 4:36 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:25:59 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:25:59 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
the maximum your single neuron brain can muster. If you feel...
"powerful" because of that, I'm sure conservatives are shaking-in-
their-boots. — J. A. A. —
NoEinstein
Dec 10, 2012, 10:50:00 PM12/10/12
to
On Dec 9, 3:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Attitude will determine the outcome.
One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
“the President” and “the next four years” while talking about the
ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL would-be administration under Obama. The
media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT of our
Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
have government be in charge of the people! Nothing about our
founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
scrapping our present Constitution—and THAT will require ratification
by 75% of the states. The latter isn’t likely to happen considering
that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
The liberal media, including Fox News—to its rotten core—enjoy showing
our pseudo president in meetings with sick-at-their-stomach-looking
invites breathing the same tainted air as Obama. How “presidential”
will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
those who were BRIBED, as close to half of Obama’s voters were. That
means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT of
our Constitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
office(s) the second the “Push Granny over the cliff” video aired.
Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
limits on Government’s authority:
“The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
without 55% of the voters so approving on election day, and no
increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, the
President shall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
overruled by a 60% vote of the House. 12 years from the adoption of
this New Constitution, and following a successful two year test in two
or more states, taxation in the USA shall be changed to sales tax and
fuel tax, only—at a max. conglomerate rate per annum of 35% of the GNP—
home food and medicines excluded. In addition, cities and counties
may charge the employers therein a nominal head tax on their full time
adult employees.*
Section 6: The House shall have the power to collect taxes, customs
duties and user fees that are due from the states and territories,
with the proviso that user fees shall not be applied to major areas of
government services so that the total cost of federal government
exceeds 15% of the previous year’s GNP. …”
“Except as allowed elsewhere in this constitution, there shall be no
taxes, fees, licenses or other payments that are prorated based on
income or personal property; nor taxes on the free transfer of estates
to rightful heirs and/or assigns.”
It is amazing how panic-stricken those on the right (who are in-the-
right) are because of the much discussed ’fiscal cliff’. First, that
law is a non law because such raises taxes without first having gotten
THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED! And as with 95% of the other laws that
shackle the workers, that law isn’t constitutional because such got
passed with the involvement of the US Senate, which is an OLIGARCHY.
Instead of worrying about short-term cash flow problems, ignore Obama
Care and REMOVE all taxation on businesses and over-regulation of
businesses—except those things necessary to protect the world
environment and the public health and safety. *** Unshackling
businesses will cause an immediate spurt in hiring and will cause the
GNP to increase so fast, there will be enough new cash flow to allow
time to devise FAIR and unthreatening private phase-ins to replace
Social Security and Medicare over the next 25 to 30 years. No
“Granny” needs to worry. The USA will honor our naively-made
promises, while allowing our booming, rejuvenated capitalist system to
correct 95% of our economic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
I would like to point out, that by my requiring stock purchases and
sales to be based on the average value in the previous six months
time, that most hurtful speculation of stocks, that can cause sudden
downturns in value, will be eliminated! This is especially important
to seniors, who, because of an illness or death of a spouse must sell
their stocks… regardless of when prudent insiders would recommend. I
have dozens of short clause or one sentence descriptions of business
restrictions that will benefit Americans far and wide. For example:
“Without a signed sales order coerced, baited or unsolicited goods are
free to the addressee. Any bank billing such goods shall pay the
addressee $25.00 per instance. Persons profiting from scam, confusing
promos, advertising or contracts, trickery, high-pressure sales
tactics, continuing charges for difficult-to-cancel, no longer desired
goods or services or any other willful dishonesty are committing a
felony. It is a 5-year felony to dictate or authorize—for undeserved
gain—the dunning, threatening or extorting of any Citizen. Banks or
businesses that loan or sell on credit shall not discriminate, nor
punitively vary charges, interest rates or fees.”
In the last two days I have gotten vibes from Senator Mitch McConnell
(wasn’t smiling); Alan Simpson (smiling) and Rudy Giuliani (smiling
big!) Since so few of you will openly acknowledge your media or
political affiliations, I am heartened that a few of you—some I know
the faces but can’t associate a name—are encouraging me to keep typing
away about my save-the-USA efforts. Whether you yourselves are
willing to act for my cause, please do tell others the location of
this niche where my thoughts can be read. My sincere thanks to
Google, a company in which I own a bit of stock, for giving me,
perhaps the last forum on Earth where my this-way-to-safety messages
can be gotten out. Pray that the US Secret Service will honor their
OATHS over their too-robot-like esprit de corps, and bring Barack
Obama to justice. Don’t place any credence on anything that the
Supreme Court does or doesn’t do—that body is criminal and rotten to
the core, just like the White House.
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. *** Legal authority of law enforcement or
the courts [and the White House!] over the Citizens is voided if used
in support of corruption. Local, state and federal law enforcement
agencies shall not be organizationally affiliated, and persons or
groups, therein, shall not be presumed by law enforcement to be acting
lawfully solely because of such auspices.”
I’ve just gotten a Sarah Palin vibe. She does have her unique twist
on what the crux of our problems are. Keep thinking about me, folks.
Emotional thought is the same thing that powers prayers! “Pay It
Forward.” and … Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> solution, won’t correct the problem at all! The near fatal decline ofourgovernment(s) is due to the errant notion that 500 plus ego-
> damage to the USA of any person inourentire history, that TRAITOR
>
Attitude will determine the outcome.
One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
“the President” and “the next four years” while talking about the
ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL would-be administration under Obama. The
media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT of our
Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
have government be in charge of the people! Nothing about our
founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
scrapping our present Constitution—and THAT will require ratification
by 75% of the states. The latter isn’t likely to happen considering
that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
The liberal media, including Fox News—to its rotten core—enjoy showing
our pseudo president in meetings with sick-at-their-stomach-looking
invites breathing the same tainted air as Obama. How “presidential”
will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
those who were BRIBED, as close to half of Obama’s voters were. That
means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT of
our Constitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
office(s) the second the “Push Granny over the cliff” video aired.
Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
limits on Government’s authority:
“The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
without 55% of the voters so approving on election day, and no
increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, the
President shall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
overruled by a 60% vote of the House. 12 years from the adoption of
this New Constitution, and following a successful two year test in two
or more states, taxation in the USA shall be changed to sales tax and
fuel tax, only—at a max. conglomerate rate per annum of 35% of the GNP—
home food and medicines excluded. In addition, cities and counties
may charge the employers therein a nominal head tax on their full time
adult employees.*
Section 6: The House shall have the power to collect taxes, customs
duties and user fees that are due from the states and territories,
with the proviso that user fees shall not be applied to major areas of
government services so that the total cost of federal government
exceeds 15% of the previous year’s GNP. …”
“Except as allowed elsewhere in this constitution, there shall be no
taxes, fees, licenses or other payments that are prorated based on
income or personal property; nor taxes on the free transfer of estates
to rightful heirs and/or assigns.”
It is amazing how panic-stricken those on the right (who are in-the-
right) are because of the much discussed ’fiscal cliff’. First, that
law is a non law because such raises taxes without first having gotten
THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED! And as with 95% of the other laws that
shackle the workers, that law isn’t constitutional because such got
passed with the involvement of the US Senate, which is an OLIGARCHY.
Instead of worrying about short-term cash flow problems, ignore Obama
Care and REMOVE all taxation on businesses and over-regulation of
businesses—except those things necessary to protect the world
environment and the public health and safety. *** Unshackling
businesses will cause an immediate spurt in hiring and will cause the
GNP to increase so fast, there will be enough new cash flow to allow
time to devise FAIR and unthreatening private phase-ins to replace
Social Security and Medicare over the next 25 to 30 years. No
“Granny” needs to worry. The USA will honor our naively-made
promises, while allowing our booming, rejuvenated capitalist system to
correct 95% of our economic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
I would like to point out, that by my requiring stock purchases and
sales to be based on the average value in the previous six months
time, that most hurtful speculation of stocks, that can cause sudden
downturns in value, will be eliminated! This is especially important
to seniors, who, because of an illness or death of a spouse must sell
their stocks… regardless of when prudent insiders would recommend. I
have dozens of short clause or one sentence descriptions of business
restrictions that will benefit Americans far and wide. For example:
“Without a signed sales order coerced, baited or unsolicited goods are
free to the addressee. Any bank billing such goods shall pay the
addressee $25.00 per instance. Persons profiting from scam, confusing
promos, advertising or contracts, trickery, high-pressure sales
tactics, continuing charges for difficult-to-cancel, no longer desired
goods or services or any other willful dishonesty are committing a
felony. It is a 5-year felony to dictate or authorize—for undeserved
gain—the dunning, threatening or extorting of any Citizen. Banks or
businesses that loan or sell on credit shall not discriminate, nor
punitively vary charges, interest rates or fees.”
In the last two days I have gotten vibes from Senator Mitch McConnell
(wasn’t smiling); Alan Simpson (smiling) and Rudy Giuliani (smiling
big!) Since so few of you will openly acknowledge your media or
political affiliations, I am heartened that a few of you—some I know
the faces but can’t associate a name—are encouraging me to keep typing
away about my save-the-USA efforts. Whether you yourselves are
willing to act for my cause, please do tell others the location of
this niche where my thoughts can be read. My sincere thanks to
Google, a company in which I own a bit of stock, for giving me,
perhaps the last forum on Earth where my this-way-to-safety messages
can be gotten out. Pray that the US Secret Service will honor their
OATHS over their too-robot-like esprit de corps, and bring Barack
Obama to justice. Don’t place any credence on anything that the
Supreme Court does or doesn’t do—that body is criminal and rotten to
the core, just like the White House.
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. *** Legal authority of law enforcement or
the courts [and the White House!] over the Citizens is voided if used
in support of corruption. Local, state and federal law enforcement
agencies shall not be organizationally affiliated, and persons or
groups, therein, shall not be presumed by law enforcement to be acting
lawfully solely because of such auspices.”
I’ve just gotten a Sarah Palin vibe. She does have her unique twist
on what the crux of our problems are. Keep thinking about me, folks.
Emotional thought is the same thing that powers prayers! “Pay It
Forward.” and … Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 7, 6:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
>
> Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
> morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
> regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
> floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
> Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
> ‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
> more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
> Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
> had another nice chat. It wouldn’t be too long before he was madePresidentof the University of NC. Since obtaining finances for
>
> Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
>
> Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
> morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
> regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
> floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
> Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
> ‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
> more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
> Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
> inventions, obviously, wasn’t my forte (pronounced ‘fort’), I decided
> to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
> (easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
> reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
>
> I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
> can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
> complex problems—like correctingourlive-or-die governmental crises.
> to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
> (easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
> reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
>
> I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
> can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
> Over the last century, because of the undue influence of the media
> regarding whoourelected officials can be, it is mostly ego maniacs
Lookout
Dec 10, 2012, 11:30:05 PM12/10/12
to
NoEinstein
Dec 11, 2012, 8:03:52 PM12/11/12
to
On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>
Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:21:42 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:21:42 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
NoEinstein
Dec 11, 2012, 8:07:24 PM12/11/12
to
On Dec 10, 10:50 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Readers: Even a highly motivated writer like me must, at times,
attend to the necessities of life—like grocery shopping. I have
gotten “vibes”, today, from John McCain and of all people Hillary R.
Clinton. She is scheduled to testify about Benghazi before some
committee next year. Since she certainly knows what Obama knew from
the first minutes of that fatal raid, she has it in her power to be
like George Washington and say: “I cannot tell a lie…” Barack Obama
did much more than just cut-down a cherry tree—he has cut-down the
entire US economy!
Like the master of Zen that he is, Obama manages to keep up
“appearances” of normalcy around him, by calmly looking (pseudo)
presidential. But I sense that those in the media and in politics are
beginning to talk about my had-been hush-hush charges of TREASON
against Obama. Realize that thousands of USA servicemen have been
wounded or died trying to protect other nations from socialist-
communistic leanings. I agree with Victoria Jackson that “though
(she) sing(s) like a mouse, there is a Communist in the White House.”
I also got vibes, today, from that fast talking Chris Mathews and that
other Chris, Wallace. Strangely, both were smiling. Oh, David
Axelrod was a not-happy vibe sender. Since he orchestrated the
unconstitutional “ground game” that he credits with giving Democrats
their “win”, he should probably be charged with treason, too. It
seems apt that he has an almost Hitler-like mustache. Hitler doesn’t
have an un violated grave, nor any marker. Such is the justice that
befalls all tyrants.
People, think SOLUTIONS rather than obstacles. My “NC”—which used our
present Constitution as its spine—can and will make the economy and
social climate in America much better for the vast majority of the
people, left and right. With love-for-humanity in your hearts, “Pay
It Forward!” and… Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT ofourConstitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
> promises, while allowingourbooming, rejuvenated capitalist system to
> correct 95% ofoureconomic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
> the core, just like the White ...
>
> read more »
>
Dear Readers: Even a highly motivated writer like me must, at times,
attend to the necessities of life—like grocery shopping. I have
gotten “vibes”, today, from John McCain and of all people Hillary R.
Clinton. She is scheduled to testify about Benghazi before some
committee next year. Since she certainly knows what Obama knew from
the first minutes of that fatal raid, she has it in her power to be
like George Washington and say: “I cannot tell a lie…” Barack Obama
did much more than just cut-down a cherry tree—he has cut-down the
entire US economy!
Like the master of Zen that he is, Obama manages to keep up
“appearances” of normalcy around him, by calmly looking (pseudo)
presidential. But I sense that those in the media and in politics are
beginning to talk about my had-been hush-hush charges of TREASON
against Obama. Realize that thousands of USA servicemen have been
wounded or died trying to protect other nations from socialist-
communistic leanings. I agree with Victoria Jackson that “though
(she) sing(s) like a mouse, there is a Communist in the White House.”
I also got vibes, today, from that fast talking Chris Mathews and that
other Chris, Wallace. Strangely, both were smiling. Oh, David
Axelrod was a not-happy vibe sender. Since he orchestrated the
unconstitutional “ground game” that he credits with giving Democrats
their “win”, he should probably be charged with treason, too. It
seems apt that he has an almost Hitler-like mustache. Hitler doesn’t
have an un violated grave, nor any marker. Such is the justice that
befalls all tyrants.
People, think SOLUTIONS rather than obstacles. My “NC”—which used our
present Constitution as its spine—can and will make the economy and
social climate in America much better for the vast majority of the
people, left and right. With love-for-humanity in your hearts, “Pay
It Forward!” and… Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 9, 3:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Attitude will determine the outcome.
>
> One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
> ‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
> “thePresident” and “the next four years” while talking about the
>
> Attitude will determine the outcome.
>
> One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
> ‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
> ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL would-be administration under Obama. The
> media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
> Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
> that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
> a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
>
> The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
> import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
> it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
> things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
> shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
> inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
> mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
> exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
> to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
> the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
> the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
> unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT ofour
> Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
> have government be in charge of the people! Nothing aboutour
> founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
> ‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
> Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
> realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
> scrappingourpresent Constitution—and THAT will require ratification
> media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
> Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
> that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
> a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
>
> The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
> import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
> it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
> things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
> shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
> inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
> mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
> exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
> to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
> the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
> the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
> unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT ofour
> Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
> have government be in charge of the people! Nothing aboutour
> founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
> ‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
> Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
> realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
> by 75% of the states. The latter isn’t likely to happen considering
> that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
> regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
> mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
>
> The liberal media, including Fox News—to its rotten core—enjoy showingourpseudopresidentin meetings with sick-at-their-stomach-looking
> that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
> regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
> mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
>
> invites breathing the same tainted air as Obama. How “presidential”
> will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
> rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
> Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
> body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
> out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
> foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
> official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
> have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
> distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
> SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
>
> No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
> those who were BRIBED, as close to half of Obama’svoterswere. That
> will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
> rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
> Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
> body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
> out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
> foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
> official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
> have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
> distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
> SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
>
> No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
> means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT ofourConstitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
> office(s) the second the “Push Granny over the cliff” video aired.
> Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
> hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
> fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
> remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
> and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
> sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
>
> Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
> non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
> limits on Government’s authority:
>
> “The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
> of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
> of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
> uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
> state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
> receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
> revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
> without 55% of thevotersso approving on election day, and no
> Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
> hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
> fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
> remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
> and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
> sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
>
> Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
> non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
> limits on Government’s authority:
>
> “The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
> of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
> of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
> uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
> state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
> receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
> revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
> increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
> shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
> a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
> determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
> with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
> within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
> The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
> exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
> similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
> sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
> or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
> shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, thePresidentshall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
> shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
> a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
> determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
> with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
> within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
> The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
> exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
> similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
> sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
> or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
> correct 95% ofoureconomic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
>
> read more »
Lookout
Dec 11, 2012, 8:33:06 PM12/11/12
to
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:03:52 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
<noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
>your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>>
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
<noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
>your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>>
Filtered so I won't see your moronic replies anymore.
HAHAAHAHAHAHHA
Now..CHANGE YOUR NAME!
See? I can make you do what ever I want you to do!
HAHAHAHAAHAHA
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 11, 2012, 8:52:33 PM12/11/12
to
>Lookout <mrLoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:03:52 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
><noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
>>your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>>>
>Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>
>Filtered so I won't see your moronic replies anymore.
TRANSLATION: Lookout can't come up with a response.
>On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:03:52 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
><noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
>>your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>>>
>Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>
>Filtered so I won't see your moronic replies anymore.
NoEinstein
Dec 12, 2012, 11:02:50 AM12/12/12
to
On Dec 11, 8:33 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:03:52 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:03:52 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
>
> <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
> >your moronic replies are. Thanks! J. A. A.
>
> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>
> Filtered so I won't see your moronic replies anymore.
>
> HAHAAHAHAHAHHA
> Now..CHANGE YOUR NAME!
>
> See? I can make you do what ever I want you to do!
>
> HAHAHAHAAHAHA
Said the puppet to the puppeteer! J. A. A.
> >On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
> >your moronic replies are. Thanks! J. A. A.
>
> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>
> Filtered so I won't see your moronic replies anymore.
>
> HAHAAHAHAHAHHA
> Now..CHANGE YOUR NAME!
>
> See? I can make you do what ever I want you to do!
>
> HAHAHAHAAHAHA
NoEinstein
Dec 12, 2012, 11:06:06 AM12/12/12
to
On Dec 11, 8:52 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
wrote:
> >Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> >On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:03:52 -0800 (PST), NoEinstein
> ><noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> >>On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
> >>your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>
> >Complaints-To: groups-ab...@google.com
> ><noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> >>On Dec 10, 11:30 pm, Lookout <mrLooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>Dear Lookout: "Top Reply" so more people will realize how off-base
> >>your moronic replies are. Thanks! — J. A. A. —
>
>
> >Filtered so I won't see your moronic replies anymore.
>
> TRANSLATION: Lookout can't come up with a response.
Dear Klaus: That's positive, I 'think'. John A. Armistead
> >Filtered so I won't see your moronic replies anymore.
>
> TRANSLATION: Lookout can't come up with a response.
NoEinstein
Dec 12, 2012, 11:23:01 AM12/12/12
to
On Dec 11, 8:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
… the usual suspects.
For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
about the turn-a-deaf-ear nature of our media to any news story that
might require their commentators to use more than the maximum two to
two and a half levels of reasoning that they are capable of. Any
“news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone but me (when
considered as a TOTAL document, but not as a series of more or less
isolated parts).
I was so deep in thought upon hearing that nice lady’s questions that
I had to ask her to repeat what she had just said. Even then, I was
still hearing those questions with only a tiny part of my brain.
Because I am a highly moral person—as geniuses of all degrees usually
are—I was in an absolute quandary whether to answer, truthfully, about
my trials and tribulations in trying to save-the-world; giving her my
detailed personal dental assessment based on my flossing and brushing
rituals, and sometimes sensitivity to hot or cold; or giving her a
piece-of-my-mind for interrupting my thought processes. After, what
must have seemed, to her, a long time for me to answer such simple
questions, I looked her straight in the face—probably with a slightly
perturbed look befitting my complex reasoning—and said, “As far as I
know, I am fine.”
Since I am an inventor as well as a highly-motivated and energetic
person, it is rare that I can sincerely tell the world I am “fine”.
That is because those wishing to “improve things” must be capable of
seeing the flaws in most that is going on around them, in order to
form creative concepts for improving things. I am “fine” only after
the solution to some pressing problem has been determined, Then, I am
not just “fine”, I am jubilant! I LIVE for those moments when I can
feel jubilant like that! One such moment was when I realized that the
group-against-group fights that are constantly polarizing the citizens
of this country and undermining our social and economic fabric, can
forever be purged from our governmental processes. How? By the
simple expedient of requiring all public office holders to take the
following oath (that is expanded, in a separate location, to be under
penalty of DEATH for elected officials (but not employees):
“All local, state and federal office holders and employees—upon taking
office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath: “I,
(Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to be
unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.”
And… “The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. *** Principles
of fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. *** Any
public office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the
latter shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished
up to and including the *** death penalty ***. Any government
employee, media figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or
influence of their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy
and fair play shall be guilty of a felony. Note: Fair play shall be
defined as any individual or group action that achieves positive
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of *** opportunity *** for self
determination of one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement
within our Free Enterprise System *** without requiring government
oversight.”
Since socialism isn’t fair, by the above most clear definition, any
elected official who proposes a bill or a governmental procedure that
is in any way socialistic will be arrested and tried for treason. My
hope is, that after Obama and a few others are so hanged, that
socialism will become a non issue in this country.
Unions, that are mostly in their death throes, are physically fighting
to have more power than their members are entitled to have. Since
that isn’t FAIR, then those who lobby for favoritism for unions (or
for any faction whatsoever!) will be arrested and charged with a
felony. Once people realize that there is nothing to be gained by
joining any union, those will just fade away. My “NC” requires that
employees be treated fairly, so businesses should start being more
considerate. Once the economy is flourishing again, few will be
fretting that their standards of living aren’t high enough.
I’ve gotten Charles Krauthammer vibes the last two days. He had his
usual drug-numbed facial expression manifesting the Tourette’s
Syndrome he has had to deal with. I place his IQ at about 135, close
to the threshold where moral sensibilities start dominating business
or societal dictates. Numbers of times I have expressed my desire to
see him out of the media. That isn’t because I disagree with his
“almost there” conservative assessments, but because he always stops
just short of saying: “Send the rascals to jail! They are in
violation of the very principles on which this country was founded!”
Instead, he must always appear innocuous to his liberal bosses both at
Fox, and at the newspapers that run his syndicated columns. In short,
he has been bought. If he had to choose between leading a REVOLUTION
to save the USA from socialism, or to continue to get paid high
salaries for compromising his principles, he will always choose the
latter, and to hell with what happens to the USA.
Judy Miller, with her locked-in surgical and botox petrified smile, is
placed on the left (viewed first) on those Fox commentary panels of
experts. That is done so that casual viewers will suppose that the
world is just fine, and continue to tune in rather than jump over the
nearest fiscal cliff. There must be red neon signs all over Fox that
flash SMILE, SMILE so those like Jon Scott will get out of his “red
pickup truck” blues and make the viewers feel all warm and cozy
inside. One thing Scott did a couple of weeks ago was to congratulate
Joe Biden on the occasion of Biden’s 70th birthday. That is about the
same as putting on funny hats and blowing Chinese snake whistles to
celebrate one of Hitler’s birthdays. Does Scott have no un bought
moral sensibilities?
Sheppard Smith has the right idea by mostly just reciting the news
rather than giving instant assessments according to the liberal spin,
as most on Fox do. He has disappointed me just once when he was
“covering” the story of a woman whose husband disappeared while they
were jet-skiing in the Rio Grande. Smith, apparently, is an avid jet-
skier. He presumed to act as a lie-detector to the wife’s story that
her husband had been shot by Mexicans, and that she had had to flee to
save her life. Whether she was telling the truth or not, no one
working for the “news” should give their personal opinions on
ANYTHING! Under my “NC”, those working for the media have no freedom
of speech! To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. *** No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
I hate it that Fox chooses to show, with regularity, that intended-
only-for-his-clique “mean looking” photo of Travon Martin, the
brutally murdered FL teen. The “racist” sentiment at Fox—from Geraldo
Rivera on down—is that George Zimmerman was acting in self defense.
Megyn Kelly, who comes close to being rational most days, chides the
police for not releasing the color photo sooner, that shows blood on
Zimmerman’s upper lip. Blood is, of course, likely to be the final
clue sending Zimmerman to jail for life! Why so? Because there was
zero blood found on the concrete sidewalk where Zimmerman says he was
held down and punched repeatedly. And there were zero splatters of
Zimmerman’s blood on Martin’s hand and clothing. Zimmerman also
claimed that his head was scratched by rubbing against the sidewalk.
Yet there were no abrasions on his head at all—only short lacerations
likely caused by his own needing-to-be-trimmed fingernails well AFTER
Martin had been shot and killed. And that broken nose? It was broken
from the right side of his face, unlike the way right-handed Martin
would have delivered the nose-breaking blow. So, it is a near
certainty that Zimmerman punched himself in the nose trying to FAKE
his having acted in self defense. The police know this and they will
win their case without much difficulty.
When I wish that Barack Obama be hanged, bloodlessly, for his treason,
I will feel neither joy nor remorse. For a millennia to come, his
death will be recognized as the world’s turning point away from group-
against-group, and nation-against-nation divisiveness and jealousy,
and toward the “like” if not LOVE of our neighbors the world over.
Consider LOSING your biases, people. “Pay It Forward!” and… “Long
Author and Patriot
[and *1/32 Daniel Boone!]
>
… the usual suspects.
For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
about the turn-a-deaf-ear nature of our media to any news story that
might require their commentators to use more than the maximum two to
two and a half levels of reasoning that they are capable of. Any
“news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone but me (when
considered as a TOTAL document, but not as a series of more or less
isolated parts).
I was so deep in thought upon hearing that nice lady’s questions that
I had to ask her to repeat what she had just said. Even then, I was
still hearing those questions with only a tiny part of my brain.
Because I am a highly moral person—as geniuses of all degrees usually
are—I was in an absolute quandary whether to answer, truthfully, about
my trials and tribulations in trying to save-the-world; giving her my
detailed personal dental assessment based on my flossing and brushing
rituals, and sometimes sensitivity to hot or cold; or giving her a
piece-of-my-mind for interrupting my thought processes. After, what
must have seemed, to her, a long time for me to answer such simple
questions, I looked her straight in the face—probably with a slightly
perturbed look befitting my complex reasoning—and said, “As far as I
know, I am fine.”
Since I am an inventor as well as a highly-motivated and energetic
person, it is rare that I can sincerely tell the world I am “fine”.
That is because those wishing to “improve things” must be capable of
seeing the flaws in most that is going on around them, in order to
form creative concepts for improving things. I am “fine” only after
the solution to some pressing problem has been determined, Then, I am
not just “fine”, I am jubilant! I LIVE for those moments when I can
feel jubilant like that! One such moment was when I realized that the
group-against-group fights that are constantly polarizing the citizens
of this country and undermining our social and economic fabric, can
forever be purged from our governmental processes. How? By the
simple expedient of requiring all public office holders to take the
following oath (that is expanded, in a separate location, to be under
penalty of DEATH for elected officials (but not employees):
“All local, state and federal office holders and employees—upon taking
office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath: “I,
(Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to be
unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.”
And… “The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. *** Principles
of fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. *** Any
public office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the
latter shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished
up to and including the *** death penalty ***. Any government
employee, media figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or
influence of their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy
and fair play shall be guilty of a felony. Note: Fair play shall be
defined as any individual or group action that achieves positive
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of *** opportunity *** for self
determination of one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement
within our Free Enterprise System *** without requiring government
oversight.”
Since socialism isn’t fair, by the above most clear definition, any
elected official who proposes a bill or a governmental procedure that
is in any way socialistic will be arrested and tried for treason. My
hope is, that after Obama and a few others are so hanged, that
socialism will become a non issue in this country.
Unions, that are mostly in their death throes, are physically fighting
to have more power than their members are entitled to have. Since
that isn’t FAIR, then those who lobby for favoritism for unions (or
for any faction whatsoever!) will be arrested and charged with a
felony. Once people realize that there is nothing to be gained by
joining any union, those will just fade away. My “NC” requires that
employees be treated fairly, so businesses should start being more
considerate. Once the economy is flourishing again, few will be
fretting that their standards of living aren’t high enough.
I’ve gotten Charles Krauthammer vibes the last two days. He had his
usual drug-numbed facial expression manifesting the Tourette’s
Syndrome he has had to deal with. I place his IQ at about 135, close
to the threshold where moral sensibilities start dominating business
or societal dictates. Numbers of times I have expressed my desire to
see him out of the media. That isn’t because I disagree with his
“almost there” conservative assessments, but because he always stops
just short of saying: “Send the rascals to jail! They are in
violation of the very principles on which this country was founded!”
Instead, he must always appear innocuous to his liberal bosses both at
Fox, and at the newspapers that run his syndicated columns. In short,
he has been bought. If he had to choose between leading a REVOLUTION
to save the USA from socialism, or to continue to get paid high
salaries for compromising his principles, he will always choose the
latter, and to hell with what happens to the USA.
Judy Miller, with her locked-in surgical and botox petrified smile, is
placed on the left (viewed first) on those Fox commentary panels of
experts. That is done so that casual viewers will suppose that the
world is just fine, and continue to tune in rather than jump over the
nearest fiscal cliff. There must be red neon signs all over Fox that
flash SMILE, SMILE so those like Jon Scott will get out of his “red
pickup truck” blues and make the viewers feel all warm and cozy
inside. One thing Scott did a couple of weeks ago was to congratulate
Joe Biden on the occasion of Biden’s 70th birthday. That is about the
same as putting on funny hats and blowing Chinese snake whistles to
celebrate one of Hitler’s birthdays. Does Scott have no un bought
moral sensibilities?
Sheppard Smith has the right idea by mostly just reciting the news
rather than giving instant assessments according to the liberal spin,
as most on Fox do. He has disappointed me just once when he was
“covering” the story of a woman whose husband disappeared while they
were jet-skiing in the Rio Grande. Smith, apparently, is an avid jet-
skier. He presumed to act as a lie-detector to the wife’s story that
her husband had been shot by Mexicans, and that she had had to flee to
save her life. Whether she was telling the truth or not, no one
working for the “news” should give their personal opinions on
ANYTHING! Under my “NC”, those working for the media have no freedom
of speech! To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances.”
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
I hate it that Fox chooses to show, with regularity, that intended-
only-for-his-clique “mean looking” photo of Travon Martin, the
brutally murdered FL teen. The “racist” sentiment at Fox—from Geraldo
Rivera on down—is that George Zimmerman was acting in self defense.
Megyn Kelly, who comes close to being rational most days, chides the
police for not releasing the color photo sooner, that shows blood on
Zimmerman’s upper lip. Blood is, of course, likely to be the final
clue sending Zimmerman to jail for life! Why so? Because there was
zero blood found on the concrete sidewalk where Zimmerman says he was
held down and punched repeatedly. And there were zero splatters of
Zimmerman’s blood on Martin’s hand and clothing. Zimmerman also
claimed that his head was scratched by rubbing against the sidewalk.
Yet there were no abrasions on his head at all—only short lacerations
likely caused by his own needing-to-be-trimmed fingernails well AFTER
Martin had been shot and killed. And that broken nose? It was broken
from the right side of his face, unlike the way right-handed Martin
would have delivered the nose-breaking blow. So, it is a near
certainty that Zimmerman punched himself in the nose trying to FAKE
his having acted in self defense. The police know this and they will
win their case without much difficulty.
When I wish that Barack Obama be hanged, bloodlessly, for his treason,
I will feel neither joy nor remorse. For a millennia to come, his
death will be recognized as the world’s turning point away from group-
against-group, and nation-against-nation divisiveness and jealousy,
and toward the “like” if not LOVE of our neighbors the world over.
Consider LOSING your biases, people. “Pay It Forward!” and… “Long
Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
*John A. Armistead
Respectfully submitted,
Author and Patriot
[and *1/32 Daniel Boone!]
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 12, 2012, 8:13:28 PM12/12/12
to
>NoEinstein <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
You've just been added to the Long List of People Who Have Brutalized
Lookout.
If the night is quiet, you can hear him sobbing and clutching his
teddie from here.
Lookout.
If the night is quiet, you can hear him sobbing and clutching his
teddie from here.
Gray Guest
Dec 12, 2012, 9:26:34 PM12/12/12
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:traic8lf6siqu5n2u...@4ax.com:
--
Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama
NoEinstein
Dec 13, 2012, 6:28:55 AM12/13/12
to
On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
that the president isn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
this country is being tampered with.
There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
issue threatening to bring down this country is our finances. Either
we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
that protects seniors AND starts lowering our deficit, immediately.
The nutshell of that is as follows:
As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
working (in our to-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
law, to take the money that used to be withheld for SS and put such
into (conditionally) un tapable escrow accounts.
Those individual accounts will be mutual funds that invest in the
stock and/or bond markets. The objective is to require each person to
accumulate enough money so that, statistically, they will never be a
burden to friends, relatives nor government for their health or
survival necessities for life. The escrow accounts can’t be tapped
until the above-mentioned conglomerate, single payment insurance and
living expenses plan has been purchased. The cost of the latter will
vary favoring the following: Those who already own their own home will
have only their utility bills and home repair bills to pay. That is
because my “NC” forbids property taxes. In the latter’s place will be
a ‘head tax’ ONLY on those people who are working. So, the objective
of most people should be to get an acceptable place to live that can
be paid for in full. Even if such a person becomes unemployed along
the way, there will be no taxes on the food and medicines they buy,
under my “NC”. Having a paid-for place to live should lower the
single payment insurance and living necessities policy to about,
perhaps (my guesstimate) $200,000.00 per person. Once Americans
realize the importance of paying-off their mortgages and getting
enough money to purchase that SINGLE PAYMENT insurance and living
necessities policy, they will be inspired to put a higher percentage
of their earnings into their escrow accounts. These last two
paragraphs explain how governments, after a 25 to 30 year phase-out
period for SS and Medicare, will never again be burdened with insuring
or caring for anyone!
The first order of business, informally or formally, will be for the
House to realize that such is the ONLY still-functioning branch of
government. The US Senate is unconstitutional and choked with
criminal, socialist Democrats, negating any authority it ever
“assumed” that it had. The Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch
are rotten-to-the-core, and shall not be respected nor deferred to in
any wise.
Perhaps the reason Mitch McConnell seemed so somber in that ‘vibe’
that I got from him is because he knows he is no longer needed in
Washington. I’m continuing to get smiling vibes from Alan Simpson,
however. My reasoning is that he values having solutions be found to
fix our broken government more than he desires being caught in the
mire that is the Senate. It would be the joy of his life to see
government finally be fixed! Now that’s patriotic!
The second order of business of the House is to vote mentally ill John
Boehner out of his speaker-ship. The NEW speaker should declare to
the world that no rulings made by the US Supreme court since Obama
wormed-his-way-into-office are valid. That means Obama Care is
permanently DEAD! Upon the announcement of such fact, the stock
market should skyrocket!
The third order of business of the House is to demand that Barack
Obama show PHYSICAL PROOF of his being a US Citizen. Since he,
obviously, can’t do that—or he would have already done so—Obama shall
immediately be arrested for treason along with Joe Biden and a to-be-
assembled list of his most vocal socialist cohorts. That list shall
include Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Since Bill Clinton knowingly
lied about the US job and economic situation, dozens of times, in
campaigning for Obama, and since Clinton is credited with Obama’s
“winning” (ha!) then Bill Clinton should be tried for treason, too.
Hillary Clinton “may” can save her husband’s neck if she will
immediately BLOW THE WHISTLE on Obama regarding her having been BRIBED
with an implied 2008 promise of her being considered as his VP. She
can also come clean about how, from the first hours, Obama instructed
Susan Rice to LIE about the motivation for the Benghazi raid being
because of a barely-ever-viewed video—so that his “image” with Muslims
wouldn’t be tarnished.
Realize, people, that it is the SPIRIT of the original Constitution
that demands that all of these things be done. My “NC” is just a
clarified and expanded version of the original that will require no
court, ever, to explain what such means! So, the Supreme Court can go
to hell! And I say that sincerely!
With Obama physically EXTRACTED from the White House, and Mitt Romney
expeditiously moved in before the end of the year, 2013 should be the
year of REBIRTH of the USA as THE Greatest Nation in the World! “Pay
> of this country and underminingoursocial and economic fabric, can
> forever be purged fromourgovernmental processes. How? By the
> withinourFree Enterprise System *** without requiring government
> ...
>
> read more »
>
Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
that the president isn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
this country is being tampered with.
There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
issue threatening to bring down this country is our finances. Either
we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
that protects seniors AND starts lowering our deficit, immediately.
The nutshell of that is as follows:
As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
working (in our to-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
law, to take the money that used to be withheld for SS and put such
into (conditionally) un tapable escrow accounts.
Those individual accounts will be mutual funds that invest in the
stock and/or bond markets. The objective is to require each person to
accumulate enough money so that, statistically, they will never be a
burden to friends, relatives nor government for their health or
survival necessities for life. The escrow accounts can’t be tapped
until the above-mentioned conglomerate, single payment insurance and
living expenses plan has been purchased. The cost of the latter will
vary favoring the following: Those who already own their own home will
have only their utility bills and home repair bills to pay. That is
because my “NC” forbids property taxes. In the latter’s place will be
a ‘head tax’ ONLY on those people who are working. So, the objective
of most people should be to get an acceptable place to live that can
be paid for in full. Even if such a person becomes unemployed along
the way, there will be no taxes on the food and medicines they buy,
under my “NC”. Having a paid-for place to live should lower the
single payment insurance and living necessities policy to about,
perhaps (my guesstimate) $200,000.00 per person. Once Americans
realize the importance of paying-off their mortgages and getting
enough money to purchase that SINGLE PAYMENT insurance and living
necessities policy, they will be inspired to put a higher percentage
of their earnings into their escrow accounts. These last two
paragraphs explain how governments, after a 25 to 30 year phase-out
period for SS and Medicare, will never again be burdened with insuring
or caring for anyone!
The first order of business, informally or formally, will be for the
House to realize that such is the ONLY still-functioning branch of
government. The US Senate is unconstitutional and choked with
criminal, socialist Democrats, negating any authority it ever
“assumed” that it had. The Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch
are rotten-to-the-core, and shall not be respected nor deferred to in
any wise.
Perhaps the reason Mitch McConnell seemed so somber in that ‘vibe’
that I got from him is because he knows he is no longer needed in
Washington. I’m continuing to get smiling vibes from Alan Simpson,
however. My reasoning is that he values having solutions be found to
fix our broken government more than he desires being caught in the
mire that is the Senate. It would be the joy of his life to see
government finally be fixed! Now that’s patriotic!
The second order of business of the House is to vote mentally ill John
Boehner out of his speaker-ship. The NEW speaker should declare to
the world that no rulings made by the US Supreme court since Obama
wormed-his-way-into-office are valid. That means Obama Care is
permanently DEAD! Upon the announcement of such fact, the stock
market should skyrocket!
The third order of business of the House is to demand that Barack
Obama show PHYSICAL PROOF of his being a US Citizen. Since he,
obviously, can’t do that—or he would have already done so—Obama shall
immediately be arrested for treason along with Joe Biden and a to-be-
assembled list of his most vocal socialist cohorts. That list shall
include Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Since Bill Clinton knowingly
lied about the US job and economic situation, dozens of times, in
campaigning for Obama, and since Clinton is credited with Obama’s
“winning” (ha!) then Bill Clinton should be tried for treason, too.
Hillary Clinton “may” can save her husband’s neck if she will
immediately BLOW THE WHISTLE on Obama regarding her having been BRIBED
with an implied 2008 promise of her being considered as his VP. She
can also come clean about how, from the first hours, Obama instructed
Susan Rice to LIE about the motivation for the Benghazi raid being
because of a barely-ever-viewed video—so that his “image” with Muslims
wouldn’t be tarnished.
Realize, people, that it is the SPIRIT of the original Constitution
that demands that all of these things be done. My “NC” is just a
clarified and expanded version of the original that will require no
court, ever, to explain what such means! So, the Supreme Court can go
to hell! And I say that sincerely!
With Obama physically EXTRACTED from the White House, and Mitt Romney
expeditiously moved in before the end of the year, 2013 should be the
year of REBIRTH of the USA as THE Greatest Nation in the World! “Pay
It Forward!” and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 11, 8:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> … the usual suspects.
>
> For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
> a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
> I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
> me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
> than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
> for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
> perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
> going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
> teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
> procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
> about the turn-a-deaf-ear nature ofourmedia to any news story that
>
> … the usual suspects.
>
> For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
> a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
> I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
> me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
> than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
> for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
> perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
> going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
> teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
> procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
> forever be purged fromourgovernmental processes. How? By the
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Dec 13, 2012, 6:43:20 AM12/13/12
to
On Dec 13, 6:28 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
CORRECTION: In the second paragraph, change the apt sentence to read:
> fixourbroken government more than he desires being caught in the
>
CORRECTION: In the second paragraph, change the apt sentence to read:
"Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach that includes
huge SPENDING reductions." [not TAX reductions] Thanks! J. A. A.
>
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> that thepresidentisn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> issue threatening to bring down this country isourfinances. Either
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> that protects seniors AND starts loweringourdeficit, immediately.
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> The nutshell of that is as follows:
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
> working (inourto-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
NoEinstein
Dec 13, 2012, 5:45:52 PM12/13/12
to
Be Not Kings
By John A. Armistead
Leaders, many, who come and go,
Claim the voters’ will to know.
Leaders, many, that we elect,
Straddle the fences of our respect.
Public will vs. party due,
‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few...
Leaders abide in the public’s trust.
Is it for duty, or the power-lust?
Proud offices of celebrity,
Too soon, an addictive notoriety.
How quickly are the right things done?
How surely will the next election be won?
See the worthy jobs to do,
For ‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few.
In the public trust abide.
From the public’s will ne’r hide.
When your pride dictates other things,
Be not kings.
_______________
> fixourbroken government more than he desires being caught in the
By John A. Armistead
Leaders, many, who come and go,
Claim the voters’ will to know.
Leaders, many, that we elect,
Straddle the fences of our respect.
Public will vs. party due,
‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few...
Leaders abide in the public’s trust.
Is it for duty, or the power-lust?
Proud offices of celebrity,
Too soon, an addictive notoriety.
How quickly are the right things done?
How surely will the next election be won?
See the worthy jobs to do,
For ‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few.
In the public trust abide.
From the public’s will ne’r hide.
When your pride dictates other things,
Be not kings.
_______________
>
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> that thepresidentisn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> issue threatening to bring down this country isourfinances. Either
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> that protects seniors AND starts loweringourdeficit, immediately.
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> The nutshell of that is as follows:
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
> working (inourto-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 13, 2012, 6:34:04 PM12/13/12
to
well, I haven't volunteered, yet;
still studying fractions!
still studying fractions!
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 13, 2012, 10:56:45 PM12/13/12
to
speaking of fractions,
here is an easy problem that no-one can "get"
over in alt.global-warming:
as it pertains to the arctic & antarctic circles (toward the poles,
not the equator),
how do you calculate the "angle of total reflection of sunlight
off of water (by refraction; that is by using Snell's law,
plugging-in the indices of refraction for air (1) and water
(1.3?)
this is to show that the whole discussion of "the albedo and
the arctic ice" is no where, there.
here is an easy problem that no-one can "get"
over in alt.global-warming:
as it pertains to the arctic & antarctic circles (toward the poles,
not the equator),
how do you calculate the "angle of total reflection of sunlight
off of water (by refraction; that is by using Snell's law,
plugging-in the indices of refraction for air (1) and water
(1.3?)
this is to show that the whole discussion of "the albedo and
the arctic ice" is no where, there.
SaPeIsMa
Dec 14, 2012, 12:15:34 PM12/14/12
to
"1treePetrifiedForestLane" <Spac...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb3baed3-a810-47bf...@ut5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
NOT have a perfect surface for reflection
Light absorption/reflection varies with the "chop"
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 14, 2012, 8:06:40 PM12/14/12
to
in deed; it is not unlike the problem for optical density
of clouds, but that doesn't negate the essential thing ...
which I am not going to reveal at this moment-being.
> NOT have a perfect surface for reflection
> Light absorption/reflection varies with the "chop"
thus:
it may simply be an artifact of Newton's "theory" of light,
not of Young's experimental apparatus.
> No one has ever modulated a signal at one end and
> affected the other end.
thus:
there are technically no "fossilized" fuels; I mean,
just say, No, thank you, Geoffery -- I have no idea whatsoever
what the category of the question is; thank you.
--Snell's law for interferometers; thank you
of clouds, but that doesn't negate the essential thing ...
which I am not going to reveal at this moment-being.
> NOT have a perfect surface for reflection
> Light absorption/reflection varies with the "chop"
it may simply be an artifact of Newton's "theory" of light,
not of Young's experimental apparatus.
> No one has ever modulated a signal at one end and
> affected the other end.
thus:
there are technically no "fossilized" fuels; I mean,
just say, No, thank you, Geoffery -- I have no idea whatsoever
what the category of the question is; thank you.
--Snell's law for interferometers; thank you
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:33:20 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 13, 5:45 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The economic component of senseless murders.
During the presidential campaign, a leftist group aligned with the
Democrats ran an ad claiming that because Romney had laid-off workers
at a business, a woman working there lost her health insurance. And
since she was unable to obtain another policy, she subsequently died
of, I think, cancer. The implication (actually CRIMINAL, innuendo
libel) was that Romney was an uncaring murderer more interested in
material gains than human lives (sic!!!). The time line later showed
that Romney wasn’t even running that business when the layoff
happened. But great personal damage had already been done by
typically immoral Democrats who see winning by any means as their
“entitlement”. Please know that under my New Constitution those
producing or even referencing such a video as being truthful—including
the leftist media showing such—would all be guilty of a serious
felony. Every one of those would now be surrounded by cold hard
masonry, concrete and steel bars or doors. Know this: Lying for
personal gain will not be tolerated in the USA!
At the time Democrats, like Juan Williams, were reveling that such
(unjustifiable) harm had been done to Romney, I thought: ‘Even if
Romney had done something that chanced to cause the death of one
person (Of course he had never done so!), Obama is guilty of killing
HUNDREDS, if not thousands all across this once great country. Who
are those? They were the distraught, out-of-work people who got
evicted from their homes, and who, being unable to care for their
families, took their own lives… because of Obama’s failed economic
policies.
The senseless mass murder, today, that has killed 20 young and
defenseless children, and eight adults, apparently, was the result of
bottled-up hatred of a son for his own mother. It is easy to imagine
that that mother had been giving her son “tough love” over his not
being determined enough to pay his own way in the world. Because of
his having, repeatedly, turned to her for financial help, she probably
told him she only had (I speculate) a teacher’s salary. He may have
countered by saying… “You love those other children MORE than you love
me, your own child.” Hearing that she may have told him too… “get
out”. In a rage, and unable to accept his own failings, he rushed to
get her own guns and shot her in the face.
I’ve read that murdering one’s own mother is the most soul-tearing of
all human actions. Unable to accept responsibility for his own sin,
he turned his anger on those innocent school children that,
apparently, were more important than he was. He reasoned, with
shallowness, that if there were no children for his mother to love
more than him, then she might have been more considerate of his
requests for aid.
Again and again, senseless violence has an economic component. People—
too often minorities—become involved in crime because they don’t see
economic opportunities otherwise. Once convicted and imprisoned for,
say, drug dealing, that person is stigmatized for life. That means
businesses are less likely to hire him. And the combined stresses of
his life are more likely to cause tragedy.
But imagine if our sick and depressed US economy could start
flourishing such that businesses are practically begging for workers
to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
true.
It may be soothing to our collective, saddened hearts to have our… God
damned “president” express the national sorrow. But the one saying
those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
“something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
Branch of government.
Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
Democrats. However, Romney DID win big among those voters who had not
been bribed by entitlements or promises of favoritism for the ’middle’
class at the expense of the soon-not-to-be upper class—if Obama isn’t
EXTRACTED from his fowled offices PDQ.
Today, I got a solicitation from George and Laura Bush to contribute
to his Presidential Center. It was explained that there will be
conferences, therein, of thoughtful people on improving the national
condition. I thought: Why do there need to be conferences (of a lot
of people) if I—the most intelligent and analytical person in the world
—have already figured out how to solve most of the world’s problems
through fairly-liberated capitalism? After making a small ‘charter
member’ contribution, I was wishing to get on with other
responsibilities. Suddenly, I began getting smiling vibes from Laura
Bush. I thought: “Well!” Five or ten minutes later I started getting
smiling vibes from George as well. This lasted for ten to fifteen
minutes.
My supposition is that Laura heard about my economic proposal for
phasing-out SS and Medicare; read what I wrote; and liked it. She may
have pointed this out to George, who started liking it, too. I have
always been psychic. But I never expected my talent to become my
primary link to the mostly uncommunicative readers of what I write.
I’m aware of the courage and patriotism required for even a single
Secret Service agent; a single public or media figure; or a single
politician to HONOR the SPIRIT of US Constitution and demand that
Obama produce PHYSICAL proof that he is a legal United States, native-
born citizen. Since—as has already been stated—the HOUSE is the only,
present, legally-functioning branch of government, *** such should
immediately notify Obama, in writing, of his having an ample 72-hours
to produce PHYSICAL proof, delivered to the primary House chamber, or
to be arrested for treason. No one needs to make any speeches, or
even mention my “NC” (which is a well-clarified, updated and expanded
version of the original). Just have House couriers hand-deliver the
stated requirement to Obama. Simultaneous with the delivery of such
requirement, notify the Head of the US Secret Service that Obama shall
not be allowed to fly in Air Force One, nor to be transported via
motorcade to any other place until he has produced, or found others
who can produce, PHYSICAL proof (not digital) of his being born in
Hawaii.
I invite those of you who can feel my energy to let such well-up
inside of you as patriotism for saving this country from socialism!
Tell others about this hard-to-find site, and thank-your-lucky-stars
that GOOGLE hasn’t been shackled by the demands of tyrants. “Pay It
>
The economic component of senseless murders.
During the presidential campaign, a leftist group aligned with the
Democrats ran an ad claiming that because Romney had laid-off workers
at a business, a woman working there lost her health insurance. And
since she was unable to obtain another policy, she subsequently died
of, I think, cancer. The implication (actually CRIMINAL, innuendo
libel) was that Romney was an uncaring murderer more interested in
material gains than human lives (sic!!!). The time line later showed
that Romney wasn’t even running that business when the layoff
happened. But great personal damage had already been done by
typically immoral Democrats who see winning by any means as their
“entitlement”. Please know that under my New Constitution those
producing or even referencing such a video as being truthful—including
the leftist media showing such—would all be guilty of a serious
felony. Every one of those would now be surrounded by cold hard
masonry, concrete and steel bars or doors. Know this: Lying for
personal gain will not be tolerated in the USA!
At the time Democrats, like Juan Williams, were reveling that such
(unjustifiable) harm had been done to Romney, I thought: ‘Even if
Romney had done something that chanced to cause the death of one
person (Of course he had never done so!), Obama is guilty of killing
HUNDREDS, if not thousands all across this once great country. Who
are those? They were the distraught, out-of-work people who got
evicted from their homes, and who, being unable to care for their
families, took their own lives… because of Obama’s failed economic
policies.
The senseless mass murder, today, that has killed 20 young and
defenseless children, and eight adults, apparently, was the result of
bottled-up hatred of a son for his own mother. It is easy to imagine
that that mother had been giving her son “tough love” over his not
being determined enough to pay his own way in the world. Because of
his having, repeatedly, turned to her for financial help, she probably
told him she only had (I speculate) a teacher’s salary. He may have
countered by saying… “You love those other children MORE than you love
me, your own child.” Hearing that she may have told him too… “get
out”. In a rage, and unable to accept his own failings, he rushed to
get her own guns and shot her in the face.
I’ve read that murdering one’s own mother is the most soul-tearing of
all human actions. Unable to accept responsibility for his own sin,
he turned his anger on those innocent school children that,
apparently, were more important than he was. He reasoned, with
shallowness, that if there were no children for his mother to love
more than him, then she might have been more considerate of his
requests for aid.
Again and again, senseless violence has an economic component. People—
too often minorities—become involved in crime because they don’t see
economic opportunities otherwise. Once convicted and imprisoned for,
say, drug dealing, that person is stigmatized for life. That means
businesses are less likely to hire him. And the combined stresses of
his life are more likely to cause tragedy.
But imagine if our sick and depressed US economy could start
flourishing such that businesses are practically begging for workers
to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
true.
It may be soothing to our collective, saddened hearts to have our… God
damned “president” express the national sorrow. But the one saying
those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
“something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
Branch of government.
Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
Democrats. However, Romney DID win big among those voters who had not
been bribed by entitlements or promises of favoritism for the ’middle’
class at the expense of the soon-not-to-be upper class—if Obama isn’t
EXTRACTED from his fowled offices PDQ.
Today, I got a solicitation from George and Laura Bush to contribute
to his Presidential Center. It was explained that there will be
conferences, therein, of thoughtful people on improving the national
condition. I thought: Why do there need to be conferences (of a lot
of people) if I—the most intelligent and analytical person in the world
—have already figured out how to solve most of the world’s problems
through fairly-liberated capitalism? After making a small ‘charter
member’ contribution, I was wishing to get on with other
responsibilities. Suddenly, I began getting smiling vibes from Laura
Bush. I thought: “Well!” Five or ten minutes later I started getting
smiling vibes from George as well. This lasted for ten to fifteen
minutes.
My supposition is that Laura heard about my economic proposal for
phasing-out SS and Medicare; read what I wrote; and liked it. She may
have pointed this out to George, who started liking it, too. I have
always been psychic. But I never expected my talent to become my
primary link to the mostly uncommunicative readers of what I write.
I’m aware of the courage and patriotism required for even a single
Secret Service agent; a single public or media figure; or a single
politician to HONOR the SPIRIT of US Constitution and demand that
Obama produce PHYSICAL proof that he is a legal United States, native-
born citizen. Since—as has already been stated—the HOUSE is the only,
present, legally-functioning branch of government, *** such should
immediately notify Obama, in writing, of his having an ample 72-hours
to produce PHYSICAL proof, delivered to the primary House chamber, or
to be arrested for treason. No one needs to make any speeches, or
even mention my “NC” (which is a well-clarified, updated and expanded
version of the original). Just have House couriers hand-deliver the
stated requirement to Obama. Simultaneous with the delivery of such
requirement, notify the Head of the US Secret Service that Obama shall
not be allowed to fly in Air Force One, nor to be transported via
motorcade to any other place until he has produced, or found others
who can produce, PHYSICAL proof (not digital) of his being born in
Hawaii.
I invite those of you who can feel my energy to let such well-up
inside of you as patriotism for saving this country from socialism!
Tell others about this hard-to-find site, and thank-your-lucky-stars
that GOOGLE hasn’t been shackled by the demands of tyrants. “Pay It
Forward!” and… “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 13, 6:28 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Be Not Kings
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Leaders, many, who come and go,
> Claim thevoters’ will to know.
>
> Be Not Kings
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Leaders, many, who come and go,
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:34:30 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 13, 6:34 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
wrote:
> well, I haven't volunteered, yet;
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
> > > > nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone- Hide quoted text -
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:38:14 PM12/14/12
to
> well, I haven't volunteered, yet;
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
> > > > nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone- Hide quoted text -
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear 1tree: What I have done both in science and for patriotism don't
> - Show quoted text -
have any historic precedent to help you decide. So, just trust your
gut and get-on-board! — NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:45:10 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 13, 10:56 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Dear 1tree: Most of the equations relating to optics result from
empirical equations fitted to the observed parameters. Though I know
more about the physics of light and of gravity than any other person
who has ever lived, my present attention must be directed toward
saving the USA, because if I don't "science" will be down-the-tubes,
anyway. — NoEinstein —
wrote:
empirical equations fitted to the observed parameters. Though I know
more about the physics of light and of gravity than any other person
who has ever lived, my present attention must be directed toward
saving the USA, because if I don't "science" will be down-the-tubes,
anyway. — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:55:55 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 14, 12:15 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> "1treePetrifiedForestLane" <Space...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Dear SPM: 1tree, a mathematician, gets comfort knowing that mostly
unneeded data can at least be correctly calculated. I'm a
pragmatist. My disproving Newton, Coriolis, Lorentz and Einstein is
about enough of my time spent on "just" science, don't you think? I
should be spending my time on practical inventions to stop global
warming, and lower sea levels without stopping using fossil fuels.
Obama wouldn't like that. But the world has no use for a "community
organizer" (communist) from Chicago who got to teach the Constitution,
but never has believed one word of what he taught. My guess is that
his students are now very disillusioned Democrats. — NoEinstein —
> "1treePetrifiedForestLane" <Space...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
unneeded data can at least be correctly calculated. I'm a
pragmatist. My disproving Newton, Coriolis, Lorentz and Einstein is
about enough of my time spent on "just" science, don't you think? I
should be spending my time on practical inventions to stop global
warming, and lower sea levels without stopping using fossil fuels.
Obama wouldn't like that. But the world has no use for a "community
organizer" (communist) from Chicago who got to teach the Constitution,
but never has believed one word of what he taught. My guess is that
his students are now very disillusioned Democrats. — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 11:01:12 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 14, 8:06 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
1tree: The most simple thing you need to learn about light is that
such is composed only of photons—pancake-like tangles of IOTA energy—
and never of waves. Except in physical solids and fluids there are no
waves anywhere in the Universe. — NoEinstein —
wrote:
such is composed only of photons—pancake-like tangles of IOTA energy—
and never of waves. Except in physical solids and fluids there are no
waves anywhere in the Universe. — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Dec 15, 2012, 4:25:35 PM12/15/12
to
On Dec 14, 10:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Katie, Bar the Door!
For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
short order, correct our broken government(s). Going back much more
than four years, Britt Hume, who at the time was a give-presidents-
HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
strict limits placed on what our, generally, finger-down-the-throat
media will be allowed to do, or not do, in the future.
“The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
the People.”
“Section 9: Other than the President or his agents, no person, news
medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
make scheduled depositions provided they don’t communicate with the
representatives otherwise. A representative’s constituents shall be
allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
only while they are in their home states or districts.
Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
above, is a felony—defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed.”
“English, that is grammatically written and correctly spoken, is the
official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium
and every public discourse.”
“Bill of Rights and Amendments:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. Freedom of the
press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
in reporting. *** Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate
omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter’s right to privacy
by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium’s
programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they shall
be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
medium. *** Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage
shall not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
display active public records without the free consent of the apt
parties.”
“Conclusion: This New Constitution, together with any and all
subsequent amendments, shall set the tone for all other laws that are
made or that shall be allowed to remain in force. The
constitutionality of laws may be brought into question by any law-
abiding, prudent Citizen conversant on the whole New Constitution.
When a law’s constitutionality is justifiably questioned,
determination of constitutionality shall be made by a qualified judge
or justice—thoughtfully and without bias—within six weeks. Any such
ruling by a judge or justice can be appealed to an upper court or to
the entire High Court on a first-come-first-serve basis.
This New Constitution empowers every Citizen with broad civil
rights that they may invoke at will without the necessity of the prior
involvement of counsel or of a judicial authority. Those in or
working for governments shall be subordinate to any Citizen demanding
civil rights. The rightfulness of any such demand may be brought into
question only by just and comprehensive proof—delivered at a later
date in writing—with the apt named official(s) being in full jeopardy
of such punishments as are herein defined, if they are in error.
Notes: (1.) *Italicized text represents portions of the New
Constitution which shall be omitted unless separately and specifically
approved by 60% of the voters. Voting to approve the New Constitution
shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or
business which polls the People on their support or non support of
this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
Constitution.]
People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy in our governments,
all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
includes my having thoroughly and unconstitutionally been vetted by
both the US Secret Service and the FBI. Such was probably done
because I “might have been” a threat to a criminal, seated US
Senator. Law enforcement felt that it was their duty to defend
elected officials, criminal or not.
When I say that the USA shall never again be a POLICE STATE—with law
enforcement acting as the Gestapos of government—know that such fact
will benefit ALL Americans from ever being fearful of being unfairly
treated by Law Enforcement or the Courts, as I have been! By reading
between the lines, there will never again be an arrest of anyone for
driving over the posted speed limit, if that was ALL the driver was
doing. Under my “NC” fines shall NEVER be used to defray the cost of
government. So no municipality in the USA can give their law officers
“quotas” of how many speeders they are required to stop per day, in
order to pay that officer’s salary.
The original Constitution was intended to be (but was never realized
to be) a Representative Republic. In such a government, the people
determine what can or cannot be done—that is, those things that are
above and beyond what is spelled-out in the Constitution. The
accurately-proportioned-to-the-population representatives only have
the authority to do the will of their constituents. They are NOT our
elected dictators! [Be Not Kings!]
The House, by (unconstitutional) rules, dictates that the chairmen of
its committees and the Speaker of the House shall be from the 'party’
that won the majority. Since that gives “the leaders” more power than
the other members, it is 100% unconstitutional, as are political
parties themselves!!!!! The Speaker and the committee chairmen only
have the “honor”—not the power. Their duty is primarily that of
parliamentarians to make sure that things proceed smoothly.
There are so many disparate power structures in Washington, that most—
even those who have been there a long time—still have no idea who is
in charge. [Read my book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’, to better understand.] House members who are smart
enough to comprehend the powerful rationale that I am making that
Barack Obama is a TRAITOR to this nation and to the whole human race,
are still concerned about what “all-of-this” will do to their chances
of being re elected two years from now. They know, from hard
personal experience, that the liberal media will be shoving
microphones down-their-throats and demanding that they justify their
having done a single thing that isn’t like the “traditional” [and
unconstitutional status quo] way.
I’ve anticipated all of that and include in my “NC” these
requirements, which I highly recommend the House mandate, immediately:
“Representatives shall not intentionally communicate with any news
medium whose coverage area is predominately outside of their home
district. Nor shall they, or any government official, cultivate a
media personae, or make petty public speeches, introductions or
comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any civil or private
projects or those responsible. Comments to media by representatives
or government employees shall be germane to pending legislation, or to
the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not solicit public
officials’ opinions over those of the People.”
“Felons are prohibited from holding public office. By this amendment,
likewise, it becomes a felony for anyone in government—past, present
or future—to support, or to have supported, any person for public
office if such person being supported would prudently be suspected to
be, or privately be known to be, a felon. Actively campaigning for,
giving financing for, or shielding the truth from the general Public
about a personally known probable felony by any office holder or any
candidate shall likewise be a felony.”
“29th Amendment: Governments shall pass no laws intended to exclude
themselves, their elected or appointed officials, their depts.,
agencies, agents or employees from criminal or civil actions arising
from any claim by any Citizen. Crimes committed against elected or
appointed officials or against any government employee shall carry the
same punishment as similar crimes committed against any Citizen.
Systematic record keeping by law enforcement on law-abiding Citizens
is prohibited by this New Constitution. However, record keeping by
other depts. or agencies shall be thorough and accurate concerning
dealings with any Citizen, group or business, but no common data base
is allowed, nor inter departmental data exchange—except by court
order. The intentional destruction, altering, exclusion or
misrepresentation of official correspondence or other records by any
government employee, elected or appointed officials or their agents in
an attempt to influence any present or future criminal or civil
proceeding is hereby made a felony on all so acting. It shall be
unlawful for law enforcement to endanger the Public in the reckless
pursuit of a real or supposed wrongdoer, or to batter anyone already
apprehended, or to allow another to batter such person without
restraint. No Citizen can be stopped, detained, forced to show ID,
nor required to explain any activity—including running—without there
being substantial proof of their involvement in a felony. Petty crime
commitment does not give law enforcement license to make unreasonable
searches nor seizures.”
“14th Amendment: Persons born within the USA, if their mothers are
Citizens or legal residents, and those persons who have attained
naturalization, are Citizens of the USA and the state where they
reside. No government, court nor public vote shall make, continue, or
enforce any law or combination of laws that abridges the civil rights,
privileges or immunities of Citizens of the USA; nor shall anyone
deprive a person of life, liberty or property without due process of
law, nor deny to any Citizen the equal protection of the laws.”
It is obvious that my “NC” is a long and exceedingly well thought-out
document. I will try to include smaller excerpts, later, if those
will adequately explain what I have done. I should mention that in
the process of my butting heads with Government over my exposé
regarding that criminal US Senator, that I wrote a detailed, small
font, legal page description of all that had transpired. I sent the
latter to every single governor in this country—including to George W.
Bush, then Governor of Texas. There was a conference of governors
scheduled, and I was hoping that those people would discuss what had
happened and perhaps make enough waves to start turning things around
in this country. Because I know that governors have mail readers, I
have no way of knowing if the younger Bush was ever informed of my
travail. But I can reason, with near certainty, that the detailed
letter I later sent to Mrs. Barbara Bush urging that she and her
husband not make a scheduled campaign appearance for the criminal US
Senator, contributed to my being arrested at the behest of the FBI.
I hope that by my candidly revealing all of these things, that you
readers will realize how exceedingly well-positioned I am to, single-
handedly, pen-and-polish our ‘New Constitution of the United States of
America’. The US Secret Service and the FBI know that fact, too. So,
I don’t expect any of the more intelligent people in those agencies to
stand in the way of having the House DEMAND the following: “Barack
Obama shall, within 72 hours, deliver to the Main House of
Representatives Chamber, PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in
Hawaii or face arrest for capital treason against the USA.”
Author and Patriot
>
> But imagine ifoursick and depressed US economy could start
>
Katie, Bar the Door!
For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
short order, correct our broken government(s). Going back much more
than four years, Britt Hume, who at the time was a give-presidents-
HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
strict limits placed on what our, generally, finger-down-the-throat
media will be allowed to do, or not do, in the future.
“The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
the People.”
“Section 9: Other than the President or his agents, no person, news
medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
make scheduled depositions provided they don’t communicate with the
representatives otherwise. A representative’s constituents shall be
allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
only while they are in their home states or districts.
Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
above, is a felony—defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed.”
“English, that is grammatically written and correctly spoken, is the
official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium
and every public discourse.”
“Bill of Rights and Amendments:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. Freedom of the
press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
in reporting. *** Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate
omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter’s right to privacy
by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium’s
programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they shall
be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
medium. *** Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage
shall not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
display active public records without the free consent of the apt
parties.”
“Conclusion: This New Constitution, together with any and all
subsequent amendments, shall set the tone for all other laws that are
made or that shall be allowed to remain in force. The
constitutionality of laws may be brought into question by any law-
abiding, prudent Citizen conversant on the whole New Constitution.
When a law’s constitutionality is justifiably questioned,
determination of constitutionality shall be made by a qualified judge
or justice—thoughtfully and without bias—within six weeks. Any such
ruling by a judge or justice can be appealed to an upper court or to
the entire High Court on a first-come-first-serve basis.
This New Constitution empowers every Citizen with broad civil
rights that they may invoke at will without the necessity of the prior
involvement of counsel or of a judicial authority. Those in or
working for governments shall be subordinate to any Citizen demanding
civil rights. The rightfulness of any such demand may be brought into
question only by just and comprehensive proof—delivered at a later
date in writing—with the apt named official(s) being in full jeopardy
of such punishments as are herein defined, if they are in error.
Notes: (1.) *Italicized text represents portions of the New
Constitution which shall be omitted unless separately and specifically
approved by 60% of the voters. Voting to approve the New Constitution
shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or
business which polls the People on their support or non support of
this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
Constitution.]
People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy in our governments,
all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
includes my having thoroughly and unconstitutionally been vetted by
both the US Secret Service and the FBI. Such was probably done
because I “might have been” a threat to a criminal, seated US
Senator. Law enforcement felt that it was their duty to defend
elected officials, criminal or not.
When I say that the USA shall never again be a POLICE STATE—with law
enforcement acting as the Gestapos of government—know that such fact
will benefit ALL Americans from ever being fearful of being unfairly
treated by Law Enforcement or the Courts, as I have been! By reading
between the lines, there will never again be an arrest of anyone for
driving over the posted speed limit, if that was ALL the driver was
doing. Under my “NC” fines shall NEVER be used to defray the cost of
government. So no municipality in the USA can give their law officers
“quotas” of how many speeders they are required to stop per day, in
order to pay that officer’s salary.
The original Constitution was intended to be (but was never realized
to be) a Representative Republic. In such a government, the people
determine what can or cannot be done—that is, those things that are
above and beyond what is spelled-out in the Constitution. The
accurately-proportioned-to-the-population representatives only have
the authority to do the will of their constituents. They are NOT our
elected dictators! [Be Not Kings!]
The House, by (unconstitutional) rules, dictates that the chairmen of
its committees and the Speaker of the House shall be from the 'party’
that won the majority. Since that gives “the leaders” more power than
the other members, it is 100% unconstitutional, as are political
parties themselves!!!!! The Speaker and the committee chairmen only
have the “honor”—not the power. Their duty is primarily that of
parliamentarians to make sure that things proceed smoothly.
There are so many disparate power structures in Washington, that most—
even those who have been there a long time—still have no idea who is
in charge. [Read my book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’, to better understand.] House members who are smart
enough to comprehend the powerful rationale that I am making that
Barack Obama is a TRAITOR to this nation and to the whole human race,
are still concerned about what “all-of-this” will do to their chances
of being re elected two years from now. They know, from hard
personal experience, that the liberal media will be shoving
microphones down-their-throats and demanding that they justify their
having done a single thing that isn’t like the “traditional” [and
unconstitutional status quo] way.
I’ve anticipated all of that and include in my “NC” these
requirements, which I highly recommend the House mandate, immediately:
“Representatives shall not intentionally communicate with any news
medium whose coverage area is predominately outside of their home
district. Nor shall they, or any government official, cultivate a
media personae, or make petty public speeches, introductions or
comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any civil or private
projects or those responsible. Comments to media by representatives
or government employees shall be germane to pending legislation, or to
the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not solicit public
officials’ opinions over those of the People.”
“Felons are prohibited from holding public office. By this amendment,
likewise, it becomes a felony for anyone in government—past, present
or future—to support, or to have supported, any person for public
office if such person being supported would prudently be suspected to
be, or privately be known to be, a felon. Actively campaigning for,
giving financing for, or shielding the truth from the general Public
about a personally known probable felony by any office holder or any
candidate shall likewise be a felony.”
“29th Amendment: Governments shall pass no laws intended to exclude
themselves, their elected or appointed officials, their depts.,
agencies, agents or employees from criminal or civil actions arising
from any claim by any Citizen. Crimes committed against elected or
appointed officials or against any government employee shall carry the
same punishment as similar crimes committed against any Citizen.
Systematic record keeping by law enforcement on law-abiding Citizens
is prohibited by this New Constitution. However, record keeping by
other depts. or agencies shall be thorough and accurate concerning
dealings with any Citizen, group or business, but no common data base
is allowed, nor inter departmental data exchange—except by court
order. The intentional destruction, altering, exclusion or
misrepresentation of official correspondence or other records by any
government employee, elected or appointed officials or their agents in
an attempt to influence any present or future criminal or civil
proceeding is hereby made a felony on all so acting. It shall be
unlawful for law enforcement to endanger the Public in the reckless
pursuit of a real or supposed wrongdoer, or to batter anyone already
apprehended, or to allow another to batter such person without
restraint. No Citizen can be stopped, detained, forced to show ID,
nor required to explain any activity—including running—without there
being substantial proof of their involvement in a felony. Petty crime
commitment does not give law enforcement license to make unreasonable
searches nor seizures.”
“14th Amendment: Persons born within the USA, if their mothers are
Citizens or legal residents, and those persons who have attained
naturalization, are Citizens of the USA and the state where they
reside. No government, court nor public vote shall make, continue, or
enforce any law or combination of laws that abridges the civil rights,
privileges or immunities of Citizens of the USA; nor shall anyone
deprive a person of life, liberty or property without due process of
law, nor deny to any Citizen the equal protection of the laws.”
It is obvious that my “NC” is a long and exceedingly well thought-out
document. I will try to include smaller excerpts, later, if those
will adequately explain what I have done. I should mention that in
the process of my butting heads with Government over my exposé
regarding that criminal US Senator, that I wrote a detailed, small
font, legal page description of all that had transpired. I sent the
latter to every single governor in this country—including to George W.
Bush, then Governor of Texas. There was a conference of governors
scheduled, and I was hoping that those people would discuss what had
happened and perhaps make enough waves to start turning things around
in this country. Because I know that governors have mail readers, I
have no way of knowing if the younger Bush was ever informed of my
travail. But I can reason, with near certainty, that the detailed
letter I later sent to Mrs. Barbara Bush urging that she and her
husband not make a scheduled campaign appearance for the criminal US
Senator, contributed to my being arrested at the behest of the FBI.
I hope that by my candidly revealing all of these things, that you
readers will realize how exceedingly well-positioned I am to, single-
handedly, pen-and-polish our ‘New Constitution of the United States of
America’. The US Secret Service and the FBI know that fact, too. So,
I don’t expect any of the more intelligent people in those agencies to
stand in the way of having the House DEMAND the following: “Barack
Obama shall, within 72 hours, deliver to the Main House of
Representatives Chamber, PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in
Hawaii or face arrest for capital treason against the USA.”
“Pay It Forward!” and… “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead,
Respectfully submitted,
Author and Patriot
>
> flourishing such that businesses are practically begging for workers
> to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
> corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
> adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
> better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
> will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
> hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
> true.
>
> It may be soothing toourcollective, saddened hearts to haveour… God
> to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
> corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
> adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
> better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
> will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
> hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
> true.
>
> damned “president” express the national sorrow. But the one saying
> those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
> simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
> there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
> the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
> “something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
> treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
> has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
> Branch of government.
>
> Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
> Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
> needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
> rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
> Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
> have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
> Democrats. However, Romney DID win big among thosevoterswho had not
> those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
> simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
> there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
> the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
> “something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
> treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
> has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
> Branch of government.
>
> Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
> Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
> needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
> rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
> Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
> have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
NoEinstein
Dec 16, 2012, 10:14:06 AM12/16/12
to
On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Honor Not Thieves!
By John A. Armistead
Lose a little or a lot,
That’s snatched before your very eyes,
Then feign disbelief,
At the wiles of the thief.
Robyn Hoods in disguise,
Claim that they are for others caring.
While so few of those others,
Ever escape their dependencies.
Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
Democrats they call themselves,
While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
Our decline to the brink happened slow,
So, the populace would hardly even know,
That our Constitution has long been denied,
Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
Is the President our authority?
Or shouldn’t he our servant be?
Obama surely “plays” the role,
While his socialist policies take their toll.
There are communists in the White House—
sound the alarm!
They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
While they all continue to do great harm?
Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
The scoundrels in our midst,
While they honor not their sworn oaths,
To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
That fair people have lost any sway.
Their loyalty is to their own biases,
Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
While attracting mostly egotists,
Because the media has held those on high.
Our corrupt media is the bane of a fair democracy,
That brainwashes us 24/7,
With polls and well-chosen video bites,
And commentators hired to deceive.
Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
Reason has a good chance to prevail,
If each one of them will disregard any fear.
Those people can save our USA dear!
They can block the media at the door,
And all quickly come to agree,
That Obama is the cause,
Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
No law shall ever be respected,
That respected not the people.
And no court shall be respected,
That respected not the Constitution.
That document clearly requires:
“No person except a natural born citizen…”
But Obama was never vetted,
And the country is now so indebted.
Obama will surely hang,
For not respecting our Constitution dear.
He’s the Robyn Hood in disguise,
Bent on causing our country’s demise.
72 hours is all it will take,
To prove Obama is a fake.
While some in the nation will grieve,
The USA shall honor not thieves!
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> approved by 60% of thevoters. Voting to approve the New Constitution
>
> read more »
>
Honor Not Thieves!
By John A. Armistead
Lose a little or a lot,
That’s snatched before your very eyes,
Then feign disbelief,
At the wiles of the thief.
Robyn Hoods in disguise,
Claim that they are for others caring.
While so few of those others,
Ever escape their dependencies.
Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
Democrats they call themselves,
While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
Our decline to the brink happened slow,
So, the populace would hardly even know,
That our Constitution has long been denied,
Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
Is the President our authority?
Or shouldn’t he our servant be?
Obama surely “plays” the role,
While his socialist policies take their toll.
There are communists in the White House—
sound the alarm!
They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
While they all continue to do great harm?
Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
The scoundrels in our midst,
While they honor not their sworn oaths,
To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
That fair people have lost any sway.
Their loyalty is to their own biases,
Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
While attracting mostly egotists,
Because the media has held those on high.
Our corrupt media is the bane of a fair democracy,
That brainwashes us 24/7,
With polls and well-chosen video bites,
And commentators hired to deceive.
Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
Reason has a good chance to prevail,
If each one of them will disregard any fear.
Those people can save our USA dear!
They can block the media at the door,
And all quickly come to agree,
That Obama is the cause,
Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
No law shall ever be respected,
That respected not the people.
And no court shall be respected,
That respected not the Constitution.
That document clearly requires:
“No person except a natural born citizen…”
But Obama was never vetted,
And the country is now so indebted.
Obama will surely hang,
For not respecting our Constitution dear.
He’s the Robyn Hood in disguise,
Bent on causing our country’s demise.
72 hours is all it will take,
To prove Obama is a fake.
While some in the nation will grieve,
The USA shall honor not thieves!
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> On Dec 14, 10:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Katie, Bar the Door!
>
> For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
> balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
> short order, correctourbroken government(s). Going back much more
>
> Katie, Bar the Door!
>
> For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
> balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
> than four years, Britt Hume, who at the time was a give-presidents-
> HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
> certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
> his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
> Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
> didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
> he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
> ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
> considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
> than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
> strict limits placed on whatour, generally, finger-down-the-throat
> HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
> certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
> his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
> Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
> didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
> he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
> ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
> considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
> than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
> media will be allowed to do, or not do, in the future.
>
> “The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
> the People.”
>
> “Section 9: Other than thePresidentor his agents, no person, news
>
> “The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
> the People.”
>
> shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or
> business which polls the People on their support or non support of
> this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
> shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
> standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
> document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
> People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
> including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
> with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
> this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
> the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
> will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
> Constitution.]
>
> People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
> Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
> with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy inourgovernments,
> all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
> includes my ...
> business which polls the People on their support or non support of
> this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
> shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
> standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
> document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
> People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
> including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
> with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
> this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
> the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
> will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
> Constitution.]
>
> People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
> Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
> with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy inourgovernments,
> all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Dec 17, 2012, 6:59:06 PM12/17/12
to
On Dec 16, 10:14 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Negotiate not with thieves!
John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
(except me!) hostage! If international terrorists make demands that
our country do such-and-such, our standard reply is: “The USA does
NOT negotiate with terrorists (nor with thieves)!” So, why is Boehner
even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
1. Obama has not and does not support our as-written US Constitution.
2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
3. Obama has assumed the attitude of a DICTATOR (Be not Kings!) that
our Founding Fathers were bound-and-determined should NEVER control
this Country!
4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
single thing in those directions!
5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
him for president, in exchange for their being “considered” for VP.
6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
large rebate on purchased gasoline.
7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
enacted.
8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
commercials.
9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, ex president Bill
Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
11. Obama bribed younger voters with grand speeches claiming college
educations should be free to all.
12. Obama bribed those on food stamps by stating those (useless
people) will never have to prove they are seeking work in order to get
paid.
13. Obama chose to let four Americans DIE in Benghazi rather than
have it appear that he is angry at Muslims for what they were about to
do. Note: The latter, non action, is tantamount to CAPITAL
MURDER!!!!!
14. Obama proffered a fraudulent digital document as proof of his
being a native born citizen.
15. Obama has suppressed the rights of the individual states to
protect their borders from illegal immigrants. And he has done so to
garner the “conflict of interest” votes of legal Hispanics in this
country, who can’t, however, under the Constitution get to “legalize”
what is so clearly illegal, simply because the people are Hispanic!
Knowing just the above tip-of-the-iceberg, not a SOUL in the House of
Representatives should even answer a phone call from anyone in the
(supposed) executive branch!!!!! Since I’m, well, a very, very
intelligent person, I know that Laws, in the main, depend on the
willful acceptance of those laws by the People in order for such to be
enforceable. The ONLY reason it is ’presumed’ that taxes will go up
Jan. 1, 2013, is because those hardheaded people in the House don’t
realize that they, as the ONLY legally functioning branch, have it
within their POWER to say that such “law:” is UNCONSTITUTIONAL—because
it isn’t FAIR, and because such has never had the consent-of-the-
governed!
By the simple expedient of having the House proclaim that ‘Obama Care’
is as UNCONSTITUTIONAL as the CRIMINAL Supreme Court that supposedly
confirmed it, the economic climate in this country will improve over
night! Businesses will be confident enough to start hiring again, and
tax revenues will start going up. And with my simple and workable
solution to the SS and Medicare problems in the offing, the cost of
government will start going down every year until socialism is DEAD,
once-and-for-all in America!
After I wrote my to-the-point poem, “Honor not thieves!” I got some
long and not happy vibes from none other than our TRAITOR IN
RESIDENCE, Barack Obama. About half an hour later, I got similar,
“(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
I am most surprised and pleased that President George W. Bush is
sending me so many smiling vibes. His energy to be hiking and bike
riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
being snubbed in any way. With our economy flourishing, again, the
avenues for having our needy be helped will be wide and many.
“Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
>
Negotiate not with thieves!
John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
(except me!) hostage! If international terrorists make demands that
our country do such-and-such, our standard reply is: “The USA does
NOT negotiate with terrorists (nor with thieves)!” So, why is Boehner
even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
1. Obama has not and does not support our as-written US Constitution.
2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
3. Obama has assumed the attitude of a DICTATOR (Be not Kings!) that
our Founding Fathers were bound-and-determined should NEVER control
this Country!
4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
single thing in those directions!
5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
him for president, in exchange for their being “considered” for VP.
6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
large rebate on purchased gasoline.
7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
enacted.
8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
commercials.
9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, ex president Bill
Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
11. Obama bribed younger voters with grand speeches claiming college
educations should be free to all.
12. Obama bribed those on food stamps by stating those (useless
people) will never have to prove they are seeking work in order to get
paid.
13. Obama chose to let four Americans DIE in Benghazi rather than
have it appear that he is angry at Muslims for what they were about to
do. Note: The latter, non action, is tantamount to CAPITAL
MURDER!!!!!
14. Obama proffered a fraudulent digital document as proof of his
being a native born citizen.
15. Obama has suppressed the rights of the individual states to
protect their borders from illegal immigrants. And he has done so to
garner the “conflict of interest” votes of legal Hispanics in this
country, who can’t, however, under the Constitution get to “legalize”
what is so clearly illegal, simply because the people are Hispanic!
Knowing just the above tip-of-the-iceberg, not a SOUL in the House of
Representatives should even answer a phone call from anyone in the
(supposed) executive branch!!!!! Since I’m, well, a very, very
intelligent person, I know that Laws, in the main, depend on the
willful acceptance of those laws by the People in order for such to be
enforceable. The ONLY reason it is ’presumed’ that taxes will go up
Jan. 1, 2013, is because those hardheaded people in the House don’t
realize that they, as the ONLY legally functioning branch, have it
within their POWER to say that such “law:” is UNCONSTITUTIONAL—because
it isn’t FAIR, and because such has never had the consent-of-the-
governed!
By the simple expedient of having the House proclaim that ‘Obama Care’
is as UNCONSTITUTIONAL as the CRIMINAL Supreme Court that supposedly
confirmed it, the economic climate in this country will improve over
night! Businesses will be confident enough to start hiring again, and
tax revenues will start going up. And with my simple and workable
solution to the SS and Medicare problems in the offing, the cost of
government will start going down every year until socialism is DEAD,
once-and-for-all in America!
After I wrote my to-the-point poem, “Honor not thieves!” I got some
long and not happy vibes from none other than our TRAITOR IN
RESIDENCE, Barack Obama. About half an hour later, I got similar,
“(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
I am most surprised and pleased that President George W. Bush is
sending me so many smiling vibes. His energy to be hiking and bike
riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
being snubbed in any way. With our economy flourishing, again, the
avenues for having our needy be helped will be wide and many.
“Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead,
Author and Patriot
>
John A. Armistead,
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Honor Not Thieves!
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Lose a little or a lot,
> That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> Then feign disbelief,
> At the wiles of the thief.
>
> Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> Claim that they are for others caring.
> While so few of those others,
> Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> Democrats they call themselves,
> While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> Our decline to the brink happened slow,
> So, the populace would hardly even know,
> That our Constitution has long been denied,
> Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
>
> Is the President our authority?
> Orshouldn’the our servant be?
>
> Honor Not Thieves!
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Lose a little or a lot,
> That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> Then feign disbelief,
> At the wiles of the thief.
>
> Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> Claim that they are for others caring.
> While so few of those others,
> Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> Democrats they call themselves,
> While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> Our decline to the brink happened slow,
> So, the populace would hardly even know,
> That our Constitution has long been denied,
> Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
>
> Is the President our authority?
Tommy
Dec 17, 2012, 7:23:02 PM12/17/12
to
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote a load of crap in message
news:e82354d2-
I waded through this crap diligently, waiting for the freeware -
Ohh well, you have to listen to thunder -
Or you put your fingers in your ears and go nyahh nyahh nyahhh nyahh -
indeed :-|
Cheers
Tommy
news:e82354d2-
I waded through this crap diligently, waiting for the freeware -
Ohh well, you have to listen to thunder -
Or you put your fingers in your ears and go nyahh nyahh nyahhh nyahh -
indeed :-|
Cheers
Tommy
NoEinstein
Dec 18, 2012, 1:13:59 PM12/18/12
to
On Dec 17, 6:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Getting Through to the Timid Ones and Hardheads!
1. There is no validity to the “winning” of an election wherein the
candidate claiming to have so done intentionally used FRAUD, threats,
BRIBERY, favoritism and general unconstitutional unfairness in even a
SINGLE provable instance of either one!!!!!
2. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that works
counter to the SPIRIT of the Constitution so as to, in any way,
restrict the personal civil liberties of any citizen or class.
3. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that
substitutes governmental actions for the constitutionally guaranteed
right of all citizens to determine their own fair destiny without
government interference.
4. There is no Constitutionality to political parties of ANY
ideology, because such seek group-against-group ’power’ that always
unfairly treats 50% of the population!!!!!
5. There is no constitutionality nor validity to any ideology that
supports the THEFT of the assets of one class to give to another
class.
6. Realize that personal property rights are the primary bone-of-
contention in government, and not petty social issues. Therefore,
since the primary thrust of the Democratic party is to TAKE the
personal property of another constitutionally-protected CLASS, by the
“force” of unconstitutional, socialist laws, then, the votes of anyone—
in government or without—who was, or is now, a God Damned Democrat is,
and always shall be, INVALID!!!!!
7. Republicans, based on their CONSERVATIVE economic positions,
alone, and on NONE of their unconstitutional social issues, are the
only voices of REASON (after yours truly) in this country. Therefore,
the ONLY valid votes in determining any action taken on economic
issues prior to the ratification of my (our) New Constitution, are
those cast by CONSERVATIVES!!!
8. Since our courts—primarily from the top down—have evolved to be
extensions of the unconstitutionally divisive political parties that
are so represented, then the decisions of ALL higher courts have no
legality nor validity, and shall not be respected.
9. Since the ENTIRE Executive Branch, and major portions of the top
Judicial Branch are corrupt Democratic socialists, bent on destroying
the USA, then, no action nor non action by either of the latter shall
have the force of law!!!!!
10. Therefore, be it known: The CONSERVATIVES in the House of
Representatives, relative to all economic issues, but NOT to a single
social issue, is now the sole, constitutionally-functioning body
qualified to direct the economic course of the USA. Conservative
voices all across this great country are URGED to rally behind House
Conservatives!
The order of business of the NEW House shall be: (Democrats go home
for the Holidays and never come back!)
1. Bar the doors leading to the House side of the Capital, with the
objective of blocking entry by a single member of the media!!!!! Turn
off broadcasting (but not recording) of what is transpiring in the
House, and confiscate all cell phones with cameras!!!
2. Vote Boehner OUT as Speaker!!!!! He is much too stigmatized for
having ‘negotiated’ to allow the USA to keep creeping toward 100%
‘Atlas Shrugged’ socialism.
3. Send a “House ORDER” (a new term!) to Barack Obama informing him
that he has just 72 hours to deliver to the House main chamber
PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in Hawaii, or to be arrested
for capital, hang-by-the-neck-until-dead treason.
4. Send a “House ORDER” to the head of the US Secret Service
informing them that Barack Obama shall not be allowed to fly on Air
Force One, nor to be motorcaded to another location.
5. After the 72 hours explained in 3, above, have the NEW Speaker of
the House go out onto the Capital steps and announce, (A) that,
because the Executive Branch and the upper Judicial Branch are
unconstitutionally corrupt, the NEW House—composed only of economic
CONSERVATIVES—declares that ‘Obama Care’ is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and
invalid!!!!! (B) Declare that the tax laws that were in effect for
2012 shall REMAIN in effect for at least the entire 2013 fiscal
year!!!! (So there is no looming fiscal cliff!!!) (C) Inform the
country that no ruling by the Supreme Court has any validity since
Barack Obama, fraudulently, assumed the role of president. (D)
Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are our legally-elected
President and Vice President and shall be moving into the Chief
Executive Offices, immediately!!!!! (E) Explain that Barack Obama
and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
REINSTALL our Constitution—that has been so grossly neglected for the
last century—as our ruling document in SPIRIT, until our STRENGTHENED,
CLARIFIED and much more COMPREHENSIVE ‘New Constitution of the United
States of America’ can rightly be ratified.
I hope “the above” is defined clearly enough for our last-saving-grace
House of Representatives to understand. Since I’ve recently gotten
some good, smiling vibes from Fox’s Chris Wallace, and subsequently, a
brief, disbelieving smiling vibe from Bret Baier, I’m wondering if
either or both of those men are up-to-the-task of covering some REAL
breaking news like I’m proposing should soon come to be. People,
please realize that John A. Armistead, THE most intelligent person on
Earth today, who is in the league with Da Vinci and Christ Jesus—my
personal hero and savior—has unselfishly devoted 17 years of his life
to defining OPTIMUM government. Such will allow the maximum amount of
fairly-achieved prosperity for the maximum number of people, the world
over—including Muslims.
In order to allow “believers”—or those who agree with my high
objectives for the USA—to ‘subtly’ be KNOWN to one another, I ask that
each of you, who are sincerely willing to put aside petty group-
against-group divisiveness in favor of genuine love-of-humanity
NEIGHBORLINESS (for all races, creeds and nations), do the following:
Reach into your pocket or purse, or look into the back of your desk
drawers; locate and place a ballpoint pen in your left shirt or coat
pocket. Anyone, like me… in my turtleneck shirt, without a chest
pocket, clip a small safety pin to your blouse or jacket. Such
innocuous signals will—if we will… “Pay It Forward!”—soon light up the
world!
At this Christmas season, I would like to champion, and to urge
millions more to champion, the world-wide efforts of the Reverend
Franklin Graham, who by DEEDS, not just words, is working to change
the “caring” climate in our troubled world. I urge all who will to
pray that those mired down in our dysfunctional government will see-
the-Holy-light. And pray for those in our severely biased media to
take long vacations. Enough hurtful words have been said already!
*** “Four things I know for sure: It is better to love than to hate;
it is better to give than to take; it is better to help rather than to
hinder; and it is better to forgive rather than to hold a grudge.”
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> long and not happy vibes from none other thanourTRAITOR IN
> avenues for havingourneedy be helped will be wide and many.
>
Getting Through to the Timid Ones and Hardheads!
1. There is no validity to the “winning” of an election wherein the
candidate claiming to have so done intentionally used FRAUD, threats,
BRIBERY, favoritism and general unconstitutional unfairness in even a
SINGLE provable instance of either one!!!!!
2. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that works
counter to the SPIRIT of the Constitution so as to, in any way,
restrict the personal civil liberties of any citizen or class.
3. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that
substitutes governmental actions for the constitutionally guaranteed
right of all citizens to determine their own fair destiny without
government interference.
4. There is no Constitutionality to political parties of ANY
ideology, because such seek group-against-group ’power’ that always
unfairly treats 50% of the population!!!!!
5. There is no constitutionality nor validity to any ideology that
supports the THEFT of the assets of one class to give to another
class.
6. Realize that personal property rights are the primary bone-of-
contention in government, and not petty social issues. Therefore,
since the primary thrust of the Democratic party is to TAKE the
personal property of another constitutionally-protected CLASS, by the
“force” of unconstitutional, socialist laws, then, the votes of anyone—
in government or without—who was, or is now, a God Damned Democrat is,
and always shall be, INVALID!!!!!
7. Republicans, based on their CONSERVATIVE economic positions,
alone, and on NONE of their unconstitutional social issues, are the
only voices of REASON (after yours truly) in this country. Therefore,
the ONLY valid votes in determining any action taken on economic
issues prior to the ratification of my (our) New Constitution, are
those cast by CONSERVATIVES!!!
8. Since our courts—primarily from the top down—have evolved to be
extensions of the unconstitutionally divisive political parties that
are so represented, then the decisions of ALL higher courts have no
legality nor validity, and shall not be respected.
9. Since the ENTIRE Executive Branch, and major portions of the top
Judicial Branch are corrupt Democratic socialists, bent on destroying
the USA, then, no action nor non action by either of the latter shall
have the force of law!!!!!
10. Therefore, be it known: The CONSERVATIVES in the House of
Representatives, relative to all economic issues, but NOT to a single
social issue, is now the sole, constitutionally-functioning body
qualified to direct the economic course of the USA. Conservative
voices all across this great country are URGED to rally behind House
Conservatives!
The order of business of the NEW House shall be: (Democrats go home
for the Holidays and never come back!)
1. Bar the doors leading to the House side of the Capital, with the
objective of blocking entry by a single member of the media!!!!! Turn
off broadcasting (but not recording) of what is transpiring in the
House, and confiscate all cell phones with cameras!!!
2. Vote Boehner OUT as Speaker!!!!! He is much too stigmatized for
having ‘negotiated’ to allow the USA to keep creeping toward 100%
‘Atlas Shrugged’ socialism.
3. Send a “House ORDER” (a new term!) to Barack Obama informing him
that he has just 72 hours to deliver to the House main chamber
PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in Hawaii, or to be arrested
for capital, hang-by-the-neck-until-dead treason.
4. Send a “House ORDER” to the head of the US Secret Service
informing them that Barack Obama shall not be allowed to fly on Air
Force One, nor to be motorcaded to another location.
5. After the 72 hours explained in 3, above, have the NEW Speaker of
the House go out onto the Capital steps and announce, (A) that,
because the Executive Branch and the upper Judicial Branch are
unconstitutionally corrupt, the NEW House—composed only of economic
CONSERVATIVES—declares that ‘Obama Care’ is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and
invalid!!!!! (B) Declare that the tax laws that were in effect for
2012 shall REMAIN in effect for at least the entire 2013 fiscal
year!!!! (So there is no looming fiscal cliff!!!) (C) Inform the
country that no ruling by the Supreme Court has any validity since
Barack Obama, fraudulently, assumed the role of president. (D)
Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are our legally-elected
President and Vice President and shall be moving into the Chief
Executive Offices, immediately!!!!! (E) Explain that Barack Obama
and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
REINSTALL our Constitution—that has been so grossly neglected for the
last century—as our ruling document in SPIRIT, until our STRENGTHENED,
CLARIFIED and much more COMPREHENSIVE ‘New Constitution of the United
States of America’ can rightly be ratified.
I hope “the above” is defined clearly enough for our last-saving-grace
House of Representatives to understand. Since I’ve recently gotten
some good, smiling vibes from Fox’s Chris Wallace, and subsequently, a
brief, disbelieving smiling vibe from Bret Baier, I’m wondering if
either or both of those men are up-to-the-task of covering some REAL
breaking news like I’m proposing should soon come to be. People,
please realize that John A. Armistead, THE most intelligent person on
Earth today, who is in the league with Da Vinci and Christ Jesus—my
personal hero and savior—has unselfishly devoted 17 years of his life
to defining OPTIMUM government. Such will allow the maximum amount of
fairly-achieved prosperity for the maximum number of people, the world
over—including Muslims.
In order to allow “believers”—or those who agree with my high
objectives for the USA—to ‘subtly’ be KNOWN to one another, I ask that
each of you, who are sincerely willing to put aside petty group-
against-group divisiveness in favor of genuine love-of-humanity
NEIGHBORLINESS (for all races, creeds and nations), do the following:
Reach into your pocket or purse, or look into the back of your desk
drawers; locate and place a ballpoint pen in your left shirt or coat
pocket. Anyone, like me… in my turtleneck shirt, without a chest
pocket, clip a small safety pin to your blouse or jacket. Such
innocuous signals will—if we will… “Pay It Forward!”—soon light up the
world!
At this Christmas season, I would like to champion, and to urge
millions more to champion, the world-wide efforts of the Reverend
Franklin Graham, who by DEEDS, not just words, is working to change
the “caring” climate in our troubled world. I urge all who will to
pray that those mired down in our dysfunctional government will see-
the-Holy-light. And pray for those in our severely biased media to
take long vacations. Enough hurtful words have been said already!
*** “Four things I know for sure: It is better to love than to hate;
it is better to give than to take; it is better to help rather than to
hinder; and it is better to forgive rather than to hold a grudge.”
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
>
> On Dec 16, 10:14 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Negotiate not with thieves!
>
> John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
> of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
> illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
> (except me!) hostage! If international terrorists make demands thatourcountry do such-and-such,ourstandard reply is: “The USA does
>
> Negotiate not with thieves!
>
> John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
> of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
> illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
> NOT negotiate with terrorists (nor with thieves)!” So, why is Boehner
> even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
>
> By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
> with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
>
> 1. Obama has not and does not supportouras-written US Constitution.
> even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
>
> By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
> with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
>
>
> 2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
> protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
> the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
> document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
>
> 3. Obama has assumed the attitude of a DICTATOR (Be not Kings!) thatourFounding Fathers were bound-and-determined should NEVER control
> 2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
> protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
> the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
> document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
>
> this Country!
>
> 4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
> country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
> single thing in those directions!
>
> 5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
> Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
> him forpresident, in exchange for their being “considered” for VP.
>
> 4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
> country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
> single thing in those directions!
>
> 5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
> Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
>
> 6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
> large rebate on purchased gasoline.
>
> 7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
> Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
> enacted.
>
> 8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
> and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
> Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
> commercials.
>
> 9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, expresidentBill
> Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
> regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
>
> 10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
> that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
>
> 11. Obama bribed youngervoterswith grand speeches claiming college
> 6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
> large rebate on purchased gasoline.
>
> 7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
> Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
> enacted.
>
> 8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
> and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
> Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
> commercials.
>
> 9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, expresidentBill
> Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
> regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
>
> 10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
> that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
>
> RESIDENCE, Barack Obama. About half an hour later, I got similar,
> “(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
> Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
> survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
> dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
> to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
> ‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
> close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
> is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
> crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
>
> I am most surprised and pleased thatPresidentGeorge W. Bush is
> “(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
> Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
> survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
> dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
> to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
> ‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
> close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
> is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
> crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
>
> sending me so many smiling vibes. His energy to be hiking and bike
> riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
> strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
> having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
> presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
> know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
>
> Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
> considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
> who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
> Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
> alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
> think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
> the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
>
> The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
> By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
> proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
> righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
> being snubbed in any way. Withoureconomy flourishing, again, the
> riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
> strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
> having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
> presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
> know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
>
> Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
> considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
> who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
> Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
> alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
> think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
> the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
>
> The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
> By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
> proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
> righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
> avenues for havingourneedy be helped will be wide and many.
>
> “Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> John A. Armistead,
> Author and Patriot
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Honor Not Thieves!
> > By John A. Armistead
>
> > Lose a little or a lot,
> > That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> > Then feign disbelief,
> > At the wiles of the thief.
>
> > Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> > Claim that they are for others caring.
> > While so few of those others,
> > Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> > Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> > Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> > Democrats they call themselves,
> > While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> >Ourdecline to the brink happened slow,
> “Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> John A. Armistead,
> Author and Patriot
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Honor Not Thieves!
> > By John A. Armistead
>
> > Lose a little or a lot,
> > That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> > Then feign disbelief,
> > At the wiles of the thief.
>
> > Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> > Claim that they are for others caring.
> > While so few of those others,
> > Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> > Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> > Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> > Democrats they call themselves,
> > While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> > So, the populace would hardly even know,
> > ThatourConstitution has long been denied,
> > Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
>
> > Is thePresidentourauthority?
> > Orshouldn’theourservant be?
>
> > Is thePresidentourauthority?
> > Obama surely “plays” the role,
> > While his socialist policies take their toll.
>
> > There are communists in the White House—
> > sound the alarm!
> > They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
> > Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
> > While they all continue to do great harm?
>
> > Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
> > The scoundrels inourmidst,
> > While they honor not their sworn oaths,
> > To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
>
> > The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
> > That fair people have lost any sway.
> > Their loyalty is to their own biases,
> > Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
>
> > Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
> > And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
> > Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
> > Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
>
> > The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
> > From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
> > While attracting mostly egotists,
> > Because the media has held those on high.
>
> >Ourcorrupt media is the bane of a fair democracy,
> > While his socialist policies take their toll.
>
> > There are communists in the White House—
> > sound the alarm!
> > They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
> > Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
> > While they all continue to do great harm?
>
> > Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
> > The scoundrels inourmidst,
> > While they honor not their sworn oaths,
> > To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
>
> > The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
> > That fair people have lost any sway.
> > Their loyalty is to their own biases,
> > Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
>
> > Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
> > And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
> > Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
> > Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
>
> > The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
> > From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
> > While attracting mostly egotists,
> > Because the media has held those on high.
>
> > That brainwashes us 24/7,
> > With polls and well-chosen video bites,
> > And commentators hired to deceive.
>
> > Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
> > Reason has a good chance to prevail,
> > If each one of them will disregard any fear.
> > Those people can saveourUSA dear!
> > With polls and well-chosen video bites,
> > And commentators hired to deceive.
>
> > Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
> > Reason has a good chance to prevail,
> > If each one of them will disregard any fear.
>
> > They can block the media at the door,
> > And all quickly come to agree,
> > That Obama is the cause,
> > Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
>
> > No law shall ever be respected,
> > That respected not the people.
> > And no court shall be respected,
> > That respected not the Constitution.
>
> > That document clearly requires:
> > “No person except a natural born citizen…”
> > But Obama was never vetted,
> > And the country is now so indebted.
>
> > Obama will surely hang,
> > For not respectingourConstitution dear.
> > They can block the media at the door,
> > And all quickly come to agree,
> > That Obama is the cause,
> > Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
>
> > No law shall ever be respected,
> > That respected not the people.
> > And no court shall be respected,
> > That respected not the Constitution.
>
> > That document clearly requires:
> > “No person except a natural born citizen…”
> > But Obama was never vetted,
> > And the country is now so indebted.
>
> > Obama will surely hang,
> > He’s the Robyn Hood in disguise,
> > Bent on causingourcountry’s demise.
>
> > 72 hours is all it will take,
> > To prove Obama is a fake.
> > While some in the nation will grieve,
> > The USA shall honor not thieves!
>
> > “Pay It Forward!” … and
>
> > 72 hours is all it will take,
> > To prove Obama is a fake.
> > While some in the nation will grieve,
> > The USA shall honor not thieves!
>
> > “Pay It Forward!” … and
>
NoEinstein
Dec 18, 2012, 1:18:42 PM12/18/12
to
On Dec 17, 7:23 pm, "Tommy" <tommyleprech...@geemale.com> wrote:
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote a load of crap in message
Dear Tommy: For every socialist who feels crapped on, I have achieved
one more satisfying relief! — John A. Armistead —
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote a load of crap in message
one more satisfying relief! — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Dec 18, 2012, 2:16:50 PM12/18/12
to
On Dec 18, 1:13 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The following link is to a prayer inspired by the terrible CT
shootings. Know that our hope is in the simplist things: "Ask and it
shall be given; knock, and the door will be opened."
http://www.christianpost.com/news/max-lucados-prayer-in-response-to-conn-school-shooting-86681/#vqllSYSvoh82hBQT.99
> 8. Sinceourcourts—primarily from the top down—have evolved to be
> Barack Obama, fraudulently, assumed the role ofpresident. (D)
> Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan areourlegally-electedPresidentand VicePresidentand shall be moving into the Chief
> the “caring” climate inourtroubled world. I urge all who will to
> pray that those mired down inourdysfunctional government will see-
> the-Holy-light. And pray for those inourseverely biased media to
>
The following link is to a prayer inspired by the terrible CT
shootings. Know that our hope is in the simplist things: "Ask and it
shall be given; knock, and the door will be opened."
http://www.christianpost.com/news/max-lucados-prayer-in-response-to-conn-school-shooting-86681/#vqllSYSvoh82hBQT.99
> Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan areourlegally-electedPresidentand VicePresidentand shall be moving into the Chief
> Executive Offices, immediately!!!!! (E) Explain that Barack Obama
> and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
> Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
> Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
> REINSTALLourConstitution—that has been so grossly neglected for the
> and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
> Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
> Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
> pray that those mired down inourdysfunctional government will see-
> the-Holy-light. And pray for those inourseverely biased media to
Tommy
Dec 18, 2012, 2:38:24 PM12/18/12
to
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:cf5501fe-34c4-4a9a...@g6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...
one more satisfying relief! � John A. Armistead �
----
I'm a Nationalist - and I recognise crap before it 'falls' on me, or is
thrown at me -
I get satisfactory relief from a good thunderous fart though -
Thunder
Wonder
Alarm
Stink
Strife
Smell
Peace
Ease
and
Pleasure
Cheers
Tommy
news:cf5501fe-34c4-4a9a...@g6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...
----
I'm a Nationalist - and I recognise crap before it 'falls' on me, or is
thrown at me -
I get satisfactory relief from a good thunderous fart though -
Thunder
Wonder
Alarm
Stink
Strife
Smell
Peace
Ease
and
Pleasure
Cheers
Tommy
NoEinstein
Dec 19, 2012, 8:08:27 AM12/19/12
to
CORRECTION: In a chromosome, "y" is masculine, but in "thieves" the
word should be Robin Hood. As is usually the case, a little light in
the back of my brain goes off, sometimes too faintly at first, that
there is a "book learning" mistake. For those who don't know, book
learning is NOT a standard for determining IQ. The latter is based on
the ability to figure out unique problems one has never before
encountered. Once I realized that those who were writing the IQ tests
were intentionally trying to trick me, I stopped "hot-shotting" my
answers and asked, "Is there a solution NOT evident on the surface?"
Once I did that, my text scores became perfect. I was very good with
"such-and-such is to so-and-so as this is to ???" type questions that
I often realized had multiple correct answers. Since those making up
the tests had IQs 60% as high as mine, they wrongly didn't see the
alternate correct answers. The same is true for those number
sequences in which the test taker is asked fill in the next number in
the sequence. If one considers addition and subtraction in the
"equations" producing the number sequences, there will be different
answers that are equally correct. Only by my 'learning' that most of
those sequences are exponential, did I "dumb-down" enough to make
perfect scores on those, too.
I first became aware that Ben Stein was very smart after watching him
on Jeopardy. He knew the characters in books and everything about the
authors. But I have observed that those who are widely read tend to
be low on creativity. Creative people are inventing, composing, and
building stuff, NOT recreating with an "excape" that, in excess,
should have classification as a mental illness. Those who read all
the time tend to be extremely introverted. I am an extrovert, who,
because of my energy (drive, enthusiasm, libido, etc.) write so big
that I can only get a couple of sentences on a letter size page. But
because I am highly creative, I can't be socializing very much. I have
never been timid in social situations. At a high school reunion, the
class was asked to write the name of the classmate they most
remembered. I won, handily! I was told by a teacher that I was the
subject of discussion for much of the typical "teachers' meetings,
held several times a year. I was that student who held up my hand
because I knew the answer to the questions. Is it any wonder that I
was tagged on my senior photo, that stated: "John knows and knows he
knows!"
I'm explaining these things to try to get the TIMID readers from
Congress, in particular, to realize that I have thought through the
problems with our government, and more particular, the problems with
our disparate CULTURES in government. Because of the limited layers
of reasoning those in Congress are capable of, those people always
have deep fears of being "shown up" by someone with a greater niche
specialization. Though I have ZERO desire to work IN government, I
would be perfectly willing to act as a sounding board for any true
patriot who wants to get things correctly straightened out in
government.
Start trusting me, and my objectives to help most Americans! I wasn't
given an analytical mind like I have to have such be "ignored" by
those with less than 1/2 my IQ. I'm a RESOURCE, people, use it and
trust it!
"Pay It Forward! and... "Long live the USA!"
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
word should be Robin Hood. As is usually the case, a little light in
the back of my brain goes off, sometimes too faintly at first, that
there is a "book learning" mistake. For those who don't know, book
learning is NOT a standard for determining IQ. The latter is based on
the ability to figure out unique problems one has never before
encountered. Once I realized that those who were writing the IQ tests
were intentionally trying to trick me, I stopped "hot-shotting" my
answers and asked, "Is there a solution NOT evident on the surface?"
Once I did that, my text scores became perfect. I was very good with
"such-and-such is to so-and-so as this is to ???" type questions that
I often realized had multiple correct answers. Since those making up
the tests had IQs 60% as high as mine, they wrongly didn't see the
alternate correct answers. The same is true for those number
sequences in which the test taker is asked fill in the next number in
the sequence. If one considers addition and subtraction in the
"equations" producing the number sequences, there will be different
answers that are equally correct. Only by my 'learning' that most of
those sequences are exponential, did I "dumb-down" enough to make
perfect scores on those, too.
I first became aware that Ben Stein was very smart after watching him
on Jeopardy. He knew the characters in books and everything about the
authors. But I have observed that those who are widely read tend to
be low on creativity. Creative people are inventing, composing, and
building stuff, NOT recreating with an "excape" that, in excess,
should have classification as a mental illness. Those who read all
the time tend to be extremely introverted. I am an extrovert, who,
because of my energy (drive, enthusiasm, libido, etc.) write so big
that I can only get a couple of sentences on a letter size page. But
because I am highly creative, I can't be socializing very much. I have
never been timid in social situations. At a high school reunion, the
class was asked to write the name of the classmate they most
remembered. I won, handily! I was told by a teacher that I was the
subject of discussion for much of the typical "teachers' meetings,
held several times a year. I was that student who held up my hand
because I knew the answer to the questions. Is it any wonder that I
was tagged on my senior photo, that stated: "John knows and knows he
knows!"
I'm explaining these things to try to get the TIMID readers from
Congress, in particular, to realize that I have thought through the
problems with our government, and more particular, the problems with
our disparate CULTURES in government. Because of the limited layers
of reasoning those in Congress are capable of, those people always
have deep fears of being "shown up" by someone with a greater niche
specialization. Though I have ZERO desire to work IN government, I
would be perfectly willing to act as a sounding board for any true
patriot who wants to get things correctly straightened out in
government.
Start trusting me, and my objectives to help most Americans! I wasn't
given an analytical mind like I have to have such be "ignored" by
those with less than 1/2 my IQ. I'm a RESOURCE, people, use it and
trust it!
"Pay It Forward! and... "Long live the USA!"
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Honor Not Thieves!
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Lose a little or a lot,
> That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> Then feign disbelief,
> At the wiles of the thief.
>
> Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> Claim that they are for others caring.
> While so few of those others,
> Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> Democrats they call themselves,
> While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> Ourdecline to the brink happened slow,
>
> Honor Not Thieves!
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Lose a little or a lot,
> That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> Then feign disbelief,
> At the wiles of the thief.
>
> Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> Claim that they are for others caring.
> While so few of those others,
> Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> Democrats they call themselves,
> While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> So, the populace would hardly even know,
> ThatourConstitution has long been denied,
> Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
>
> Is thePresidentourauthority?
> Orshouldn’theourservant be?
>
> Is thePresidentourauthority?
> Obama surely “plays” the role,
> While his socialist policies take their toll.
>
> There are communists in the White House—
> sound the alarm!
> They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
> Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
> While they all continue to do great harm?
>
> Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
> The scoundrels inourmidst,
> While they honor not their sworn oaths,
> To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
>
> The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
> That fair people have lost any sway.
> Their loyalty is to their own biases,
> Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
>
> Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
> And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
> Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
> Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
>
> The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
> From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
> While attracting mostly egotists,
> Because the media has held those on high.
>
> Ourcorrupt media is the bane of a fair democracy,
> While his socialist policies take their toll.
>
> There are communists in the White House—
> sound the alarm!
> They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
> Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
> While they all continue to do great harm?
>
> Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
> The scoundrels inourmidst,
> While they honor not their sworn oaths,
> To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
>
> The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
> That fair people have lost any sway.
> Their loyalty is to their own biases,
> Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
>
> Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
> And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
> Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
> Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
>
> The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
> From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
> While attracting mostly egotists,
> Because the media has held those on high.
>
> That brainwashes us 24/7,
> With polls and well-chosen video bites,
> And commentators hired to deceive.
>
> Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
> Reason has a good chance to prevail,
> If each one of them will disregard any fear.
> Those people can saveourUSA dear!
> With polls and well-chosen video bites,
> And commentators hired to deceive.
>
> Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
> Reason has a good chance to prevail,
> If each one of them will disregard any fear.
>
> They can block the media at the door,
> And all quickly come to agree,
> That Obama is the cause,
> Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
>
> No law shall ever be respected,
> That respected not the people.
> And no court shall be respected,
> That respected not the Constitution.
>
> That document clearly requires:
> “No person except a natural born citizen…”
> But Obama was never vetted,
> And the country is now so indebted.
>
> Obama will surely hang,
> For not respectingourConstitution dear.
> They can block the media at the door,
> And all quickly come to agree,
> That Obama is the cause,
> Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
>
> No law shall ever be respected,
> That respected not the people.
> And no court shall be respected,
> That respected not the Constitution.
>
> That document clearly requires:
> “No person except a natural born citizen…”
> But Obama was never vetted,
> And the country is now so indebted.
>
> Obama will surely hang,
> He’s the Robyn Hood in disguise,
> Bent on causingourcountry’s demise.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 19, 2012, 8:11:56 AM12/19/12
to
>Only by my 'learning' that most of
>those sequences are exponential, did I "dumb-down" enough to make
>perfect scores on those, too.
Looks like your dumbing down program was a success! Congratulations!
>those sequences are exponential, did I "dumb-down" enough to make
>perfect scores on those, too.
Tommy
Dec 19, 2012, 1:56:20 PM12/19/12
to
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net dribbled thorugh his cakehole...
> ...
>
> read more �- Hide quoted text -
Isn't it a pity that newsreaders won't obey the order to hide quoted text,
especially this dribblers hahahahahahaha - jaysus I'm a scream.
Cheers
Tommy
> ...
>
> read more �- Hide quoted text -
Isn't it a pity that newsreaders won't obey the order to hide quoted text,
especially this dribblers hahahahahahaha - jaysus I'm a scream.
Cheers
Tommy
NoEinstein
Dec 19, 2012, 5:19:39 PM12/19/12
to
On Dec 19, 8:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
CORRECTION: That should be EScape, not EXcape. The X is right below
the S on my keyboard; my finger slipped. Sorry! — J. A. A. —
> problems withourgovernment, and more particular, the problems withourdisparate CULTURES in government. Because of the limited layers
>
CORRECTION: That should be EScape, not EXcape. The X is right below
the S on my keyboard; my finger slipped. Sorry! — J. A. A. —
NoEinstein
Dec 19, 2012, 5:24:04 PM12/19/12
to
Little Giants Be!
By John A. Armistead
Bap, bap, bap the guns aren’t toys.
Have you ever heard such a terrible noise?
Duck-or-run might seem the way,
To save one’s life for another day.
Bap, bap, bap though you might hide,
Bullets could still pass through your insides.
Imagine all of the tears to be shed,
If a dear one like you wound up… dead.
Tremble not from fear too soon.
Planning ahead will save many from doom.
Fire drills, and storm drills, too;
There needs to be something new.
There is strength in NUMBERS for big or small,
In a school or in a mall,
In a restaurant where a disgruntled-one looms,
Even a soldier’s life can end too soon.
BEFORE wasting any seconds in sheer disbelief,
Save your families from having any grief.
ATTACK in unison, armed or not.
And your brave deeds won’t be forgot!
As traveler Gulliver surely knew,
Tiny threads can hold like glue.
A forty pound kid can lock an arm.
How can such an arm cause any harm?
A forty pound kid can bite to blood.
No such defense would ever be a dud,
Especially, if a dozen kids will pile on top.
Such a force few bad guys could easily stop!
Realize that if more knew these simple things,
There would be fewer sad church bells to ring.
So ATTACK in unison, without delay.
That can save many lives for another day!
Dinner plates can like Frisbees be.
A dining chair can smash a knee.
Imagine that man’s great surprise,
To get black pepper tossed in his eyes.
ATTACK in unison, that’s the plan,
Never let any rascal continue-to-stand.
A gallon of colored marbles could save the day,
If such can be spilled in the evil one’s way!
Honk, honk, honk in a rhythm of three,
From your car if some evil-one you see.
That’s an alarm that ALL should know.
Hear-such-an-alarm and lock the doors!
On all teachers’ desks should be these toys:
A compressed air horn that will make much noise;
And a large can of very-very hot,
Pepper spray, so-he’ll-know-he’s-been-shot!
Don’t live in fear of mortal harm.
And don’t wait to hear an alarm.
Just ATTACK from all sides and you will see,
How POWERFUL little giants be!
___________
> 8. Sinceourcourts—primarily from the top down—have evolved to be
> Barack Obama, fraudulently, assumed the role ofpresident. (D)
> Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan areourlegally-electedPresidentand VicePresidentand shall be moving into the Chief
> the “caring” climate inourtroubled world. I urge all who will to
> pray that those mired down inourdysfunctional government will see-
> the-Holy-light. And pray for those inourseverely biased media to
By John A. Armistead
Bap, bap, bap the guns aren’t toys.
Have you ever heard such a terrible noise?
Duck-or-run might seem the way,
To save one’s life for another day.
Bap, bap, bap though you might hide,
Bullets could still pass through your insides.
Imagine all of the tears to be shed,
If a dear one like you wound up… dead.
Tremble not from fear too soon.
Planning ahead will save many from doom.
Fire drills, and storm drills, too;
There needs to be something new.
There is strength in NUMBERS for big or small,
In a school or in a mall,
In a restaurant where a disgruntled-one looms,
Even a soldier’s life can end too soon.
BEFORE wasting any seconds in sheer disbelief,
Save your families from having any grief.
ATTACK in unison, armed or not.
And your brave deeds won’t be forgot!
As traveler Gulliver surely knew,
Tiny threads can hold like glue.
A forty pound kid can lock an arm.
How can such an arm cause any harm?
A forty pound kid can bite to blood.
No such defense would ever be a dud,
Especially, if a dozen kids will pile on top.
Such a force few bad guys could easily stop!
Realize that if more knew these simple things,
There would be fewer sad church bells to ring.
So ATTACK in unison, without delay.
That can save many lives for another day!
Dinner plates can like Frisbees be.
A dining chair can smash a knee.
Imagine that man’s great surprise,
To get black pepper tossed in his eyes.
ATTACK in unison, that’s the plan,
Never let any rascal continue-to-stand.
A gallon of colored marbles could save the day,
If such can be spilled in the evil one’s way!
Honk, honk, honk in a rhythm of three,
From your car if some evil-one you see.
That’s an alarm that ALL should know.
Hear-such-an-alarm and lock the doors!
On all teachers’ desks should be these toys:
A compressed air horn that will make much noise;
And a large can of very-very hot,
Pepper spray, so-he’ll-know-he’s-been-shot!
Don’t live in fear of mortal harm.
And don’t wait to hear an alarm.
Just ATTACK from all sides and you will see,
How POWERFUL little giants be!
___________
> Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan areourlegally-electedPresidentand VicePresidentand shall be moving into the Chief
> Executive Offices, immediately!!!!! (E) Explain that Barack Obama
> and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
> Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
> Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
> and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
> Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
> Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
> REINSTALLourConstitution—that has been so grossly neglected for the
> last century—asourruling document in SPIRIT, untilourSTRENGTHENED,
> last century—asourruling document in SPIRIT, untilourSTRENGTHENED,
> pray that those mired down inourdysfunctional government will see-
> the-Holy-light. And pray for those inourseverely biased media to
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages