11,000 scientists warn of 'untold suffering' caused by climate change

[kensi]

More than 11,000 researchers from around the world on Tuesday issued a
grim warning of the "untold suffering" that will be caused by climate
change if humanity doesn't change its ways.

The group said that as scientists, they have the "moral obligation to
tell it like it is."

Phoebe Barnard, one of the lead authors of the report and the chief
science and policy officer at the Conservation Biology Institute, a
nonprofit science group, told CNN the report makes it clear "there's no
more wiggle room" for policymakers.

"Posterity will remember them badly for dismissing climate change as a
serious threat to our civilization," she said:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/05/world/climate-emergency-scientists-warning-intl-trnd/index.html

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

[Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛]

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 05:02:15 +0200, LO AND BEHOLD; kensi
<kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> determined that the following was
of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
in <qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>:

✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ More than 11,000 researchers from around the world on Tuesday issued a

✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ grim warning of the "untold suffering" that will be caused by climate
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ change if humanity doesn't change its ways.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ The group said that as scientists, they have the "moral obligation to
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ tell it like it is."
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Phoebe Barnard, one of the lead authors of the report and the chief
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ science and policy officer at the Conservation Biology Institute, a
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ nonprofit science group, told CNN the report makes it clear "there's no
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ more wiggle room" for policymakers.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "Posterity will remember them badly for dismissing climate change as a
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ serious threat to our civilization," she said:
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/05/world/climate-emergency-scientists-warnin

✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ g-intl-trnd/index.html
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡

it is a VERY good thing that checkmate is prepared he will have non tainted water and he's not worried about the marauding survivors and rotting corpses and the plague if a rat or fly drags it off of a festering corpse within a mile of his bunker. he will have a bounty of fresh vegetables and groceries from sam's club plus he ordered the 5 gallon buckets of food from the evangelist jebus paid advertisement, probly.


"nads" won't comment on this poast...

--
[THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION]

THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic...@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfef...@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

[Checkmate!]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...

> there's no more wiggle room

There's a little bit. Just enough for you to wiggle your ass on outta here,
you obsessed, ass-burger-ridden KooKj0b.

--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc

***************************************************
"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as
kensi." -Nadegda
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$2...@dont-email.me>
***************************************************

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

BEST SONG(s) EVER MADE:

https://youtu.be/BUhGh04Sgsk

[Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛]

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 22:01:33 -0800, LO AND BEHOLD; The Pathetic
Anti-Muslim Wannabe Homegrown Terrorist Posting as "💩!
<ricks...@gmail.com>" determined that the following was of great

importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in

<MPG.382d531...@news.altopia.com>:

🐸Warning!AlwayswearANSIapprovedsafetygoggleswhenreadingpostsby
🐸💩!Inarticle<qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>,kkensington01
🐸@gmail.nospam.invalidsays...
🐸
🐸
🐸🐸there'snomorewiggleroom
🐸
🐸There'salittlebit.Justenoughforyoutowiggleyourassonoutta
🐸here,youobsessed,ass-burger-riddenKooKj0b.
🐸

you do a lot of "wiggilin" and i think you'll do a little bit more in front of a judge soon, based on what i have heard from some people.

[Ken Burgess]

In article <qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
kensi <kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
> More than 11,000 researchers

How many of those researchers are getting funding that was
approved by nutty Democrats?

Snopes uses "researchers". One of their "researchers" is a
heroin addict and another is a convicted felon who did time for
perjury.

You cannot change the climate.

The climate changes you.

[Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛]

[bigdog]

On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 10:02:23 PM UTC-5, kensi wrote:
> More than 11,000 researchers from around the world on Tuesday issued a
> grim warning of the "untold suffering" that will be caused by climate
> change if humanity doesn't change its ways.
>

You mean if they don't move to higher ground when the seas rise. Yes I guess those
people will suffer but if they are that fucking stupid, they will deserve it.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, kkkensi <kkkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> cried WOLF again...

>More than 11,000 researchers from around the world on Tuesday issued a
>grim warning of the "untold suffering" that will be caused by climate
>change if humanity doesn't change its ways.

LOL! *Researchers*... Hell, they don't even have the decency
to say climate, weather, atmosphere, etc. researchers. Why,
they could be yogurt researchers for fuck's sake.

>The group said that as scientists, they have the "moral obligation to
>tell it like it is."

The *group*? LOL, why they could be a group of Greta Thunberg
fan club members.

>Phoebe Barnard, one of the lead authors of the report and the chief
>science and policy officer at the Conservation Biology Institute, a
>nonprofit science group, told CNN the report makes it clear "there's no
>more wiggle room" for policymakers.

Policy makers? LOL, just another name for brainwashed bureaucrats.

>"Posterity will remember them badly for dismissing climate change as a
>serious threat to our civilization," she said:
>

>https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/05/world/climate-emergency-scientists-warning-inlt-trnd/index.html

Serious threat to our civilization? LOL. "THE SKY IS FALLING,
THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING...."

What a joke!

--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignøred misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Checkmate! <ricks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>KKKensi,, kkkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid says...

<...>

>> there's no more wiggle room
>
>There's a little bit. Just enough for you to wiggle your ass on outta here,
>you obsessed, ass-burger-ridden KooKj0b.

LOL

[benj]

Hey bigdog. "Kensi" says the lake has already risen 10 feet driving
people out of Chicago. That makes it clear we must DO SOMETHING no
matter how stupid and ineffective and do it now!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h4DZeBleLs

[Just Wondering]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BzjPukTLoY

[Nadegda]

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!

On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:32:29 +0100, Ken Burgess wrote:

> In article <qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
> kensi <kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> More than 11,000 researchers
>
> How many of those researchers are getting funding that was
> approved by nutty Democrats?

What does your question have to do with climate change, kook?

> Snopes uses "researchers".

How fascinating.

> One of their "researchers" is a heroin addict and another is a convicted
> felon who did time for perjury.

Proof, kook?

> You cannot change the climate.

False to fact.

> The climate changes you.

It's made you into a frothing kook. That, or denial has. Tell me, how much
money do you have invested in fossil fuel and pipeline stocks?

--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[benj]

On 11/7/2019 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:32:29 +0100, Ken Burgess wrote:
>
>> In article <qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
>> kensi <kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> More than 11,000 researchers
>>
>> How many of those researchers are getting funding that was
>> approved by nutty Democrats?
>
> What does your question have to do with climate change, kook?
>
>> Snopes uses "researchers".
>
> How fascinating.
>
>> One of their "researchers" is a heroin addict and another is a convicted
>> felon who did time for perjury.
>
> Proof, kook?
>
>> You cannot change the climate.
>
> False to fact.

Remember idiot journo-libs do not do quantity. Sure if Nads cuts one of
"her" stinky farts it COULD perhaps change climate some amount so small
that God himself would have trouble measuring it. But Alarmist pretend
that ANY amount is somehow the same as a significant amount. Truth is
that America could shut all anthropogenic CO2 production to ZERO and it
would absolutely NO significant change in world climate. That is
scientific truth.

>> The climate changes you.
>
> It's made you into a frothing kook. That, or denial has. Tell me, how much
> money do you have invested in fossil fuel and pipeline stocks?

Climate has obviously rotted your brain. You can't even notice that the
murder of hundreds of millions of people is bad! What in hell are you
good for? You aren't even a good piece of tail!

<snicker>

[kensi]

On 11/7/2019 6:23 PM, benj wrote:
> America could shut all anthropogenic CO2 production to ZERO and it
> would absolutely NO significant change in world climate. That is
> scientific truth.

No, it's balderdash. Poppycock. Balloonjuice!

> Climate has obviously rotted your brain. You can't even notice that the
> murder of hundreds of millions of people is bad!

Proof, k0ok?

> What in hell are you good for?

Physics stuff, mostly. Oh, and to address some foamage I've been
noticing in other threads: my focus has been on star formation and
evolution, not cosmology. Go pester someone else with your dark energy
questions.

> You aren't even a good piece of tail!

I wasn't put on this Earth for your gratification, misogynist.

[vallor]

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 07:24:54 +0200, kensi wrote:

> Go pester someone else with your dark energy questions.

Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?

Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is where he gets his hair
done.

--
-v

[Scooter]

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 07:24:54 +0200, kensi
<kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>
>Physics stuff, mostly. Oh, and to address some foamage I've been
>noticing in other threads: my focus has been on star formation and
>evolution, not cosmology. Go pester someone else with your dark energy
>questions.

Translation: I don't know shit.

[Checkmate!]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by

Checkmate! In article <qq28fj$ku0$3...@dont-email.me>, nad31...@gmail.invalid
says...


> Subject: Re: 11,000 government funding recipients warn of 'untold suffering' caused by climate change
> From: Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid>
> Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate

>
>
>
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:32:29 +0100, Ken Burgess wrote:
>
> > In article <qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
> > kensi <kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> More than 11,000 researchers
> >
> > How many of those researchers are getting funding that was
> > approved by nutty Democrats?
>
> What does your question have to do with climate change, kook?
>
> > Snopes uses "researchers".
>
> How fascinating.
>
> > One of their "researchers" is a heroin addict and another is a convicted
> > felon who did time for perjury.
>
> Proof, kook?
>
> > You cannot change the climate.
>
> False to fact.
>
> > The climate changes you.
>

> It's made you into a frothing kook...

<...she frothed>

[Checkmate!]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by

Checkmate! In article <qq2u7c$1pbg$3...@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...

> I wasn't put on this Earth for your gratification, misogynist.
>

I don't think anybody finds you very gratifying, KooK.

[Pandora]

Does he even have any hair?

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, vallor wrote:

>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, kensi wrote:
>>
>>> Go pester someone else with your dark energy questions.
>>
>> Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?
>>
>> Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is where he gets his hair
>> done.
>
>Does he even have any hair?

Gergs has lots of pubic hair... you wanna see?

[Pandora]

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:15:46 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, vallor wrote:
>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, kensi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Go pester someone else with your dark energy questions.
>>>
>>> Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?
>>>
>>> Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is where he gets his hair
>>> done.
>>
>>Does he even have any hair?
>
> Gergs has lots of pubic hair... you wanna see?

No thanx. And you didn't negate my question.

[The Starmaker]

i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...

maybe two or three..

the rest...kooks.

and how do you get 11,000 to agree on anything??? or even two or three of them?



'untold suffering' they must be talking about being turned down for governments grants...








--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

[Sn!pe]

Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:37:00 +0000, vallor wrote:

[...]

> > Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?
> >
> > Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is
> > where he gets his hair done.
>
> Does he even have any hair?

Yep, on his palms.

--
^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon can see the fnords.

[%]

On 2019-11-08 12:17 p.m., Sn!pe wrote:
> Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:37:00 +0000, vallor wrote:
> [...]
>>> Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?
>>>
>>> Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is
>>> where he gets his hair done.
>>
>> Does he even have any hair?
>
> Yep, on his palms.
>

https://www.youtube.com/c/matthewcurryofficial

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:

Here's a clue: God only makes a limited number of perfect heads.
The rest He covers with hair.

[Nadegda]

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:01:45 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:

> i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...
>
> maybe two or three..
>
> the rest...kooks.

If it's kooks you're looking for, you've come to the right froup.

Or, you could just look in the nearest available reflective surface.

<snicker>

> 'untold suffering' they must be talking about being turned down for
> governments grants...

Right wing conspiracy theory noted. Get back to us when you have a real
argument to make.

[Just Wondering]

On 11/8/2019 2:04 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!

You realize, do you not, that the snowflakes are all left wingnuts?

[benj]

On 11/8/2019 12:24 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 11/7/2019 6:23 PM, benj wrote:
>> America could shut all anthropogenic CO2 production to ZERO and it
>> would absolutely NO significant change in world climate. That is
>> scientific truth.
>
> No, it's balderdash. Poppycock. Balloonjuice!

As a Journo you do not do quantity. Thus, you cannot understand the
difference between "any change" and "significant change". Your ignorance
is not our problem.

<snicker>

>> Climate has obviously rotted your brain. You can't even notice that
>> the murder of hundreds of millions of people is bad!
>
> Proof, k0ok?

Proof is easily seen by the fact all you do is cut an paste
journo-science propaganda. No "journalist" has ever been shown to have
an understanding of science. Given that they all believe that reality is
determined by their fantasies, it's no wonder.

>> What in hell are you good for?
>
> Physics stuff, mostly. Oh, and to address some foamage I've been
> noticing in other threads: my focus has been on star formation and
> evolution, not cosmology. Go pester someone else with your dark energy
> questions.

Fake physicist. That much is clear from your posts. Star formation is
not cosmology? This is your PH.D. level understanding of science? And
you think we need proof you are a fake physicist? Even a drooling
ignorant journalist can look up Webster's definition of cosmology! Whoa!

Auto-Smackdoodle!

<chortle>

>> You aren't even a good piece of tail!
>
> I wasn't put on this Earth for your gratification, misogynist.

Such overblown dyke ego! Misandrist, what made you think ANY man could
hold his breath long enough to touch you?

[Checkmate!]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by

Checkmate! In article <3j8bsep1a1mbabo9d...@4ax.com>,
greghall@høme.fake says...

>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> >On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, vallor wrote:
> >> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, kensi wrote:
> >>
> >>> Go pester someone else with your dark energy questions.
> >>
> >> Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?
> >>
> >> Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is where he gets his hair
> >> done.
> >
> >Does he even have any hair?
>
> Gergs has lots of pubic hair... you wanna see?

How disgusting...

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Checkmate! <ricks...@gmail.com> wrote:

<...>

>How disgusting...

Indeed, and perfect for Pandora who is the same.

Ayup!

[Pandora]

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:49:52 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>>On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, vallor wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, kensi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Go pester someone else with your dark energy questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?
>>>>>
>>>>> Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is where he gets his
>>>>> hair done.
>>>>
>>>>Does he even have any hair?
>>>
>>> Gergs has lots of pubic hair... you wanna see?
>>
>>No thanx. And you didn't negate my question.
>
> Here's a clue: God only makes a limited number of perfect heads.
> The rest He covers with hair.

Lame excuse for being bald.

[Pandora]

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:23:59 -0800, Checkmate! wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate! In article <3j8bsep1a1mbabo9d...@4ax.com>,
> greghall@høme.fake says...
>
>
>
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>> >On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, vallor wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019, kensi wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Go pester someone else with your dark energy questions.
>> >>
>> >> Are you referring to the post gergles made earlier?
>> >>
>> >> Pretty funny stuff. Gergs thinks cosmology is where he gets his
>> >> hair done.
>> >
>> >Does he even have any hair?
>>
>> Gergs has lots of pubic hair... you wanna see?
>
> How disgusting...

He certainly is that.

[Pandora]

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 17:39:20 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019, Checkmate! <ricks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <...>
>
>>How disgusting...
>
> Indeed, and perfect for Pandora who is the same.
>
> Ayup!

Ewwwwwwww. Never!

[%]

i shave my head not to the skin but very short

[The Starmaker]

Nadegda wrote:
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:01:45 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> > i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...
> >
> > maybe two or three..
> >
> > the rest...kooks.
>
> If it's kooks you're looking for, you've come to the right froup.
>
> Or, you could just look in the nearest available reflective surface.
>
> <snicker>

Out of the 11,000 scientists, can you name three of them?

>
> > 'untold suffering' they must be talking about being turned down for
> > governments grants...
>
> Right wing conspiracy theory noted. Get back to us when you have a real
> argument to make.
>
> --
> FNVWe Nadegda
>
> "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
> you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
> Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[The Starmaker]

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Nadegda wrote:
> >
> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:01:45 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > > i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...
> > >
> > > maybe two or three..
> > >
> > > the rest...kooks.
> >
> > If it's kooks you're looking for, you've come to the right froup.
> >
> > Or, you could just look in the nearest available reflective surface.
> >
> > <snicker>
>
> Out of the 11,000 scientists, can you name three of them?

okay, you might have a hard time naming 3 scientists...how about How Many of the 11,000 scientist are...kooks? or what percentage??

[kensi]

On 11/8/2019 6:50 PM, The Starmaker started talking to himself, which is
never a good sign, while frothing at Nadegda:

> The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:01:45 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...
>>>>
>>>> maybe two or three..
>>>>
>>>> the rest...kooks.
>>>
>>> If it's kooks you're looking for, you've come to the right froup.
>>>
>>> Or, you could just look in the nearest available reflective surface.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>
>> Out of the 11,000 scientists, can you name three of them?
>
> okay, you might have a hard time naming 3 scientists...how about How
> Many of the 11,000 scientist are...kooks? or what percentage??

Zero.

[kensi]

On 11/8/2019 4:59 PM, benj wrote:
> [snip a lot of k0Okf0Am] Star formation is not cosmology?

Nope, just astrophysics. Though astrophysics does provide many of the
tools used by cosmologists: the Cepheid and Type IA standard-candles,
lower bounds on the age of the cosmos, and so on and so forth.

[The Starmaker]

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Nadegda wrote:
> > >
> > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > > On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:01:45 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > > i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...
> > > >
> > > > maybe two or three..
> > > >
> > > > the rest...kooks.
> > >
> > > If it's kooks you're looking for, you've come to the right froup.
> > >
> > > Or, you could just look in the nearest available reflective surface.
> > >
> > > <snicker>
> >
> > Out of the 11,000 scientists, can you name three of them?
>
> okay, you might have a hard time naming 3 scientists...how about How Many of the 11,000 scientist are...kooks? or what percentage??

Actually...the answer is very simple...if you have 11,000 scientist who believe in climate change...then they're all KOOKS!


Like for example, any scientist who believes Pluto is not a planet is a PUSSY.

[Checkmate!]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by

Checkmate! In article <qq5gba$1lgm$3...@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...

>
> On 11/8/2019 6:50 PM, The Starmaker started talking to himself, which is
> never a good sign, while frothing at Nadegda:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> >> Nadegda wrote:
> >>
> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:01:45 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...
> >>>>
> >>>> maybe two or three..
> >>>>
> >>>> the rest...kooks.
> >>>
> >>> If it's kooks you're looking for, you've come to the right froup.
> >>>
> >>> Or, you could just look in the nearest available reflective surface.
> >>>
> >>> <snicker>
> >>
> >> Out of the 11,000 scientists, can you name three of them?
> >
> > okay, you might have a hard time naming 3 scientists...how about How
> > Many of the 11,000 scientist are...kooks? or what percentage??
>
> Zero.

PRooF KooK?

[benj]

On 11/8/2019 11:49 PM, kensi wrote:
> On 11/8/2019 4:59 PM, benj wrote:
>> [snip a lot of k0Okf0Am] Star formation is not cosmology?
>
> Nope, just astrophysics. Though astrophysics does provide many of the
> tools used by cosmologists: the Cepheid and Type IA standard-candles,
> lower bounds on the age of the cosmos, and so on and so forth.
>

"Age of Cosmos" sure sounds like like cosmology to me. Oh wait, you are
a journo and logic and thinking have no place in their minds. If you
were really other than a fake physicist you'd know that it is Cepheid
that show that the whole BB (and thus the "age" of the universe) is a
house of cards and the biggest mistake ever in physics. You have pretty
big balls (and tiny brain) to think that a journo like you can pass
yourself off as a person of science. Journos know no science and neither
do libs. You are one huge FAKE 'kensi" or should I say "Paul"?

Got any proof you are no Paul. kook?

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:09:23 -0800, The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
<...>

>Like for example, any scientist who believes Pluto is not a planet is a PUSSY.

They are hedging their bets by calling Pluto a *dwarf planet*.

A dwarf human is still a human just as a dwarf planet is still
a planet.

What these so-called scientists succumbed to is liberalism and
Orwellian "Newspeak". They set science aside in favor of the
politics of the left. And, these same goons expect us thinking
folks to believe their stance on AGW is anything but political?
They can call it science until pigs fly but it will remain politics.

It is to LAFF!

[Nadegda]

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!

On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 06:46:27 +0200, kensi wrote:

> On 11/8/2019 6:50 PM, The Starmaker started talking to himself, which is
> never a good sign, while frothing at Nadegda:

You'd be surprised how often that happens.

<snicker>

>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:01:45 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> i didn't know there were 11,000 scientist on earth...
>>>>>
>>>>> maybe two or three..
>>>>>
>>>>> the rest...kooks.
>>>>
>>>> If it's kooks you're looking for, you've come to the right froup.
>>>>
>>>> Or, you could just look in the nearest available reflective surface.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>> Out of the 11,000 scientists, can you name three of them?
>>
>> okay, you might have a hard time naming 3 scientists...how about How
>> Many of the 11,000 scientist are...kooks? or what percentage??
>
> Zero.

SPANKY-SPANKY!

<snicker>

[Nadegda]

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!

On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 06:54:28 -0500, benj wrote:

> On 11/8/2019 11:49 PM, kensi wrote:
>> On 11/8/2019 4:59 PM, benj wrote:
>>> [snip a lot of k0Okf0Am] Star formation is not cosmology?
>>
>> Nope, just astrophysics. Though astrophysics does provide many of the
>> tools used by cosmologists: the Cepheid and Type IA standard-candles,
>> lower bounds on the age of the cosmos, and so on and so forth.
>>
> "Age of Cosmos" sure sounds like like cosmology to me.

I expect kensi means astrophysicists can determine the ages of individual
stars, and that cosmologists may then infer that the universe is no younger
than the oldest of these. Is that correct, kensi?

> Oh wait, you are a journo and logic and thinking have no place in their
> minds. If you were really other than a fake physicist you'd know that it
> is Cepheid that show that the whole BB (and thus the "age" of the
> universe) is a house of cards and the biggest mistake ever in physics.
> You have pretty big balls (and tiny brain) to think that a journo like
> you can pass yourself off as a person of science. Journos know no science
> and neither do libs. You are one huge FAKE 'kensi" or should I say "Paul"?
>
> Got any proof you are no Paul. kook?

Burden of proof is the other way around ... kook.

[Nadegda]

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:09:23 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:

> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > Nadegda wrote:

[snip]

Wow, one single post by me was enough to put this one into full autofroth mode.

[benj]

On 11/9/2019 4:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!

> On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 06:46:27 +0200, kensi wrote:
>
>> On 11/8/2019 6:50 PM, The Starmaker started talking to himself, which is
>> never a good sign, while frothing at Nadegda:
>
> You'd be surprised how often that happens.
>
> <snicker>

No we wouldn't you dumb bitch!

<chortle>

[benj]

On 11/9/2019 4:31 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:09:23 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nadegda wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Wow, one single post by me was enough to put this one into full autofroth mode.
>

It's not caring to abuse the mentally ill who are more mentally ill than
you are!

<chortle>

[Scooter]

On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 21:31:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:09:23 -0800, The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Nadegda wrote:
>[snip]
>
>Wow, one single post by me was enough to put this one into full autofroth mode.

I guess I could say that about you after I snipped most of the post
away. You got rid of the evidence so no one believes you.

[kensi]

On 11/9/2019 4:30 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 06:54:28 -0500, benj wrote:
>> On 11/8/2019 11:49 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> Nope, just astrophysics. Though astrophysics does provide many of the
>>> tools used by cosmologists: the Cepheid and Type IA standard-candles,
>>> lower bounds on the age of the cosmos, and so on and so forth.
>>
>> "Age of Cosmos" sure sounds like like cosmology to me.
>
> I expect kensi means astrophysicists can determine the ages of individual
> stars, and that cosmologists may then infer that the universe is no younger
> than the oldest of these. Is that correct, kensi?

Indeed it is.

Which means another SPNAK! on benj.

*snicker*

[Ken Burgess]

In article <qq01fr$ih5$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
kensi <kkensi...@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
> More than 11,000 researchers

How many of those researchers are getting funding that was
approved by nutty Democrats?

Snopes uses "researchers". One of their "researchers" is a
heroin addict and another is a convicted felon who did time for
perjury.

You cannot change the climate.

The climate changes you.