Let me explain something to you ignorant moronic jackass darwinists
Tapestry
Your time wasn't there.
You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
billions of
years represented.
Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
happened in thousands not millions
or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
Is that clear?
odin
now that you put it that way, yes, it is clear
VoiceOfReason
No, it's not clear. We need to see evidence to back up your
assertions. Got any?
Tapestry
Baron Bodissey
I don't know where I've heard it in such elegant language, such limpid
logic, such exquisite phrasing.
Baron Bodissey
We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the
culture.
– Rev. Ray Mummert, Dover, PA
Tapestry
> On Oct 25, 4:06 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Your time wasn't there.
>
> > You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
> > billions of
> > years represented.
>
> > Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
>
> > Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
> > happened in thousands not millions
> > or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
>
> > Is that clear?
>
> I don't know where I've heard it in such elegant language, such limpid
> logic, such exquisite phrasing.
This is so you can place my arguments now in the right context instead
of
running around claiming he says evolution happens or other such
nonsensical idiocy.
wf3h
we don't say it happens
nature does.
what YOU say is....irrelevant
wf3h
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Tapestry
<estr...@gmail.com>:
Your ignorance is quite clear, and has been for months if
not years.
But thanks for reinforcing.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Dana Tweedy
> Your time wasn't there.
Why not?
>
> You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
> billions of
> years represented.
Any evidence to support this claim?
>
> Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
Why should I?
>
> Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
> happened in thousands not millions
> or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
And on the basis of your unsupported assertion, do you really think anyone
should believe you?
>
> Is that clear?
It's clear you need to seek medical attention.
DJT
Dana Tweedy
I take it you don't quite grasp the concept of sarcasm.......
DJT
AusShane
In other words,
If we do not retract our blasphemous understanding of the natural
world, then your wonderful caring loving supremely intelligent god
will, through the auspices of his servants force it on us by means of
threats foul language and violence???
Dana Tweedy
He might even resort to sarcasm...
DJT
Boikat
Yes, it's clear that you're ignorant.
Boikat
R Brown
"Tapestry" <estr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7d2a4772-1a6d-43dc...@s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
you religious fruitcake.
John Harshman
true and clear would be best.)
Are you actually a young-earth creationist? Do you really think the
universe is 6000 years old? If so, what evidence do you have for this claim?
VoiceOfReason
Or even (gasp) the comfy chair??
guscubed
Yup, consider me convinced. To quote the late Bill Hicks: "you can't
argue with that kind of... logic"
William Morse
Dana Tweedy
No one expects the comfy chair....
DJT
Ilas
0ca933...@s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
Wow. All those decades of thought and research destroyed in 8 masterly
lines. If only Einstein had just written "Newton is a retarded mronic
dumbfuck", he'd have saved himself years of work.
William
Yes. I see. I am going to renounce evolution, sell all my
worldly goods and set up a monastery devoted to developing
a slinky that can be stretched one million fold.
- William Hughes
Great Dayne
I have posted repeatedly in here otherwise.
Still see you are having continuing memory problems.
Steven L.
If Einstein had lived in the age of the Internet, maybe that's what he
would have done. (Imagine what Albert Einstein's blog would have been
like: The physics of space-time, violin music, and erotica.)
--
Steven L.
Email: sdli...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
Dana Tweedy
You might want to actually state what your position on the age of the Earth
might be. You aren't being very clear here.
DJT
Kermit
Yes. But unrelated to reality.
So, we have 150 years of evidence and theory testing, and you have a
slinky analogy.
<Makes weighing motion with hands>
Slinky analogy, evidence, analogy, evidence.
Call me old-fashioned, but I'm afraid I'm going to stick with reality.
kermit
John Harshman
have no idea.
Tapestry
>
> - Show quoted text -
You have taken a short period of time and stretched it way out.
I will demonstrate this later. I am too busy wasting my time and posts
responding to your stupidity and trolling.
(David P.)
>
> Call me old-fashioned, but I'm afraid I'm going to stick with reality.
Devils Advocaat
> Your time wasn't there.
>
> You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
> billions of
> years represented.
>
> Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
>
> Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
> happened in thousands not millions
> or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
>
> Is that clear?
So you think that by calling those who disagree with you a whole lot
of names that they are going to take you seriously?
You really do need to get out more. :)
John Harshman
years but it's not so short as 6000 years, how short do you think it
really is? And what evidence do you have for that claim?
Desertphile
<boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 3:06 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Your time wasn't there.
"Your?" Who is this retard writing to? What does the stupid git
mean by "there?"
> > You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
> > billions of years represented.
Huh?
> > Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
What?
> > Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
> > happened in thousands not millions or billions, you fucking
> > retarded mronic dumbfucks,
Er, ah.... is this meant as a joke?
> > Is that clear?
"Clear?" ROTFL!
> Yes, it's clear that you're ignorant.
It wasn't even comprehensible. I guess language isn't his first
language.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Desertphile
<estr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 11:27 am, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > Great Dayne wrote:
> > > On Oct 25, 8:04 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > >> Tapestry wrote:
> > >>> Your time wasn't there.
> > >>> You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
> > >>> billions of
> > >>> years represented.
> > >>> Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
> > >>> Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
> > >>> happened in thousands not millions
> > >>> or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
> > >>> Is that clear?
> > >> Yes, but it isn't true. True is better than clear any day. (Though both
> > >> true and clear would be best.)
> >
> > >> Are you actually a young-earth creationist? Do you really think the
> > >> universe is 6000 years old?
> >
> > > I have posted repeatedly in here otherwise.
> > > Still see you are having continuing memory problems.
> >
> > Then what are you trying to say about this "slinky" being "stretched"? I
> > have no idea.- Hide quoted text -
I didn't get it either. Some kind of net.kook lunacy.
>
> You have taken a short period of time and stretched it way out.
Time doesn't stretch, nut.
Desertphile
<unrestra...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 1:06 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Your time wasn't there.
> >
> > You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
> > billions of
> > years represented.
> >
> > Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
> >
> > Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
> > happened in thousands not millions
> > or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
> >
> > Is that clear?
> Yes. But unrelated to reality.
It appears to be barely related to a language.
> So, we have 150 years of evidence and theory testing, and you have a
> slinky analogy.
An analogy? Did you understand what the net.nut was trying to say?
> <Makes weighing motion with hands>
>
> Slinky analogy, evidence, analogy, evidence.
>
> Call me old-fashioned, but I'm afraid I'm going to stick with reality.
>
> kermit
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Tapestry
<estr...@gmail.com>:
>On Oct 25, 3:24 pm, Baron Bodissey <mct5...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 25, 4:06 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Your time wasn't there.
>>
>> > You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
>> > billions of
>> > years represented.
>>
>> > Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
>>
>> > Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
>> > happened in thousands not millions
>> > or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
>>
>> > Is that clear?
>>
>> I don't know where I've heard it in such elegant language, such limpid
>> logic, such exquisite phrasing.
>
>This is so you can place my arguments now in the right context
Done.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Great Dayne
<ihaveth...@aol.com>:
And yet you claimed (see above): "life was formed and
created, it was not by evolution, and it happened in
thousands not millions (of years)".
>Still see you are having continuing memory problems.
My IronyMeter is smoking again...
SkyEyes
Wasn't he the one who coined the phrase "You can't fix stupid"?
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
skyeyes nine at cox dot net
Tom McDonald
wrote:
Try lying in a hospital bed with tubes sticking into and out of you
for days and days.
. . . oh, yeah. Hmm. Nevermind.
heekster
Dana Tweedy
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:32:44 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Tapestry
> <estr...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Oct 25, 3:24 pm, Baron Bodissey <mct5...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 25, 4:06 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Your time wasn't there.
>>>
>>>> You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
>>>> billions of
>>>> years represented.
>>>
>>>> Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
>>>
>>>> Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
>>>> happened in thousands not millions
>>>> or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
>>>
>>>> Is that clear?
>>>
>>> I don't know where I've heard it in such elegant language, such
>>> limpid logic, such exquisite phrasing.
>>
>> This is so you can place my arguments now in the right context
>
> Done.
You forgot to flush.....
DJT
Rolf
I'd like to learn how to stretch time, can you show me?
Tapestry
It artificially aged. You date things by ratios of substances in them.
It either aged rapidly or the entity removed a portion of
the item you measure to create a different ratio making it appear
older
to your instruments.
Reddfrogg
Do you have evidence to support this?
>You date things by ratios of substances in them.
That's one way of dating rocks, as radioactive decay causes a change
in the ratios over time.
> It either aged rapidly or the entity removed a portion of
> the item you measure to create a different ratio making it appear
> older
> to your instruments.
Why would this "entity" be trying to trick people? Why isn't there
any evidence of the ratios changing more rapidly?
DJT
Kermit
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:28:03 -0700 (PDT), Kermit
>
>
>
> <unrestrained_h...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 25, 1:06 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Your time wasn't there.
>
> > > You have essentially a slinky, that you have stretched way out to
> > > billions of
> > > years represented.
>
> > > Now take your stretched out slinkly and collapse it back.
>
> > > Now life was formed and created, it was not by evolution, and it
> > > happened in thousands not millions
> > > or billions, you fucking retarded mronic dumbfucks,
>
> > > Is that clear?
> > Yes. But unrelated to reality.
>
> It appears to be barely related to a language.
>
> > So, we have 150 years of evidence and theory testing, and you have a
> > slinky analogy.
>
> An analogy? Did you understand what the net.nut was trying to say?
As well, I think, as he does.
He believes - among things - that he is the president of the United
States, that he loops through time on a regular basis, that a judge
and a camera and a person he calls Rollock is temporarily preventing
this from happening again.
The slinky is time itself (he may also be mixing this loop up with the
"day equals millions of years" in the Old Earth Creationist crowd).
Bigger, smaller, round and round it goes.
The judge and camera makes me think he has spent time in court - many
paranoid schizophrenics (internet diagnosis alert!) have unhappy and
confused memories of court.
Rollock is a composite of anyone on the internet who annoys him.
See?
Go into dream mode, where A is connected in some way to B, and B to C,
but it doesn't at all follow that A is connected to C, however
tenuously...
It was just shorter to call it an analogy.
>
> > <Makes weighing motion with hands>
>
> > Slinky analogy, evidence, analogy, evidence.
>
> > Call me old-fashioned, but I'm afraid I'm going to stick with reality.
>
> > kermit
>
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Kermit
William
ur instruments.
>
> Why would this "entity" be trying to trick people?
He isn't. He provided details of everything he did.
It was Satan who adjusted the isotope ratios.
(Actually, the isotope ratios have not been changed.
Satan just manipulates the instruments that read them.
Less work).
Did you know that Santa is an anagram of Satan?
Coincidence? I think not!
--
- William Hughes
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind
and won't change the subject. -Sir Winston Churchill
John Harshman
Desertphile
Otch, well, now it all makes sense! Gods, I'm glad I haven't been
trying to keep up with all of these amazing discoveries; here I am
wasting my time paying attention to new discoveries in genetics,
astronomy, chemistry, anthropology..... and I some how missed the
fastly Bigger Picture that is Tapestry. I hope he writes a book.
--
Desertphile
>>> This is so you can place my arguments now in the right context.
>> Done.
> You forgot to flush.....
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by "Dana Tweedy"
<redd...@bresnan.net>:
Oops! *Now* done; thanks.