On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 21:49:21 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by RSNorman
<
r_s_n...@comcast.net>:
>On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 21:34:35 -0400, "Mr. B1ack" <
now...@nada.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 13:55:47 -0600, "André G. Isaak"
>><
agi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Esto es una prueba
>>>
>>>Andre
>>
>> I think there's a newsgroup called "alt.test" that's
>> made just for testing connections.
>
>The problem is that moderated groups have different properties from
>unmoderated ones like alt.test. For example, there were problems here
>resulting from the t.o. moderation robot that caused threading to fail
>for posts originating in google groups whereas the same sequence of
>posts sent to alt.test succeeded. I know because I did those tests.
There have also been issues with some news servers being
improperly configured for a "robo-moderated" group such as
t.o; apparently it required some sort of tweaks to the
server software. It was a temporary issue back in the
mid-90s when I was on (IIRC) Comcast.
>There are other reasons why moderated groups behave differently -- the
>posting agency has to know about the moderation, for example, and send
>it differently.
--
Bob C.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov