On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:15:43 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <
tri...@multiweb.nl>
wrote:
>On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 7:55:03 PM UTC+1, Martin Harran wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 19:03:22 +0100, Rolf <
rolf.a...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >The reason creationism is dead is that it never was alive.
>>
>> Sorry Rolf but you are engaging in wishful thinking. The contributions
>> here of people like Pagano, Bill (AKA freon), AlphaBeta, SteadyEddie
>> and - at least until recently - Martinez show that Creationism is
>> alive and well.
>
>I've been away for a while. Did Ray Martinez ever publish his paper?
If he did, it wasn't under that name.
And welcome back.
>> Not to mention the estimated 2.4 million people who visited Ken Ham's
>> Creation Museum during it's first 8 years of existence.
>>
>> The original raison d'être for TO remains in place.
>>
>>
>> >Religion is a poor substitute for science. I have nothing against
>> >religion itself, it is just that creationists use religion for a purpose
>> >it was not and is not meant for. Religion is about our soul, creationism
>> >is about creationists attributing the origins of species to God,
>> >something God doesn't care about. Nature is handling and always have
>> >been handling evolution in the best possible manner, letting nature work
>> >according to its - nature. - Bingo.
>> >
>> >But creationists are incapable of understandig that. They want an
>> >omnipotent and omniscient being - as if such an absurd monster would be
>> >possible - to be responsilbe for both the existence of life itself, and
>> >for its evolution over billions of years. Some busybody, their God!
>> >
>> >Rolf
>
--
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Evelyn Beatrice Hall
Attributed to Voltaire