Sean Dillon <
seand...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Ray:
>
> A Christian is any person who believes in and worships the teachings of
> Jesus Christ. Your "follower of" definition is bullshit, directly aimed
> at making it linguistically impossible for Christians to sin. Christians
> DO sin. In fact, Christianity holds this truth as a central precept.
> Christianity is a personal IDENTITY, not a label that disappears any time
> a person sins. In fact, a person remains a Christian, no matter HOW
> egregious their sin, if they maintain belief in the teachings of Jesus
> Christ. Sorry, you don't get you substitute your own bullshit definition.
> "Christian" already has a definition.
>
> Timothy McVeigh was a Christian. He committed mass murder. The
> Inquisitors were Christians. They committed mass murder. The Puritans
> circa the witch hysteria were Christians. They committed mass murder.
> That's a very shallow sampling of a very deep pool. I honestly don't give
> a rat's ass whether YOU accept these people as Christians. They were. Deal with it.
>
> "Atheism" -- logically, linguistically, and historically -- means only a
> lack of belief in the existence of a god or gods. You don't get to
> substitute your own bullshit definition. "Atheism" already has a definition.
>
> I don't hate Christianity. I only hate bigotry in the NAME of
> Christianity, of the sort you practice.
>
Ray acts as an opportunist to use a horrific shooting as a means to his
preconceived end of painting atheists in *toto* in a very negative light.
As soon as that utility evaporates he moves on without a hint of compassion
for the victims or understanding of the tragedy.
Meanwhile this article from CNN highlights new developments:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/us/texas-church-shooting/index.html
“The man who killed more than 20 people at a small Texas church escaped
from a mental health facility five years ago after sneaking guns onto an
Air Force base and making threats against commanders, according to a police
report.”
And I think this section is dense with stuff needing unpacking:
“Kelley, who had a record of violence, was consumed by a dispute with his
mother-in-law and spent time posting anti-God and pro-gun statements on
Facebook in the months before the shooting, according to officials, as well
as acquaintances and former classmates.”
Ray would no doubt focus exclusively on the anti-God statements part as it
confirms his narrative. He achieves closure on the topic and that’s it.
Don’t disrupt with other considerations.
By his definition Christians are incapable of atrocity. By my definition
atheists merely lack God belief. Ray displays his bias by adding “savage
hatred of Christ” to the definition. So Ray is a definition wielding
essentialist?
And I had read that Timothy McVeigh (you mentioned above) had identified
as an agnostic. But that needs to be timelined:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh
“McVeigh was raised Roman Catholic.[89] During his childhood, he and his
father attended Mass regularly.[90] McVeigh was confirmed at the Good
Shepherd Church in Pendleton, New York, in 1985.[91] In a 1996 interview,
McVeigh professed belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost
touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do
maintain core beliefs."[89] In McVeigh's biography American Terrorist,
released in 2002, he stated that he did not believe in a hell and that
science is his religion.[92][93] In June 2001, a day before the execution,
McVeigh wrote a letter to the Buffalo News identifying himself as agnostic.
However, he took the Last Rites, administered by a priest, just before his
execution.[94][95][96][97][98][99] Father Charles Smith ministered to
McVeigh in his last moments in death row.[100]”