Does Ron o think echolocation of the oilbird

[satoshi]

Has anything to do with any alleged gene similarity or difference
Between whale and bat?

His predicted answer is no.

[RonO]

Why lie? When have I ever predicted such a thing. Your whole beef was
about the straight forward results that they found by comparing bats and
whales. Whatever beef you had with those findings was obviously bogus.
You put up a reference on swifts. There happened to be a swift genome
that had been sequenced so I was able to compare the same gene with the
bat and whale sequence of the gene. The swift did not have the same
shared mutations. You snipped and ran from that result, and would not
discuss it.

Why put up oilbirds? What exactly is your argument, and why does it matter?

You have to realize by now that you have played the idiot for several
days and all it accomplished was confirming that you are an idiot.

If you want to make some claim, make it and then support it. There is
no support for the bogus claim that you made above. Not only that, but
what would it matter if your claim was true? Do you have any idea what
that would mean? Just state what you think your claim means, and you
can verify that you never had an argument to put up.

Why start another thread to demonstrate what a moron you can be?

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

You don't believe in a deity at all

People are familiar with bats

Here is an pilots

A picture is worth a thousand words

[satoshi]

Oilbird

[JWS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

[RonO]

On 10/8/2018 9:01 PM, satoshi wrote:
> Oilbird
>

So what? Your claim was bogus so how does this support the bogus claim?

Is this an example of snipping and running from yourself?

Ron Okimoto

[RonO]

Where is the picture? Why snip and lie about someone else?

The real tragedy that you have to face is that the claim that you have
been trying to support for days and multiple threads is just bogus. If
you had understood what the study was about you would have known that
the study actually demonstrated that in that particular case for that
gene understudy greater similarity did not reflect closer evolutionary
relationship. Really. Go back and try to understand what was done. If
you need help I could explain it.

The fact is that the stupid creationist claim about similarity is bogus.
This study should tell you that it isn't simple similarity, but nested
simiarity that indicates evolutionary relationships. Using the nested
simiarities and multiple lineages the study could identify when in the
evolution those changes in the protein had occurred, and it turned out
that they occurred long after bats and whales had separated.

Junk like this isn't going to change that reality.

If you had stated your claim, and stated why your evidence supported
that claim this whole mess would have been over in just one post for
you. You would have been able to determine that you had no point in
making the stupid claim. If you still believed that it was a valid
claim you could have started your own discussion on the topic and put up
an instance where you believed that your claims applied to. That did
not happen, and you have just been a moron for several days because you
will not simply state what you are discussing. Sad but true.

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 4:40:04 AM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/8/2018 8:58 PM, satoshi wrote:
> > You don't believe in a deity at all
> >
> > People are familiar with bats
> >

> > Here is an oilbird

> >
> > A picture is worth a thousand words
> >
>
> Where is the picture?

Exactly

[Bob Casanova]

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:01:14 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
<travellin...@gmail.com>:

>Oilbird

Dildo
--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov

[Bob Casanova]

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 05:45:57 -0700 (PDT), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
<travellin...@gmail.com>:

Yurt

[zencycle]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 9:55:02 PM UTC-4, Ron O wrote:

> On 10/8/2018 8:15 PM, shitoshi wrote:
> >
> > His predicted answer is no.
> >
>

> You have to realize by now that you have played the idiot for several
> days and all it accomplished was confirming that you are an idiot.

whether he realizes it or not is moot. He's going to keep doing it.

> If you want to make some claim, make it and then support it.

he isn't capable.

> Why start another thread to demonstrate what a moron you can be?

I think he's sweet on you ;)

[satoshi]

Anyone who remembers rfgdxm aka Robert f golaszewski doubt it is him?

[RonO]

About what all your other posts have been. What is the difference?

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

Thanks for admitting you have brainless all along.

[RonO]

On 10/9/2018 5:57 PM, satoshi wrote:
> Thanks for admitting you have brainless all along.
>

Snip and run from reality. You were the one that obviously doesn't have
a clue. Snipping and running indicate that you have enough on the ball
to realize how stupid you are, but you can't seem to do much about
improving.

Ron Okimoto

[Wolffan]

On 09 Oct 2018, satoshi wrote
(in article<bfb8ed6f-4eda-44aa...@googlegroups.com>):

I’m pretty sure that you replied to Bob Casanova.

I’m also pretty sure that you need medication. Lots of it.

[Wolffan]

On 08 Oct 2018, satoshi wrote
(in article<b6730a5b-2197-4116...@googlegroups.com>):

ah... where’s the pic? I don’t see a link or anything. t.o’s not a
binary group, you can’t post binaries to it. And you use Google Groups. I
don’t think that GG lets you post binaries, even if t.o would allow it.
Which it doesn’t.

[Wolffan]

On 08 Oct 2018, JWS wrote
(in article<759599cf-55df-405e...@googlegroups.com>):

Are you saying that satoshi perpetuates bad lip-sync videos? Or is or is a
gay white boy who can’t sing or dance?

[Wolffan]

On 09 Oct 2018, zencycle wrote
(in article<9f96b42e-3517-4dae...@googlegroups.com>):

satoshi’s definitely gay for Ron. Don’t bend over near him, Ron!

[Bob Casanova]

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:27:29 -0700 (PDT), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
<travellin...@gmail.com>:

>On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:50:03 AM UTC-6, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:01:14 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
>> <travellin...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >Oilbird
>>
>> Dildo

>Anyone who remembers rfgdxm aka Robert f golaszewski doubt it is him?

You should only post single words in this game, but...

Moron.

[Bob Casanova]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 06:37:52 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Wolffan <akwo...@zoho.com>:

>On 09 Oct 2018, satoshi wrote
>(in article<bfb8ed6f-4eda-44aa...@googlegroups.com>):
>
>> On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:50:03 AM UTC-6, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:01:14 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> > appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
>> > <travellin...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Oilbird
>> >
>> > Dildo

>> Anyone who remembers rfgdxm aka Robert f golaszewski doubt it is him?
>
>I’m pretty sure that you replied to Bob Casanova.

He did, poorly; he apparently doesn't understand the "First
Letter-Last Letter" game, even though it's a children's game
and shouldn't be beyond his skill level.

And he apparently has substituted "Robert f golaszewski"
(caps apparently optional) for "Howard Hershey", since in
satoshiWorld *everyone* is "Robert f golaszewski".

>I’m also pretty sure that you need medication. Lots of it.

I suspect self-"medication" may be a large part of his
problem.

[satoshi]

On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 10:50:03 AM UTC-7, Bob Casanova wrote:

> Moron.

You sure like typing stupid.

[satoshi]

On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 10:50:03 AM UTC-7, Bob Casanova wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:27:29 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
> <travellin...@gmail.com>:
>
> >On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:50:03 AM UTC-6, Bob Casanova wrote:
> >> On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:01:14 -0700 (PDT), the following
> >> appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
> >> <travellin...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> >Oilbird
> >>
> >> Dildo
>
> >Anyone who remembers rfgdxm aka Robert f golaszewski doubt it is him?
>
> You should only post single words in this game, but...
>
> Moron.

rfg certainly is

[Bob Casanova]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:10:47 -0700 (PDT), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
<travellin...@gmail.com>:

>On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 10:50:03 AM UTC-7, Bob Casanova wrote:
>
>> Moron.
>
>You sure like typing stupid.

Fail; "moron" does not end in "y". And you left out the "to"
following "typing".

But I'll carry on:

dummy

[satoshi]

Moron is a synonym for a stupid person.

And yes you also seem to enjoy typing the word stupid.

You get partial credit for adding dummy at the end for not quite realizing, but almost that it is also a synonym.

[Bob Casanova]

On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:46:37 -0700 (PDT), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
<travellin...@gmail.com>:

>Moron is a synonym for a stupid person.

Yep.

>And yes you also seem to enjoy typing the word stupid.

Says the author of "You sure like typing stupid.".

>You get partial credit for adding dummy at the end for not quite realizing, but almost that it is also a synonym.

You get no credit, since you neglected context and
attributions *again*.

[satoshi]

On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 11:15:03 AM UTC-7, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:46:37 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by satoshi
> <travellin...@gmail.com>:
>
> >Moron is a synonym for a stupid person.
>
> Yep.
>
> >And yes you also seem to enjoy typing the word stupid.
>
> Says the author of "You sure like typing stupid.".
>
> >You get partial credit for adding dummy at the end for not quite realizing, but almost that it is also a synonym.
>
> You get no credit, since you neglected context and
> attributions *again*.

good, since all you would wrongfully give is an F.