For Ron o

[satoshi]

You can make all the noise you want
But if you lack the brain to properly
Process the info ...

[RonO]

Why is projection a way of life for you? I do not get how it could be a
defense mechanism when to apply it you have to know how stupid and
incompetent you are.

You obviously have enough on the ball to understand how you have screwed
up by the numbers because you snip and run from what you can't deal
with. Then you make your stupid projected claims of your own stupidity
onto others. How does it work? Not very well, obviously, because you
have resorted to posts like this thread. Really, point out the post
where you demonstrated enough brain power to matter. Go for it.

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

Obviously the pilots has to have the brain specialized to utilize echolocation

[satoshi]

Oilbird

[RonO]

On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
> Obviously the pilots has to have the brain specialized to utilize echolocation
>

We have never discussed pilots and this may be the first time you have
mentioned echolocation. I assumed your stupidity had something to do
with echolocation when you put up the swift link, but you snipped and ran.

Just state what your claim is and then state why the links that you keep
putting up support that claim.

It is a simple and rational thing to do, but you won't do it.

Really, what does your above junk mean to you. Just clearly spell it
out and make it relevant to something that we have discussed.

Ron Okimoto

[RonO]

On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:

> Oilbird
>

I looked up Oilbird and it is a type of swift. So what? You have
already snipped and run from the discussion on Swifts. State your
claim, and then support the claim with evidence. You should tell me how
the evidence is supposed to be relevant to the claim. I can't read your
mind so you can take off the foil cap and just write out what you think
that you are doing.

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

The issue was oilbirds.
For some reason this tablet substituted the word pilots.
Might have to do with mini x backdoor on the tablet or alteration of the keyboard program. Substitute oilbird for pilots and try to engage in a discussion as a normal person would. Of course, you wouldn't be able to do that.

[satoshi]

You are aware of the difference between a swift, and a swiftlet?

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:45:03 AM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
> > Obviously the pilots has to have the brain specialized to utilize echolocation
> >
>
> We have never discussed pilots and this may be the first time you have
> mentioned echolocation. I assumed your stupidity had something to do
> with echolocation when you put up the swift link, but you snipped and ran.
>
> Just state what your claim is

You brought it up.
I also know you don't comprehend pronouns or what you are even doing so I will have to point it out to you.

You brought up echolocation.

So someone went to discuss it
And you ignored that and typed bunch of drivel

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:50:02 AM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
> > Oilbird
> >
>
> I looked up Oilbird and it is a type of swift. So what? You have
> already snipped and run from the discussion on Swifts. State your
> claim, and then support the claim with evidence.

Further evidence of you being brainless?

[John Harshman]

On 10/8/18 3:44 AM, RonO wrote:
> On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
>> Oilbird
>>
>
> I looked up Oilbird and it is a type of swift.

Not actually true. Swifts and oilbirds are both members of a group that
has various names, none of them currently settled on, one of which is
Caprimulgiformes. The traditional order Caprimulgiformes doesn't include
swifts (and hummingbirds), but it turns out to be paraphyletic if you don't.

What is satoshi, or whatever his name is, talking about here? Does it
have something to do with echolocation? Because oilbirds do that, and a
few species of swifts do too.

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:10:04 AM UTC-6, John Harshman wrote:
> On 10/8/18 3:44 AM, RonO wrote:
> > On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
> >> Oilbird
> >>
> >
> > I looked up Oilbird and it is a type of swift.
>
> Not actually true.

Good thing I already pointed that out

Swifts and oilbirds are both members of a group that
> has various names, none of them currently settled on, one of which is
> Caprimulgiformes. The traditional order Caprimulgiformes doesn't include
> swifts (and hummingbirds), but it turns out to be paraphyletic if you don't.
>
> What is satoshi, or whatever his name is, talking about here? Does it
> have something to do with echolocation? Because oilbirds do that, and a
> few species of swifts do too.
>

I
Now he is trying to argue to make an oilbird into a swift like I told you he would try when it certainly isnt.
Just because a bat and a whale echolocate, doesn't mean they are closely related to a submarine

[RonO]

Repost what you can't deal with:

END REPOST:

You did not mention oilbirds. If that was your argument you should, at
least, state that. Look what you wrote and what I responded to. If you
are not competent enough to understand what you write, you might want to
pay a little more attention to writing it.

I have repeatedly given you some very good advice. You should state
what your claim is and then put up the evidence that you think supports
that claim. You should also give a reason for why you think that
evidence supports the claim. Doing what you are doing is obviously stupid.

Ron Okimoto

[RonO]

Why talk about yourself like this? What good does it do? It doesn't
change the fact that you obviously had nothing to say about the subject
worth bothering about because you still will not say why you are doing
what you are doing.

I made an assumption, but you snipped and ran from it and put up more
utter nonsensical drivel. Did you want to discuss something about
echolocation? Why is it so hard for you to state what your claim is?
Nothing but stupidity ever comes out of you, so what type of response do
you expect to get? Just look at your response in your post above? How
stupid was that?

Ron Okimoto

[RonO]

On 10/8/2018 9:09 AM, John Harshman wrote:
> On 10/8/18 3:44 AM, RonO wrote:
>> On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
>>> Oilbird
>>>
>>
>> I looked up Oilbird and it is a type of swift.
>
> Not actually true. Swifts and oilbirds are both members of a group that
> has various names, none of them currently settled on, one of which is
> Caprimulgiformes. The traditional order Caprimulgiformes doesn't include
> swifts (and hummingbirds), but it turns out to be paraphyletic if you
> don't.
>
> What is satoshi, or whatever his name is, talking about here? Does it
> have something to do with echolocation? Because oilbirds do that, and a
> few species of swifts do too.

Beats me, he won't say what the issue is.

[RonO]

On 10/8/2018 7:15 AM, satoshi wrote:
> You are aware of the difference between a swift, and a swiftlet?
>

Tell me why it matters.

Do you want to be this stupid?

Ron Okimoto

[RonO]

Is this your second personality kicking in? Why respond to the same
post twice?

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:10:03 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/8/2018 7:41 AM, satoshi wrote:
> > On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:50:02 AM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> >> On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
> >>> Oilbird
> >>>
> >>
> >> I looked up Oilbird and it is a type of swift. So what? You have
> >> already snipped and run from the discussion on Swifts. State your
> >> claim, and then support the claim with evidence.
> >
> >
> > Further evidence of you being brainless?
> >
>
> Is this your second personality kicking in?

That would be you and harshman

Why respond to the same
> post twice?
>

To add more to your ass kicking here?

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:10:02 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/8/2018 7:15 AM, satoshi wrote:
> > You are aware of the difference between a swift, and a swiftlet?
> >
>

> Tell me why it matters.those

so you don't get confused and think an oilbir d is one of those

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:00:02 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/8/2018 7:14 AM, satoshi wrote:
> > The issue was oilbirds.
>

> You did not mention oilbirds.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?nomobile=true#!original/talk.origins/CT3ptvFy7uA/GIUZZDm0AQAJ

So you can't even understand a single word.

If that was your argument you should, at
> least, state that. Look what you wrote and what I responded to

It shows you have no comprehension and can't follow simple directions
>

[RonO]

What a bonehead. I asked "so what?" Why do you want to put up
oilbirds. That was the issue that you are running from.

Where did you ever get the idea about bats and whale echo location
meaning that they are closely related? Just try to put up your evidence
for that. Go for it. Try to be as specific as you can be.

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

yet another massive good by Ron o! LOL! A huge retarded blunder yet again! I never said the whale and bar are closely related! Not did I claim you did!
I said a submarine!!!!

You fail every comprehension test you have ever had,dont,you?

[RonO]

What do you think that means about what you think that I was wrong about
for bats and whales? Do you even know what you write? Just demonstrate
that I supported any such notion, go for it. Lying to yourself has to
get lame after doing it so often.

>
> You fail every comprehension test you have ever had,dont,you?
>

Look at all the threads that you started and all the bogus behavior of
you acting like a moron. Why? Because you misunderstood something and
now you can't face that simple fact. If you think that you did not
misunderstand something demonstrate it by putting up support for your
bogus claim. It should be easy. You got the stupid notion from
somewhere, so go back there and demonstrate what you claim.

Really, all your stupid behavior for how many days and it all is because
you were wrong about something, and never stated what you were wrong
about, so that it could be discussed and set straight. How utterly sad
is that?

Ron Okimoto

[JWS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhnaYfqQu-c

[RonO]

Kicking yourself in the ass is stupid, and you should stop doing it.
Projection has to be getting to you by now. How wrong have you been for
days? All that stupidity for nothing. What does that make you feel
like? I kept asking you what your claim was, and what did you keep
doing? Now we know that your claim was bogus, and what do you do?

Ron Okimoto

[RonO]

On 10/8/2018 6:13 PM, satoshi wrote:
> On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:10:02 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
>> On 10/8/2018 7:15 AM, satoshi wrote:
>>> You are aware of the difference between a swift, and a swiftlet?
>>>
>>
>> Tell me why it matters.those
>
> so you don't get confused and think an oilbir d is one of those

Why does your oilbird comment matter? What did it have to do with your
now revealed bogus claim? How could you even make any claim about any
bird to support your stupidity?

You can demonstrate that your bogus claim isn't bogus. Just go back to
where you got the idea and demonstrate that I ever supported any such
notion. You won't be able to do that. Isn't it stupid that you never
stated what your beef was, and now it turns out to be stupid and bogus.

Just think if you had presented your claim in the second post that you
wrote on the topic. It could have all been over days ago. You wouldn't
have made such an utter fool of yourself so many times, and there
wouldn't have been all the post where you had to snip and lie to
yourself about reality.

Ron Okimoto

[jillery]

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:52:47 -0700 (PDT), JWS <jld...@skybeam.com>

or alternately:

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoP1E9J4jpg>


There are three trolls in T.O. playing that game concurrently.

--
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Evelyn Beatrice Hall
Attributed to Voltaire

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 6:05:02 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/8/2018 6:14 PM, satoshi wrote:
> > On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:10:03 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> >> On 10/8/2018 7:41 AM, satoshi wrote:
> >>> On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 4:50:02 AM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> >>>> On 10/7/2018 2:22 PM, satoshi wrote:
> >>>>> Oilbird
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I looked up Oilbird and it is a type of swift. So what? You have
> >>>> already snipped and run from the discussion on Swifts. State your
> >>>> claim, and then support the claim with evidence.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Further evidence of you being brainless?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is this your second personality kicking in?
> > That would be you and harshman
> >
> >
> > Why respond to the same
> >> post twice?
> >>
> >
> > To add more to your ass kicking here?
> >
>
> Kicking yourself in the ass is stupid, and you should stop doing it.
> Projection has to be getting to you by now.

You are greatly confused as I am not you and you are not me.

[satoshi]

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 6:20:03 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> On 10/8/2018 6:13 PM, satoshi wrote:
> > On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:10:02 PM UTC-6, Ron O wrote:
> >> On 10/8/2018 7:15 AM, satoshi wrote:
> >>> You are aware of the difference between a swift, and a swiftlet?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Tell me why it matters.those
> >
> > so you don't get confused and think an oilbir d is one of those
>
> Why does your oilbird comment matter? What did it have to do with your
> now revealed bogus claim? How could you even make any claim about any
> bird to support your stupidity?
>
> You can demonstrate that your bogus claim isn't bogus. Just go back to
> where you got the idea and demonstrate that I ever supported any such notion.

Maybe you will believe harshman when he tried to allegedly correct you:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?nomobile=true#!original/talk.origins/CT3ptvFy7uA/otgX0p3xAQAJ

[RonO]

His correction doesn't matter to your claim. Demonstrate that it does.
The fact that you never had any valid claims is the reality that you
have to deal with. If you think that you did have a valid claim state
it and how oilbirds fit into it. You might also demonstrate why
Harshman's correction would matter to that issue. Go for it.

Ron Okimoto

[RonO]

You are not me, so why project your stupidity onto me? Why has been
kicking themselves in the ass for several days over their own
misconception? That would be you. Would you have to resort to this
type of nonsense if you ever had a valid claim to make?

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

i don't think you even comprehend my claim.
It is that your brain is defective.You have given tons of proof of that.

[RonO]

Why lie? What good could it possibly do you at this time? We both
understand (you at a very low level or you wouldn't keep acting like a
moron) that you have the defective brain, so why lie about someone else?
If you didn't realize that you are the one that has been stupid for
days you wouldn't have to lie about it, and you could just demonstrate
that you ever had a valid claim to make.

Really, if you were not the one with the defective brain why were you
the one that has been kicking themselves in the ass for days in multiple
threads because they were wrong about something. All you had to do was
state what you were wrong about and it would have been over in one post.
That is how stupid you have been.

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

It isn't a lie at all that your brain is defective.
You disagree, sue me

[RonO]

Why would I sue you for you making a fool of yourself?

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

for pointing out your brain is defective.
cant you comprehend anything ever?

[RonO]

Why would I sue you for being stupid? Snipping and running is pretty
stupid and dishonest at this point. Why do that? It seems all that you
can do. Are you just too incompetent to form a rational argument. Do
you need some assistance in writing out an understandable sentence
concerning what you want to discuss? Just putting up links obviously is
not what you need to do because for the last instance you claim was so
bogus that no matter how you tried to support it, nothing would have
mattered.

What you should do is write out what you want to discuss. Let it sit
for a day, and go back to it and reread it and ask yourself is you want
to post it or not. You should consider if you can support the claim or
not. You have to take your evidence and evaluate it. Write out what
you think the evidence supports and how it supports that. Let it sit
for a day and come back and reread what you wrote and try to figure out
if it makes sense or not.

What you are doing now is just not working. Beats me why you don't want
to state what you are trying to do. If you don't want anyone to know,
why post the junk?

Ron Okimoto

[satoshi]

It is not my fault you are stupid.

[RonO]

You should know what you should do at this time in order to demonstrate
that you are not the stupid one. Really, why lie about someone else.
Just do what you should have done days ago and demonstrate what a fool
you have been for days. This should tell you that you have to change.
All you need to start doing is to simply state what you want to discuss.
The discussion will move on from there. Try it. At the very least it
will cut your misery down to fewer posts. This whole mess would have
been over in just one post if you had simply stated what you thought
that you were doing. Do it and see for yourself.

Ron Okimoto

[Walter Bushell]

In article <8d638e0a-c277-4f46...@googlegroups.com>,

satoshi <biggda...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Now he is trying to argue to make an oilbird into a swift like I told you he
> would try when it certainly isnt.
> Just because a bat and a whale echolocate, doesn't mean they are closely
> related to a submarine

Aren't all metazoa closely related?! Looking at the chart of organisms
they occupy a tiny portion of the space.

--
Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greed. Me.