What is the ID/creationist explanation for the molecular data?

[RonO]

Bill is just the latest IDiot to start going on about data and how it is
evaluated, but the IDiots obviously have no interpretation worth putting
forward for things like the molecular data. We are not talking about
simple similarity, but the nested similarity that allows the
identification of the place in the evolution of life for any existing
organism and fossil that we can get DNA from. The reality is that this
is more than just evidence for a common plan, but is actually a road map
of the creation of life on earth. Most IDiots want to deny this, but
the simple fact is that IDiots with a clue have always known that common
descent is a fact of nature and has to be incorporated into any IDiocy
worth talking about.

So all any IDiot/creationist has to do is come up with an explanation
for the data that we have that fits into their model. That means that
they actually have to have some model and put it forward, but that is
just another failure of IDiocy.

The evidence for a common ancestor is overwhelming. Just couple cell
theory with the DNA evidence and what do you get? The IDiots keep
claiming that this is just evidence for a common plan or common creator.
It is obvious that a creator could have done it anyway that they
wanted, but what had to happen for biological evolution? It isn't even
just a common plan. As I said above it is a road map of the evolution
of life on earth. It isn't just that all organisms have similarities in
their DNA it is the nature of the similarities that allow us to
demonstrate that there was a sponge genome before there were
deuterostomes and protostomes. There were deuterostomes before
cordates, cordates before vertebrates, vertebrates before lobefin fish,
lobefin fish before amphibians, amphibians before amniotes (terrestrial
reptile-like), amniotes before mammals, mammals before primates,
primates before simians, simians before apes, and apes before humans.
Humans have the basic genome of an ape and the morphology that clearly
places humans within all other apes. Just using sponge as an outgroup
you can create the phylogenetic tree of life for multicellular animals
that include humans. You can do this blind by just giving a lab the DNA
samples and getting back the tree based on the DNA sequences. What
should that tell any thinking human being?

How is this data incorporated in the current IDiocy? ID perps like Behe
admit that common descent is a fact of nature, but continue to lie that
common descent isn't an important part of IDiocy for political reasons.
So how do the IDiots with less brain power than Behe account for
undeniable evidence for common descent?

Ron Okimoto

[pdblack...@hotmail.co.uk]

> What is the ID/creationist explanation for the molecular data?

They simply do not care.

A simpler question would be.

Why are the pinacles of religious hierarchy *NEVER* poor?