On Jan 23, 2017, John Bode wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2017, Matt Beasley wrote:
> > On Jan 23, 2017, John Bode wrote:
> > > On Jan 22, 2017, Matt Beasley wrote:
> > > > On Jan 19, 2017, John Bode wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 18, 2017, Matt Beasley wrote:
> > > > > > On Jan 18, 2017, John Bode wrote:
> > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2017, Matt Beasley wrote:
> > > > > > > > The rise in the incidence of autism coincides with
> > > > > > > > the rise in the prevention of childhood diseases.
> > > > > > > > Maybe not having the immune system challenged enough
> > > > > > > > leads to more kids having arrested mental development!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sure, polio, measles, rubella, diptheria are mere "challenges"
> > > > > > > to the immune system. They don't ever lead to death or
> > > > > > > permanent disability.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In general, most of human conflict comes from big egos at the top,
> > > > > > and their avarice. The other major causes are drug prohibition and the
> > > > > > black market, overpopulation and its strain on infrastructure, and not
> > > > > > having a stable currency, pegged to gold, the lack of which adds
> > > > > > uncertainty and distortion to the marketplace.
> > > > >
> > > > > Which has dick-all to do with *autism*.
> > > >
> > > > John Bode doesn't know what the big picture is,
> > > > and John Bode doesn't want to know!
> > > >
> > > > > > The way to address the selfishness gone wild at the top is with an
> > > > > > unselfish act or acts. Shortening life spans is an example of an
> > > > > > unselfish act, and it's one that shows respect for other creatures
> > > > > > and future generations, by addressing the problem of overpopulation.
> > > > > > Stopping the prevention of some communicable diseases, like influenza,
> > > > > > is the best way to do that. We don't have to like the way nature
> > > > > > works; we just have to accept it.
> > > > >
> > > > > So put your money where your mouth is - be unselfish and
> > > > > shorten *your* lifespan. Lead by example.
> > > >
> > > > I'm the one sticking my neck out saying this stuff,
> > > > so I'm ALREADY "going first", obviously!
> > >
> > > Posting to a Usenet news group is not "sticking your neck out".
> >
> > I've been sending letters to the editor since the 1970s.
> > Posting comments on NY Times, Facebook, and elsewhere.
>
> "I've written *letters*! Lots and lots and lots of *letters*!"
> Several *million* people marched this past weekend in protest of Trump's
> election, and what did it accomplish? Trump's still President. Congress
> is still in the hands of a bunch of radicals salivating at the prospect
> of burning *everything* to the ground. Nothing changed.
>
> Writing letters to the editor accomplishes *dick*. Carrying signs and
> singing songs accomplishes *dick*.
>
> You want to *do* something, then volunteer at a non-profit, run for office,
> personally harangue your Congressweasel until they can't ignore you, go the full Kaczynski, I don't care. But don't pretend that "I've written lots of
> letters" is the same as actually *doing something*.
A letter to the editor (LTTE or LTE) is a letter sent to a
publication about issues of concern from its readers. Usually,
letters are intended for publication. In many publications,
letters to the editor may be sent either through conventional
mail or electronic mail.
LTEs are most frequently associated with newspapers/magazines.
However, they are sometimes published in other periodicals
(such as entertainment & tech mags), & radio & TV stations.
In the latter instance, letters are sometimes read on the air
(usually, on news broadcast or talk radio). In that presentation
form, it can also be described as viewer mail or listener mail,
depending on the medium.
In academic publishing, LTEs of an academic journal are usually open
postpublication reviews of a paper, often critical of some aspect
of the original paper. The authors of the original paper sometimes
respond to these with LTE of their own. Controversial papers in
mainstream journals often attract numerous LTEs. Good citation
indexing services list the original papers together w/all replies.
Depending on the length of the letter & the journal's style, other
types of headings may be used, such as peer commentary. There are
some variations on this practice. Some journals request open
commentaries as a matter of course, which are published together
w/the original paper, & any authors' reply, in a process called open
peer commentary. The intro of the "epub ahead of print" practice in
many journals now allows unsolicited letters to the editor (and
authors' reply) to appear in the same print issue of the journal,
as long as they are sent in the interval between the electronic
publication of the original paper and its appearance in print.
Subject matter
The subject matter of LTEs vary widely. However, the most common
topics include:
Supporting or opposing a stance taken by the publication in its
editorial, or responding to another writer's letter to the editor.
Commenting on a current issue being debated by a governing body –
local, regional or national depending on the pub's circulation.
Often, the writer will urge elected officials to make their
decision based on his/her viewpoint.
Remarking on materials (such as a news story) that have appeared in
a previous edition. Such letters may either be critical or praising.
Correcting a perceived error or misrepresentation.
History
LTEs always have been a feature of American newspapers. Much of the
earliest news reports and commentaries published by early-American
newspapers were delivered in the form of letters, & by the mid-18th
century, LTEs were a dominant carrier of political/social discourse.
Many influential essays about the role of govt in matters such as
personal freedoms & economic development took the form of letters —
consider Cato's Letters or Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania,
which were widely reprinted in early American newspapers.
Through the 19th century, LTEs were increasingly centralized near
the editorials of newspapers, so that by the turn of the 20th cent
LTEs had become permanent fixtures of the opinion pages.
Modern LTE forums differ little from those earlier counterparts.
A typical forum will include a half-dozen to a dozen letters (or
excerpts from letters). The letters chosen for publication usually
are only a sample of the total letters submitted, with larger-circu-
lation publications running a much smaller percentage of submissions
& small-circulation publications running nearly all of the relatively
few letters they receive. Editors generally read all submissions,
but in general most will automatically reject letters that include
profanity, libelous statements, personal attacks against individuals
or specific organizations, that are unreasonably long (most pubs
suggest length limits ranging from 200 to 500 words) or that are
submitted anonymously.
The latter criterion is a fairly recent development in LTE mgmt.
Prior to the Cold War paranoia of the mid-20th century, anonymous
LTEs were common; in fact, the right to write anonymously was
central to the free-press/free-speech movement (as in the 1735
trial against John Peter Zenger, which started with an anonymous
essay). By the 70s, editors had developed strong negative attitudes
toward anonymous letters, and by the end of the 20th century, about
94% of newspapers automatically rejected anonymous LTEs.
Some papers in the 80s & 90s created special anonymous opinion
forums that allowed people to either record short verbal opinions
via telephone (which were then transcribed & published) or send
letters that were unsigned or where the author used a pseudonym.
Although many journalists derided the anonymous call-in forums as
unethical (for instance, someone could make an unfounded opinion
without worry of the consequences or having to back the comment up
with hard facts), defenders argued that such forums upheld the
free-press tradition of vigorous, uninhibited debate similar to
that found in earlier newspapers.
Although primarily considered a function of print pubs, LTEs also
are present in electronic media. In broadcast journalism, LTEs have
always been a semi-regular feature of 60 Minutes & the news programs
of National Public Radio. LTE's also are widespread on the Internet
in various forms.
By the early 21st c., the Internet had become a delivery system for
many LTEs via e-mail & news Web sites (in fact, after several
envelopes containing a powder suspected to be anthrax were mailed
to lawmakers and journalists, several news organizations announced
they would only accept e-mail LTEs). Because the Internet broadly
expanded the potential readership of editorials and opinion columns
at small newspapers, their controversial editorials or columns could
sometimes attract much more e-mail than they were used to handling —
so much so that a few newspapers had their e-mail servers crash.
Editors are a frequent target of letter-writing campaigns, also
called “astroturfing,” or “fake grass-roots” operations where sample
letters are distributed on the Internet or otherwise, to be copied
or rewritten and submitted as personal letters.
Although LTE management gets little attention in trade journals, one
organization, the National Conference of Editorial Writers, often
includes essays on LTE management in its newsletter, The Masthead, &
at its annual meetings. Among the NCEW's strongest champions for
LTEs was Ronald D. Clark of the St. Paul Pioneer Press, who wrote,
"Consider letters as a barometer of how well (you are) engaging
readers or viewers. The more you receive, the more you're connecting.
The fewer you receive, the stronger the sign that you're putting the
masses to sleep."
OTOH many editors will allow the publication of anonymous letters
where the details of name/address of the author are not printed, but
are disclosed to the editor. This can promote a debate of issues that
are personal, contentious or embarrassing, yet are of importance to
raise in a public debate.
Sometimes an LTE in a local newspaper, such as the Dear IRS letter
written by Ed Barnett to the Wichita Falls Times Record News in
Wichita Falls TX, will end up receiving attention from the national
media
Misrepresentation
Submitting a letter under a false name to shill in support or to
criticize an opponent can have significant consequences. For example,
Canadian politician Paul Reitsma's career ended in scandal in 1999,
after he signed letters addressed to newspapers as "Warren Betanko"
praising himself and attacking his political opponents. His local
paper wrote a front-page story under the headline of "MLA Reitsma
is a liar and we can prove it."
In 1966 Israel, the Herut Party of then opposition leader Menachem
Begin was shaken by scandal when letters sharply attacking Begin,
which had been published in major dailies, were proven to have been
authored by Begin's rivals for the party leadership and sent to the
papers under various aliases & false names. As a result, the rivals
were discredited & eventually expelled from the party, which helped
buttress Begin's leadership position up to win the 1977 general
elections and become Prime Minister of Israel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_to_the_editor