On October 26, rsNorman wrote:
>> Why do humans scream in pain?
>> not "what are the
>> neural pathways connecting larynx to pain centers"
>> yada yada, the question is: what survival advantage
>> does this behavior offer?
>
> Still, pain vocalization is generally considered a signal to other
> members of your own species. It can serve to bring assistance,
> as for instance a baby crying, or it can serve as a warning
> signal to others about the danger from whatever you suffered. It
> can also act negatively as a signal that you are somewhat
> helpless and defensive. But the cry for assistance notion
> generally seems to prevail among the animal behaviorists.
This is the answer I expected, and it's amusing.
First, nature is red in tooth and claw. When a lion attacks
a herd of giraffe, the lame will become dinner, he can scream
his head off, the others will scurry... "glad it's him and
not me!" No assistance. It's unwarranted to claim that
Cro-Magnon was a bleeding heart liberal.
The 'baby is hungry' idea works for infants, but a
stretch to claim that it applies to an injured adult.
More crucially, the question is: their medical facility
was... what, exactly? Injured or ill, you recovered on
your own. Or not. What good came from whining? It's
about SURVIVAL ADVANTAGE, guys, remember? So your cousins
cluck in sympathy, how does that boost your genetic perseverence?
Funniest is the rationale that it serves as warning
to others. So one eats a poison mushroom, bellyaches,
then expires. Thus his buddies learn to avoid that
variety of cap. Hence THEY are the beneficiaries, not
the whimperer. He's the fool whose genes are ELIMINATED
from the pool! Indeed, this behavior ought to be selected...
OUT! This 'explanation' turns Darwinism on its head.
None of the facile "Just So" tales pass muster.
--
Rich