Do people think that there would be enough work involved in a
potential GSoC project to improve SymPy-Bot? Right now, there are 33
open issues for it (https://github.com/sympy/sympy-bot/issues). Most
of these are simple bugs, but many things are non-trivial, such as
setting a system up that can serve out requests (the "sympy-bot work"
idea) and improving the formatting of the test output.
Even with those ideas, I feel that it's not enough, though such a
project would be useful to have. Can anyone think of more things that
could go in such a project to make it sufficient, so we can add it to
the ideas list?
Aaron Meurer
From what I understand, you've already got a script that does this,
right? Maybe you could clean it up and submit it for inclusion as
part of the coverage_test script (maybe as something like
`./bin/coverage_test.py --compare`, which would compare against an
already existing built coverage). It would then be easy to adapt that
into SymPy bot.
Also look to see if the coverage module has something like this
already supported.
Aaron Meurer
You can get the code from https://github.com/sympy/sympy .
The description for the easiest/best way to hack on SymPy is at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Development-workflow .
HTH
Aaron Meurer
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sympy+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
I think he meant Chris's coverage script.