More plugins please! :)

[deadbeatguitarist]

It would be great to see more audio plugins show up in the studiopkg package repo...

TAP
SWH
Invada

Thanks :)

[B Watson]

On 3/13/12, deadbeatguitarist <steve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be great to see more audio plugins show up in the studiopkg
> package repo...
>
> TAP
> SWH
> Invada

All 3 of these are on slackbuilds.org. AFAIK, the StudioWare project
allows submitting packages from other sources like SBo, so you could
submit these yourself (someone correct me if I'm wrong?)

[David Woodfall]

On (12:38 13/03/12), B Watson <yal...@gmail.com> put forth the proposition:

If the sbo maintainer wants to submit them then that's fine. Otherwise
it needs a ground up slackbuild built from scratch if someone else
wants to do it. It's easier if the maintainers of our scripts are
close to us.

Having said that I use mkslack to build my slackbuilds, which uses the
standard sbo templates so our scripts will mostly look the same.

http://www.dawoodfall.net/index.php/mkslack

This speeds things up a _lot_

--
Studioware. We provide the tools - You make the music.
http://www.studioware.org

[B Watson]

On 3/13/12, David Woodfall <da...@studioware.org> wrote:
> If the sbo maintainer wants to submit them then that's fine. Otherwise
> it needs a ground up slackbuild built from scratch if someone else
> wants to do it. It's easier if the maintainers of our scripts are
> close to us.

Hm. For TAP, invada, and the LV2 version of SWH, the maintainer would
be me (a fact I had forgotten). I guess I should go through all the
audio-related stuff I submitted to SBo and resubmit to studioware...

Seems like a lot of extra work though. Have to edit the default TAG in
the script, and choose a proper StudioWare category (since they're all
just "audio" on SBo). Not even sure how to submit stuff to StudioWare
(I don't see a "submit" page on the site, do I use git?)

How about if I just make this public statement: StudioWare is welcome
to import any of my SBo SlackBuilds. (Actually, my builds don't bear
a copyright notice, because I don't consider them copyrighted, so the
statement might be redundant. IANAL, YMMV, HAND)

Someone else can do all the submitting (and maintaining, if needed). I
write SlackBuilds because I need them (and because I enjoy writing
them), I upload them to SBo so others can hopefully benefit from my
work. I don't much care if those "others" are getting my scripts from
slackbuilds.org, studioware.org, whatever. All I ask is that whoever
adds my stuff to StudioWare also adds a "modified for StudioWare.org by
(whoever)"... but I'm only asking, not demanding it.

> Having said that I use mkslack to build my slackbuilds, which uses the
> standard sbo templates so our scripts will mostly look the same.
>
> http://www.dawoodfall.net/index.php/mkslack
>
> This speeds things up a _lot_

Heh, I use a (completely different, dumber) script I wrote, also called
mkslack. I should think of a different name...

[David Woodfall]

On (13:28 13/03/12), B Watson <yal...@gmail.com> put forth the proposition:

>On 3/13/12, David Woodfall <da...@studioware.org> wrote:
>> If the sbo maintainer wants to submit them then that's fine. Otherwise
>> it needs a ground up slackbuild built from scratch if someone else
>> wants to do it. It's easier if the maintainers of our scripts are
>> close to us.
>
>Hm. For TAP, invada, and the LV2 version of SWH, the maintainer would
>be me (a fact I had forgotten). I guess I should go through all the
>audio-related stuff I submitted to SBo and resubmit to studioware...
>
>Seems like a lot of extra work though. Have to edit the default TAG in
>the script, and choose a proper StudioWare category (since they're all
>just "audio" on SBo). Not even sure how to submit stuff to StudioWare
>(I don't see a "submit" page on the site, do I use git?)
>
>How about if I just make this public statement: StudioWare is welcome
>to import any of my SBo SlackBuilds. (Actually, my builds don't bear
>a copyright notice, because I don't consider them copyrighted, so the
>statement might be redundant. IANAL, YMMV, HAND)
>
>Someone else can do all the submitting (and maintaining, if needed). I
>write SlackBuilds because I need them (and because I enjoy writing
>them), I upload them to SBo so others can hopefully benefit from my
>work. I don't much care if those "others" are getting my scripts from
>slackbuilds.org, studioware.org, whatever. All I ask is that whoever
>adds my stuff to StudioWare also adds a "modified for StudioWare.org by
>(whoever)"... but I'm only asking, not demanding it.

Ok I'll add those to my todo list and submit myself.

No problem

[Dave]

I've uploaded some - had some problems with invada since the download link is dead. Looks like they're working on a new site or something. I did though get the invada ladspa built.

Also had problems building tap - seems that reverbed is missing. Builds fine without it. I think they have a separate source for that.