Slots results analysis

[Alistair Lynn]

Hi all–

lilafisch and I are doing a bit of number crunching on the data from the SR2014 competition[0]. I'll add data to this thread as we go.

Firstly, some basic analysis: the distribution of points amongst team appearances (in which the team was both present and not disqualified), covering both the knockouts and the league.

Alistair

[0] https://www.studentrobotics.org/cgit/comp/sr2014-comp.git/

[Alistair Lynn]

Hi all-

In response to a question posed by Jon Bartlett, the number of
appearances in which a team took more than two zones in Slots, under
the same conditions:

2.906% of appearances (22 of 757)

Number of teams: 5

HRS: 13
HSO: 5
MAI: 2
RGS: 1
BRK: 1

Alistair

[Jon Bartlett]

Hi,
Thanks for this. Just to clarify, how many teams took two or more
zones (assuming these are for three or more zones)?

Thanks,
Jon

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Alistair Lynn

<al...@studentrobotics.org> wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> In response to a question posed by Jon Bartlett, the number of
> appearances in which a team took more than two zones in Slots, under
> the same conditions:
>
> 2.906% of appearances (22 of 757)
>
> Number of teams: 5
>
> HRS: 13
> HSO: 5
> MAI: 2
> RGS: 1
> BRK: 1
>
> Alistair
>
> On 3 August 2014 22:59, Alistair Lynn <al...@studentrobotics.org> wrote:
>> Hi all–
>>
>> lilafisch and I are doing a bit of number crunching on the data from the
>> SR2014 competition[0]. I'll add data to this thread as we go.
>>
>> Firstly, some basic analysis: the distribution of points amongst team
>> appearances (in which the team was both present and not disqualified),
>> covering both the knockouts and the league.
>>
>> Alistair
>>
>> [0] https://www.studentrobotics.org/cgit/comp/sr2014-comp.git/
>

> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Student Robotics" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to srobo+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Alistair Lynn]

Hi Jon-

Apologies, I misspoke—that was for two or more zones, not more than
two zones. Nobody took three or more zones.

Alistair

[Jon Bartlett]

Cool, thanks. Does scoring data exist from earlier competitions?

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Alistair Lynn

[Alistair Lynn]

Hi Jon-

I believe they do, but not in anything like such a usable form as the
2014 data. Eldritch Redis database dumps are involved.

I could look at the most recent Smallpeice data but I fear it may not
be very useful.

Alistair

[Jon Bartlett]

Not to worry then - possibly something that could be considered as a
standard part of post-competition stuff for the future.
Thanks,
Jon



On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Alistair Lynn

[Peter Law]

Alistair wrote:
> I believe they do, but not in anything like such a usable form as the
> 2014 data. Eldritch Redis database dumps are involved.

The 2013 data is available as raw scoring YAML files, here:
https://github.com/PeterJCLaw/scoring_2013/tree/master/matches

Peter

[Jon Bartlett]

Hi,
With apologies for the horrible formatting, a brief analysis of SR2013
(A Strange Game) follows.

Of 408 'runs' (102 matches, 4 teams in each):

Movement -

340 runs (83.3%) robot moved from start zone
68 runs (16.7%) no movement

Tokens -

All teams ended at least one round with a token in a zone (sometimes
apparently without actually moving).

165 runs (40.4%) moved zero tokens to a zone
187 runs (45.8%) moved one token to a zone

9 teams
22 runs (5.4%) moved two tokens to zones

2 teams
6 runs (1.5%) moved three tokens to zones

1 team (HSO)
1 run (0.25%) moved four tokens to zones

1 team (HSO2)
1 run (0.25%) moved five tokens to zones

1 team (HSO2)
1 run (0.25%) moved six tokens to zones

Pedestals -

5 teams placed tokens on pedestals
25 runs (6.1%) moved at least one token to a pedestal.


Cheers,
Jon