Mockito causes org.specs.specification.PathException in certain cases

[Michael Matczynski]

Hello!

I was using mockito with specs and ran into an issue with verifying no invocations on a mock.  I was trying to figure out how to verify zero interactions with a mock, so tried a "there was no(uselessMock)" call in one of my examples.  Strangely, the example with this code passes, but the next example fails with a cryptic PathException that halts all remaining example runs.  I would expect an error in one example to be isolated and not pollute subsequent example test runs.

Code below followed by stack trace at the bottom.

Thanks!
Mike



import org.specs.SpecificationWithJUnit
import org.specs.mock.Mockito

class ListSpec extends SpecificationWithJUnit with Mockito {

  "MyList" should {
    // actual type of Mock doesn't matter
    val uselessMock = mock[List[Int]]
    "test" in {
      there was no(uselessMock)(any)
    }
    "test again" in {
      there was no(uselessMock)
    }
    "test last time" in {
      there was no(uselessMock)(any)
    }
  }
}



org.specs.specification.PathException: TreePath(List(0, 0, 2))not found for test last time
    at org.specs.specification.SpecificationExecutor$class.executeExample(SpecificationExecutor.scala:51)
    at org.specs.specification.BaseSpecification.executeExample(BaseSpecification.scala:58)
    at org.specs.specification.BaseSpecification.executeExample(BaseSpecification.scala:58)
    at org.specs.specification.ExampleLifeCycle$$anonfun$executeExample$1.apply(ExampleLifeCycle.scala:125)
    at org.specs.specification.ExampleLifeCycle$$anonfun$executeExample$1.apply(ExampleLifeCycle.scala:125)
    at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:133)
    at org.specs.specification.ExampleLifeCycle$class.executeExample(ExampleLifeCycle.scala:125)
    at org.specs.specification.Examples.executeExample(Examples.scala:52)
    at org.specs.specification.Examples.executeExample(Examples.scala:52)
    at org.specs.specification.Examples$$anonfun$executeExamples$2.apply(Examples.scala:80)
    at org.specs.specification.Examples$$anonfun$executeExamples$2.apply(Examples.scala:80)
    at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:133)
    at org.specs.specification.Examples.executeExamples(Examples.scala:80)
    at org.specs.specification.ExampleStructure$class.ownSkipped(ExampleStructure.scala:60)
    at org.specs.specification.Examples.ownSkipped(Examples.scala:52)
    at org.specs.runner.ExampleTestCase.run(JUnit.scala:205)
    at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
    at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
    at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuite$class.run(JUnit.scala:62)
    at org.specs.runner.ExamplesTestSuite.run(JUnit.scala:167)
    at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
    at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
    at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuite$class.run(JUnit.scala:62)
    at org.specs.SpecificationWithJUnit.run(SpecificationWithJUnit.scala:29)
    at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45)
    at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
    at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:74)
    at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:202)
    at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:65)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:120)

[etorreborre]

Hi,

Do you still have the possibility to migrate your code over to specs2?

specs was rebuild to get a better control over this kind of issue. If you have difficulties migrating please ask questions on the specs2-users mailing list, I will help you.

Eric.

[Michael Matczynski]

I thought that would be the answer.  :)

I'll investigate to see if it's feasible.  Thanks!