Brazil gets carbon credit for methane factory dams

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Thomas Goreau

unread,
Aug 18, 2016, 1:48:34 AM8/18/16
to Soil Age, philip.f...@gmail.com

Here is another bizarre case of GHG false accounting by omitting the effects of methane.

Brazil is getting carbon credits for huge hydroelectric dams in the Amazon Basin, mostly built on land stolen from indigenous people.

In 1984 I published the first data to measure methane release from Amazonian dams, and found huge methane releases from the stagnant anoxic waters.

My colleague Phil Fearnside, from INPA (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, the National Amazon Research Institute) has been the only person to follow through on this, and has published many, many papers showing that these methane releases may have more greenhouse warming impact than the fossil fuel CO2 emissions they are supposed to reduce!

The entire “carbon offset and trading” industry has promoted many such examples of false accounting created by ignoring major impacts.

Thomas J. F. Goreau, PhD
President, Global Coral Reef Alliance
President, Biorock Technology Inc.
Coordinator, Soil Carbon Alliance
Coordinator, United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development Small Island Developing States Partnership in New Sustainable Technologies
37 Pleasant Street, Cambridge, MA 02139

Books:

Geotherapy: Innovative Methods of Soil Fertility Restoration, Carbon Sequestration, and Reversing CO2 Increase

Innovative Methods of Marine Ecosystem Restoration

The Green Disc, New Technologies for a New Future: Innovative Methods for Sustainable Development

No one can change the past, everyone can change the future

Benoit Lambert

unread,
Aug 18, 2016, 12:09:37 PM8/18/16
to Soil Age, philip.f...@gmail.com
Hi Thomas, and all, hope you are well.
It is indeed crucial that methodologies and projects be followed and scrutinized... 
It means expertise and lots of time.
Here is the CDM documentation on UNFCCC site regarding Jirau Hydro Power Plant. 
Indeed they seem to get away with lots of methane... . 
I don't know what the process is, but I believe credits can be contested to UNFCCC. NGOs could play a great role here.
The methodology seems to have been built by hydro guys themselves... (see pp. 23-24)
Best regards,
Benoit

pp. 23-24

E.2. Calculation of project emissions or actual net GHG removals by sinks

As per the methodology ACM0002 (version 13.0.0), for most renewable energy project activities,

the project emissions are zero (PEy = 0). However, for hydro power plants that result in new

reservoir (the JHPP case), the project emissions shall be calculated as follows:

PEy = PEHP,y

Where:

PEy = Project emissions in year y (tCO2e/yr);

PEHP,y = Project emissions from water reservoirs of hydro power plants in year y

(tCO2e/yr).

For hydro power project activities that result in new single or multiple reservoirs and hydro power

project activities that result in the increase of single or multiple existing reservoirs, project

proponents shall account for CH4 and CO2 emissions from the reservoir, estimated as follows:

(a) If the power density (installed power generation capacity divided by the flooded surface

area) of the single or multiple reservoirs (PD) of power plant is greater than 4 W/m2 and

less than or equal to 10 W/m2:

1000

Re

,

s y

HP y

EF TEG

PE

=

Where:

24

As published by the Brazilian DNA. Available at: http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/view/327813.html#ancora.

25

Available at: http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/view/307492.html.

CDM-MR-FORM

Version 05.1 Page 24 of 29

PEHP,y = Project emissions from water reservoirs (tCO2e/yr);

EFRes = Default emission factor for emissions from reservoirs of hydro power plants

(kgCO2e/MWh);

TEGy = Total electricity produced by the project activity, including the electricity supplied to the

grid and the electricity supplied to internal loads, in year y (MWh).

(b) If the power density (PD) of the power plant is greater than 10 W/m2:

PEy = 0

The power density of the project activity is calculated as follows:

PJ BL

PJ BL

A A

Cap Cap

PD

=

Where:

PD = Power density of the project activity, in W/m2;

CapPJ = Installed capacity of the hydro power plant after the implementation of the project

activity (W);

CapBL = Installed capacity of the hydro power plant before the implementation of the

project activity (W). For new hydro power plants, this value is zero;

APJ = Area of the single or multiple reservoirs measured in the surface of the water, after

the implementation of the project activity, when the reservoir is full (m2);

ABL = Area of the single or multiple reservoirs measured in the surface of the water,

before the implementation of the project





file:///Users/Benoit/Desktop/numérisation0003.jpg


(from/de Soil Carbon Coalition)


As Vernadsky realized about 100 years ago, life (powered by photosynthesis and carbon cycling) is the most potent geologic force. Carbon cycling (which heavily influences water cycling) underlies almost all of our biggest challenges. Many now realize that humans have become a principle influence on carbon and water cycling, but our influence has been largely inadvertent, and often (e.g. changes in soil carbon in specific places) outside our awareness.


Comme l’a découvert Vernadsky il y a approximativement un siècle, la vie (générée par la photosynthèse et le cycle du carbone) est la plus puissante des forces géologiques. Le cycle du carbone (qui influence fortement le cycle de l’eau) est la principale force derrière tous nos plus importants défis. Plusieurs réalisent aujourd’hui que l’humanité est devenue la principale influence sur les cycles du carbone et de l’eau, mais notre influence s’est produite largement par inadvertance, et souvent (e.g. la diminution des niveaux de carbone des sols) en dehors de notre connaissance. 


--
Also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/Soil4Climate/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "soil-age" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to soil-age+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to soil...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/soil-age.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/soil-age/0B5A246B-B1C4-4A50-B0AE-D3DF56DFE7A5%40bestweb.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

9226 1 MR.pdf

Monika Firl

unread,
Aug 18, 2016, 1:10:46 PM8/18/16
to soil...@googlegroups.com, philip.f...@gmail.com
thanks Benoit and Thomas for this timely feedback!

i am looking at different "carbon offset or inset" solutions for our network of coffee roasters -- and plowing through so much information on big projects, this verification burdon creates exactly these kinds of concerns for me!

best to you both!
Monika


For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Monika Maria Firl, Director of Sustainability
CoopCoffees/ CoopSol Cafe Equitable
5425 rue Bordeaux suite #500
Montréal, QC H2H 2P9 Canada
Phone: 1.514.907.9853 ext.502
Skype: mmf1237585

mon...@coopcoffees.com
www.coopcoffees.coop


Thomas Goreau

unread,
Aug 18, 2016, 2:25:57 PM8/18/16
to soil...@googlegroups.com, philip.f...@gmail.com
When the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) was set up by the World Bank and the UN to fund and assess projects that claim to be reducing net greenhouse emissions for carbon credits I was appointed to their NGO advisory board. 

GEF would mail huge stacks of paper with the various proposals for carbon credit projects. In my view almost all of them used dishonest bogus accounting, hidden behind a dense wall of mathematical formulas for calculating assumed GHG emissions in the complete absence of real data. The problem is worst for nitrous oxide and for methane, the assumed emissions are entirely fictitious based on irrelevant assumed “emission factors” that do not reflect the natural biogeochemical sources and sinks of these gases. I almost never got an honest proposal in these stacks, and despaired that whole forests were being destroyed to produce paper garbage. 

Fortunately they lost my address when I moved, so I no longer have to throw them out.

Thomas J. F. Goreau, PhD
President, Global Coral Reef Alliance
President, Biorock Technology Inc.
Coordinator, Soil Carbon Alliance
Coordinator, United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development Small Island Developing States Partnership in New Sustainable Technologies
37 Pleasant Street, Cambridge, MA 02139

Books:

Geotherapy: Innovative Methods of Soil Fertility Restoration, Carbon Sequestration, and Reversing CO2 Increase

Innovative Methods of Marine Ecosystem Restoration

The Green Disc, New Technologies for a New Future: Innovative Methods for Sustainable Development

No one can change the past, everyone can change the future

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to soil-age+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to soil...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/soil-age.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<9226 1 MR.pdf>

Benoit Lambert

unread,
Aug 18, 2016, 3:30:18 PM8/18/16
to Soil Age, philip.f...@gmail.com
Thank you Philip, I will read this.
Engineer firms love dams! In Quebec we call it the heaver syndrome  Right from the start, they contested any methane problem. Yet, 'renewable portfolio standards' in US states exclude hydro, for reasons as methane emissions I presume. Hydro will not survive the coming renewables revolution anyway: kWh went from 3 USD in 2010 to 30 cents in 2016. Last 375 MW photovoltaic contract in Dubai was obtained for 2.99 cents per kWh, to be delivered in 2030... In Québec, new dams as La Romaine will be producing at 10 cents... The end of an era coming. 
Best, Benoit

file:///Users/Benoit/Desktop/numérisation0003.jpg


(from/de Soil Carbon Coalition)


As Vernadsky realized about 100 years ago, life (powered by photosynthesis and carbon cycling) is the most potent geologic force. Carbon cycling (which heavily influences water cycling) underlies almost all of our biggest challenges. Many now realize that humans have become a principle influence on carbon and water cycling, but our influence has been largely inadvertent, and often (e.g. changes in soil carbon in specific places) outside our awareness.


Comme l’a découvert Vernadsky il y a approximativement un siècle, la vie (générée par la photosynthèse et le cycle du carbone) est la plus puissante des forces géologiques. Le cycle du carbone (qui influence fortement le cycle de l’eau) est la principale force derrière tous nos plus importants défis. Plusieurs réalisent aujourd’hui que l’humanité est devenue la principale influence sur les cycles du carbone et de l’eau, mais notre influence s’est produite largement par inadvertance, et souvent (e.g. la diminution des niveaux de carbone des sols) en dehors de notre connaissance. 


--
Also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/Soil4Climate/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "soil-age" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to soil-age+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to soil...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/soil-age.

Benoit Lambert

unread,
Aug 18, 2016, 3:32:20 PM8/18/16
to Soil Age, philip.f...@gmail.com
Thank you Philip, I will read this.
Engineer firms love dams! In Quebec we call it the beaver syndrome  Right from the start, they contested any methane problem. Yet, 'renewable portfolio standards' in US states exclude hydro, for reasons as methane emissions I presume. Hydro will not survive the coming renewables revolution anyway: kWh went from 3 USD in 2010 to 30 cents in 2016. Last 375 MW photovoltaic contract in Dubai was obtained for 2.99 cents per kWh, to be delivered in 2030... In Québec, new dams as La Romaine will be producing at 10 cents... The end of an era coming. 
Best, Benoit

file:///Users/Benoit/Desktop/numérisation0003.jpg


(from/de Soil Carbon Coalition)


As Vernadsky realized about 100 years ago, life (powered by photosynthesis and carbon cycling) is the most potent geologic force. Carbon cycling (which heavily influences water cycling) underlies almost all of our biggest challenges. Many now realize that humans have become a principle influence on carbon and water cycling, but our influence has been largely inadvertent, and often (e.g. changes in soil carbon in specific places) outside our awareness.


Comme l’a découvert Vernadsky il y a approximativement un siècle, la vie (générée par la photosynthèse et le cycle du carbone) est la plus puissante des forces géologiques. Le cycle du carbone (qui influence fortement le cycle de l’eau) est la principale force derrière tous nos plus importants défis. Plusieurs réalisent aujourd’hui que l’humanité est devenue la principale influence sur les cycles du carbone et de l’eau, mais notre influence s’est produite largement par inadvertance, et souvent (e.g. la diminution des niveaux de carbone des sols) en dehors de notre connaissance. 


--
Also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/Soil4Climate/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "soil-age" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to soil-age+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to soil...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/soil-age.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages