Re: Science has to bend over again for dogmatic rapists

W.T.S., ^6c1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

unread,

Sep 19, 2016, 7:42:16 PM9/19/16

to

W.T.S., ^6c1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

unread,

Sep 20, 2016, 11:33:39 AM9/20/16

to

Cloud Hobbit <youngbl...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:fbd06dee-17e3-43bc...@googlegroups.com:

> On Monday, September 19, 2016 at 9:25:26 PM UTC-7, JTEM wrote:
>> W.T.S., ^6c1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!* wrote:
>> [nothing]
>>
>> Do you remember to wipe your mouth after you shit?
>>
>> Darwin was never a "Scientist." Darwin didn't
>> even know what evolution was! The jackass used
>> the word "Transmutation" until people a lot
>> smarter than him managed to bang some sense into
>> his head...
>>
>> Darwin was a disgrace. The only people WORSE
>> than Darwin are the assholes who preach ignorance,
>> who want people to believe in myths like Darwin.
>>
> Since your claims run counter to everything anybody can find on the
> subject of Darwin, how about you provide some sources for your insane
> screeds?
>
> If you can't or won't provide them, we'll have to assume you just made
> it all up again.
>
> He was so thorough that it took him 20 years to finally publish.
>
> http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/

<http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>

> The concept of evolution had been hatched thousands of years before
> Darwin’s time. In July 1837 Darwin began keeping a notebook of his
> thoughts and theories about the variation of plants and animals.
>
> Also, his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, had made some striking
> contributions to evolutionary theory, including the idea that all life
> has a common origin.
>
> By this time, he had completely accepted that species could evolve
> (or, to use Darwin’s language, transmute).
>
> He decided he would make his investigation according to the principles
> of Francis Bacon. He would assemble facts before producing a theory.
>
> In October 1838 he read Thomas Malthus’s work on population, showing
> that populations increase until food runs out, then crash. There is a
> struggle for existence. Darwin said that having read Malthus: Charles
> Darwin“It at once struck me that under these circumstances favorable
> variations would tend to be preserved, and unfavorable ones to be
> destroyed. The result of this would be the formation of new species.
> Here, then, I had at last got a theory by which to work.”
>
> Charles Darwin
> Autobiography, written 1876
> By December 1838 Darwin was mulling over how breeders improve domestic
> animals by selecting the animals with the best qualities. In the
> natural world the selection is carried out by the environment. The
> lifeforms best adapted to the environment survive and breed. This is
> natural selection.
>
> In 1842 he wrote his first paper on what came to be known as evolution
> by natural selection, but only for his own use.
>
> In 1845 he published thoughts, formed much earlier, about the new
> species of finches he had discovered in the Galapagos Islands, saying
> he could imagine that one original species had been modified into all
> the different species he had seen.
>
> If Darwin had been an ambitious scientist, he could have published a
> theory of evolution by natural selection in 1839, but he didn’t. He
> continued:
>
> gathering and weighing evidence and assessing specimens from his
> voyage breeding animals and plants to determine how species could
> be modified by artificial selection writing books and papers about
> a variety of topics including geology
>
> Darwin’s Hand is Forced
>
> On 18 June 1858, aged 49, Darwin opened his mail and got a terrible
> shock. He had been corresponding with Alfred Russel Wallace, a young,
> self-trained naturalist who was on an expedition in the East Indies.
>
> Wallace now asked for Darwin’s opinion of a paper he had written.
> The paper described the theory of evolution by natural selection �€"
> the theory Darwin had spent decades gathering evidence for, but had
> never published. Darwin wrote back, offering his opinion that
> Wallace’s paper could be published in any journal of Wallace’s
> choosing.
>
> Darwin also showed Wallace’s paper to his scientific friends Charles
> Lyell (Wallace had requested this) and Joseph Dalton Hooker.
>
> Darwin was in crisis at this time because his young son had been
> terribly sick, eventually dying of scarlet fever on June 28.
>
> His friends were aware that Darwin had actually arrived at the theory
> first. They decided the joint theories of Darwin and Wallace should be
> read to the Linnean Society on July 1. Darwin did not attend the
> reading. His son’s funeral came first.
>
> So poor JTEM, you are as usual, completely wrong and a liar.
> Unless you have some stunning new accounts of Darwin's life and
> discoveries, you are obviously lying, again.

Thanks! I've Tweeted your URL to all of my Twitter contacts,
and added it to my Evolution URLs list.

W.T.S., ^6c1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

unread,

Sep 20, 2016, 7:02:43 PM9/20/16

to

JTEM <jte...@lying.Bozo> Defecated on himself in news:

JTEM, Andrew, Bob, here's the deal. You're all probably used to doing
business with the public, making speeches, selling books, DVDs, trinkets,
and other profitable creationist and ID sidelines. I admit that
creationism is a profitable business, and I can see why you need a
constant influx of new suckers to keep the money coming in. So, you've
come here, to the Usenet, to try to drum up new suckers, have them visit
your disinformation sites, watch the latest nonsense you've thought up
and are pushing on YouTube.
Well, it doesn't work here. Each and every post you make you're going
to get a response, a lot of responses, you may've noticed. You're
lying bull shit, made up myths, all of it will be exposed several times
over, and the other readers will explain to you what sort of people
you are, a pack of liars, frauds, cheats, slanderers, and just general
low lifes.
I know you're not used to that. On the outside, the vast majority
of people are polite and civilized. They'll sit quietly and not point
out the crap coming out of your mouths, even if they know what liars
you are. They don't want to create a "scene". They'll applaud and
forget about you two seconds later. Isn't that nice? I'll bet you're
not used to being subject to public redicule, but after all, you can't
buy entertainment like a creationist.
So, why don't you leave here, and go back to where you operate normally,
can say anything you wish without being exposed, and make your money?
Besides, there just aren't that many suckers here!

W.T.S., vrn-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

unread,

Oct 4, 2016, 5:02:41 PM10/4/16

to

JTEM <jte...@Lying.Bozo> Farted out in news, again:

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk>

<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

<https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zascach>

< https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>

<https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>

<http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>

<http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?
_r=0>

<http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>

<http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/>

<http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>

<http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html>

<http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>

"Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould>

<http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>

<http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>

<http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys>

<http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>

<http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home>

<http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk>

<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>

<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>

W.T.S., vrn-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

unread,

Oct 6, 2016, 5:52:16 AM10/6/16

to

JTEM <jte...@Lying.Bozo> Farted out in news, once more:

<https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zascach>

< https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-be
rlinski/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>

<https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-answe
rs-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>

<http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>

<http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?_
r=0>

<http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>