www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list
Lots of them are buddhists, and some I have met personally!
The URL doesn't come up when I click on it, but it does appear to be
correct when I put it in manually. So that's kind of a mystery. Maybe
there is some invisible character or something in there? I dunno.
Anyway, I've reentered the URL:
http://www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list
None of them appear to be Christians, or Jews, or Islamists, by the
way. Here's a list of the top 10:
http://www.watkinsbooks.com/review/top10-people-on-spiritual-power-list
What a disappointment, not one political appointee.........
brian
To be honest, the only ones I'm familiar with are Nelson Mandela and
Desmond Tutu. Come to think of it Desmond Tutu is a Christian cleric.
So there is at least one Catholic on the 100 list, I guess. I remember
Tutu issued some scathing criticisms of Bush and Tony Blair, calling
the Iraq war immoral. So he's definitely one person I would put on my
own most admired list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepak_Chopra
His father was one of the best cardiologists in India, his brother is
a specialist and he was himself, endocrinologist.
I am not one of his devotees, but I listen to him if he is on.
But I saw the discussion with him and your Pope of the Church of the
Atheists, Dawkins. Dawkins was rude, mean, arrogant and a son of a
bitch that only likes to put other people down and show his rigid
orthodox dogmas. Great representative of the "free" thinkers.
Actually I find him interesting, but a bit commercial. Tolle is
really good. All the various Buddhists on the list are people I
enjoy, with the exception of Sogyal Rinpoche who is no good at all.
Globalist is right about Chopra being a brilliant doctor who does
spirituality as a sideline.
Evelyn
Surely you can't say that about the Dalai Lama who is #2 on the list?
Evelyn
I don't know why I am having so much difficulty copying and pasting
links to usenet through Forte Agent. Must be some kind of
incompatibility? I never had a problem before switching to Windows 7
and using Google's Chrome.
Evelyn
Trust me in that I am familiar with just about every flap going on in
the tibetan buddhist world. I am pretty sure I know what you are
talking about, and if it is what I think it is, he is right.
Evelyn
It isn't MY list, dumbass.
I simply happen to know who some of them are.
By the way, there is a flock of chickens came through here. They were
looking for you.
Several years ago someone spotted a picture of the Dalai Lama on the
dash of a New Delhi taxi -- with the words "Be Stoked" across the
bottom. Something like this:
http://birdhouse.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/bestoked-tm.jpg
Since then it has popped up all over the world. I thought it was so
cool that I hunted around the web for an appropriate picture, added
the lettering, and had some printed up. I think it has earned me a
discount from my Tibetan handyman. (-8
BTW -- Why isn't Sordo somewhere on that list?
I've never heard of Dawkins, but here are a couple of quotes I found:
"Not a single one of your ancestors died young. They all copulated at
least once."
"My last vestige of "hands off religion" respect disappeared in the
smoke and choking dust of September 11th 2001, followed by the
"National Day of Prayer," when prelates and pastors did their
tremulous Martin Luther King impersonations and urged people of
mutually incompatible faiths to hold hands, united in homage to the
very force that caused the problem in the first place."
I've never used Google's Chrome. The older I get, the less adventurous
I become. :-)
LOL!
Evelyn
The situation sort of reminds me of all those people over the last 20
years or so who have told me that I need to switch over to Linux since
it was the up and coming thing. I always told them that if they wanted
to switch, do it on their own computer, mine works just fine. :-)
> www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list
>
>
> Lots of them are buddhists, and some I have met personally!
What a crock of shit.
The usual from Evelyn.
--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he dropped another white rhino.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
Thanks, Obama: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/politica/thanks.jpg
They couldn't have been real Foster Farms chickens then.
>On Mar 30, 6:18 pm, High Miles <2blues1...@comcast.net> wrote:
I liked XP better than I like Windows 7, but then my needs and uses
are simple with a computer. I imagine that other people may have
uses that stress these operating systems and so they switch around.
From what I understand the whole idea with linux was to get around
microsoft.
Evelyn
>I have used Chrome for some time now. Like it better than Firefox,
>and Explorer.
I find it doesn't do certain things that I am used to very well.
Evelyn
Like what, specifically?
--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he tried to learn COBOL.
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:01:31 -0700, Rita <Ri...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:18:17 -0500, High Miles
>><2blue...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On 3/30/2011 7:00 PM, mg wrote:
>>>> I've never used Google's Chrome. The older I get, the less adventurous
>>>> I become. :-)
>>>Safer and less stressful.
>>>Who needs added stress at any time ?
>>
>>I have used Chrome for some time now. Like it better than Firefox,
>>and Explorer.
>
>I find it doesn't do certain things that I am used to very well.
>
>Evelyn
That's the trouble with so-called "upgrades". After
much struggle, you get to where you're finally
comfortable with an application or operating system,
then they turn it upside down and jerk it all around,
usually with no compensating benefit to anyone who
isn't trying to make a living using the application.
You just get used to one program or application, then a new thing
comes around and you have to relearn all over again how to do the same
simple things with different rules. It is a pain.
Evelyn
I worked on a computer for a friend about 6 months ago and his Chrome
browser seemed to be using an inordinate amount of CPU cycles and
slowing down his computer. Then I did a search on Google and found
that there seemed to be a lot of complaints about it on the internet.
As I recall, the problem might have been the WOT (web of trust) add-
on, I dunno. Anyway, I'm probably overly conservative when it comes to
installing new stuff and I still look at Chrome as relatively new.