Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

top 100 most revered spiritual individuals

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 10:41:41 AM3/30/11
to

www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list


Lots of them are buddhists, and some I have met personally!

mg

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 2:17:58 PM3/30/11
to
On Mar 30, 8:41 am, Evelyn <evelyn.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list
>
> Lots of them are buddhists, and some I have met personally!

The URL doesn't come up when I click on it, but it does appear to be
correct when I put it in manually. So that's kind of a mystery. Maybe
there is some invisible character or something in there? I dunno.
Anyway, I've reentered the URL:

http://www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list

None of them appear to be Christians, or Jews, or Islamists, by the
way. Here's a list of the top 10:

http://www.watkinsbooks.com/review/top10-people-on-spiritual-power-list

High Miles

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 2:35:47 PM3/30/11
to
Only one on the list I can't stick.
To me.....................................Deepak is a full of shit
profiteer.

brian

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 2:48:36 PM3/30/11
to

What a disappointment, not one political appointee.........

brian

GLOBALIST

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 3:01:57 PM3/30/11
to
In a very vague way they might be considered spiritualists..they are
talk-show folks, entertainers...Louise Hayes is a witch. I still
remember when she was wanting guys on their last legs with AIDS to pay
for her positive thinking stuff. Most of them deny to the hilt that
they are religious, cause it would drive the paying audience away.
I've heard most of them talk and after you pick up their first
stick ...they repeat it 5 million times.

mg

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 3:25:01 PM3/30/11
to

To be honest, the only ones I'm familiar with are Nelson Mandela and
Desmond Tutu. Come to think of it Desmond Tutu is a Christian cleric.
So there is at least one Catholic on the 100 list, I guess. I remember
Tutu issued some scathing criticisms of Bush and Tony Blair, calling
the Iraq war immoral. So he's definitely one person I would put on my
own most admired list.

GLOBALIST

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 3:46:00 PM3/30/11
to
"Chopra is full of shit" I wish some of you feeble minded ,
uneducated dickheads were half as educated as he was.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepak_Chopra

His father was one of the best cardiologists in India, his brother is
a specialist and he was himself, endocrinologist.
I am not one of his devotees, but I listen to him if he is on.
But I saw the discussion with him and your Pope of the Church of the
Atheists, Dawkins. Dawkins was rude, mean, arrogant and a son of a
bitch that only likes to put other people down and show his rigid
orthodox dogmas. Great representative of the "free" thinkers.


Evelyn

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 4:26:37 PM3/30/11
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:35:47 -0500, High Miles
<2blue...@comcast.net> wrote:


Actually I find him interesting, but a bit commercial. Tolle is
really good. All the various Buddhists on the list are people I
enjoy, with the exception of Sogyal Rinpoche who is no good at all.
Globalist is right about Chopra being a brilliant doctor who does
spirituality as a sideline.

Evelyn

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 4:27:27 PM3/30/11
to


Surely you can't say that about the Dalai Lama who is #2 on the list?

Evelyn

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 4:28:45 PM3/30/11
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:17:58 -0700 (PDT), mg <mgke...@yahoo.com>
wrote:


I don't know why I am having so much difficulty copying and pasting
links to usenet through Forte Agent. Must be some kind of
incompatibility? I never had a problem before switching to Windows 7
and using Google's Chrome.

Evelyn

GLOBALIST

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 4:31:16 PM3/30/11
to
Big big dispute with the followers of the Dalai Lama. I will post
it. His followers are going to disobey his directives. I don't
understand the ins and outs but I will find it. One gal in a
discussion group posted it and every in the group pounced on here and
I found the video , where she was correct.

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 4:34:05 PM3/30/11
to

Trust me in that I am familiar with just about every flap going on in
the tibetan buddhist world. I am pretty sure I know what you are
talking about, and if it is what I think it is, he is right.

Evelyn

Olly Mensch

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 4:35:18 PM3/30/11
to
High Miles wrote, regarding Evelyn's list of famous thinkers,
authors,etc.etc.
' 'Only one on the list I cannot stick...Deepak to me is a ful lof shit
profiteer."
Well, I find myself in the uncomfortable position of agreeing with High
Miles - though not with the language, and also, I would add some more to
the list.
But, I have no argument with Evelyn's admiration of those; everyone is
free to choose their own philosophy of life; but certainly I would not
choose many of those.
However, I would add that, if Evelyn would ask us to be tolerant and
understanding and admiring of the ones she listed, then how come she is
ever so intolerant of anyone who IS religious. Makes no sense!
I am not religious - but respect those who feel they need and want to
be.
Olly

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 4:47:22 PM3/30/11
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:35:18 -0400, Old...@webtv.net (Olly Mensch)
wrote:


It isn't MY list, dumbass.
I simply happen to know who some of them are.

By the way, there is a flock of chickens came through here. They were
looking for you.

El Castor

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 7:30:08 PM3/30/11
to

>
>
>www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list
>
>
>Lots of them are buddhists, and some I have met personally!

Several years ago someone spotted a picture of the Dalai Lama on the
dash of a New Delhi taxi -- with the words "Be Stoked" across the
bottom. Something like this:
http://birdhouse.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/bestoked-tm.jpg
Since then it has popped up all over the world. I thought it was so
cool that I hunted around the web for an appropriate picture, added
the lettering, and had some printed up. I think it has earned me a
discount from my Tibetan handyman. (-8

BTW -- Why isn't Sordo somewhere on that list?

mg

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 7:53:01 PM3/30/11
to

I've never heard of Dawkins, but here are a couple of quotes I found:

"Not a single one of your ancestors died young. They all copulated at
least once."

"My last vestige of "hands off religion" respect disappeared in the
smoke and choking dust of September 11th 2001, followed by the
"National Day of Prayer," when prelates and pastors did their
tremulous Martin Luther King impersonations and urged people of
mutually incompatible faiths to hold hands, united in homage to the
very force that caused the problem in the first place."

mg

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 8:00:06 PM3/30/11
to
On Mar 30, 2:28 pm, Evelyn <evelyn.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:17:58 -0700 (PDT), mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com>

I've never used Google's Chrome. The older I get, the less adventurous
I become. :-)

High Miles

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 8:18:17 PM3/30/11
to
On 3/30/2011 7:00 PM, mg wrote:
> I've never used Google's Chrome. The older I get, the less adventurous
> I become. :-)
Safer and less stressful.
Who needs added stress at any time ?

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 8:19:51 PM3/30/11
to


LOL!

Evelyn

mg

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 8:59:40 PM3/30/11
to

The situation sort of reminds me of all those people over the last 20
years or so who have told me that I need to switch over to Linux since
it was the up and coming thing. I always told them that if they wanted
to switch, do it on their own computer, mine works just fine. :-)

Message has been deleted

Dan C

unread,
Mar 30, 2011, 10:10:47 PM3/30/11
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:41:41 -0400, Evelyn wrote:

> www.watkinsbooks.com/review/watkins-spiritual-100-list
>
>
> Lots of them are buddhists, and some I have met personally!

What a crock of shit.

The usual from Evelyn.

--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he dropped another white rhino.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
Thanks, Obama: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/politica/thanks.jpg

Rumpelstiltskin

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 2:27:26 AM3/31/11
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:47:22 -0400, Evelyn <evely...@gmail.com>
wrote:


They couldn't have been real Foster Farms chickens then.


Evelyn

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 7:25:38 AM3/31/11
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:59:40 -0700 (PDT), mg <mgke...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On Mar 30, 6:18 pm, High Miles <2blues1...@comcast.net> wrote:


I liked XP better than I like Windows 7, but then my needs and uses
are simple with a computer. I imagine that other people may have
uses that stress these operating systems and so they switch around.
From what I understand the whole idea with linux was to get around
microsoft.

Evelyn

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 7:26:28 AM3/31/11
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:01:31 -0700, Rita <Ri...@nowhere.com> wrote:

>I have used Chrome for some time now. Like it better than Firefox,
>and Explorer.

I find it doesn't do certain things that I am used to very well.

Evelyn

Dan C

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 9:17:03 AM3/31/11
to

Like what, specifically?


--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".

"Bother!" said Pooh, as he tried to learn COBOL.

Rumpelstiltskin

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 10:03:50 AM3/31/11
to
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:26:28 -0400, Evelyn <evely...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:01:31 -0700, Rita <Ri...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:18:17 -0500, High Miles
>><2blue...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On 3/30/2011 7:00 PM, mg wrote:
>>>> I've never used Google's Chrome. The older I get, the less adventurous
>>>> I become. :-)
>>>Safer and less stressful.
>>>Who needs added stress at any time ?
>>
>>I have used Chrome for some time now. Like it better than Firefox,
>>and Explorer.
>
>I find it doesn't do certain things that I am used to very well.
>
>Evelyn

That's the trouble with so-called "upgrades". After
much struggle, you get to where you're finally
comfortable with an application or operating system,
then they turn it upside down and jerk it all around,
usually with no compensating benefit to anyone who
isn't trying to make a living using the application.

Evelyn

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 10:07:58 AM3/31/11
to

You just get used to one program or application, then a new thing
comes around and you have to relearn all over again how to do the same
simple things with different rules. It is a pain.

Evelyn

High Miles

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 10:13:11 AM3/31/11
to
Linux is a whole different concept, and is in fact a cleaner system.
We used it at the lab for that reason.
But for us casual, end users, winders is fine.
And XP is still a fine stable product.


mg

unread,
Mar 31, 2011, 1:53:08 PM3/31/11
to
On Mar 30, 8:01 pm, Rita <R...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:18:17 -0500, High Miles
>
> I have used Chrome for some time now.  Like it better than Firefox,
> and Explorer.

I worked on a computer for a friend about 6 months ago and his Chrome
browser seemed to be using an inordinate amount of CPU cycles and
slowing down his computer. Then I did a search on Google and found
that there seemed to be a lot of complaints about it on the internet.
As I recall, the problem might have been the WOT (web of trust) add-
on, I dunno. Anyway, I'm probably overly conservative when it comes to
installing new stuff and I still look at Chrome as relatively new.

0 new messages