Ruling class using common women to destroy the middle class?
John Doe
society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before the
horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common women,
weakening the society under them, so they have an easier time
staying on top. The fact they do not practice what they preach is
evidenced by the so-called glass ceiling (that is never going
away), while they pacify "the feminist majority" by pounding
common men with more and more aggressive feminist law. Any
research on that theory? Any books?
If it is a good theory, seems to me that an alternative to taking
up arms would be for some author to write a book about the
subject.
Eddie Haskell
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:4d1a4e62$0$31472$c3e8da3$c14f...@news.astraweb.com...
> Apparently the ruling class is using feminists/women to turn our
> society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before the
> horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common women,
> weakening the society under them, so they have an easier time
> staying on top.
Suits me. Let them do all the work.
Heh heh..
Cleaver..
Heh heh..
-Eddie Haskell
Stephen Morgan
I've been saying that for years. Of course no-one's going to publish that,
too politically incorrect. More importantly, doesn't suit the interests of
the elites who run the publishing firms. The nearest thing I've seen is a
website called "Gloria in Excelsis" exposing Steinem as a Gladio-style CIA
covert operative and blacktown.net, which takes an explicitly racial
angle.
John Doe
> John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>> Apparently the ruling class is using feminists/women to turn
>> our society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before
>> the horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common women,
>> weakening the society under them, so they have an easier time
>> staying on top. The fact they do not practice what they preach
>> is evidenced by the so-called glass ceiling (that is never
>> going away), while they pacify "the feminist majority" by
>> pounding common men with more and more aggressive feminist law.
>> Any research on that theory? Any books?
>>
>> If it is a good theory, seems to me that [some author should]
>> write a book about the subject.
>
> I've been saying that for years. Of course no-one's going to
> publish that, too politically incorrect.
That's what UseNet is for.
> More importantly, doesn't suit the interests of the elites who
> run the publishing firms. The nearest thing I've seen is a
> website called "Gloria in Excelsis" exposing Steinem as a
> Gladio-style CIA covert operative and blacktown.net, which takes
> an explicitly racial angle.
How about your own writing, can you refer to some prior posts?
Thanks.
John Doe
> ... website called "Gloria in Excelsis" exposing Steinem as a
> Gladio-style CIA covert operative
URL?
John Doe
> Third, God will hold men accountable for their actions incident
> to government. The making and enforcing of laws are to be for
> the good of society. If this is abused, if laws are passed to
> subjugate men, promote wickedness, weaken the fabric of society,
> deprive men of their rights, or engage in other forms of abuse,
> those responsible will be held accountable in the day of
> judgement. Would it be too much to say that not only those who
> sought to establish oppressive government will be held
> accountable, but also those who knew better but did not stand
> forth to defend the government God intended?
Might be interesting to find quotes on the Internet that support
the theory but are not explicitly related. The intended meaning of
"men" in that context might be "citizens"or "people".
Avoid using the term "family values" because it sounds like
"family valuables"... and you know what that does to a feminist.
--
UseNet is widely propagated.
John Doe
> Remember that, at least in America, the average person is stupid
> enough to view politics as usual as though it were a wrestling
> match.
Or, more likely because that is the way the one-way media presents
it (like a big game/fight).
> Their guy is the good guy and really smart people vote the way
> they do. Pass the popcorn and remember to vote for the corrupt
> scumbag of your choice.
Or for the choice of your favorite hatemonger.
> ... women are the tool the system uses to subjugate men.
Common men.
> I don’t see them getting anything really significant done in
> terms of law or politics anytime in the forseeable future.
Apparently the author thinks that we face a problem with no
identifiable motive and that the problem might somehow magically
go away.
Stephen Morgan
Part 4 can be found here:
http://www.beyondweird.com/conspiracy/cn09-31.html
The rest are elsewhere on the same site, but I can't find an index.
Stephen Morgan
I used to post here a lot, but that was years ago. Probably about 1999-2001,
which will presummably mostly still be on Google Groups.
I also post on these topics at www.rigorousintuition.ca where I get flamed
for my trouble.
And I've got a blog I rarely post to at newdealforyounguns.blogspot.com
Think so, anyway.
Giant Attitude
How old are you now anyway? I hope that you've at least gotten a
haircut by now.
----------------------------
"Populus me sibilat, at mihi plaudo."(The people hiss at me, but I am well satisfied with myself).
- Horace, the Roman poet
Logical positivism, dominant in American and British universities, is suicidally bent upon
establishing the impossibility of knowing anything. As Wyndham Lewis suggested in "Self
Condemned", the neo-positivist pedant reduces himself to a mosquito, able to wound, nearly
invulnerable to counter-assault - but only an insect, not a man.
- Russell Kirk, Enemies of the Permanent Things
Stephen Morgan
25, I think. Haven't had a haircut in about ten years. Naziritism, haircuts
being forbidden by God. Like Samson in the Bible.
Giant Attitude
<grauniad...@yahoo.uksuffix> wrote:
Certainly, if you haven't had a haircut in 10 years, you fit the
pattern of what a liberal is in the United States.
Now, if you're also regularly unemployed, live at home with your
mother, and are addicted to methamphetamine, you would fit the pattern
perfectly.
But you need to brush up on your vocabulary. You're too well-read and
too erudite to be the quintessential American liberal.
You need to use more profanity in your Usenet contributions and in
your everyday life.
Masculist
> Apparently the ruling class is using feminists/women to turn our
> society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before the
> horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common women,
> weakening the society under them, so they have an easier time
> staying on top. The fact they do not practice what they preach is
> evidenced by the so-called glass ceiling (that is never going
> away), while they pacify "the feminist majority" by pounding
> common men with more and more aggressive feminist law. Any
> research on that theory? Any books?
Yes I have researched this theory and am in fact it's author. It's
time I put it in one place and totally vet it. I'll post here when I
do.
This kind of sexual politics isn't anything new and it was in America
in the 19th century that it was fully developed in it's present form.
Now it's poised to take over the world and our foreign policy is
unabashedly using feminism to do so.
> If it is a good theory, seems to me that an alternative to taking
> up arms would be for some author to write a book about the
> subject.
Rebellion and revolution are out of the question. We are now too
technologically advanced and men too oppressed to be able to pull that
off.
Tom
retardsman
smitty, Polish Knight already has a handle on these matters, with
comprehensive solutions for each issue
but, thx for yr offer
more books will change nothing, lets stop wasting time and get on
board the polish choo choo and cruise to victory!
just my two scents...
ray
Masculist
Yes, Steve has written some good stuff along those lines.
Key words to my stuff are "Benevolent Empire", "Masculism", Nixon's
plumbers, "counter insurgent" <smile>, "Ursulines".
Tom
Masculist
ray, does this mean you don't want to go on a roadtrip?
Tom
> ray
retardsman
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
roadtrip? eh?
this has nothing to do with roadtrips, i'm just calling them as i see
them
inferring that my comment masks some agenda of personal aggrandizement
is pretty darn cynical of you, smitty . . . that hurts.... it really
does
youre both christians, right? well what does the Book say? "See, I
have sent you Polish Knight, to guard you and to keep you in the way.
Obey his voice, he will not forgive your rebellions, for my name is in
him"
i rest my case
John Doe
> John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>> Apparently the ruling class is using feminists/women to turn
>> our society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before
>> the horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common women,
>> weakening the society under them, so they have an easier time
>> staying on top. The fact they do not practice what they preach
>> is evidenced by the so-called glass ceiling (that is never
>> going away), while they pacify "the feminist majority" by
>> pounding common men with more and more aggressive feminist law.
>> Any research on that theory? Any books?
>
> Yes I have researched this theory and am in fact it's author.
Citations please, as in message IDs or URLs. I am sure you have
never used the exact same words, and I would like to see what you
said. Actually, seeing any other writing on the subject might be
fun, from anywhere on the Internet.
> It's time I put it in one place and totally vet it. I'll post
> here when I do.
Okey-dokey.
--
Stephen Morgan
One out of three, not bad.
> But you need to brush up on your vocabulary. You're too well-read and
> too erudite to be the quintessential American liberal.
I'm not an American or a liberal, I'm an English Socialist, the most erudite
and well-read group of people on earth.
> You need to use more profanity in your Usenet contributions and in
> your everyday life.
You know me, GA, I don't shy away from no cunting profanity.
Masculist
I never inferred any such thing.
> youre both christians, right? well what does the Book say? "See, I
> have sent you Polish Knight, to guard you and to keep you in the way.
> Obey his voice, he will not forgive your rebellions, for my name is in
> him"
I'm not sure Polish Knight is a Christian or one seriously attached to
the faith. We were talking politics anyway. Is there something in
the political discussion that you take issue with?
Tom
> i rest my case
Masculist
> Masculist <masculist gmail.com> wrote:
> > John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> >> Apparently the ruling class is using feminists/women to turn
> >> our society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before
> >> the horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common women,
> >> weakening the society under them, so they have an easier time
> >> staying on top. The fact they do not practice what they preach
> >> is evidenced by the so-called glass ceiling (that is never
> >> going away), while they pacify "the feminist majority" by
> >> pounding common men with more and more aggressive feminist law.
> >> Any research on that theory? Any books?
>
> > Yes I have researched this theory and am in fact it's author.
>
> Citations please, as in message IDs or URLs. I am sure you have
> never used the exact same words, and I would like to see what you
> said. Actually, seeing any other writing on the subject might be
> fun, from anywhere on the Internet.
I'll put it together on my blog and put the link here.
Tom
retardsman
oh, i know -- i inferred it, then denied it, then blamed you, then
giggled uncontrollably, all v satisfying
>
> > youre both christians, right? well what does the Book say? "See, I
> > have sent you Polish Knight, to guard you and to keep you in the way.
> > Obey his voice, he will not forgive your rebellions, for my name is in
> > him"
>
> I'm not sure Polish Knight is a Christian or one seriously attached to
> the faith.
i dunno if he's got faith, but he's got a HOUSE! :O)
> We were talking politics anyway. Is there something in
> the political discussion that you take issue with?
>
> Tom
>
>
nah i'm not interested in politics, our generation was duped into
believing in political solutions to everything, yakkety yak yak
.....just trying to have a little fun and grease the Roadtrip wheels
(which youre gumming up)
i'm thinking of inviting a Third to go along, you know, Masculist
Trinity/Three Amigos kinda thang ... leaning towards Stevie Morgan...
praps Stormy?...
any thoughts? and once again
THANK YOU POLISH KNIGHT!!
$ Turin ♂
On Jan 3, 2:14 pm, Mascaralust <mascar...@gmail.com> bullshitted:
> On Jan 2, 3:12 pm, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
> > eMasculist <malefeminist gmail.com> wrote:
> > > John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> > >> Apparently the ruling class is using feminists/women to turn
> > >> our society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before
> > >> the horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common women,
> > >> weakening the society under them, so they have an easier time
> > >> staying on top. The fact they do not practice what they preach
> > >> is evidenced by the so-called glass ceiling (that is never
> > >> going away), while they pacify "the feminist majority" by
> > >> pounding common men with more and more aggressive feminist law.
> > >> Any research on that theory? Any books?
>
> > > Yes I have researched this theory and am in fact it's author.
>
> > Citations please, as in message IDs or URLs. I am sure you have
> > never used the exact same words, and I would like to see what you
> > said. Actually, seeing any other writing on the subject might be
> > fun, from anywhere on the Internet.
>
> I'll put it together on my blog and put the link here.
Hahaha ...Malefeminist is laying down the breadcrumbs, for you,
Son.
Besides having a mental handicap, little Thomasina is just a bum on
the street, an ex-prison con/faggot-ass-drug offender and has never
read a book in his drugged up, useless fucking life.
This little autistic asshole trolls people, using this sort of come-
on, all of the time. If there's one thing that he's not, it's read up
on any subject. He couldn't pull out a real fact, for anyone, if it
inserted itself into his ass, for him.
- - -
For this cause came he into the world:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambar ∞
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/ ♂
http://turinturambar.fortunecity.com/blog/ ⚕
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
> Tom, the Fleabag
$ Turin ♂
Anyone who thinks that PolishedTripe is serious about anything
probably also thinks that Rush Limbaugh is drug-free, or, that Sarah
Palin is sexy.
- - -
"And he stretched out his hand over the sea of bullshit. And the Lord
caused the bullshit to go back by a strong east wind all that night,
and made the bullshit dry land. And the bullshit was divided.":
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambar ∞
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/ ♂
http://turinturambar.fortunecity.com/blog/ ⚕
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
> Tom
>
> > i rest my ass
John Doe
> John Doe <j... usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>> Masculist <masculist gmail.com> wrote:
>> > John Doe <j... usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>> >> Apparently the ruling class is using feminists/women to turn
>> >> our society upside down (inside out, putting the cart before
>> >> the horse, etc). They hold a carrot in front of common
>> >> women, weakening the society under them, so they have an
>> >> easier time staying on top. The fact they do not practice
>> >> what they preach is evidenced by the so-called glass ceiling
>> >> (that is never going away), while they pacify "the feminist
>> >> majority" by pounding common men with more and more
>> >> aggressive feminist law. Any research on that theory? Any
>> >> books?
>>
>> > Yes I have researched this theory and am in fact it's author.
>> > �
>>
>> Citations please, as in message IDs or URLs. I am sure you have
>> never used the exact same words, and I would like to see what
>> you said. Actually, seeing any other writing on the subject
>> might be fun, from anywhere on the Internet.
>
> I'll put it together on my blog and put the link here.
No, I meant previous discussion. You cannot be the author of
something you have not already written. The subject is a mega
theory subject to mega error. However, if multiple people come up
with the same idea independently as someone else suggested here,
that adds credibility.
If you want to do some research, go for it (I probably will too
in my spare time), but posting it here would be better. Here on
USENET, we have a permanent record that is very difficult to
alter, unless you own all of the archives.
Good luck and have fun.
--
>
> Tom
>
>> > It's time I put it in one place and totally vet it. �I'll post
>> > here when I do.
>>
>> Okey-dokey.
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > This kind of sexual politics isn't anything new and it was in America
>> > in the 19th century that it was fully developed in it's present form.
>> > Now it's poised to take over the world and our foreign policy is
>> > unabashedly using feminism to do so.
>>
>> >> If it is a good theory, seems to me that an alternative to taking
>> >> up arms would be for some author to write a book about the
>> >> subject.
>>
>> > Rebellion and revolution are out of the question. �We are now too
>> > technologically advanced and men too oppressed to be able to pull that
>> > off.
>>
>> > Tom
>
>
see also Google Groups
> Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!j19g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Masculist <masculist gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.democrats,soc.men
> Subject: Re: Ruling class using common women to destroy the middle class?
> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:14:46 -0800 (PST)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 53
> Message-ID: <ef6f7cb8-b194-4859-9959-cd8bc13059a9 j19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
> References: <4d1a4e62$0$31472$c3e8da3$c14f6927 news.astraweb.com> <75005aaa-ba8b-4959-b785-f3e1d7691afc r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <4d210654$0$9475$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6 news.astraweb.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.75.65.137
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1294082086 9730 127.0.0.1 (3 Jan 2011 19:14:46 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 19:14:46 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: j19g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.75.65.137; posting-account=ktC8lwkAAACziLpj2cVSiK4oEjnF0N3x
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/8.0.552.224 Safari/534.10,gzip(gfe)
>
Stephen Morgan
...don't talk back.
> .....just trying to have a little fun and grease the Roadtrip wheels
> (which youre gumming up)
>
> i'm thinking of inviting a Third to go along, you know, Masculist
> Trinity/Three Amigos kinda thang ... leaning towards Stevie Morgan...
> praps Stormy?...
You stage your road trip in the East Midlands, I'm there.
> any thoughts? and once again
>
> THANK YOU POLISH KNIGHT!!
TLC are in league with the devil, priestesses of the foul new order where
the only measure of a man is his economic value. The fact is that 'scrubs'
and losers are the only nobility left in this shitty world. Anyone who
earns more than 10,000 pounds a year has sold out to the multinational
corporations who enslave mankind. The only way to succeed today is to lie,
cheat, steal, murder, betray yourself and others, exploit the Third World
and poke kittens in the belly with sharp sticks (see Vance Packard on
corporate bonding rituals). Losers are not lazy or stupid, we are morally
superior to the rest of you. The horrendous eugenic mating practices of
the likes of TLC are ensuring that kindness and gentleness will be bred
out of the race by the year 2100.
-- http://michaelkelly.artofeurope.com/tlc.htm
Masculist
Excellent idea. In any negotiatons we have it'd be best to have lots
of old Leftists around to keep things honest. You know I don't buy
this one sided argument about who's to blame for feminism but us guys
on the Left do have huge problems due to what our "boys" did the past
40 years.
> THANK YOU POLISH KNIGHT!!
I second that. Now onward to Washington DC to straighten this mess
out for once and for all. Roadtrip!
Tom
Masculist
wrote:
Right on Steve! Up with losers!
Tom
$ Turin ♂
wrote:
> On 2011-01-03, retard <remarks...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Tell us how you really feel, Morgana.
- - -
He has the face of an angel,
The charm of the devil,
....and, the power of a god:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambar ∞
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/ ♂
http://turinturambar.fortunecity.com/blog/ ⚕
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
$ Turin ♂
Yeah. What about Nikki?
Long drive....no girls to fuck along the way......you know...?
Lmao
> and once again
>
> Excellent idea. In any negotiatons we have it'd be best to have lots
> of old Leftists around to keep things honest.
Tom must mean "old bums, drinking beer". He also means for you guys
to bring the beer.
> You know I don't buy
> this one sided argument about who's to blame for feminism but us guys
> on the Left do have huge problems due to what our "boys" did the past
> 40 years.
Does this statement actually mean anything?
Is Tom blaming Nixon for Ithaca, again...?
> > THANK YOU POLISH KNIGHT!!
>
> I second that. Now onward to Washington DC to straighten this mess
> out for once and for all. Roadtrip!
I seriously doubt that even PolishedKnitwit is going to be willing to
pick you two retards up, to head on over to D.C., just so you can both
embarrass him by shouting out incoherent slogans about your unpaid
child support.
Is he a deadbeat, too? Or, Does he just play one on Usenet?
- - -
He raised his hand, and over the earth he traced in space:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambar ∞
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/ ♂
http://turinturambar.fortunecity.com/blog/ ⚕
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
> Frog
$ Turin ♂
> On Jan 4, 10:14 am, Stephen Mugwort <grauniad2libe...@yahoo.uksuffix>
> wrote:
Sounds like Tom is trying, once again, to start up his own
following.
- - -
This has been another enlightening moment, with:
Stormy
LOL
Stormy