Obama AG Lynch Enforcing Sharia Law

[Joe Cooper]

As most AT readers know, Loretta Lynch recently stated that she would
prosecute anyone who expressed “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that led to
violence against Muslims. Among other things, she also invited members of
the Muslim community to contact her if their children are bullied at
school. Wow! Does anyone else have Lynch’s direct line so they can hop,
skip, and jump over the playground monitor, teacher, counselor, vice-
principal, and/or principal to the Attorney General of the United States?
I can almost hear the phones dialing now with the next wave of fabricated
clock boy complaints.

Lynch is enforcing Sharia law, creating two classes of citizens. Muslims
are the protected class and non-Muslims are second-class citizens. I’m
amazed Black Lives Matter folks aren’t up in arms over this, because
blacks have just been relegated to a lower rung on the priority ladder
(unless you’re black and Muslim, in which case, you’re golden).

But back to Lynch’s threat to prosecute those who don’t uphold Islamic
blasphemy law. After covering this issue at AT on Saturday, I wanted to
write a couple of updates. First, Pamela Geller wrote an excellent piece
at Breitbart, where she states:

If Lynch is serious in prosecuting hate speech, then she
will have to start closing down mosques and banning the
Quran. She wants to restrict the First Amendment so as to
curb “actions predicated on violent talk?” Then she should
ban this “violent talk.”

Geller then lists a multitude of passages from the Quran that mandate
such peace-loving ideas as expel, persecute, fight, slay, banish, beat,
slaughter, crucify, chastise, smite, force, ambush, terrorize, and kill.

She continues:

When Lynch made her revolting statement, the bodies were
still warm in San Bernardino….

Yet when she spoke to the 10th Anniversary Dinner of Muslim
Advocates, the group that got the Obama administration to
scrub all counter-terror training materials of any mention
of jihad and Islam, Lynch said that her “greatest fear” was
the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” in
America. (snip)

Loretta Lynch said that the San Bernardino jihad attack
gave her a “wonderful opportunity.” She said, “We’re at
the point where these issues have come together really
like never before in law enforcement thought and in our
nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity
and a wonderful moment to really make significant change.”

Lynch’s statement about a “wonderful moment to really make a significant
change” gave me chills (and not the good kind). It echoed Obama’s
“fundamental transformation” and should give anyone pause. The Attorney
General of the United States wants to enforce Sharia law.

Meanwhile, George Pataki is urging Lynch to arrest him for strongly
suggesting we fight this war that has been waged against us. And while
this may be a desperate bid for attention from a GOP presidential
candidate polling at zero, it’s nonetheless a welcome development. On
Saturday, Pataki sent out the following tweet: “We must declare war on
radical Islam. @Loretta Lynch I’m not edging toward violent speech, I’m
declaring we kill them. Go ahead, arrest me.”

I’m not a big fan of George Pataki, but I have to take my hat off to him
on this one.

Source: http://bit.ly/1NCMdVu

Democrats just can't help it - they have to expose their loathing of the
American people at every opportunity, and Lynch (who belonged to an
antisemitic, racist group at Harvard) has proven the point.

Your First Amendment rights mean nothing to her - bad mouth a Muslim and
she's going to slap you down and enforce Muslim supremacy.

Wake up, America.

--
Obama Nine Hours Before Paris Terror Attack: "We've Contained ISIS"

"Never underestimate the willingness of white progressives to be offended
on behalf of people who aren’t and to impose their will on those who
didn’t ask for it." (Derek Hunter)

"Liberals never argue with one another over substance; their only dispute
is how to prevent the public from figuring out what they really
believe." (Ann Coulter)

[someone else]

On 12/6/2015 11:50 AM, Joe Cooper wrote:
> As most AT readers know


Someone else might identify that as a logical fallacy


Wariness of tougher gun laws in response to the massacres routinely
drives panic buying of more of weapons. Amid a recent spate of
shootings, guns flew off the shelves in record numbers on the national
shopping bonanza known as Black Friday, according to the FBI.

The phenomenon appears bleak for advocates of tighter controls, but
could also open up a new line of attack against the industry that
profits from it.

The profits generated by firearms sales should, some campaigners
believe, intensify public attention on the corporations and retailers
who benefit. While liberal arguments against the right to bear arms have
made little headway over the years, they hope a hard-headed economic
case could gain more traction – especially in a climate in which
presidential candidate Bernie Sanders’ attacks on big business have
resonated.

On Friday the group Common Cause launched an online petition to the US
Congress under the title “Give back the gun lobby’s dirty money”. Since
2000, it alleged, pro-gun groups have spent more than $101m in lobbying
on Capitol Hill. The Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence estimates more
than 100,000 Americans are victims of gun violence every year.

In particular, activists have identified a perverse cycle whereby a mass
shooting prompts the president to call for tougher gun restrictions,
which the gun lobby exploits to sow fear, which in turns leads to an
outbreak of urgent stockpiling, all of which boosts profits. In short, a
massacre is “good for business”.


http://www.alternet.org/culture/san-bernardino-shooting-gun-sales-soar-familiar-pattern-panic-and-profit

[Joe Cooper]

N...@Wussy.com wrote in news:vv496b5cm337q19hq...@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 17:50:42 -0000 (UTC), Joe Cooper
> <drag...@removeunseen.is> wrote:
>
>>As most AT readers know, Loretta Lynch recently stated that she would
>>prosecute anyone who expressed "anti-Muslim rhetoric" that led to
>>violence against Muslims.

> Don't think you have any problem if that were anti-christian violence,
> do you?

Poor, stupid Gary. Lynch wasn't talking about violence, she was talking
about LEADING TO VIOLENCE, and, yes, there is a difference, although you
are clearly too stupid to grok.

Unlike you, I respect the 1st Amendment.

[someone else]

On 12/6/2015 5:09 PM, Joe Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> As most AT readers know

Someone else might think that your false narratives are starting to get
a little thread-bare


1. Create a failed state: Convince people the government doesn’t work,
then defund vital programs and functions so it can’t work. Refuse to
fund anything except for police, the military, “the war on terror,” and
tax cuts for the rich. Get people elected who block critical bills from
getting passed so voters get angry and frustrated and feel government
won’t respond to them. Threaten to shut down the U.S. government so you
can slash spending on programs most of us support. Egg on all those tin
foil hat-wearing survivalists and self-proclaimed “sovereign citizens”
by claiming the Feds are tyrants who have no authority over them. Let
white folks like Cliven Bundy get away with flouting the law and putting
rangers’ and federal agents’ lives in danger. Proclaim laws, court
decisions, and even presidents illegitimate when you don’t agree with
them. Do everything possible to keep us from voting them out…Or from
voting at all.

2. Incite rage and hate: Openly spewing hate towards immigrants, LGBT
individuals, women, people of color, non-Christians, and others used to
be the domain of right-wing nut jobs (RWNJs). Now, we’ve got leading GOP
presidential hopefuls for 2016 airing these views on national TV, and
the party’s leaders do nothing to stop it. Since the 1970s, the GOP has
employed a “Southern Strategy” to exploit racism and to encourage
downwardly mobile white folks to place the blame on people of color for
their economic woes, instead of where it belongs: On our nation’s
political and corporate elites. Most folks in the Republican party used
to at least keep their bigotry under the radar by cloaking it in thinly
veiled terms referred to as “dog whistles.” Now, right-wingers boldly
bring their hate into the open as they vilify entire groups of people as
lazy, sinful, lawless, violent, thuggish, rapey, terroristic, grasping,
and/or un-American.

3. Arm would-be terrorists: Once you get people scared and riled up, all
you need to do is arm your potential terrorist threats to the gills,
without looking like you’re trying to create an army of brown shirts.
Glorify gun culture. Proclaim the sanctity of our God-given Second
Amendment rights. Refuse to enact tougher gun safety laws, or even close
loopholes for the few we’ve got, so unstable people like Aurora, Colo.
shooter James Holmes can buy guns and other weapons online, at gun
shows, or through private sales. Allow open carry “activists” to roam
the streets with rifles slung over their shoulders. Say nothing when one
of those “open carry” gun lovers turns out to be a mass shooter.

4. Lie and deny: When the GOP’s stochastic terrorists are deployed in
the form of yet another angry white man with a gun or a bomb, and the
next tragic round of mass murders takes place, the hateful merchants of
death take refuge in their fortress of plausible deniability. Wring your
hands, pray to the Lord, and lament the tragedy as though these acts of
terrorism on your behalf are acts of God or some kind of natural
disaster. Cry crocodile tears as you express sorrow and offer
condolences. Claim the perpetrator is mentally ill, but propose no
programs to help people who suffer from mental illness. Insist that our
perverse and violent form of gun culture has nothing to do with gun
violence. Blame it all on non-Christian media like TV, fiction, movies,
music and video games — which most of us know are only entertainment —
while having “experts,” lawmakers and other public figures push false
and dangerous narratives on TV news shows, which most of us do see as
authoritative and believable.

5. Cover up: Republicans know we can’t fight the right-wing terrorism
they foment if they de-fund the agencies that can prove it exists. Daryl
Johnson, an expert on counter terrorism, used to work for the Dept. of
Homeland Security, but not any more. Wired reports he published a paper
on domestic terrorism and the rise of right-wing extremism in 2009, and
that was the end of his career with DHS. Republicans in Congress raised
a ruckus and claimed DHS was trying to criminalize “free speech” on the
far right. As of 2012, the department Johnson once ran consisted of only
one person to keep up with all non-Islamic terroristic threats. The GOP
members of Congress have also banned funding for the Centers for Disease
Control’s research on gun violence, as reported by The Hill and only a
handful of other news outlets. A furious Rep. Nita Lowey’s (D-N.Y.) —
whose GOP colleagues in the House Appropriations Committee refused to
add her amendment to restore funding to a health, education and labor
bill — fumed:

“When it comes to gun violence, my friends, this committee won’t
give one dime for the CDC to conduct research on something that is
killing Americans by the thousands,”

How can we even begin to address the threats of right-wing terrorism and
gun safety to our nation’s safety and public threat when the agencies
charged with those tasks are denied any funding or support for doing
their jobs?


http://reverbpress.com/features/stochastic-terrorism-gop-terroristic-threat/

[Siri Cruz]

In article <vv496b5cm337q19hq...@4ax.com>, N...@Wussy.com wrote:

> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 17:50:42 -0000 (UTC), Joe Cooper
> <drag...@removeunseen.is> wrote:
>

> >As most AT readers know, Loretta Lynch recently stated that she would
> >prosecute anyone who expressed “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that led to
> >violence against Muslims.
>

> Don't think you have any problem if that were anti-christian violence,
> do you?

Was it Starbucks that didn't come out with limitted edition disposable Christmas
coffee cup?

IT'S A WAR ON CHRISTMAS!!!!11!!! CHRISTIANS MUST ARM THEMSELVES WITH SWORDS AND
FIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES ON THE COMING WAR BECAUSE THEY CANNOT TRUST THEIR GOD
TO SAVE THEM!!!!!5!!!

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
God exists since mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists since we
cannot prove the consistency. ~~ Morris Kline

[Governor Swill]

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 17:17:17 -0600, someone else
<con...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>Create a failed state: Convince people the government doesn’t work,
>then defund vital programs and functions so it can’t work. Refuse to
>fund anything except for police, the military, “the war on terror,” and
>tax cuts for the rich. Get people elected who block critical bills from
>getting passed so voters get angry and frustrated and feel government
>won’t respond to them. Threaten to shut down the U.S. government so you
>can slash spending on programs most of us support. Egg on all those tin
>foil hat-wearing survivalists and self-proclaimed “sovereign citizens”
>by claiming the Feds are tyrants who have no authority over them. Let
>white folks like Cliven Bundy get away with flouting the law and putting
>rangers’ and federal agents’ lives in danger. Proclaim laws, court
>decisions, and even presidents illegitimate when you don’t agree with
>them. Do everything possible to keep us from voting them out…Or from
>voting at all.

"Democrats are the party that says government can
make you richer, smarter, taller, and get the chickweed
out of your lawn.
Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work,
and then they get elected and prove it." - P.J. O'Rourke

*newsgroups restored*

Asshole.

Swill
--
The Democratic Party makes me ashamed to be an American.
The Republican Party makes me ashamed to be a human being. - Clave

[Black Lies Matter]

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 11:55:49 -0600, someone else
<con...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On 12/6/2015 11:50 AM, Joe Cooper wrote:
>> As most AT readers know
>
>
>Someone else

...needs to learn to deal with his impotence.