Forwarded post from S. J.
Catholic Church involved in Kudankulam Nuclear Plant agitation: Dr.
Swamy asks for PM's explanation
October 17, 2011.
Statement of Dr. Subramanian Swamy,
President of the Janata Party.
I demand an explanation from the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh as
to why his Secretary Mr. Pulok Chatterji, with the help of the
Maharashtra Chief Minister Mr. Prithviraj Chavan, has entered into
negotiations with the Catholic Church in Mumbai to help resolve the
protests taking place against the Kudankulam Nuclear Plant. Does
this mean that the Catholic Church is behind the agitation in which
case it is highly objectionable and calls for action under IPC
Sections 153A & B, 295A and 505(2). It also exposes that the PMO is
under the clutches of the Catholic Church probably due to the extra-
constitutional authority exercised by the now ailing Ms Sonia Gandhi
who appears to regard Mr. Pulok Chatterji with the PMO as her
personal civil domestic servant judging by his role when she was
hospitalized in New York. During the period of her hospitalization,
Mr. Pulok Chatterji was frequently seen arranging for pizza and other
snacks for her large Italian entourage numbering about fifty and
living in plush apartments in New York close to the hospital.
The Prime Minister, if he is committed to secular, that is, not
prejudiced against the majority Hindu community and biased in favour
of the Christians because they are patrons of Ms. Sonia Gandhi,
should put an end to this condemnable negotiation on the viability of
the Kudankulam Plant. The Church has no business to decide
whatsoever on whether a new reactor set up after Government approval
is to be opposed or supported. Let the Catholic Church restrict
itself to religious matters otherwise persons like myself would be
free to investigate the practices of the Church such as in
appointment of Bishops on direction from the Vatican, and receipt of
funds from abroad.
(SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY)
End of forwarded post from S. J.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.