It was Saul Alinsky who taught Obama How to Cry on Cue

[Joe Cooper]

In his last year in the now-dysfunctional Oval Office, President Barack
Obama is living Saul Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ to the letter, by
digging deep down in the trick bag to cast himself off as the ‘underdog’.

Knowing how the masses always fall for the underdog, conniving Alinsky
trains acolytes like Obama and Hillary Clinton to cast themselves in the
underdog role, a fact unearthed by savvy Canada Free Press columnist Ray
DiLorenzo in reviewing Allinsky’s 12 rules.

“Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the
public sympathizes with the underdog. [A well-known union tactic.)

“Hillary Clinton wrote her senior thesis about Saul Alinsky and was
offered a job by him. She did not take the position electing instead to
go to law school, but she did stay in touch with him for years after. I
doubt whether Alinsky would have extended Hillary Rodham a post if he
felt she wouldn’t have been a good disciple.”

So when Obama, as a kind of last resort to go for the nation’s guns,
turned on his crocodile tears on Monday, he was channeling a mentor whose
book, ‘Rules for Radicals’ was dedicated to Satan.

Over the past seven years, Obama has proven he’s anything but a man of
good will or good heart.

His contrived tears for the children lost to the Sandy Hook massacre came
not within days or weeks of the tragedy, but in fact on his way out the
door on January 5, 2016—some three long years later.

Hard to imagine this professional America hater sniffling into his
pillows at the White House, or wiping away a stray tear before taking his
next golf swing, or while slurping yet another holiday shaved ice.

Obama’s faux tears were 100% Alinsky-influenced to try to trick law-
abiding Americans out of their cherished 2nd Amendment rights when they
would be left with no defense against the Gitmo detainees that followed
the 2015 release of thousands of prisoners, including rapists and
murderers; when American citizens would be left defenseless against
terrorists masquerading as helpless “refugees” set up in sanctuary
cities, now that he’s hollowed out the U.S. military.

Obama’s Boo-Hoo Act followed by mere days his return from a lavish,
$500,000 a-day Hawaiian Christmas vacation that sent out the message:
“Merry Christmas, Suckers!” and the Daily Mail front page pictorial,
including the one depicting him lifting deputy national security advisor
Ben Rhodes’ toddler dressed in a Halloween costume while lying supping on
the Oval Office floor.

Obama, the Actor, thinks folk don’t know that the only guns he’s not
after are those in use by Chicago thugs and Islamic terrorists.

Obama is not full of love, nor is he the kind of man driven to tears by
the memory of the loss of little children, or the thousands of women
raped by Islam.

For all to see, this has been a commander-in-chief unflinching in the
cruelest of roles motivated by an obsessive hatred of America and one
full of a conceit-laced spite of the most destructive kind imaginable.

Yet quick-hit people who let the talking heads of the boob tube do their
thinking for them are still Obama gullible.

It’s not that Obama spent the last seven years bowing and scraping to the
leaders of countries who would, given the chance, bury America, it’s that
his administration has reached the zenith where a feckless mainstream
media and a cowardly ‘Opposition’ constantly bow and scrape to him.

Obama’s the curse of Western Society and his curse is fanning out like a
virulent influenza.

During his stint in the Oval Office, he’s been able to take Bishop of
Rome, Pope Francis, away from saving souls to the hard core activism of
global warming/climate change, a kind of activism that places global
warming as a bigger threat to mankind than Islamic terrorism.

Obama’s successfully lured Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron, who
calls him his “brother” into his tent and helped return Canada to lib-
left rule under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, though ‘Pretty Boy’
Trudeau seems more window dressing than anything else.

With all barriers now removed by Obama, the only reason Islamic terrorism
hasn’t taken over America is that the barbarians waiting to crash through
the door know that Americans, long protected by the Second Amendment, are
armed to the teeth.

Obama’s executive orders are never going to lead Americans to turn in
their weapons. They’d be just as likely to turn in their Christian
beliefs.

In some respects, Obama has much in common with the jihadists of Islam.
Obama seeks to force Marxism on the masses, while Islamist terrorism
seeks to force Sharia Law and their Caliphate on all.

Both Obama and the jihadists seem blissfully unaware that once man has
tasted freedom, he will never give it up, even though defending it may
cost him his very life.

This is what Obama and his jihadist friends are up against.

Meanwhile, it’s going to take far more than Obama swallowing whole
Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ and the the imposition of the Koran for
Americans to give up their guns.

Source: http://bit.ly/1VR2pc2

--
Obama Nine Hours Before Paris Terror Attack: "We've Contained ISIS."
ISIS: "We've contained Obama."

"Never underestimate the willingness of white progressives to be offended
on behalf of people who aren’t and to impose their will on those who
didn’t ask for it." (Derek Hunter)

"No doubt Hillary would like to call [Paula] Jones a liar, but Bill paid
Jones $850,000 to settle her sexual harassment suit. Can you imagine the
fun Donald Trump, for one, would have with that? Plus, it was Bill
Clinton, not Paula Jones, who was found by the presiding federal judge to
have committed perjury."--John Hinderaker

[Jos Boersema]

Op 2016-01-08, Joe Cooper schreef <drag...@removeunseen.is>:

> In his last year in the now-dysfunctional Oval Office, President Barack
> Obama is living Saul Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ to the letter, by
> digging deep down in the trick bag to cast himself off as the ‘underdog’.
>
> Knowing how the masses always fall for the underdog, conniving Alinsky
> trains acolytes like Obama and Hillary Clinton to cast themselves in the
> underdog role, a fact unearthed by savvy Canada Free Press columnist Ray
> DiLorenzo in reviewing Allinsky’s 12 rules.

It is worse in the case of Hillary. The "casting" is done professionally,
and it goes into outright fraud on a grand scale involving the mass media.
Larry Nichols who was (claims to be, if you prefer) a hitman (hired murderer)
for the Clinton crime family, associates and patrons, exposed how they work.
It is key for a Democrat like Hillary to be seen as the underdog, but how do
you do that with an establishment operator like Hillary ? Larry says that the
entire e-mail scandal was contrived for this purpose. Hillary - so says Larry -
cannot be indicted, because the e-mails are classified and therefore the Judge
will be forced to reject the case. But what it does is give the general public
the idea that there is a pursecution happenign by the establishment against
Hillary, and that idea is the key to get her elected. This is how they are
making her the underdog.

There are some other rules that Larry - who wrote the rules on this system,
so he says - mentions, such as getting all the donations to your campaign
in the beginning so that the other candidates are starved of funding. It is
a whole program.

[...]

> During his stint in the Oval Office, he's been able to take Bishop of
> Rome, Pope Francis, away from saving souls to the hard core activism of
> global warming/climate change, a kind of activism that places global
> warming as a bigger threat to mankind than Islamic terrorism.

You think the Pope is into saving souls ? You mean saving them for Lucifer ?

[...]

> With all barriers now removed by Obama, the only reason Islamic terrorism
> hasn't taken over America is that the barbarians waiting to crash through
> the door know that Americans, long protected by the Second Amendment, are
> armed to the teeth.

This is an exaggeration. To "take over" means to rule. Radical Islam hasn't
made more then a few attacks on the USA. 9/11 was no such attack, because
that was the Pentagon attacking itself and its own people. There has been
next to nothing, and even in Europe - without a 2nd amendment - we are still
not taken over or even suffer major attacks and fighting by radical Islam
either (although some of that is starting). However this threat by radical
Islam is not really coming from radical Islam. It is coming from our own
Governments and ruling classes, who want a maesure of chaos in the streets
because the economy they ruined is imploding. The radical Islamists, who
are in the ISIS detachment of the American army, are a weapon by our own
ruling class.

> Obama's executive orders are never going to lead Americans to turn in
> their weapons. They'd be just as likely to turn in their Christian
> beliefs.

For all your tough words, you handed them in a sheep during Katrina, and
multiple large cities are gun free zones. It remains to be seen whether
you will stand. Because you are Europeans, and all but the Swiss have become
disarmed, and you do not share the type of real democracy that the Swiss
have and therefore you do not share their character, my guess is that
you will be disarmed within 150 years, or sooner. England is disarmed even
to the point of knives (!), Australians are not allowed to own a sword.
All the nations that are like you, of Anglo-Saxon origin, end up disarmed.
Therefore I think that you will also end up disarmed. The fact that you
are armed is probably an historical accident that came out of the method
of conquest of America by the Anglo-Saxons. You had to be armed for the
conquest, but now that you have secured the land for your Barons - who
changed their title to Billionaires - your weapons are no longer required.

Also you should keep in mind that they already outlaw the heavier weapons,
while at the same time modern technology makes ever more advanced weapons.
The gap between you and the ruling class is going to increase. I wish you
would be capable of keeping your weapons, but it remains to be seen.
Americans watch TV, I'd say that says it all. There is no hope for a people
who watches TV, correct ?

> In some respects, Obama has much in common with the jihadists of Islam.
> Obama seeks to force Marxism on the masses, while Islamist terrorism
> seeks to force Sharia Law and their Caliphate on all.

There is a report by infowars.com, that several secret service sources
say that Obama is a radical Wahabi, and prays 5 times a day to Mecca in
the White House. He also treats his staff unbelievably bad. He is a really
bad person. Remember how he folded over for the brutal mass murderer who
is King of Saudi Arabia. To Obama, that is his Callief, that is his ruler.
In this regard it should be remember that radical Islam is more about
radical then it is about Islam. These Wahabis are into western decadence,
but they clothe it in radical Islam to get a measure of local support and
an amount of crazed religious fundamentalists to fight for them.

> Both Obama and the jihadists seem blissfully unaware that once man has
> tasted freedom, he will never give it up, even though defending it may
> cost him his very life. This is what Obama and his jihadist friends are
> up against.

[...]

Good luck, but you don't have freedom. You have no land. You think you are
free, while being enslaved, and that makes it impossible to free you. You
are not free, because you did not allow others to also have land, including
the Injuns from which you took it. You better start making progress toward
real freedom, rather then wage a defensive struggle around a few islands
of limited freedom you still have.

I think you need to form Militias who do free security patrols for people
who are likely on Government hit lists. You need to start throwing yourselves
into the hail of fire.