Re: Donald Trump Wants Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize Stripped
Ray O'Hara
"WhiteWolf! <rayh<spam>@iol.ie>" <ra...@iol.ie> wrote in message
news:a9tin51o85e8gg6lu...@4ax.com...
> Billionaire real estate tycoon Donald Trump wants Al Gore's Nobel Peace
> Prize
> stripped from the Global Warmingist-in-Chief.
>
> "With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels up
> and
> down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back, "
> Trump
> recently told members of his Westchester, New York, country club according
> to
> the New York Post.
>
> "Gore wants us to clean up our factories and plants in order to protect
> us
> from global warming, when China and other countries couldn't care less. It
> would
> make us totally noncompetitive in the manufacturing world, and China,
> Japan and
> India are laughing at America's stupidity."
>
> According to the Post, the crowd of 500 stood and applauded.
>
> I guess there weren't any liberal media members there.
>
> What say you?
donald trump? lol.
Lesley Robertson
"Ray O'Hara" <raymon...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlc1sa$401$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> donald trump? lol.
>
He's the guy that's digging up that SSSI on the east coast of
Scotland, isn't he?
It'll suit him if people keep their heads buried in the sand.
Lesley Robertson
Jellore
wrote:
> Billionaire real estate tycoon Donald Trump wants Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize
> stripped from the Global Warmingist-in-Chief.
>
> "With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels up and
> down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back, " Trump
> recently told members of his Westchester, New York, country club according to
> the New York Post.
>
> "Gore wants us to clean up our factories and plants in order to protect us
> from global warming, when China and other countries couldn't care less. It would
> make us totally noncompetitive in the manufacturing world, and China, Japan and
> India are laughing at America's stupidity."
>
> According to the Post, the crowd of 500 stood and applauded.
>
> I guess there weren't any liberal media members there.
>
> What say you?
>
> --
> "To win that war, we need a commander-in-chief, not
> a professor of law standing at the lectern."
> (Regarding War On Terror)
> - Sarah Palin.
> (National Tea Party Convention 2010)
> How's that hopey, changey thing working out for ya?
Perhaps he should get a decent haircut......Trump that is.
Ray O'Hara
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:27:15 -0800 (PST), Jellore <jel...@bigpond.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 16, 3:24 am, "WhiteWolf! <rayh<spam>@iol.ie>" <r...@iol.ie>
>>wrote:
>>> Billionaire real estate tycoon Donald Trump wants Al Gore's Nobel Peace
>>> Prize
>>> stripped from the Global Warmingist-in-Chief.
>>>
>>> "With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels
>>> up and
>>> down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back, "
>>> Trump
>>> recently told members of his Westchester, New York, country club
>>> according to
>>> the New York Post.
>>>
>>> "Gore wants us to clean up our factories and plants in order to protect
>>> us
>>> from global warming, when China and other countries couldn't care less.
>>> It would
>>> make us totally noncompetitive in the manufacturing world, and China,
>>> Japan and
>>> India are laughing at America's stupidity."
>>>
>>> According to the Post, the crowd of 500 stood and applauded.
>>>
>>> I guess there weren't any liberal media members there.
>>>
>>> What say you?
>
>
> John
> Edwards got:
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18157456/
>
> (Note to O'Hara: the source I used here is your beloved MSNBC, I choose
> that
> just for you :)
> --
you don't see anybody defending Edwards.
but if he wasa repb you'd bedefending him.
its you wingnts who think as yuor told.
look at congress.the Dems vote as they think.
the repubs oteas they are told.
thats why we recently saw 6 Repubs votea gainst a bill they sponsored.
they were told too.
the fact it was something they wanted didn't matter. they followed orders.
individual thinking is verboten
and with the Pay as you go.
Senate Republicans Called For Commitment To PAYGO Before Voting Against It
Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and Susan Collins (R-ME)
In his State of the Union address last night, President Obama urged the
Senate to adopt pay-as-you-go rules (PAYGO), which essentially stipulate
that all spending increases will be offset by either cuts elsewhere or tax
increases. "When the vote comes tomorrow, the Senate should restore the
pay-as-you-go law that was a big reason for why we had record surpluses in
the 1990s," Obama said.
Today, the Senate followed through, and considering all of the deficit
fearmongering that has been going on in Congress, you'd think that it would
have passed by a fairly wide margin. But no. Instead, the rules passed on a
party line vote of 60-40.
And the blanket Republican opposition is particularly interesting
considering that some Senate Republicans used to support PAYGO, even when it
was opposed by their own party. For instance, in 2004, three current Senate
Republicans - Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), and Sen.
John McCain (R-AZ) - joined 47 Democrats in adopting PAYGO, against the
majority Republicans' wishes (although the rule was ultimately scuttled when
Congress failed to pass a budget). The next year, the same three senators
were joined by Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) in a failed attempt to implement
the rule.
Yet all four of them opposed the rule today. Here's what they've had to say
in favor of PAYGO in the past:
VOINOVICH: I just don't understand how we can continue to go this way.
We're
living in a dream world. This deficit continues to grow.
COLLINS: [PAYGO is] much-needed restraint for members of Congress as we
wrestle with fiscal decisions.
SNOWE: I believe now is the time for both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue to
commit to pay-as-you-go rules for both revenues and spending.
Just last year, Snowe approved of Obama's advocating for PAYGO. And in the
last few weeks, all of these Republicans have voiced concerns about the
deficit and spending. So what changed? And why did all the supposed deficit
hawks in the Senate - like Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) - vote against it as well?
Could it be that they're actually deficit peacocks, who "like to preen and
call attention to themselves, but are not sincerely interested" in
addressing deficits?
In last night's address, Obama chided Senate Republicans, saying that "just
saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it's not
leadership. We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions. So
let's show the American people that we can do it together." They're not off
to a good start.