Islamic Terrorism: Why There Is None in Japan [Islamic, Muslim terrorism]

[Dr. Jai Maharaj]

ISLAMIC TERRORISM: WHY THERE IS NONE IN JAPAN

With all this Muslim terrorism plaguing the world,
perhaps it is time to take a look at a country not
suffering the same fate and analyze exactly why that is…

chersonandmolschky.com
April 13, 2015

http://chersonandmolschky.com/2015/04/13/islamic-terrorism-japan/

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://bit.do/jaimaharaj

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

On 12/09/2015 03:41 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> ISLAMIC TERRORISM: WHY THERE IS NONE IN JAPAN
>
> With all this Muslim terrorism plaguing the world,
> perhaps it is time to take a look at a country not
> suffering the same fate and analyze exactly why that is…

Is it because the Japanese would cut their terrorist heart out and feed
it to them for dinner?

--
That's Karma

[Mr. B1ack]

Actually the Japanese are serious racists & xenophobes.
If it were possible they'd close their borders again and not
let ANY foreign devils in.

[Topaz]

Because it is false flag and the Jews prefer to kill White people.


CIA insider tells 911 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view,
America!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbMjAN7Bws

The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse
of steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes,
is the SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's few small
fires and superficial debris damage could not account for this
collapse, which had all the earmarks of controlled demolition by
explosives. Videos clearly show this. Such demolitions take many days
or weeks to set up - not the few hours between the plane "attacks" and
the collapse. The explosives therefore had to be put in place
BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of previously placed
explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like the badly
damaged and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have
remained standing.

Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological
denial still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it
obviously was, and they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and
fabrications, elaborate lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to
defend their indefensible position. The REAL terrorists are desperate
to cover up their mass-murderous crime of the century - the permitting
if not perpetration of, and subsequent political and economic
exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster.

Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's
most sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible
morning? I don't think so!

There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable
than the explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing
down of NORAD. Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on
the roofs of nearby buildings. These were too far away to be from
jumpers from the towers. If the towers simply collapsed from damage
and fire alone, what blew these bodies to smithereens and sent the
fragments flying for considerable distances? The plane impacts did not
have the explosive brisance (shattering force) necessary to do this -
only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny bits and throw them such
distances.

So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than
their being the result of high explosives being detonated in the
towers?


The following article proves, using the inviolate laws of physics, the
falsity of the government's propaganda explanation for the World Trade
Center building collapses:

SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK

On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World Trade
Center (WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent
people. Videos of the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for
days. About 5 hours after the towers fell, WTC building 7 also
collapsed suddenly, completely, and straight down at near free-fall
speed. This steel-framed building was not touched by the planes that
struck the towers, and had sustained relatively minor debris damage
and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily damaged remained
standing.

In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan
Reynolds, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert
Gates stated, "The American people know what they saw with their own
eyes on September11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government
conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale."

We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's
tale that's "beyond the pale!"

Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented
phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics,
and the emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have
stymied objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of
authoritarian assertions?

The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told
us that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now
referred to as a "pancake collapse". According to the government
claims, the plane crashes and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet
fuel is NOT exotic) fires heated the UL-certified structural steel to
the point where it was significantly weakened, which is very difficult
to believe, never mind repeat in an experiment. Even with massive
fires that incinerate everything else, the steel frames of such
buildings generally remain standing.

According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical
evidence was quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly
caused part of the tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the
tower, which, we've been repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain
reaction of the lower floors sequentially, one at a time, yielding to
the weight falling from above.

There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the
observed facts

* It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical
steel core columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the
next.

* The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to
gravity
alone.

This "collapse" was not without far more physical resistance than from
the air alone. It proceeded through all the lower stories of the
tower. Those undamaged floors below the plane impact zone offered
resistance thousands of times greater than that of air. Those lower
stories, and the central steel core columns, had successfully
supported the mass of the tower for 30 years despite hurricane-force
winds and tremors. Air cannot do that.

Can anyone possibly imagine undamaged lower floors getting out of the
way of the upper floors as gracefully and relatively without friction
as air would? Can anyone possibly imagine the lower stories slowing
the fall of the upper floors less than would, say, a parachute?

What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers
could not have collapsed gravitationally, through their intact lower
stories, as rapidly as was observed on 9/11. Not even close. This is
shown to be physically impossible!


So WHERE DID ALL THAT ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY COME FROM?

Conclusions

In order for the towers to have collapsed "gravitationally" in the
observed duration, as we've been told over and over again, one or more
of the following zany-sounding conditions must have been met

* The undamaged structure below the impact zone offered zero
resistance to the collapse.
* The glass and concrete spontaneously disintegrated without any
expenditure of energy.
* The massive vertical steel core columns simply vanished, as if by
magic.

None of these laws-of-physics-violating, and thus impossible,
conditions can be accounted for by the official government theory of
9/11, nor by any of the subsequent analyses and arguments designed to
prop up this official myth of 9/11.

The Bottom Line


It is utterly impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so
destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near
free-fall time. This fact debunks the preposterous contention that the
WTC collapses can be blamed solely upon damage resulting from the
plane impacts.

The unnaturally short durations of the top-down collapses reveal that
the towers did not disintegrate because they were coming down, but
rather they came down because something else was causing them to
disintegrate.

So, to the extent that people accept the ridiculous "pancake collapse"
story, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Gates'
other premise, that people know what they saw, is also false. It is
left to you to decide if his conclusion, which was based upon clearly
incorrect presumptions, is also flawed.

The collapse of WTC building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane, also
collapsed within a second of free-fall time later that same day.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192

No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever
collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel
columns

Understanding the full truth of 9/11 seems to require two separate
awakenings.

The first, awakening to the fraudulence of the "official 9/11 story,"
is a pretty simple brain function and only requires a little study,
logic or curiosity. We can help a lot with that part here and it's a
major purpose of this site.

The second step, however, consciously confronting the implications of
that knowledge--and what it says about our media, politics and
economic system today--is by far the harder awakening and requires an
enormous exercise of nerve and heart. (As the Chinese say, "You cannot
wake up a man who is pretending to sleep.") In other words, this part
of the journey depends more on character than on maps and evidence so
we can't help you much here, except to point out inspiring heroes and
heroines who have courageously faced that truth, spoken out, and
survived...



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:casj6bd81hgke4kp8...@4ax.com:

> Because it is false flag and the Jews prefer to kill White people.

Would those be the same SooperJews that you insist are superior to all
Gentiles, Alex?

--
Obama Nine Hours Before Paris Terror Attack: "We've Contained ISIS"

"Never underestimate the willingness of white progressives to be offended
on behalf of people who aren’t and to impose their will on those who didn’t
ask for it." (Derek Hunter)

"Liberals never argue with one another over substance; their only dispute
is how to prevent the public from figuring out what they really believe."
(Ann Coulter)

[Dr. Jai Maharaj]

Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

>
> ISLAMIC TERRORISM: WHY THERE IS NONE IN JAPAN
>
> With all this Muslim terrorism plaguing the world,
> perhaps it is time to take a look at a country not
> suffering the same fate and analyze exactly why that is…
>
> chersonandmolschky.com
> April 13, 2015
>
> http://chersonandmolschky.com/2015/04/13/islamic-terrorism-japan/

Forwarded post:

Michael Savage is covering this very topic today on his
radio show. Japan acts pro-actively to protect and
preserve what it has.

Posted by lee martell

End of forwarded post.

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj

[Dr. Jai Maharaj]

Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > ISLAMIC TERRORISM: WHY THERE IS NONE IN JAPAN
> >
> > With all this Muslim terrorism plaguing the world,
> > perhaps it is time to take a look at a country not
> > suffering the same fate and analyze exactly why that is…
> >
> > chersonandmolschky.com
> > April 13, 2015
> >
> > http://chersonandmolschky.com/2015/04/13/islamic-terrorism-japan/
>
> Forwarded post:
>
> Michael Savage is covering this very topic today on his
> radio show. Japan acts pro-actively to protect and
> preserve what it has.
>
> Posted by lee martell
>
> End of forwarded post.

Forwarded post:

View image here:

http://s916.photobucket.com/user/Coggeshall1955/media/000--Japan-Islam_zpsix6ti3kp.jpg.html

Posted by Patton@Bastogne

End of forwarded post.

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://bit.ly/1EM9nsg

[David Johnston]

On 12/10/2015 2:41 PM, Topaz wrote:
>
> Because it is false flag

So you think it if it was real, then the large Islamic population in
Japan would be doing it?

[Topaz]

http://tomatobubble.com

WHY DON'T 'SUICIDE TERRORISTS' EVER ATTACK POLITICIANS?
By Mike King

Imagine that you are the head of a vast international terrorist
network. At your disposal are hundreds of fanatics, including women,
who are willing to blow themselves up in suicide attacks. Just do a
Google Search of the term "suicide bomber" and see how many of these
attacks are alleged to have taken place over the past 30 years -- most
notably the 9/11 attacks, in which 19 young "terrorist hijackers" with
boxcutters allegedly gave up their lives for the cause, all at the
same time (rolling eyes, smirking).

With a never-ending supply of such unstoppable human weaponry at your
disposal, wouldn't you, as the head of "Al Qaeda" -- "Al Nusra" --
"ISIS" -- "ISIL" -- "Khorasan" -- "Boku Haram" -- or pick your
favorite "jihadist" bunch of bogeymen of the month -- want to take out
the western political big shots that you profess to hate so much?
Think about it; a suicide bomber or suicide shooter can get to
anybody. No Prime Minister, no President, no Senator, no Congressman,
no Parliamentarian, no King, no Pope, no Secretary of State or Foreign
Minister would be safe from a suicidal fanatic who cares not if he
gets killed or is captured on the spot. And yet: thankfully, this has
not happened. Why not?

Case in point: the assassination of U.S. President William McKinley by
a Red fanatic named Leon Czolgosz in 1901. That was a suicide attack
that no bodyguard could have stopped. We say "suicide" because surely,
Czolgosz must have known that he would be apprehended after shooting
McKinley from up close in a crowded setting. Czolgosz shot McKinley in
September. He fried in the Electric Chair in October.

The "suicide shooter" Czolgosz brought a mighty nation to mourning and
anger. But he was neither the first nor the last such Red agent to
shock the world. Czolgosz admitted that the inspiration for his crime
(referred to by Reds as "The Propaganda of the Deed") was another
suicide assassination that had taken just one year earlier -- the
murder of King Umberto I of Italy at the hands of Anarchist Gaetano
Bresci.

BRAINWASHED TOOLS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER GANG

1- Bresci: "I killed the King for the sake of the common man."

2- Czolgosz: "I killed the President because he was the enemy of the
good people - the good working people. I am not sorry for my crime."

Red suicide assassination attacks neither began nor ended with the
1900 & 1901 killings of Umberto and McKinley. Controlled "Nationalist"
fanatics also carried out suicide assassinations. If the following
limited list proves surprising to you, just imagine how much these
shocking events must have rattled the world, from high to low, during
the many decades where such suicidal attacks were routine.


Year: 1853
Target: Emperor Franz Joseph (Austria)

Year: 1866
Target: Czar Alexander II (Russia)

Year: 1874
Target: Chancellor Bismarck (Germany)

Year: May, 1878
Target: Kaiser Wilhelm (Germany)

Year: June, 1878
Target: Kaiser Wilhelm

Year: April, 1879
Target: Czar Alexander II (Russia)

Year: February, 1880
Target: Czar Alexander II

Year: 1881
Target: Czar Alexander II

Year: 1881
Target: President James Garfield (USA)

Year: 1894
Target: President Carnot (France)

Year: 1897
Target: Prime Minister Canovas (Spain)

Year: 1898
Target: Empress Elizabeth (Austria)

Year: 1900
Target: King Umberto (Italy)

Year: 1901
Target: President McKinley (USA)

Year: 1905
Target: Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich (Russia)

Year: 1906
Targets: King Alphonso & Wife Victoria Eugenia (Spain)

Year: 1908
Targets: King Carlos & Prince Felipe (Portugal)

Year: 1911
Target: Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin (Russia)

Year: 1912
Target: Prime Minister Jose Canalejas (Spain)

Year: 1914
Target: Duke Francis Ferdinand & Wife Sophie (Austria-Hungary)

Year: 1921
Target: Prime Minister Eduardo Dato (Spain)

Year: 1922
Target: President Alexandre Millerand (France)

Year: 1933
Target: Mayor Anton Cermak (Chicago)

Year: 1935
Target: Senator Huey Long (Louisiana)

Year: 1936
Target: Swiss NSDAP Leader Wilhelm Gustloff

Year: 1938
Target: Paris-based German Diplomat Ernst vom Rath


As you might imagine, this wave of self-sacrificing suicide killings
and near-killings rocked the foundations of Europe (and even America)
to their core. There were also many lesser known personages who were
killed or wounded in such brazen suicide attacks. No one, no matter
how big or how well-protected, was immune to death at the hands of a
controlled suicidal Red or controlled suicidal "Nationalist". These
murderous psychos, unwittingly acting on behalf of their unseen NWO
superiors, literally changed the course of world history. It's all
spelled out in 'PLANET ROTHSCHILD'.

Isn't it strange that the controllers of the suicidal Muslim
bogeyman-of-the-year groups have yet to figure out that they can
easily take out as many western leaders as they want to?

Think about it! Presidents, Parliamentarians and Prime Ministers
appear before large crowds on a regular basis -- often shaking hands
and kissing babies as their bodyguards stand by. No matter how
vigilant, these guards would be very hard-pressed to stop a demented
and determined suicide shooter, as the near-assassination of President
Reagan in 1981 demonstrated.


John Hinckley came within an inch of killing a heavily guarded U.S.
President ---but suicidal "Islamic Terrorists" are too stupid to
figure out this vulnerability???


* Just 6 years earlier (1975), President Gerald Ford survived two
self-sacrificing assassination attempts, just 3 weeks apart, and both
carried out in broad daylight. In each case, a female shooter was
arrested on the spot.

With the nanotechnology of today's explosives, one would think that
one of these hundreds of "suicide bombers" would have been enlisted to
chuck a Golf Ball bomb at some western big-shot, or even a
not-so-big-shot by now. Or bum-rushed a politician while detonating a
'suicide belt' -- or fired a rifle at one from close range. But they
haven't even attempted! Why is that? -- Answer: Because, unlike
suicidal true-believing Red terrorists of the past; "Suicidal Muslim
Terrorists" do not exist!

The manufactured monster of "Islamic Terror" is the stuff of complete
fables -- a useful Orwellian tool to achieve various geo-strategic and
domestic ends. "Islamic Terror" consists solely of clandestine
Intelligence operatives (dressed in laughable Ninja pajamas and orange
jumpsuits) and well paid mercenaries controlled by the very same
shadow government whose wholly-owned politicians are safe from
"suicide assassins" who only kill ordinary people. And, of course, the
CIA-Mossad news-media is 100% "in on it" as well.

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:k8v37bdltcetvn06e...@4ax.com:

> WHY DON'T 'SUICIDE TERRORISTS' EVER ATTACK POLITICIANS?

I guess you inferior Aryan chaps missed the attempt on the President's life
in Paris?

You really ARE inferior, Alex.

--
Obama Nine Hours Before Paris Terror Attack: "We've Contained ISIS." ISIS:
"We've contained Obama."

"Never underestimate the willingness of white progressives to be offended
on behalf of people who aren’t and to impose their will on those who didn’t
ask for it." (Derek Hunter)

"We are a people who won’t be played for fools by a president in the grip
of dangerous denial about the identity of the enemy and its dramatic
successes. We are a people who remember an important lesson from World War
II: believe tyrants who tell us who they are and what they plan to do.
Above all, we are a people who refuse to be guilt-tripped into national
suicide"--Joy Overbeck