On Dec 17, 5:13 pm, DMJoshi <
josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 16, 11:40 am, Arindam Banerjee <
adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 16, 6:30 pm, DMJoshi <
josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 15, 9:25 pm, Arindam Banerjee <
adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 16, 12:15 am, DMJoshi <
josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 15, 11:23 am, Arindam Banerjee <
adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Dec 15, 8:02 pm, DMJoshi <
josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 15, 7:25 am, Arindam Banerjee <
adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 6:00 pm, DMJoshi <
josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 6:51 am, Arindam Banerjee <
adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > By binning Einstein and banning Gandhi, we regain sanity and
> > > > > > > > > > prosperity.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Arindam Banerjee
>
> > > > > > > > > Giving up Indian Citizenship
>
> > > > > > > > I have got OCI visa which is not bad as a second class Indian
> > > > > > > > citizenship. Australian citizenship is useful for travel, voting
> > > > > > > > here, etc.
>
> > > > > > > > > and claiming to have become gentleman of
> > > > > > > > > Fortune does not seem to have sanity for you.
>
> > > > > > > > It is sane to not have to follow a mediocre foreign woman as the
> > > > > > > > supreme leader; and not to worship a treacherous freak (the great-
> > > > > > > > unca) as the Father of the Nation. It is very sane to give one's
> > > > > > > > children better opportunities. It is supremely sane to find out
> > > > > > > > exactly what is wrong with India and the world and express it
> > > > > > > > poetically as
>
> > > > > > > > bin Einstein ban Gandhi
>
> > > > > > > > Note1: bin means trash, throw out as rubbish, discard etc
> > > > > > > > Note2: ban means ban, outlaw, kick out, abolish, etc.
>
> > > > > > > > > As for prosperity it has
> > > > > > > > > not been enough to carry out experiment you demanding other carry out
> > > > > > > > > to prove your theories of Arindam Physics.
>
> > > > > > > > Not yet, but my prosperity has been enough to make me do other more
> > > > > > > > important things at the personal level. Like raising my family,
>
> > > > > > > Your forefathers did raise their families without leaving India.
>
> > > > > > Yes. But in their days India was not run by quotawallahs.
>
> > > > > Is Mamta Banerjee a Quotq-Wallah?
>
> > > > No. But she has come to power only recently. Had honest and brave
> > > > people been in power in India when I was there, then there would be no
> > > > need for us to emigrate.
>
> > > When you had the privileged of spending your childhood years in
> > > Commune life was the country ruled by Honest people like Mamta
> > > Banerjee? Your father I believed was in Central Government service or
> > > loaned by the State to Centre.
>
> > I am not responsible for being in whatever places I inhabited in my
> > childhood.
>
> You resent your priviledge?
What privilege?
> > Talking of honesty, though, the first lines of Hindi that
> > I learnt and still remember, back in 1963 were:
> > gali gali mein shore hai
> > congress party chor hai
>
> > (in every lane there is this cry:
> > the congress party is a thief)
>
> 11 years before JP got active and 14 years before any opposition
> party came to rule India and few states in the North including the
> State with most honest Indians namely WB.
I was in Bihar.
> > My father was never in Central Govt. service.
>
> IPS is a Central Government Service is it not?
Yes.
Wasn't HEC a Government
> of India Enterprise.
Yes, it was a Public Sector Undertaking.
I believe it was there that you lived in a
> "Communist Commune".
Yes, where my father was the executive manager and caretaker. He left
his safe and steady job as a police Serjeant in the West Bengal police
so that I could get a good education in St. Xavier's School, Doranda,
Ranchi. Also, he did not like his police job. I too emigrated to
Australia under similar conditions, for similar reasons.
> > > > > Neither is Narendra Modi.
>
> > > > But the Union Govt is pure quotawallah-run, as are most states.
>
> > > I suppose it is first time you have said what you mean by
> > > "quotawallah" for you they are Politicians and not those get their
> > > jobs, rntrances to IIT, promotions because the quota is set by
> > > Ambedkar and subsequent State and Centre committes, that is SC/ST, BC,
> > > OBC, etc
>
> > Whatever. Whoever has something to do with quota, is a quotawallah.
> > Like, whoever has something to do with potatoes (aloos) is an
> > aloowallah or more musically aluwaliah. Similarly with
> > jhoonjhoonwala, etc.
>
> So MamtaBanrjee is quotawallah as she has lot to do with SC/ST, BC,
> OBC, Gorkha, Quota issues of WB.
She is a quotawaali, like our Ms Julia Gillard, the Hon. PM of
Australia.
> > > I suppose you believe Mamta Banerjee, Mayawati, Narendra Modi are not
> > > politicians.
>
> > There is less quota nonsense in WB than in most other states, thank
> > goodness.
>
> > > Is Australia governed by non-politicians?
>
> > Here there are quotas too, for Aboriginal and Torres Straits
> > Islanders, etc. Certain groups get pensions and allowances, such as
> > unemployed, disabled, elderly, war verterans, indigenous peoples,
> > single mothers, retired politicians and bureaucrats, etc. These are
> > the groups that need the politicians.
>
> > Since I don't get and thus don't depend upon such funds, I don't need
> > to know nor care about whoever runs Australia. As far as I am
> > concerned, all quotawallahs can be replaced by a marvellous computer
> > resource allocation algorithm, which would be much safer, cheaper and
> > efficient than the current corrupt and evil political processes
> > involving the quotawallahs. That would be superpolitics, a very
> > superior form of direct democracy. I have talked about that recently
> > in Usenet.
>
> > > > > Mayawati was no where when you trashed your country for the country
> > > > > ruled by the progeny of Criminal Whites.
>
> > > > I did not and do not trash any country. I trash the maddening/
> > > > impoverishing BigJew-GujJew combo pack of Einstein and Gandhi, as
> > > > Mahabungler and Mahabundurr respectively.
> > > > Australia is a very great country, with huge potential. I am very
> > > > glad to be here. I will be very glad to tour India for 11 weeks,
> > > > starting next week. Nice to do that with sufficient dollars in
> > > > plastic cards, and the terrific exchange rate certainly helps!
>
> > > > > BTW the one who used (using) to trash Gandhi, it was he who created
> > > > > Quota-Wallah in India.
>
> > > > All politicians are quotawallahs, as they deal with quotas or
> > > > allocations. As such it is not a negative term. But when quotas are
> > > > unfairly used for political gains, when other priorities and issues
> > > > are crushed simply for quota rivalry, then the term becomes
> > > > pejorative.
>
> > > Anyone on Usenet using quota, allocations unfairly for political gains
> > > by crushing other priorities and issues for quota rivalry?
>
> > The newbie kmqw, the cttc se comes to mind.
>
> Whoever "newbie kmqw, the cttc se" how do they use what quota,
> allocations unfairly for political gains by crushing other priorities
> and issues for quota rivalry ?
Jai Maharaj indicates how, in almost every post these days. Bullying,
basically. Lying, threatening, demeaning, making unprovoked attacks,
whining when countered, etc.
> >There used to be many
> > more like that prick, but they have long bitten the usenet dust.
>
> Arindam being the one still standing?
Evidently. The anti-Arindam forces have scurried off to facebook,
twitter, etc. if they are not supporting me, as Jai now is.
And yet nobody nominates him for
> Nobel Prize.
Life offers other far more valuable prizes.
Cheers,
Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all
time, sole god among lotsa devils
c(v=V)=c(mu,ep)+V
e=0.5mVVN(N-k)