Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Who says there are no black inventors?

40 views
Skip to first unread message

sawa

unread,
Mar 1, 2007, 5:52:02 AM3/1/07
to

LEROY KNEVIL

unread,
Mar 1, 2007, 9:31:28 AM3/1/07
to
HOG WASH NIGGER

sawa wrote:
>
> Challenge this,
>
> http://www.blackinventor.com/
>

OGExtremeOne

unread,
Mar 1, 2007, 9:32:07 AM3/1/07
to
we invented the termite stick

sawa wrote:
>
> Challenge this,
>
> http://www.blackinventor.com/
>

--
The HNIC is A BLACK BITCH!!

Louis Farakoon (www.niggermania.org)

unread,
Mar 1, 2007, 12:24:56 PM3/1/07
to
On Mar 1, 6:31 am, LEROY KNEVIL <l...@klavern.net> wrote:
> HOG WASH NIGGER


Exactly TRUE Leroy. Here is ABSOLUTE PROOF that nigger inventions is a
bunch of NIGGERBABBLE

http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

Louis Farakoon, Moderartor
www.niggermania.org

LEROY KNEVIL

unread,
Mar 1, 2007, 5:40:10 PM3/1/07
to
are we the only ones that see how dumb niggers really are?

Topaz

unread,
Mar 1, 2007, 9:24:15 PM3/1/07
to
"Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy
of African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world
without traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb
filaments, and a vast number of other things we now take for granted
but could hardly imagine life without.
Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black
history. Since many of the authors have little interest in the
history of technology outside of advertising black contributions to
it, their stories tend to be fraught with misunderstandings, wishful
thinking, or fanciful embellishments with no historical basis. The
lack of historical perspective leads to extravagant overestimations of
originality and importance: sometimes a slightly modified version of a
pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken for the first invention
of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with little or no
lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's no real
evidence it was ever used.
Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an
illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets,
especially during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic
light and ironing board). When myths go unchallenged for too long,
they begin to eclipse the truth. Thus I decided to put some records
straight. Although this page does not cover every dubious invention
claim floating around out there, it should at least serve as a warning
never to take any such claim for granted. Each item below is listed
with its supposed black originator beneath it along with the year it
was supposedly invented, followed by something about the real origin
of the invention or at least an earlier instance of it.
Traffic Signal
Invented by Garrett A. Morgan in 1923? No!

The first known traffic signal appeared in London in 1868 near the
Houses of Parliament. Designed by JP Knight, it featured two semaphore
arms and two gas lamps. The earliest electric traffic lights include
Lester Wire's two-color version set up in Salt Lake City circa 1912,
James Hoge's system (US patent #1,251,666) installed in Cleveland by
the American Traffic Signal Company in 1914, and William Potts' 4-way
red-yellow-green lights introduced in Detroit beginning in 1920. New
York City traffic towers began flashing three-color signals also in
1920.
Garrett Morgan's cross-shaped, crank-operated semaphore was not among
the first half-hundred patented traffic signals, nor was it
"automatic" as is sometimes claimed, nor did it play any part in the
evolution of the modern traffic light. For details see Inventing
History: Garrett Morgan and the Traffic Signal.
Gas Mask
Garrett Morgan in 1914? No!

The invention of the gas mask predates Morgan's breathing device by
several decades. Early versions were constructed by the Scottish
chemist John Stenhouse in 1854 and the physicist John Tyndall in the
1870s, among many other inventors prior to World War I. See The
Invention of the Gas Mask.
Peanut Butter
George Washington Carver (who began his peanut research in 1903)? No!
Peanuts, which are native to the New World tropics, were mashed into
paste by Aztecs hundreds of years ago. Evidence of modern peanut
butter comes from US patent #306727 issued to Marcellus Gilmore Edson
of Montreal, Quebec in 1884, for a process of milling roasted peanuts
between heated surfaces until the peanuts reached "a fluid or
semi-fluid state." As the product cooled, it set into what Edson
described as "a consistency like that of butter, lard, or ointment."
In 1890, George A. Bayle Jr., owner of a food business in St. Louis,
manufactured peanut butter and sold it out of barrels. J.H. Kellogg,
of cereal fame, secured US patent #580787 in 1897 for his "Process of
Preparing Nutmeal," which produced a "pasty adhesive substance" that
Kellogg called "nut-butter."
George Washington Carver
"Discovered" hundreds of new and important uses for the peanut?
Fathered the peanut industry? Revolutionized southern US agriculture?
No!
Research by Barry Mackintosh, who served as bureau historian for the
National Park Service (which manages the G.W. Carver National
Monument), demonstrated the following:
a.. Most of Carver's peanut and sweet potato creations were either
unoriginal, impractical, or of uncertain effectiveness. No product
born in his laboratory was widely adopted.
b.. The boom years for Southern peanut production came prior to, and
not as a result of, Carver's promotion of the crop.
c.. Carver's work to improve regional farming practices was not of
pioneering scientific importance and had little demonstrable impact.
To see how Carver gained "a popular reputation far transcending the
significance of his accomplishments," read Mackintosh's excellent
article George Washington Carver: The Making of a Myth.
Automatic Lubricator, "Real McCoy"
Elijah McCoy revolutionized industry in 1872 by inventing the first
device to automatically oil machinery? No! The phrase "Real McCoy"
arose to distinguish Elijah's inventions from cheap imitations? No!
The oil cup, which automatically delivers a steady trickle of
lubricant to machine parts while the machine is running, predates
McCoy's career; a description of one appears in the May 6, 1848 issue
of Scientific American. The automatic "displacement lubricator" for
steam engines was developed in 1860 by John Ramsbottom of England, and
notably improved in 1862 by James Roscoe of the same country. The
"hydrostatic" lubricator originated no later than 1871.
Variants of the phrase Real McCoy appear in Scottish literature dating
back to at least 1856 - well before Elijah McCoy could have been
involved.
Detailed evidence: The not-so-real McCoy
Also see The Fake McCoy and Did Somebody Say McTrash?
Blood Bank
Dr. Charles Drew in 1940? No!

During World War I, Dr. Oswald H. Robertson of the US army preserved
blood in a citrate-glucose solution and stored it in cooled containers
for later transfusion. This was the first use of "banked" blood. By
the mid-1930s the Russians had set up a national network of facilities
for the collection, typing, and storage of blood. Bernard Fantus,
influenced by the Russian program, established the first hospital
blood bank in the United States at Chicago's Cook County Hospital in
1937. It was Fantus who coined the term "blood bank." See highlights
of transfusion history from the American Association of Blood Banks.
Blood Plasma
Did Charles Drew "discover" (in about 1940) that plasma could be
separated and stored apart from the rest of the blood, thereby
revolutionizing transfusion medicine? No!
The possibility of using blood plasma for transfusion purposes was
known at least since 1918, when English physician Gordon R. Ward
suggested it in a medical journal. In the mid-1930s, John Elliott
advanced the idea, emphasizing plasma's advantages in shelf life and
donor-recipient compatibility, and in 1939 he and two colleagues
reported having used stored plasma in 191 transfusions. (See
historical notes on plasma use.) Charles Drew was not responsible for
any breakthrough scientific or medical discovery; his main career
achievement lay in supervising or co-supervising major programs for
the collection and shipment of blood and plasma.
More: Charles Drew Mythology
Washington DC city plan
Benjamin Banneker? No!

Pierre-Charles L'Enfant created the layout of Washington DC. Banneker
assisted Andrew Ellicott in the survey of the federal territory, but
played no direct role in the actual planning of the city. The story of
Banneker reconstructing the city design from memory after L'Enfant ran
away with the plans (with the implication that the project would have
failed if not for Banneker) has been debunked by historians.
Filament for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer invented the carbon filament in 1881 or 1882? No!
English chemist/physicist Joseph Swan experimented with a
carbon-filament incandescent light all the way back in 1860, and by
1878 had developed a better design which he patented in Britain. On
the other side of the Atlantic, Thomas Edison developed a successful
carbon-filament bulb, receiving a patent for it (#223898) in January
1880, before Lewis Latimer did any work in electric lighting. From
1880 onward, countless patents were issued for innovations in filament
design and manufacture (Edison had over 50 of them). Neither of
Latimer's two filament-related patents in 1881 and 1882 were among the
most important innovations, nor did they make the light bulb last
longer, nor is there reason to believe they were adopted outside Hiram
Maxim's company where Latimer worked at the time. (He was not hired by
Edison's company until 1884, primarily as a draftsman and an expert
witness in patent litigations).
Latimer also did not come up with the first screw socket for the light
bulb or the first book on electric lighting.
Heart Surgery (first successful)
Dr. Daniel Hale Williams in 1893? No!

Dr. Williams repaired a wound not in the heart muscle itself, but in
the sac surrounding it, the pericardium. This operation was not the
first of its type: Henry Dalton of St. Louis performed a nearly
identical operation two years earlier, with the patient fully
recovering. Decades before that, the Spaniard Francisco Romero carried
out the first successful pericardial surgery of any type, incising the
pericardium to drain fluid compressing the heart.
Surgery on the actual human heart muscle, and not just the
pericardium, was first successfully accomplished by Ludwig Rehn of
Germany when he repaired a wounded right ventricle in 1896. More than
50 years later came surgery on the open heart, pioneered by John
Lewis, C. Walton Lillehei (often called the "father of open heart
surgery") and John Gibbon (who invented the heart-lung machine).
What medical historians say...
"Third Rail"
Granville Woods in 1901? No!

Werner von Siemens pioneered the use of an electrified third rail as a
means for powering railway vehicles when he demonstrated an
experimental electric train at the 1879 Berlin Industrial Exhibition.
In the US, English-born Leo Daft used a third-rail system to electrify
the Baltimore & Hampden lines in 1885. The first electrically powered
subway trains, which debuted in London in the autumn of 1890, likewise
drew power from a third rail. Details...
Railway Telegraph
Granville Woods prevented railway accidents and saved countless lives
by inventing the train telegraph (patented in 1887), which allowed
communication to and from moving trains? No!
The earliest patents for train telegraphs go back to at least 1873.
Lucius
Phelps was the first inventor in the field to attract widespread
notice, and
the telegrams he exchanged on the New York, New Haven & Hartford
railroad in
January 1885 were hailed in the Feb. 21, 1885 issue of Scientific
American
as "perhaps the first ever sent to and from a moving train." Phelps
remained
at the forefront in developing the technology and by the end of 1887
already
held 14 US patents on his system. He joined a team led by Thomas
Edison, who
had been working on his "grasshopper telegraph" for trains, and
together
they constructed on the Lehigh Valley Railroad one of the only
induction
telegraph systems ever put to commercial use. Although this telegraph
was a
technical success, it fulfilled no public need, and the market for
on-board
train telegraphy never took off. There is no evidence that any
commercial
railway telegraph based on Granville Woods's patents was ever built.
About
the patent interference case
Refrigerated Truck
Frederick Jones (with Joseph Numero) in 1938? No! Did Jones change
America's eating habits by making possible the long-distance shipment
of perishable foods? No!
Refrigerated ships and railcars had been moving perishables across
oceans and continents even before Jones was born (see refrigerated
transport timeline). Trucks with mechanically refrigerated cargo
spaces appeared on the roads at least as early as the late 1920s (see
the proof). Further development of truck refrigeration was more a
process of gradual evolution than radical change.
Air Brake / Automatic Air Brake
Granville Woods in 1904? No!

In 1869, a 22-year-old George Westinghouse received US patent #88929
for a brake device operated by compressed air, and in the same year
organized the Westinghouse Air Brake Company. Many of the 361 patents
he accumulated during his career were for air brake variations and
improvements, including his first "automatic" version in 1872 (US
#124404).
Air Conditioner
Frederick Jones in 1949? No!

Dr. Willis Carrier built the first machine to control both the
temperature and humidity of indoor air. He received the first of many
patents in 1906 (US patent #808897, for the "Apparatus for Treating
Air"). In 1911 he published the formulae that became the scientific
basis for air conditioning design, and four years later formed the
Carrier Engineering Corporation to develop and manufacture AC systems.
Airship
J.F. Pickering in 1900? No!
French engineer Henri Giffard successfully flew a powered navigable
airship in 1852. The La France airship built by Charles Renard and
Arthur Krebs in 1884 featured an electric motor and improved steering
capabilities. In 1900 Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin's first
rigid-framed dirigible took to the air. Of the hundreds of inventors
granted patents for early airship designs and modifications, few
succeeded in building or flying their craft. There doesn't appear to
be any record of a "Pickering Airship" ever getting off the ground.
US Aviation Patent Database, 1799-1909
Automatic Railroad Car Coupler
Andrew Beard invented the "Jenny [sic] coupler" in 1897? No!
The Janney coupler is named for US Civil War veteran Eli H. Janney,
who in 1873 invented a device (US patent #138405) which automatically
linked together two railroad cars upon their being brought into
contact. Also known as the "knuckle coupler," Janney's invention
superseded the dangerous link-and-pin coupler and became the basis for
standard coupler design through the remainder of the millennium.
Andrew Beard's modified knuckle coupler was just one of approximately
eight thousand coupler variations patented by 1900. See a history of
the automatic coupler and also The Janney Coupler.
Automatic Transmission/Gearshift
Richard Spikes in 1932? No!

The first automatic-transmission automobile to enter the market was
designed by the Sturtevant brothers of Massachusetts in 1904. US
Patent #766551 was the first of several patents on their gearshift
mechanism. Automatic transmission technology continued to develop,
spawning hundreds of patents and numerous experimental units; but
because of cost, reliability issues and an initial lack of demand,
several decades passed before vehicles with automatic transmission
became common on the roads.
Bicycle Frame
Isaac R. Johnson in 1899? No!

Comte Mede de Sivrac and Karl von Sauerbronn built primitive versions
of the bicycle in 1791 and 1816 respectively. The frame of John
Starley's 1885 "safety bicycle" resembled that of a modern bicycle.
Cellular Phone
Henry T. Sampson in 1971? No!

On July 6, 1971, Sampson and co-inventor George Miley received a
patent on a "gamma electric cell" that converted a gamma ray input
into an electrical output (Among the first to do that was Bernhard
Gross, US patent #3122640, 1964). What, you ask, does gamma radiation
have to do with cellular communications technology? The answer:
nothing. Some multiculturalist pseudo-historian must have seen the
words "electric" and "cell" and thought "cell phone."
The father of the cell phone is Martin Cooper who first demonstrated
the technology in 1973.
Clock or Watch (First in America)
Benjamin Banneker built the first American timepiece in 1753? No!
Abel Cottey, a Quaker clockmaker from Philadelphia, built a clock that
is dated 1709 (source: Six Quaker Clockmakers, by Edward C. Chandlee;
Philadelphia, The Historical Society of Pennsylvania, 1943). Banneker
biographer Silvio Bedini further refutes the myth:
Several watch and clockmakers were already established in the colony
[Maryland] prior to the time that Banneker made the clock. In
Annapolis alone there were at least four such craftsmen prior to 1750.
Among these may be mentioned John Batterson, a watchmaker who moved to
Annapolis in 1723;
James Newberry, a watch and clockmaker who advertised in the Maryland
Gazette on July 20, 1748; John Powell, a watch and clockmaker believed
to have been indentured and to have been working in 1745; and Powell's
master, William Roberts.
Silvio Bedini, The Life of Benjamin Banneker (Baltimore: Maryland
Historical Society, 1999)
Clothes Dryer
George T. Sampson in 1892? No!

The "clothes-drier" described in Sampson's patent was actually a rack
for holding clothes near a stove, and was intended as an "improvement"
on similar contraptions:
My invention relates to improvements in clothes-driers.... The object
of my invention is to suspend clothing in close relation to a stove by
means of frames so constructed that they can be readily placed in
proper position and put aside when not required for use.
US patent #476416, 1892
Nineteen years earlier, there were already over 300 US patents for
such "clothes-driers" (Subject-Matter Index of Patents...1790 to
1873).
A Frenchman named Pochon in 1799 built the first known tumble dryer -
a crank-driven, rotating metal drum pierced with ventilation holes and
held over heat. Electric tumble dryers appeared in the first half of
the 20th century.
Dustpan
Lloyd P. Ray in 1897? No!

While the ultimate origin of the dustpan is lost in the mists (dusts?)
of time, at least we know that US patent #20811 for "Dust-pan" was
granted to T.E. McNeill in 1858. That was the first of about 164 US
dustpan patents predating Lloyd Ray's. See the dustpan patent list.
Egg Beater
Willie Johnson in 1884? No!

The hand-cranked egg beater with two intermeshed, counter-rotating
whisks was invented by Turner Williams of Providence, Rhode Island in
1870 (US Patent #103811). It was an improvement on earlier rotary egg
beaters that had only one whisk.
Electric Trolley
Did Granville Woods invent the electric trolley car, the overhead wire
that powers it, or the "troller" wheel that makes contact with the
trolley wire, in 1888? No!
Dr. Werner von Siemens demonstrated his electric trolleybus, the
Elektromote, near Berlin on April 29, 1882. The vehicle's two electric
motors collected power through contact wheels rolling atop a pair of
overhead wires. The earliest patentee of an electric trolley in the
United States appears to be Eugene Cowles (#252193 in 1881), followed
by Dr. Joseph R. Finney (#268476 in 1882) who operated an experimental
trolley car near Pittsburgh, PA in the summer of 1882. In early 1885,
John C. Henry established in Kansas City, MO, the first overhead-wire
electric transit system to enter regular service in the United States.
Belgian-born Charles van Depoele, who earned 240+ patents in electric
railway technology and other fields, set up trolley lines in several
North American cities by 1887. In February 1888, a trolley system
designed by Frank Sprague began operating in Richmond, Virginia.
Sprague's system became the lasting prototype for electric street
railways in the US.
Elevator
Alexander Miles in 1887? No!
Was Miles the first to patent a self-closing shaft door? No!

Steam-powered hoisting devices were used in England by 1800. Elisha
Graves Otis' 1853 "safety elevator" prevented the car from falling if
the cable broke, and thus paved the way for the first commercial
passenger elevator, installed in New York City's Haughwout Department
Store in 1857. The first electric elevator appeared in Mannheim,
Germany in 1880, built by the German firm of Siemens and Halske. A
self-closing shaft door was invented by J.W. Meaker in 1874
("Improvement in Self-closing Hatchways," US Patent No.
147,853). See Elevator Timeline
Fastest Computer/Computation
Was Philip Emeagwali responsible for the world's fastest computer or
computation in 1989? Did he win the "Nobel Prize of computing"? Is he
a "father of the Internet"? No!
The fastest performance of a computer application in 1989 was 6
billion floating point operations per second (6 Gflops), achieved by a
team from Mobil and Thinking Machines Corp. on a 64,000-processor
"Connection Machine" invented by Danny Hillis. That was almost double
the 3.1 Gflops of Emeagwali's computation. Computing's Nobel Prize
equivalent is the Turing Award, which Emeagwali has never won. More...
Fire Escape
Joseph Winters in 1878? No!

Winters' "fire escape" was a wagon-mounted ladder. The first such
contraption patented in the US was the work of William P. Withey, 1840
(US patent #1599). The fire escape with a "lazy-tongs" type ladder,
more similar to Winters' patent, was pioneered by Hüttman and Kornelio
in 1849 (US patent #6155). One of the first fire escapes of any type
was invented in 18th-century England:
In 1784, Daniel Maseres, of England, invented a machine called a fire
escape, which, being fastened to the window, would enable anyone to
descend to the street without injury.
Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art, 1888
By 1888 the US had granted 1,099 patents on fire escapes of "many
forms, and of every possible material" (Butterworth).
Fire Extinguisher
Thomas J. Martin in 1872? No!

In 1813, British army captain George Manby created the first known
portable fire extinguisher: a two-foot-tall copper cylinder that held
3 gallons of water and used compressed air as a propellant. One of the
earliest extinguishers to use a chemical extinguishing agent, and not
just water, was invented in 1849 by the Englishman William Henry
Phillips, who patented his "fire annihilator" in England and the
United States (US patent #7,269).
Food Additives, Meat Curing
Lloyd Hall "is responsible for the meat curing products, seasonings,
emulsions, bakery products, antioxidants, protein hydrolysates, and
many other products that keep our food fresh and flavorable"? No! Hall
"revolutionized the meatpacking industry"? No!
Hall introduced no major class of additive, certainly not meat curing
salts (which are ancient), protein hydrolysates (popularized by Julius
Maggi as flavor enhancers in 1886), emulsifiers and antioxidants
(lecithin, for example, was used in both roles before Lloyd Hall had
any patents in food processing). The so-called revolutionary meat
curing product marketed by Hall's employer was invented primarily by
Karl Max Seifert?; the number of Seifert's patent was printed right on
the containers. Hall's main contribution to this product was to reduce
its tendency to cake during storage. Details: Lloyd Hall myth.
Fountain Pen
W.B. Purvis in 1890? No!

The first reference to what seems to be a fountain pen appears in an
Arabic text from 969 AD; details of the instrument are not known. A
French
"Bion" pen, dated 1702, represents the oldest fountain pen that still
survives. Later models included John Scheffer's 1819 pen, possibly the
first
to be mass-produced; John Jacob Parker's "self-filling" pen of 1832;
and the
famous Lewis Waterman pen of 1884 (US Patents #293545, #307735). Early
History of the Fountain Pen
Golf Tee
Dr. George Grant in 1899? No!

A small rubber platform invented by Scotsmen William Bloxsom and
Arthur Douglas was the world's first patented golf tee (British patent
#12941 of 1889). The first known tee to penetrate the ground, rather
than rest on the surface, was the peg-like "Perfectum" patented in
1892 by Percy Ellis of England. American dentist William Lowell
introduced the most common form of tee used today, the simple wooden
peg with a flared top. Details...
Hairbrush
Lyda Newman in 1898? No!

An early US patent for a recognizably modern hairbrush went to Hugh
Rock in 1854 (US Design Patent no. D645), though surely there were
hairbrushes long before there was a US Patent Office.
The claim that Lyda Newman's brush was the first with "synthetic
bristles" is false: her patent mentions nothing about synthetic
bristles and is concerned only with a new way of making the handle
detachable from the head. Besides, a hairbrush that included "elastic
wire teeth" in combination with natural bristles had already been
patented by Samuel Firey in 1870 (US, #106680). Nylon bristles weren't
possible until the invention of nylon in 1935.
Halogen Lamp
Frederick Mosby? No

The original patent for the tungsten halogen lamp (US #2,883,571;
April 21, 1959) is recorded to Elmer G. Fridrich and Emmett H. Wiley
of General Electric. The two had built a working prototype as early as
1953. Fred Mosby was part of the GE team charged with developing the
prototype lamp into a marketable product, but was not responsible for
the original halogen lamp or the concept behind it.
Hand Stamp
William Purvis in 1883? No!

The earliest known postal handstamp was brought into use by Henry
Bishop,
Postmaster General of Great Britain, in the year 1661. The stamp
imprinted
the mail with a bisected circle containing the month and the date. See
"Bishop marks"
Heating Furnace
Alice Parker in 1919? No!

In the hypocaust heating systems built by the ancient Romans, hot air
from a furnace circulated under the floor and up through channels
inside the walls, thereby distributing heat evenly around the
building. One of the most famous heating systems in recent centuries
was the iron furnace stove known as the "Franklin stove," named after
its purported originator Benjamin Franklin around 1745 AD. The US had
issued over 4000 patents for heating stoves and furnaces by 1888
(Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art, 1888).
Horseshoe
Oscar E. Brown in 1892? No!

Some sources on the web, if not ignorant enough to say Brown invented
the first horseshoe ever, will at least try to credit him for the
first double or compound horseshoe made of two layers: one permanently
secured to the hoof, and one auxiliary layer that can be removed and
replaced when it wears out. However, in the US there were already 39
earlier patents for horseshoes using that same concept. The first of
these was issued to J.B. Kendall of Boston in 1861, patent #33709.
Ice Cream
Augustus Jackson in 1832? No!

Flavored ices resembling sherbet were known in China in ancient times.
In
Europe, sherbet-like concoctions evolved into ice cream by the 16th
century,
and around 1670 or so, the Café Procope in Paris offered creamy frozen
dairy
desserts to the public. The first written record of ice cream in the
New
World comes from a letter dated 1700, attesting that Maryland Governor
William Bladen served the treat to his guests. In 1777, the New York
Gazette
advertised the sale of ice cream by confectioner Philip Lenzi. History
of
Ice Cream
Ironing Board
Sarah Boone in 1892? No!

Of the several hundred US patents on ironing boards granted prior to
Sarah Boone's, the first three went to William Vandenburg in 1858
(patents #19390, #19883, #20231). The first American female patentee
of an ironing board is probably Sarah Mort of Dayton, Ohio, who
received patent #57170 in 1866. In 1869, Henry Soggs of Columbus,
Pennsylvania earned US patent #90966 for an ironing board resembling
the modern type, with folding legs, adjustable height, and a cover.
Another nice example of a modern-looking board was designed by J.H.
Mallory in 1871, patent #120296. Details...
Laser Cataract Surgery
Patricia Bath "transformed eye surgery" by inventing the first laser
device to treat cataracts in 1986? No!
Use of lasers to treat cataracts in the eye began to develop in the
mid 1970s. M.M. Krasnov of Russia reported the first such procedure in
1975. One of the earliest US patents for laser cataract removal
(#3,982,541) was issued to Francis L'Esperance in 1976. In later
years, a number of experimenters worked independently on laser devices
for removing cataracts, including Daniel Eichenbaum, whose work became
the basis of the Paradigm PhotonT device; and Jack Dodick, whose
Dodick Laser PhotoLysis System eventually became the first laser unit
to win FDA approval for cataract removal in the United States. Still,
the majority of cataract surgeries continue to be performed using
ultrasound devices, not lasers. Details...
Lawn Mower
John Burr in 1899? No!

English engineer Edwin Budding invented the first reel-type lawn mower
(with blades arranged in a cylindrical pattern) and had it patented in
England in 1830. In 1868 the United States issued patent #73807 to
Amariah M. Hills of Connecticut, who went on to establish the
Archimedean Lawn Mower Co. in 1871. By 1888, the US Patent Office had
granted 138 patents for lawn mowers (Butterworth, Growth of Industrial
Art). Doubtlessly there were even more by the time Burr got his patent
in 1899.
Some website authors want Burr to have invented the first "rotary
blade" mower, with a centrally mounted spinning blade. But his patent
#624749 shows yet another twist on the old reel mower, differing in
only a few details with Budding's original.
Lawn Sprinkler
J. H. Smith in 1897? Elijah McCoy? No!

The first US patent with the title "lawn sprinkler" was issued to J.
Lessler of Buffalo, New York in 1871 (#121949). Early examples of
water-propelled, rotating lawn sprinklers were patented by J. Oswald
in 1890 (#425340) and J. S. Woolsey in 1891 (#457099) among a
gazillion others.
Smith's patent shows just another rotating sprinkler, and McCoy's 1899
patent was for a turtle-shaped sprinkler.
Mailbox (letter drop box)
P. Downing invented the street letter drop box in 1891? No!
George Becket invented the private mailbox in 1892? No!
The US Postal Service says that "Street boxes for mail collection
began to appear in large [US] cities by 1858." They appeared in Europe
even earlier, according to historian Laurin Zilliacus:
Mail boxes as we understand them first appeared on the streets of
Belgian towns in 1848. In Paris they came two years later, while the
English received their 'pillar boxes' in 1855.
Laurin Zilliacus, Mail for the World, p. 178 (New York, J. Day Co.,
1953)
From the same book (p.178), "Private mail boxes were invented in the
United States in about 1860."
Eventually, letter drop boxes came equipped with inner lids to prevent
miscreants from rummaging through the mail pile. The first of many US
patents for such a purpose was granted in 1860 to John North of
Middletown, Connecticut (US Pat. #27466).
Mop
Thomas W. Stewart in 1893? No!

Mops go back a long, long way before 1893. Just how long, is hard to
determine. Restricting our view to the modern era, we find that the
United States issued its first mop patent (#241) in 1837 to Jacob
Howe, called "Construction of Mop-Heads and the Mode of Securing them
upon Handles." One of the first patented mops with a built-in wringer
was the one H. & J. Morton invented in 1859 (US #24049).
The mop specified in Stewart's patent #499402 has a lever-operated
clamp for "holding the mop rags"; the lever is not a wringing
mechanism as erroneously reported on certain websites. Other inventors
had already patented mops with lever-operated clamps, one of the first
being Greenleaf Stackpole in 1869 (US Pat. #89803).
Paper Punch (hand-held)
Charles Brooks in 1893? No!

Was it the first with a hinged receptacle to catch the clippings? No!
The first numbered US patent for a hand-held hole punch was #636,
issued to Solyman Merrick in 1838. Robert James Kellett earned the
first two US patents for a chad-catching hole punch, in 1867 (patent
#65090) and 1868 (#79232).
Pencil Sharpener
John Lee Love in 1897? No!

Bernard Lassimone of Limoges, France invented one of the earliest
sharpeners, receiving French patent number 2444 in 1828. An apparent
ancestor of the 20th-century hand-cranked sharpener was patented by G.
F. Ballou in 1896 (US #556709) and marketed by the A.B. Dick Company
as the "Planetary Pencil Pointer." As the user held the pencil
stationary and turned the crank, twin milling cutters revolved around
the tip of the pencil and shaved it into a point.
Love's patent #594114 shows a variation on a different kind of
sharpener, in which one would crank the pencil itself around in a
stirring motion. An earlier device of a similar type was devised in
1888 by G.H. Courson (patent #388533), and sold under the name
"President Pencil Sharpener."
Here are several other examples of 19th century sharpeners:
Early Mechanical Pencil Sharpeners
Mechanical Pencil Sharpener Gallery ~ 1884-1899
Permanent Wave Machine (for perming hair)
Marjorie Joyner in 1928? No!

That would be German hairdresser Karl Ludwig Nessler (aka Charles
Nestlé) no later than 1906.
Postmarking and Canceling Machine
William Barry in 1897? No!

Try Pearson Hill of England, in 1857. Hill's machine marked the
postage stamp with vertical lines and postmark date. By 1892, US post
offices were using several brands of machines, including one that
could cancel, postmark, count and stack more than 20,000 pieces of
mail per hour (Marshall Cushing, Story of Our Post Office, Boston: A.
M. Thayer & co., 1892, pp.189-191).
Printing Press
W.A. Lavalette invented "the advanced printing press" in 1878? No!
Movable-type printing first appeared in East Asia. In Europe, around
1455,
Johann Gutenberg adapted the screw press used in other trades such as
winemaking and combined it with type-metal alloy characters and
oil-based
printing ink. Major advances after Gutenberg include the cylinder
printing
press (c. 1811) by Frederick Koenig and Andreas Bauer, the rotary
press
(1846) by Richard M. Hoe, and the web press (1865) by William Bullock.
Major
advances do not include Lavalette's patent, which was only one of
3,268
printing patents granted in the US by the year 1888 (Butterworth,
Growth of
Industrial Art). Improvements After Gutenberg
Propeller for Ship
George Tolivar or Benjamin Montgomery? No!
John Stevens constructed a boat with twin steam-powered propellers in
1804 in the first known application of a screw propeller for marine
propulsion. Other important pioneers in the early 1800s included Sir
Francis Pettit Smith of England, and Swedish-born ship designer John
Ericsson (US patent #588) who later designed the USS Monitor.
Refrigerator
Thomas Elkins in 1879? John Stanard in 1891? No!
Oliver Evans proposed a mechanical refrigerator based on a
vapor-compression cycle in 1805 and Jacob Perkins had a working
machine
built in 1834. Dr. John Gorrie created an air-cycle refrigeration
system in
about 1844, which he installed in a Florida hospital. In the 1850s
Alexander
Twining in the USA and James Harrison in Australia used mechanical
refrigeration to produce ice on a commercial scale. Around the same
time,
the Carré brothers of France led the development of absorption
refrigeration
systems. A more detailed timeline
Stanard's patent describes not a refrigeration machine, but an
old-fashioned icebox - an insulated cabinet into which ice is placed
to cool the interior. As such, it was a "refrigerator" only in the old
sense of the term, which included non-mechanical coolers. Elkins
created a similarly low-tech cooler, acknowledging in his patent
#221222 that "I am aware that chilling substances inclosed within a
porous box or jar by wetting its outer surface is an old and
well-known process."
Rotary Engine
Andrew Beard in 1892? No!

The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United States
Patent
Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists 394 "Rotary Engine" patents
from
1810-1873. The Wankel engine, a rotary combustion engine with a
four-stroke
cycle, dates from 1954. History of the Rotary Engine from 1588 Onward
Screw Socket for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer? No!

The earliest evidence for a light bulb screw base design is a drawing
in a Thomas Edison notebook dated Sept. 11, 1880. It is not the work
of Latimer, though:
Edison's long-time associates, Edward H. Johnson and John Ott, were
principally responsible for designing fixtures in the fall of 1880.
Their work resulted in the screw socket and base very much like those
widely used today.
R. Friedel and P. Israel, Edison's Electric Light: Biography of an
Invention, (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1986).
The 1880 sketch of the screw socket is reproduced in the book cited
above.
Smallpox Vaccine
Onesimus the slave in 1721? No!

Onesimus knew of variolation, an early inoculation technique
practiced in several areas of the world before the discovery of
vaccination. English physician Edward Jenner developed the smallpox
vaccine in 1796 after finding that the relatively innocuous cowpox
virus built immunity against the deadly smallpox. This discovery led
to the eventual eradication of endemic smallpox throughout the world.
Vaccination differs from the primitive inoculation method known as
variolation, which involved the deliberate planting of live smallpox
into a healthy person in hopes of inducing a mild form of the disease
that would provide immunity from further infection. Variolation not
only was risky to the patient but, more importantly, failed to prevent
smallpox from spreading. Known in Asia by 1000 AD, the practice
reached the West via more than one channel.
Smokestack for Locomotives
L. Bell in 1871? No!

Even the first steam locomotives, such as the one built by Richard
Trevithick in 1804, were equipped with smokestacks. Later smokestacks
featured wire netting to prevent hazardous sparks from escaping. Page
115 of John H. White Jr.'s American Locomotives: An Engineering
History, 1830-1880 (1997 edition) displays a composite picture showing
57 different types of spark-arresting smokestacks devised before 1860.
Steam Boiler Furnace
Granville Woods in 1884? No!

The steam engine boiler is of course as old as the steam engine
itself. The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United
States Patent Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists several hundred
variations and improvements to the steam boiler, including the
revolutionary water-tube boiler patented in 1867 by American inventors
George Herman Babcock and Stephen Wilcox.
Street Sweeper
Charles Brooks in 1896? No!

Brooks' patent was for a modified version of a common type of street
sweeper cart that had long been known, with a rotary brush that swept
refuse onto an elevator belt and into a trash bin. In the United
States, street sweepers started being patented in the 1840s, and by
1900 the Patent Office had issued about 300 patents for such machines.
Details...
Supercharger for Automobiles
Joseph Gammel/Gamell in 1976? No!

In 1885, Gottlieb Daimler received a German patent for supercharging
an
internal combustion engine. Louis Renault patented a centrifugal
supercharger in France in 1902. An early supercharged racecar was
built by
Lee Chadwick of Pottstown, Pennsylvania in 1908 and reportedly reached
a
speed of 100 miles per hour. History of Supercharging
Toilet
T. Elkins in 1897? No!

The Minoans of Crete are said to have invented a flush toilet
thousands of years ago; however, there is probably no direct ancestral
relationship between it and the modern one that evolved primarily in
England starting in the late 16th century, when Sir John Harrington
devised a flushing device for his godmother Queen Elizabeth. In 1775
Alexander Cummings patented a toilet in which some water remained
after each flush, thereby suppressing odors from below. The "water
closet" continued to evolve, and in 1885, Thomas Twyford provided us
with a single-piece ceramic toilet similar to the one we know today.
Who Invented the Toilet?
Toilet for Railroad Cars
Lewis Latimer in 1874? No!
William E. Marsh Jr. of New Jersey took out US patent #95597 for
"Improvement in Water-closets for Railroad Cars" five years prior to
Latimer's 1874 patent with the same title. Marsh's patent
specification suggests that railroad-car water closets, i.e., toilets,
were already in use:
In the closets or privies of railroad cars, the cold and wind,
especially while the train is in motion, are very disagreeable... My
invention is to remove these objectionable features....
W. Marsh, US patent #95597, 1869
Tricycle
M.A. Cherry in 1886? No!

In Germany in the year 1680 or thereabouts, paraplegic watchmaker
Stephan
Farffler built his own tricycle at 22 years of age. He designed it to
be
pedaled with the hands, for obvious reasons. History of the tricycle
Turn Signals
Richard Spikes in 1913? No! Did the 1913 Pierce Arrow feature Spikes'
turn signals? No!
Electric turn signal lights were devised as early as 1907 (U.S. Patent
912,831), but were not widely offered by major automobile
manufacturers until the late 1930s, when GM developed its own version
and made it standard on Buicks. The Pierce Arrow Museum in Buffalo, NY
denies that directional signals were offered on 1913 Pierce Arrows.
Typewriter
L.S. Burridge & N.R. Marshman in 1885? No!

Henry Mill, an English engineer, was the first person to patent the
basic idea of the typewriter in 1714. The first working typewriter
known to have actually been built was the work of Pellegrino Turri of
Italy in 1808.
Americans C. L. Sholes and C. Glidden patented the familiar QWERTY
keyboard
in 1868 and brought it to market in 1873. In 1878 change-case keys
were
added that enabled the typing of both capital and small letters.
Typewriter
History"

posted by LookyHere

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/

sawa

unread,
Mar 2, 2007, 1:27:16 AM3/2/07
to
Its no suprise that white racists have a hard time believing blacks
can do anything useful.
Fortunatley it does not really matter what they think so long as they
have no teeth to bite with.

> means for powering railway vehicles when he ...
>
> read more »


LEROY KNEVIL

unread,
Mar 2, 2007, 1:54:44 AM3/2/07
to
are your gums still blue? you will never know what the whiteman is
thinking or planning. keep your stupid mouth shut and you will be ok.

sawa

unread,
Mar 2, 2007, 4:52:07 AM3/2/07
to
Why do you bark so uselessly?
We all know you don't have any teeth.

> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


LEROY KNEVIL

unread,
Mar 2, 2007, 7:46:44 AM3/2/07
to
you are stepping on your dick again you jaundice eyed fool!
remain in your shithut,keep silent and you won't get hurt.

Louis Farakoon (www.niggermania.org)

unread,
Mar 2, 2007, 7:02:11 PM3/2/07
to
We are the only ones to see the truth

To see the real truth goto www.niggermania.org


Louis Farakoon, Moderator
www.niggermania.org

Byker

unread,
Mar 2, 2007, 8:51:50 PM3/2/07
to
"sawa" <goldbergnub...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172746322.3...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Challenge this,
>
> http://www.blackinventor.com/

Challenge THIS. "Topaz" left out a lot...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Black Invention Myths

More: Charles Drew Mythology

type: Henry Dalton of St. Louis performed a nearly identical operation two
years earlier, with the patient fully recovering. Decades before that, the
Spaniard Francisco Romero carried out the first successful pericardial
surgery of any type, incising the pericardium to drain fluid compressing the
heart.

Surgery on the actual human heart muscle, and not just the pericardium,
was first successfully accomplished by Ludwig Rehn of Germany when he
repaired a wounded right ventricle in 1896. More than 50 years later came
surgery on the open heart, pioneered by John Lewis, C. Walton Lillehei
(often called the "father of open heart surgery") and John Gibbon (who
invented the heart-lung machine).

What medical historians say...

"Third Rail"
Granville Woods in 1901? No!
Werner von Siemens pioneered the use of an electrified third rail as a

the bicycle in 1791 and 1816 respectively. The frame of John Starley's 1885

US patent #476416, 1892

1889). The first known tee to penetrate the ground, in contrast to earlier
tees that sat on the surface, was the peg-like "Perfectum" patented in 1892

http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/


sawa

unread,
Mar 3, 2007, 12:42:14 AM3/3/07
to
Hah! Sez who? My Uncle remus knows all about you and your mouth.

sawa

unread,
Mar 3, 2007, 12:43:48 AM3/3/07
to
Only a fool will believe there is any truth to be found on a site with
such a name.


On Mar 2, 4:02 pm, "Louis Farakoon (www.niggermania.org)"

Topaz

unread,
Mar 3, 2007, 8:34:54 AM3/3/07
to
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the
Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/

Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.

He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.

He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.

He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.

Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.

He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."

Tommy

LEROY KNEVIL

unread,
Mar 3, 2007, 12:50:45 PM3/3/07
to
that zip a dee do dah nigger knew his place

Buffington Jackson

unread,
Mar 3, 2007, 5:43:22 PM3/3/07
to
actually there is a large amount of inventions that you use daliy in
fact invented by negros
you however keep reposting this crap for what reason i just do not know ?
to prove you still are uneducated i guess

jaona...@nowhere.com

unread,
Mar 4, 2007, 12:16:40 AM3/4/07
to

so post a few

should be good for a laugh

sawa

unread,
Mar 4, 2007, 3:02:01 AM3/4/07
to
Whites already had their chance in Haiti (and Africa for that matter).
They are the ones who imported blacks from Africa to Haiti. They ruled
them for a while then got over thrown by the very Blacks they ruled
over. They got bashed all the way back to France! It must have been
the combination of brute black strength and hot sun that weakened
their will power.

The fact is Whites operate better in cold climates ( i.e places where
you find snow) and not warm climates as found in Africa and the
Carribean. This is why the USA is the most successful former European
colony aside from Australia. If the USA were as hot as Africa, and
populated by Bantu/Nilotic and other pure breed Blacks, most whites
would have emigrated back to Europe (like they did in Africa)....or
would not have gone there in the first place.
Australia is an exception mostly because they had no choice and also
the only other humans in that country are aboriginies who are also
Caucasians, and not Bantus or Nilotics as found in Africa, so they got
along well enough.

May be worth noting that Hitler was defeated by the Russians during
the very very cold Russian winter. These Russians then went on to
become one of the two major superpowers. Cold weather and White
caucasian achievement are related to each other. Haiti is just not
cold enough.


On Mar 3, 5:34 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
> the

> Url below if ya want.http://www.davidduke.com/

sawa

unread,
Mar 4, 2007, 3:17:47 AM3/4/07
to
Yeah. Pants down and his dick in your mouth.

Topaz

unread,
Mar 4, 2007, 10:18:24 AM3/4/07
to

"Black Invention Myths

#12941 of 1889). The first known tee to penetrate the ground, rather
than rest on the surface, was the peg-like "Perfectum" patented in

Typewriter
History"

posted by LookyHere

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com

Jasper Towing-Dragging LLC

unread,
Mar 4, 2007, 10:28:57 AM3/4/07
to

--
'muh-dikkkkkkk' !!!

Congratulations, nigger! Your "muh dick" post is well within
the guidelines that your Superior White Massas have commanded you to
follow when niggerposting to alt.flame.niggers. In fact, you obeyed
TWO orders from your Superior White Massas in just one post. You
obeyed Niggerposting Rule #1, AND Niggerposting Rule #6.

http://niggermania.com/afnfaq/pg/NigRules.html

"sawa" <goldbergnub...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:1172996267....@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

c11man

unread,
Mar 4, 2007, 2:27:41 PM3/4/07
to
uhhhhh... wrong.

Jackass, the reason "whites" were are so successful where ever they go is
becuase they use a combination of technology and local resources to their
FULLEST potential. Doesn't matter if it's the frozen forests of Siberia or
the arid desert of Nevada. If we can't use the local stuff to our advantage,
we trade it to someone who needs it.

By the way, aboriginies are NOT caucasians. They are an entitrely seperate
entity to themselves. The Australian land masses were seperated long enough
for the locals to develope along a different genetic line. And they ain't
black either so get that out of your head. right now.

You need to quit throwing these stupid conclusions you make from the History
101 class you took for half a semester. As someone married to a Kenyan and
is now the stepfather of four great kids, I can tell you that even though
they went to very good boarding schools, the basic education system in Kenya
is lacking. These kids each know at least five and some know 7 languages.
They are calculator fast when it comes to math and they speak and read
English like it should be spoken, but when it comes to history, science,
geography, and art, they are at least five years behind their American
peers. Why? Because these things are not so valued as much as they are in
the more developed parts of the world.

Sawa, you might want to start worrying less on the differences between
Whites and Blacks and start improving yourself and your immediant friends
and family. Regardless of I.Q. scores, blacks in general will never "catch
up" to whites or asians when it come to economic and cultural strength. It's
strictly a numbers game and the other major races have had a head start. Too
many hundreds of years of subsistance farming and tribal wars slowed down
African cultural history. In Asia and Euprope the wars came more more often
and in harsher conditions, but they augmented the population with a cohesive
religion(s) and technology that increased farming to excess amounts for
trading. Simply put, the reactions to similar situations were different. Not
wrong or right, just different. This different reaction on a local and
regional scale slowed sub-sahara Africa to a crawl on the developement
ladder. North Africa kept pace with the others because of the large amount
of trade with them. During trade, ideas are exchanged and new products and
information flow both ways.
Australian aboriginies had none of this for thousands of years and were
still the same upon discovery by the English.

Sawa, quit baiting some of these guys with half-baked thoeries and worry
about yourself.

Sorry for trolling....

"sawa" <goldbergnub...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:1172995321.1...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

Topaz

unread,
Mar 4, 2007, 2:50:50 PM3/4/07
to
On 4 Mar 2007 00:02:01 -0800, "sawa"
<goldbergnub...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Whites already had their chance in Haiti (and Africa for that matter).
>They are the ones who imported blacks from Africa to Haiti. They ruled
>them for a while then got over thrown by the very Blacks they ruled
>over. They got bashed all the way back to France! It must have been
>the combination of brute black strength and hot sun that weakened
>their will power.
>
>The fact is Whites operate better in cold climates ( i.e places where
>you find snow) and not warm climates as found in Africa and the
>Carribean. This is why the USA is the most successful former European
>colony aside from Australia. If the USA were as hot as Africa, and
>populated by Bantu/Nilotic and other pure breed Blacks, most whites
>would have emigrated back to Europe (like they did in Africa)....or
>would not have gone there in the first place.

"The Great Separation, in which proto-Whites left Africans behind, was
a turning point in the upward evolution of Man. Have we reached
another, downward, turning point?
Only the most ambitious of the early humans in Africa possessed the
curiosity to venture beyond their "comfort zone" and migrate out of
the continent in search of new adventures and opportunities. It was
this northward migration that exposed our progenitors to the new
climates and environments that would guide their evolution. This was
the historic moment that signaled the future birth of our race and all
its advancements-and the relatively backward nature of those tribes
who remained in the tropics.
Leaving their predecessors behind, the fledgling stock pushed onward.
Changing selection pressures would favor those mutations that bestowed
upon the new stock reasoning abilities, deductive thinking, and logic.
These traits would be necessary in order for the new breed of man, the
White man, to survive the colder climates to the north.
The winter season brings new challenges and obstacles to the stock.
For months at a time the fertile soil becomes a frozen, barren land,
incapable of cultivation-an inhospitable climate where even short
exposures can quickly lead to frostbite and death. Gone were the days
of endless warmth and pursuing only those behaviors that offered the
reward of immediate gratification. The new breed needed to have the
vision to see into the future and make plans ahead of time, if they
were to survive.
Through a long and rigorous process, subsistence hunting and food
gathering, and building temporary structures from mud or straw were
replaced by agriculture, domestication of livestock, and true
architecture. These are among hallmarks of civilization achieved by
early Whites. And it was only when the fundamental problems of day-to-
day survival had been solved that the mind could be free to ponder the
higher things in life-and the infinite possibilities of the future. A
future with automobiles, refrigerators, television, radios, cell
phones, satellites, and space travel. Look around you: the White man
invented virtually everything you see.
The paucity of invention by sub-Saharan Africans-it is virtually
nil-is evident. This lack of creative thinking is so because the
Africans left behind did not follow the proto-Whites along their
migration routes out of Africa-and hence did not evolve in the same
way. It was the genetic response to the changing selection pressures
generated by the exposure to the colder climates of the north that
elicited the changes in the genome that made our race, civilization,
and mighty technology possible.
To this day, the Blacks who remain in their cradle of comfort along
the equatorial zones of the earth, as well as those transplanted
around the world by slavery in recent centuries, remain several steps
below the White men and women of the West in measured intelligence,
self-restraint, civilized behavior, artistic and scientific
accomplishments, and sexual morality.
Just as the transitions from ape-like creatures to pre-man and then to
early African man were giant steps for mankind, so too was the
transformation of early African man into the White European race
during his eons-long journey to the north. It was Whites who gave us
the architecture of the Parthenon, the Pantheon and St. Basil's
cathedral, the music of Mozart and Beethoven, the artwork of
Michelangelo and Monet, and the vision of Galileo. It was the vast
collection of knowledge assimilated by the white European minds of
scientists like Newton and Maxwell that gave us our vast understanding
of chemistry and the laws of physics-and all the power that implies.
Meanwhile, the tribes of sub-Saharan Africa, regardless of where they
may have relocated in modern times, are still swatting flies, digging
grubs and sacrificing chickens.
In some ways, slavery was the best thing that ever happened to the
Blacks-who never could have found their way to America (and the
gravy-train provided by guilt-ridden Whites) on their own. Even today,
native Blacks have never shown the capability to build a boat capable
of crossing the Atlantic. Enslavement, torture, rape, and murder were
hardly unique to the Black slaves taken to America-such was the norm
in Africa (most of the transported slaves were already slaves while
there) and slavery remains an institution there to this day. In our
world's rich history of war, every race has suffered brutal treatment,
attempted genocide, and forced emigration at the hands of rival races
and nations. Even today in Africa, Blacks are hunted down, raped,
tortured, enslaved, and killed by the millions-at the hands of their
own "brothers."
Here in America, Blacks enjoy ample food, clean water, and the
opportunity for a good education, as well as the innumerable modern
conveniences we all take for granted. Blacks get to be entertainment
stars and athletes... but still, they complain about the White man.
They riot in the streets and commit a disproportionately high amount
of crime. Even very successful Blacks, who "have it all," like O. J.
Simpson, Kobe Bryant, and Michael Jackson find it difficult to rise
above their genetic propensity for violence or disrespect toward
others. The savage behavior of Black sports stars toward White women
is so legendary that it's become a part of folklore and taken almost
for granted, as is the brutal deviant sexual behavior of Black men in
prison, with young White males the usual victims.
Most alarming to decent Whites is the current push in America for
White girls to misuse their wombs as cradles for primitive Congoid
genes-instead of for the sacred purpose for which they were intended.
While such "mothers" are exalted by the Jewish media as shining
beacons of light for a new, multiracial society, their children have
been condemned to inherit genes hundreds of thousands of years behind
those that built the West. They have been robbed of their genetic
potential. The mother and her thousands of generations of ancestors'
contribution to the forward evolution of life have come to a
screeching halt. The African DNA wraps itself like a parasitic vine
around the White helix, chocking the life out of it. This is an act of
genocide against our people, and should be prosecuted as such.
Schools, under the thumb of our enemies or in the thrall of the
"equality" religion, have relaxed academic eligibility requirements.
They must eliminate all evidence of racial inequality and "close the
education gap" between Whites and non-Whites-or risk losing funding.
If we can't bring the minorities up to the achievement levels of the
Whites, we'll bring the Whites down to their level. If we can't bring
the bottom of the bell curve up, we'll bring the top down. That way,
they'll all be equal-equally stupid.
And is that not what we are seeing-not just in the schools, but
everywhere in our society?
When you look around, do you see evidence that Blacks have conformed
to White standards of culture, civility, and grace? -- or do you see
Whites conforming to Black norms of disrespect, crudity, ugliness, and
ignorance? Do you see Black kids walking down the street dressed in
fine clothes, listening to Mozart, and carrying their physics books?
-- or are you more likely to see White children wearing baggy gang
clothes, listening to "rap," sporting multiple body piercings (an
African custom), speaking Ebonics, with a concealed crack pipe in
their pocket, and obsessed with empty, lower-than-animal sex?
On the whole, have the Whites influenced the Blacks in a positive
direction, or have
the Blacks influenced the Whites in a negative direction? Even if the
answer is
"some of both," there is no way to argue that we of the West have
gained in any way
by the association."
Fritz Wuehler


>Australia is an exception mostly because they had no choice and also
>the only other humans in that country are aboriginies who are also
>Caucasians, and not Bantus or Nilotics as found in Africa, so they got
>along well enough.
>
>May be worth noting that Hitler was defeated by the Russians during
>the very very cold Russian winter. These Russians then went on to
>become one of the two major superpowers. Cold weather and White
>caucasian achievement are related to each other. Haiti is just not
>cold enough.
>

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com

sawa

unread,
Mar 5, 2007, 1:32:34 AM3/5/07
to
On Mar 4, 11:27 am, "c11man" <c11...@planetkc.com> wrote:
> uhhhhh... wrong.
>
> Jackass, the reason "whites" were are so successful where ever they go is
> becuase they use a combination of technology and local resources to their
> FULLEST potential. Doesn't matter if it's the frozen forests of Siberia or
> the arid desert of Nevada. If we can't use the local stuff to our advantage,
> we trade it to someone who needs it.


White achievements and cold places are related. The cold weather
forced them to think hard and find ways/gadgets to survive the long
winters. This is why America is the most successful former european
colony as compared to african and asian countries that were also
colonised by whites. Necessity is the mother of invention, The
technology you refer to was invented out of necessity, the necessity
to survive the long cold winters. This necessity has since evolved as
inventions and gadgets increased.

>
> By the way, aboriginies are NOT caucasians. They are an entitrely seperate
> entity to themselves. The Australian land masses were seperated long enough
> for the locals to develope along a different genetic line. And they ain't
> black either so get that out of your head. right now.


Aboriginies are caucasians. So says a white racist called Mastic, so
says the link below. Get that into your head at once!

http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/death_by_blackness_files/blackswhites1.htm


>
> You need to quit throwing these stupid conclusions you make from the History
> 101 class you took for half a semester. As someone married to a Kenyan and
> is now the stepfather of four great kids, I can tell you that even though
> they went to very good boarding schools, the basic education system in Kenya
> is lacking. These kids each know at least five and some know 7 languages.
> They are calculator fast when it comes to math and they speak and read
> English like it should be spoken, but when it comes to history, science,
> geography, and art, they are at least five years behind their American
> peers. Why? Because these things are not so valued as much as they are in
> the more developed parts of the world.


What conclusions of mine are you trying to refute?


>
> Sawa, you might want to start worrying less on the differences between
> Whites and Blacks and start improving yourself and your immediant friends
> and family. Regardless of I.Q. scores, blacks in general will never "catch
> up" to whites or asians when it come to economic and cultural strength.


Did I ever suggest Africa will be like the USA? This post was about
replacing Haiti people with Icelanders and vise versa.
David Duke says this will transform Haiti into a paradise. I say he is
wrong and give reasons that you have not effectivley refuted. Its not
about Blacks being at the same economic level as Whites. Its about the
ability of Whites to make a paradise out of hot places. They had their
chance in Haiti and failed. They had their chance in Africa and
failed. By changing the issue to justify your claims that Whites are
light years ahead of Blacks, and will always be, reveals the Bigot in
you.....regardless if you have a Black wife/husband.
To assume I have a problem with myself in pointing out flaws in David
Dukes statement is highly presumptious of you. I enjoy refuting white
racist statements,. I enjoy getting them to bark and reveal their
ignorance and lack of teeth. I am sorry if they are White like you but
its up to you to bear with it...or stop reading my posts.


It's
> strictly a numbers game and the other major races have had a head start. Too
> many hundreds of years of subsistance farming and tribal wars slowed down
> African cultural history. In Asia and Euprope the wars came more more often
> and in harsher conditions, but they augmented the population with a cohesive
> religion(s) and technology that increased farming to excess amounts for
> trading. Simply put, the reactions to similar situations were different. Not
> wrong or right, just different. This different reaction on a local and
> regional scale slowed sub-sahara Africa to a crawl on the developement
> ladder. North Africa kept pace with the others because of the large amount
> of trade with them. During trade, ideas are exchanged and new products and
> information flow both ways.
> Australian aboriginies had none of this for thousands of years and were
> still the same upon discovery by the English.
>
> Sawa, quit baiting some of these guys with half-baked thoeries and worry
> about yourself.
>
> Sorry for trolling....
>

> "sawa" <goldbergnubianpictu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> >>http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/- Hide quoted text -

Topaz

unread,
Mar 5, 2007, 7:10:04 PM3/5/07
to

Here is part of David Duke's newsletter:

"Entering my old neighborhood of Gentilly Woods in New Orleans had
a profound effect upon me. My once tidy and well-kept neighborhood was
now mostly Black and disheveled. It once sported many homes that
seemed to always have a fresh-painted look. Now they were adorned with
peeling paint an unkempt lawns of weeds and trash. In talking to some
old holdouts in the neighborhood, they told me that the once rare
burglary, vandalism and assault had now become commonplace. The
diehard White remnants who remained had adapted to the changes and
found a way to endure each indignity and violation the best they
could. The change had been so gradual that they were no longer shocked
by new instances of crime, just resigned to them.
"The streets had scattered groups of hard-featured Black men
standing around dilapidated cars giving hostile stares to an obviously
unknown White person trespassing in their neighborhood.
"Even though it had been many years since my last visit, my
memories became more vivid as I entered the boundaries of the
neighborhood. It seemed as though I had only been away a few scant
hours. Now those memories crashed against the images of the present
causing me to feel off balance. It was akin to visiting a healthy
friend and then after a few short weeks to see him wasting away with
cancer. Afraid that perhaps me recollection was more idealized than it
really was--as soon as I returned home, I ferreted out my old
photographs.
"Those photos clearly portrayed a community even more attractive
than I had remembered. Well-kept homes filled the album, often
accented with blooming flowers and finely trimmed shrubbery, sidewalks
edged closely, and many homes had a fresh paint look. Polished autos
dotted the clean streets. Even more dramatic were the Tom Sawyer and
Becky Thatcher-like bright faces of the children with whom I spent so
many happy hours of childhood.
"In my time they were the ruddy faces that filled our streets
yards and parks. They were all gone now, replaced by dark, angry
teenagers, with scarred skin and boomboxes; often with pistols and
crack in their pockets, menacing the streets where children now fear
to venture. A picture repeated, I believe, all over the United States
of America. For the current White residents of Gentilly Woods their
story is much like the story fo the frog that is put in a pot of warm
water while the temperature is slowly increased until the poor
creature is boiling and it is too late to save itself. Is the
traditional American already too lulled by the tepid water to realize
what is ahead?
"Amercians can glimpse the future in the inner cities of
America. The political corruption, failing schools, drug problems,
crime, the run down housing and even the trash in the streets- all
hold a preview of the coming attractions of 21st century America. When
all of America is of the same racial proportion as that of the inner
cities, there will be no White infrastructure, and no white cornucopia
of tax revenue mitigating the Third Worldism. Criminals will no longer
be held in check by White police, prosecutors, juries and judges. The
shrinking White tax base will be inadequate to the costs of the
criminal justice system and jails needed to house lawbreakers. The
housing, food, medical care, and schooling of those who cannot provide
their own--will no longer be able to live off the support of the aging
and diminishing European population."

The address for this newsletter is David Duke Report, Box 88,
Covington, LA 70434
http://www.duke.org

0 new messages