Original Message
From: f...@redhat.com
Sent: March 8, 2017 11:41 AM
To: aar...@gmail.com
Reply-to: smi-s-devel...@googlegroups.com
Cc: smi-s-devel...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: SMI-S Client Development - Need Inputs & Motivation
Hi Arun Anbalagan,
Long version:
Hope these helps.
Best regards.
--
Gris Ge
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SMI-S Developers Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to smi-s-developers-...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to smi-s-devel...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/smi-s-developers-group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SMI-S Developers Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to smi-s-developers-group+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to smi-s-developers-group@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/smi-s-developers-group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi Jeffery,
We are glad to see that you are using SMI-S as part of your solution and I would like to speak with you more about it when we get a chance. I see you are in Fairfax so I am assuming it is too late to speak with you today.
The performance profile has some particular challenges I that the profile had to be written to the lowest common denominator. This is caused because there are various levels at which an implementation may be able to gather statistics just because the enterprise arrays have more capabilities than let’s say a low end array. That being written there are ways to interrogate an implementation to determine what they do support so that your code can know if it should handle capabilities of a given array.
We hope you are looking at version 1.6.1 of the specification. That is the newest and will be the most inclusive of the capabilities. You can also look at the conformance testing results, www.snia.org/ctp/conformingproviers, to see of some of the particular functions are supported such as Performance Reporting Definition, Block IO Performance Reporting and Bulk retrieval of Performance Statistics. If you do not see what you want then you need to point your sales rep or partner rep and your customers to the page and ask why the array you are trying to work with does not support the function. The vendors will not change unless the folks paying for the equipment ask for the changes.
Please feel free to send feedback to us as the goal is to improve the spec not just throw it out to the public and say good luck.
James
From: Jeffery K [mailto:jeffer...@sightlinesystems.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 9:50 AM
To: smi-s-devel...@googlegroups.com
Cc: aar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: SMI-S Client Development - Need Inputs & Motivation
I will agree with Arun, it's not as "Generic" as you'd like it to be. I spent months developing a java application that would gather detailed performance data generically from SMI-S providers (par of my companies performance solution we sell) and even thought I made it as generic as i could, and used an external config/mapping file, to specify what metrics to get, so it would work with others, when I moved onto another vendor, I had to tweak some of the code, because certain assumptions didn't hold up between HP and EMC, per their use of the "Spec"
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
smi-s-developers-...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
smi-s-devel...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/group/smi-s-developers-group.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Jeffery Kuhn
SightLine Systems Corp