SipXcom/AWS Users with Dynamic IPs

[Tommy Laino]

Was wondering how everyone is handling users who only have access to dynamic IP addresses when the SipXcom server is housed on an AWS instance. Have a customer who wants to go full remote for all users and close his office which means no tunneling through an office VPN to make remote workers accessible. 

Would love to hear how some of the pros here are accomplishing this with good results.

[Matt Keys]

Use a cloud SBC to terminate connections and tunnel through VPN or whatever security level you need from there to your sipxcom server. Depending on the topology define the SBC as an unmanaged gateway (sipxproxy 5060) or as a SIP trunk / authenticated user (sipxbridge 5080).

[Matt Keys]

Sorry, it's important to mention you can do both at the same time too. Authenticated user (sip trunk) is helpful in call scenarios requiring authentication. 

[Tommy Laino]

Thanks Matt. Any recommendations on a Cloud SBC? 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "sipxcom-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sipxcom-users/x8yc6lIFNv8/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to sipxcom-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sipxcom-users/0069e781-00d6-44f5-8a3f-edfb2bffd984n%40googlegroups.com.

[Matt Keys]

I'm sorry but it's best if I refrain from answering that to avoiding any potential conflicts. In short it depends on your needs and your budget. 

[Jean-Francois Aubin]

Hi Matt, Do you known if it better with cloud SBC or  hardware SBC Like sangoma?