If you consider what they were saying with quantum money, they were saying you can;t make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, but also that when you measure a quantum state you change the quantum state, so then the act of measuring is a function.
Well they then say well if you have 3 sets of the state and one gets lost during measurement you have the original state and the measurement and a backup in case you need that.
Hard disk management these days using sophisticated algorithms to manage data across disks so that the data is protected.
https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1328/hard-drive-configurations-for-sql-server/
That science has been worked over hard with baseball bats since data is the new gold.
I have never had a hard disk fail in the last 20 years, neither have I lost any data that was of any consequence.
And probably most people are the same. It has been good technology, and a reliable way to store data and manage data, using data base technologies.
The operating system itself not as capable of data mangement as lets say a company like Oracle.
The file system in Windows a bit of a shoe box approach.
I tried to get them to switch over to rooms, buildings, towns, cities, countries, worlds, solar systems, galaxies, universes, and of course you can have doors off rooms, to other rooms, and closets and drawers, and of course any 3D item in a room could be an icon where your items that fit that category are stored.
So then this science gets developed and companies who write software learn to pre-think the user and suggest the proper container.
Cookies in the cookie jar.
Cd's in the CD player.
And I don;t mean you have to get it to open and do things, it need only be a marker. There is the object, under that is where they would be.
By attaching real world ideas to real world places in your file management system, then you have a better way of finding things quickly without searching 3 terabytes of data and of course by default wanting to search each file contents for spy words and terrorist phrases.
Then of course dribble that back to Big Brother through a secret protocol and who cares if it takes a week they never shut off the pc anyway and the data builds up in the NSA and conspiracies abound.
Slowing your systems down to a crawl.
Viruses flowing through the blood of the system further slowing the system down.
The local tel company providing our internet service here who claimed to be able to match cable speeds can do a 5th of cable speeds.
And google still unable to find things although youtube search has improved.
But all in all the system works although slowly. To render an image like this...
http://www.imagebam.com/image/fb9929470382467
can take 20 minutes on my water cooled machine, that has 2 graphic cards in it in a crossfire configuration.
And that's not complete. I cancelled the render. It would take 2 hours at least to make that one picture.
They use render bombs thousands of computers networked to render frames for Disney movies or CGI films.
So types of modern methods like accessing fast large harddrives and not using ram allow for better real time graphics. Since the data is there in each point.
The method of ghosting an image is what I invented a long time ago and was reverse engineered stolen and then used everywhere.
But that is the system we made and if DOS was not reverse engineered and stolen from IBM to become MSDOS then the pc would maybe be proprietary, and very exclusive and expensive.
IBM business machines with punch cards ruled for a long time and it was all proprietary.
So taking on big blue was a major challenge and that was a tricky bit of work to solve that problem but with huge machines like I have whacha gonna do? lol
I was giving them a lot of technology and so they were fine at that time.
We needed better faster nerds on unicycles with buffet floors in their buildings and gyms, and freedom to think and move and not stop if they needed to not stop.
So the pc's got onto the tread mill and yeah the formula for the chip has proved to be accurate as it increases in capability.
Yet right now we don't appear to be anywhere close to where we need to be to keep up with software development.
There is not much anyone can do about that.
The supercomputer is what everyone needs now.
To make a composite material using ghosting you would have to consider the materials you need and then the light from the spectrum analyzer.
Lets just look at a small modern unit...
Hapsite...
Have a look at the specs...
http://products.inficon.com/en-us/product/detail/hapsite-er-identification-system?path=Products%2Fpg-ChemicalDetection#overview
So that size piece of equipment added to your 3D printer
is not a lot of added size. So the devices are quite compact now.
So to read and write data with atoms, you need scanlines.
But what do you need most of all in a system like this?
Pure substances.
Something chemists can make, but it is for pharmacies where the letters USP appear on bottles of glycerine for instance to say this is pure according to pharmacy standards.
How pure is USP?
Not very pure in terms of exactly pure.
http://www.usp.org/usp-nf/key-issues/elemental-impurities
So you might as well accept that of you make composite materials with a printer you are going to have a holistic mix of things in there.
The ghosting approach at least allows you to quantify using variables, colors.
You can mix the materials based on ghosting techniques.
Visual results can be seen on the screen. Not simple colors but even photographs of the substance surfaces.
To be able to do that is not difficult and is done all the time using paint software but to consider the geometry of the mix is not something anyone has done since they haven't had a reason to do that.
What is it that allows one material to mix with another or adhere to another?
The valences or electron shells interactions of waves for simplicity here where the waves add up or cancel out.
So then knowing the properties of those slots, that are beside the atoms in that surface would be important.
Can you laser scan a surface and then use that information to determine what atoms might be able to sit there on top or adhere to that layer?
Sounds easy does it not?
To find a material which cancels out enough of the waves in those slots to adhere the atoms to that surface.
So then light bouncing off of a surface tells you things about that surface.
Is the light bouncing off the valences or bouncing off the nuclei?
A transverse wave, that's a wave shooting sideways, hits a spherical wave front, both are moving at c, what is going to happen, when that superfast compact, transverse wave runs up against the spherical waves from the pulsing nuclei?
Its going right through the electron shell, with a mild disturbance to it, as it gets close to the nucleus though that wave is very strong, and that photon then will hit the nuclei region, and so then can we really expect that to just bounce back at the source?
It doesn't.
What does it do?
It whacks the nucleus which emits a shower of transverse waves in all directions.
Like a light cone.
Light is not a ray remember its part of a spectrum.
An energy spectrum.
So it becomes light when we measure it.
When it is observable usually.
Just because photons are hitting your retina does not mean that an entire shitload of other wavelengths are not also hitting your retina from the same source.
Yet light being geometrical, refracts and reflects.
So a transverse wave that glaces off something does so according the angle of incidence.
Its going to disturb the nucleus region but glance off.
In order for a photon to register as a photon, then it has to be a discrete wave packet. It has to be a bundle of energy. That we can quantify.