Artificial Intelligence will have a positive impact on jobs in scientific and technical services in UK: PwC

[alal...@gmail.com]

Between 2017 to 2037, net 200,000 jobs will be created due to AI. Number of jobs in health will go up by 22% and in scientific and technical services by 16%. These are the two biggest winners. The biggest loser is manufacturing, down by 25%.

These are approximate numbers. Those who have digital skills and are creative stand to benefit the most from the AI revolution.

Abhinav Lal

[The Starmaker]

if you know anthing about...Artificial Intelligence (as i do cause i'm an expert on the subject) you'll
discover that it's ...artifical.


it's fake
it's phony




call it what it is...fake intelligence.


["*", [
"You say (1) ?",
"Can you elaborate on that ?",
"Do you say (1) for some special reason ?",
"(1). Really?",
"When did you first think about (1)"
]]
]],
["you", 0, [
["* you remind me of *", [
"goto alike"
]],
["* you are *", [
"What makes you think I am (2) ?",
"Does it please you to believe I am (2) ?",
"Do you sometimes wish you were (2) ?",
"Perhaps you would like to be (2)."
]],

[alal...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 1:03:21 AM UTC+5:30, The Starmaker wrote:
> alal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Between 2017 to 2037, net 200,000 jobs will be created due to AI. Number of jobs in health will go up by 22% and in scientific and technical services by 16%. These are the two biggest winners. The biggest loser is manufacturing, down by 25%.
> >
> > These are approximate numbers. Those who have digital skills and are creative stand to benefit the most from the AI revolution.
> >
> > Abhinav Lal
>
>
> if you know anthing about...Artificial Intelligence (as i do cause i'm an expert on the subject) you'll
> discover that it's ...artifical.
>

I know something about AI, because when I was about 16 I read a book on AI, and used that knowledge to write an AI program.

>
> it's fake
> it's phony
>

AI programs currently are very specialised, and do not have much general intelligence. Simple expert systems or algorithms can outperform humans in highly specialised tasks.

Abhinav Lal

[The Starmaker]

alal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 1:03:21 AM UTC+5:30, The Starmaker wrote:
> > alal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Between 2017 to 2037, net 200,000 jobs will be created due to AI. Number of jobs in health will go up by 22% and in scientific and technical services by 16%. These are the two biggest winners. The biggest loser is manufacturing, down by 25%.
> > >
> > > These are approximate numbers. Those who have digital skills and are creative stand to benefit the most from the AI revolution.
> > >
> > > Abhinav Lal
> >
> >
> > if you know anthing about...Artificial Intelligence (as i do cause i'm an expert on the subject) you'll
> > discover that it's ...artifical.
> >
>
> I know something about AI, because when I was about 16 I read a book on AI, and used that knowledge to write an AI program.
>
> >

well then, reading a book on ai makes you an expert on it, doesn't it?


the way it works
if you read one book
on relativity
you're an expert on it.

[alal...@gmail.com]

I said, "I know something about AI", which is something very different from claiming to be an expert. You are the one who claims to be an expert. You have failed to substantiate your claims about AI, that it is fake or phony. Instead of discussing the subject, and arguing the topic, you make misleading statements about me.

If you are an expert, please stay on topic, and explain how successful expert systems and other algorithms are fake.

Abhinav Lal

[Sergio]

we should donate $$ to get Starfarter some AI, right now he has 100%
Fake Intelligence (FI)

[alal...@gmail.com]

The AI revolution is real. We can expect boring or repetitive or dangerous jobs being taken over by intelligent machines. While robots are infiltrating manufacturing, white collar jobs are also under threat. AI will replace many paralegals and healthcare specialists, among others.

Abhinav Lal

[The Starmaker]

You misunderstood me..

I asked a question: well then, reading a book on ai makes you an expert on it, doesn't it?

The answer is either Yes or No.

Then I wrote:

the way it works
if you read one book
on relativity
you're an expert on it.

Meaning...there are a lot of people in the 'scientific community' who read 'one' book on physics and consider themselves...experts.

Unless of course they went to ...Relativity School.


I mean, what determines a person to be called a ...Scientist? Or call themselves a scientist??


Answer of course is just ...read one book on science.


I mean, you said you read one book, wrote a ai program...
you could've have sold it too if you wanted to.

Consider yourself an expert.

[The Starmaker]

are you not a ...intelligent machine?


a car is simply an extension of your feet
a gun is an extension of your fist
AI is just FAQ with TextAloud installed...


I'm waiting for them to come up with a driverless Brinks truck...

[Sergio]

AI now days is mostly marketing.

It has been around a very very long time. ever program in Prolog, LISP,
or Neural Designer ?

https://www.predictiveanalyticstoday.com/top-artificial-neural-network-software/

[reber G=emc^2]

Will a person like working next to a robot.I think not.McDonald's makes its buns with no need for bakers.Each bun is a clone.They give their burgers a human touch by turning them over.Bert

[hanson]

"reber G=emc^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> wrote
<snip> that SwineBert has been & continues to be a
mental cadaver given Bert's STUPID, constant palaver. Bert

[alal...@gmail.com]

To the best of my knowledge, Al is having a real impact on our lives during both work and leisure. A lot depends on how you define AI. Pessimists define AI as whatever humans can do, and computers can't do now. I am not buying this.

>
> It has been around a very very long time. ever program in Prolog, LISP,
> or Neural Designer ?
>
> https://www.predictiveanalyticstoday.com/top-artificial-neural-network-software/

I may have dabbled in Prolog and Lisp when I was about 14, but later used Basic to write a AI program.

When I was studying computer engineering at Arizona, I was required to take a course in "Comparative Programming Languages", that included Prolog and Lisp. But most of the courses were in C.

I am not a technical expert in AI. I am now a writer and investor, and I don't program anymore.

Abhinav Lal

[reber G=emc^2]

War on robots will be over jobs.It will be micro chips against murons .Brain waves against magnetic waves.Reality is both can be shorted out.Hmmmm Bert

[hanson]

Bert is a sanctimonious and a phony Swine
who has a simple daily rhyme that shows & really meant
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent>
by which SwineBert avoids for him to explain why
SwineBert's has posted these items in & by name:
>
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr....@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <saul...@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nob...@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" <nob...@gmail.com>:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
>
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
>
(4)
On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". -- Bert
>
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <gmea...@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert

[Double-A]

More like intelligent chips against morons (teamsters)!

Double-A

[Jeff-Relf.Me]

> intelligent chips against morons (teamsters)!

We are the robot aliens.
We're consumption machines, exploiting a niche,
(poorly) programmed by nature to take the LessBad "option".

At the start, there was "no entropy" ("no time, no space"), just "eXergy"
( a type of energy that can do physical work, force * distance ).

Eventually, this eXergy will be consumed away, replaced with entropy,
leaving us with a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy
but none of the eXergy. Gravity is residual eXergy.

Everything decays, even gravity; hence the arrow of time.

Einstein's Cosmological Constant ( 1.11 * 10^−52 / Meters^2 ) tells us
that outer space is growing EXPONENTIALLY, gravity is dying off;
-- i.e. the "Heat Death" predicted by Lord Kelvin, 1852,
is the most likley outcome.

[The Starmaker]

acutally...a car really isn't a car..

you cannot call the wheels of the car a car
you cannot call the doors a car
you cannot call the steering wheel a car
you cannot call the battery a car
you can the trunk a car
actually there isn't any parts you can call a car...

so why do you call it a car????

[reber G=emc^2]

Today computers are the best doctors.Robot due sperations.Can lawyers sue a robot for cutting to beep? I still think being your own cashier is up for grabs I'm sure a robot cop is on the watch.Now that a bag cost a dime it might pay for stuff that gets stolen.Bert

[reber G=emc^2]

Could be aliens got rid of humans by planting them on Earth.They were to crazy to be near,and they knew in the end they would kill each other.They were right and the end is near.Bert

[Jeff-Relf.Me]

Bert wrote:
> the end is near.

"The end is near, Drink the KoolAid" -- Jim Jones.

[reber G=emc^2]

Tang is the GOP Mafia way to go.On the Micky Mouse shuttles Tang was on board you can be sure of that.Bert

[The Starmaker]

why do you call a person ...a person? cause he's got a nose?

[The Starmaker]

i doubt that nature would call a person a person.

it's something else ...really.

I can go further but I would lose you in a second....


most people (if not all) believe that the person's heart is on their ...left side.


But the fact is (and hasn't yet to be discovered) that the person's heart is...on the right side.


You see...i lost you already.

[The Starmaker]

okay..this is differcult...


i'll try to simplyfly


a girl
with very big breast
is standing in front of
you...

what do you see when you
look at her?...

obvisouly, all you see is her breast.

You might even for a moment forget
there is a girl standing in front of you
with a head arms legs...

(you look up you might see a smirk)

so, everything else on her is a ...blur to you.

the rest of her doesn't really exist.

When you look at someone..
what are you looking at?

I mean, really...what are you looking at? the nose
the mouth...certaintly you cannot be looking at the
...persons eyes. A person has two eyes. It's simply not
possible for you to look at both eyes at the same time.
It's not possible. It's imposible!

It's a blur you're looking at...an illusion.



0000000000000000700000000000000000


you can see the number 7...but in order to look at another number you
have to look at it directly one at a time...it's all a blur.


if i ask you to look at the second zero at the end,,,you need to focus at that one zero and
the rest is a blur.

So, you cannot look at a persons eyes...it's a blur. You cannot look at both eyes at the same time...
you're seeing a blur of two eyes unelss you focus on one of them.

But most of the time everybody is a blur to you...(except her breast). dat you focus one..


and there's two breast...so...she's a blur and so are her breast.

wats her name, who cares.

[The Starmaker]

Now, even the words you are seeing now.. you're looking at them one word at a time...

actually all the words on this page is a blur to you unless you 'focus' on one word.

if i ask you to look at the 7th zero 0000000000000000000000000000 you need to focus to see it.


000000700000000000000000000000000000000000000

i made it easy for you but the other numbers are just a blur to you...unless i ask you to look at the third zero from the left...then the other become
a blur.

So, what happens when you look at a person's face?


Where is the focus? There is none normally...unless you decide to look at the nose...(then the rest is a blur).

So, when you're normally looking at people...you looking at them in a blur most of the time, ...if not all the time.

You're just looking at an ...illusion.


Why the illusion?

[The Starmaker]

okay, first there is the facial recognition..
then gathering information from the face..

but you look at both eyes and surounding parts to gather
information...

you cannot look at both eyes at the same time.

So, the whole face is a constant blur, because you are not focused on any one part of the face.

So, what are other people for...to gather information? walking search engines?


I guess other people are for...'Information and Entertainment Purposes Only'.