info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Non-local measures do not contain relativity
33 views
Skip to first unread message
John Gogo
Feb 5, 2016, 5:42:51 PM2/5/16
to
Any place where we cannot place clocks should be considered non-local measures. For instance, since we have NOT physically placed clocks on Jupiter's moons means that relativity must be disqualifying when we begin to use the occulations of the moons themselves to serve as a legitimate clock.
John Gogo
Feb 5, 2016, 5:49:56 PM2/5/16
to
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:42:51 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> Any place where we cannot place clocks should be considered non-local measures. For instance, since we have NOT physically placed clocks on Jupiter's moons means that relativity must be disqualifying when we begin to use the occulations of the moons themselves to serve as a legitimate clock.
Sorry, Roemer's measure of Jupiter's moons is astrology.
> Any place where we cannot place clocks should be considered non-local measures. For instance, since we have NOT physically placed clocks on Jupiter's moons means that relativity must be disqualifying when we begin to use the occulations of the moons themselves to serve as a legitimate clock.
shan
Feb 5, 2016, 5:50:34 PM2/5/16
to
Użytkownik John Gogo napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:
> Any place where we cannot place clocks should be considered non-local
> measures.
Excellent observation. It is. I mean, those are predominately non-local,
whether you can place clocks overthere or not. See Codex Alimentarius, one
of his best https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPDkTyimUYg
> Any place where we cannot place clocks should be considered non-local
> measures.
whether you can place clocks overthere or not. See Codex Alimentarius, one
of his best https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPDkTyimUYg
John Gogo
Feb 5, 2016, 6:07:59 PM2/5/16
to
Ross A. Finlayson
Feb 6, 2016, 3:02:55 AM2/6/16
to
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 2:42:51 PM UTC-8, John Gogo wrote:
> Any place where we cannot place clocks should be considered non-local measures. For instance, since we have NOT physically placed clocks on Jupiter's moons means that relativity must be disqualifying when we begin to use the occulations of the moons themselves to serve as a legitimate clock.
Bounce a laser off of it?
> Any place where we cannot place clocks should be considered non-local measures. For instance, since we have NOT physically placed clocks on Jupiter's moons means that relativity must be disqualifying when we begin to use the occulations of the moons themselves to serve as a legitimate clock.
John Gogo
Feb 6, 2016, 5:59:46 PM2/6/16
to
John Gogo
Feb 9, 2016, 8:00:37 PM2/9/16
to
On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 2:02:55 AM UTC-6, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
John Gogo
Feb 9, 2016, 8:12:10 PM2/9/16
to
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:50:34 PM UTC-6, shan wrote:
0 new messages